Regular readers know that I am or have become a bigger proponent of income investing lately and if you don’t know what I am talking about you should be reading my material more. However, there seems to be preconceived disconnect with my philosophy and what you believe to be true about interest rates moving forward. Some people see my bullishness on bonds in the face of rising interest rates as purely insane, especially given what treasuries are doing, but I can assure you it is not.
Keep in mind I am talking about investment grade corporate bonds and high yield bonds, my favorites are ‘BB’ and ‘BBB’ rate paper in an ETF format, I do not like mutual funds because of the once a day pricing. As an aside I do like selective sovereign debt as well, but don’t go out and buy Eastern European government debt or anything, be selective as the risk return is there, but supply is going to be an issue moving forward so it will pay to be extremely selective in 2010. Anyhow, back to corporate debt and why I like it.
Treasuries are entering a bear market for the first time in my memory and I expect there to be a bear market until the next crisis hits, so for only a few months. The reason there is a bear market is simple, supply, end of story. You cannot issue an endless amount of paper and expect the market to eagerly accept it without paying more for it because people, foreign central banks in this case, know they will never fully be repaid for the US debt they buy now, it is mathematically impossible for the US to repay its debt so don’t shoot the messenger hate the calculator. Because of that mathematical probability interest rates on treasuries are going higher and, according to those wonderfully bullish, and misguided, government data figures investors are pricing in interest rate hikes which kill treasuries and other high grade corporate debt, high grade being the operative word, so remember that please.
High grade corporate debt is technically, and in my opinion, anything rated higher than ‘A’ and issues interest rates slightly above treasury yields. We are talking about your really safe corporate paper issued by IBM and similar firms. Essentially, those are a riskless investment which is why your yield is so close to treasuries and why those bonds will get crushed when/if interest rates go higher. For those who do not understand how bonds work think of bonds and interest rates like a teeter-totter with interest rates on one side and bond prices on the other side, when one goes up the other side goes down. Therefore rising interest rates are bad for bonds because new bond issues will have higher yields so your existing bond will have less appeal in the marketplace and if rates go down new issue bonds will have lower rates which means your existing bond will be more attractive because it has a higher interest rate. Make sense, good.
All of that is important because we are at zero interest, technically we are in the negative interest rate area because of quantitative easing and deflation which is bond friendly. However, this red hot economy we are in, sarcasm is my trademark, many people are expecting an interest rate hike to happen at some time this year and they are right. The Fed will raise interest rates in 2010 from 0-.25% to .25-.50%, wow. There is an outside chance that rates may go to 1% by the end of the year, but that is pure speculation right now because the economic data or ‘recovery’ is spotty at best. Even if rates go up it is relatively meaningless to lower grade corporate bonds because it does not hurt the spread as badly as it does for higher grade corporate bonds.
What I mean is newer higher grade corporate debt and treasury debt will have higher yields than current issues so existing paper will get slammed. However, existing lower quality corporate paper will do OK as we would need rates to go up substantially in order to really hurt the spread. I am not saying that there is no risk in lower quality corporate debt, defaults will be a huge issue moving forward, but I am also betting that the Fed’s liquidity programs end up not going away either. In fact, I would speculate that the Fed’s balance sheet will continue to expand over the next 12 months, perhaps double again if the FASB gets its way and the SIV’s have to be added to banks balance sheets right away, but again that is speculation right now.
If the Fed does actually raise interest rates this would be a bullish signal to the markets because it means we have real growth in the economy as well. This means lower grade paper would perform better, even if that growth is only at lower levels. However, higher interest rates will not be good for stocks, in my opinion, which is why I shifted focus to lower quality corporate bonds and to companies like Alteria. I would not expect, even if the economy is cruising, to see rates go much higher than 1-1.5% though because the Fed is stuck and it cannot move rates higher or to a meaningful level ever again. Regardless, corporate bonds of ‘BBB’ or ‘BB’ and selective ‘junk’ should do OK moving forward in the face of higher interest rates because of what I said previously. We will not see huge returns like that of 2009, but I think they will do better than stocks moving forward, plus you are first in line when the company folds, something to think about.
Why the Fed is stuck
What do I mean by that, a meaningful level? You see, the US is in a debt trap that we cannot escape from, it is simple mathematics. The Fed will not be raising rates to protect the dollar, they want a weak dollar that is for another post, they do not really care about inflation as they really want massive inflation but we cannot create it. The Fed will raise interest rates to keep politicians off of its back and that is about it, but raising rates higher than 1.5% presents problems that the US cannot handle.
Congress just had to raise the debt ceiling by a few hundred billion to fund the government for the next 6-8 weeks, unbelievable, and a more ‘permanent’ fix of raising the debt ceiling to about $14T will be coming soon.
I know this is no big deal to liberal democrats because, after all, under Bush we had to raise the debt ceiling 7 times and to them 8 or 9 wrongs make a right, but this is a major, major problem. Considering that raising the debt ceiling to $14T moves the total US debt to just about 100% of GDP marks a new low for the US and is the greatest amount of debt any country has ever attempted. What I am saying is that our current debt servicing costs with the Fed holding rates at 0% and using QE is about $500B+ a year and our average maturity of our debt is less than 10 years, again this is a first in all of the world’s history.
If the Fed moves rates up past 1.5% then that debt servicing cost will go up, dramatically, and there will be major consequences that the American people are not ready to face. Forget the debt ceiling, we will repeal that silly little rule, especially since we have to raise it almost every year anyhow. Within 7 years out debt servicing costs will begin to take its toll on the national budget squeezing out typically paid for items, like earmarks. Defense spending will have to decline immensely which is why the US remains a superpower even though we have a relatively small manned military compared to say a China, India or North Korea. The dollar will decline much further, it will anyhow as the latest rally, which I anticipated, is a head fake and was driven by Dubai, Greece, Fear, short covering and the selling will comeback harder and faster than you could ever imagine.
All of the senseless spending is coming home to roost, now. China is telling us where to stick it as there is not enough dollars to buy our debt, which is kind of funny in a sick way, and they said no to strengthening their Yuan which makes sense for them and smells of protectionism to me. When we demand a foreign country make their products more expensive in the US just so we can shrink out trade deficit thereby boosting our GDP and sell more products to them that is protectionism, straight up. I do not like to be so grime, but many of the things I foresaw and have been keeping to myself are coming out in the open. Things are not good, but hey as long as the market keeps going up, who cares right? Well, you will when it comes crashing down around you. Fixed income never looked so attractive right now.
I guess a few firms had to be to Scrooge given the 452K initial claims we saw this morning. Anyone expecting a larger number than we got is crazy because companies just do not or try not to fire people around the holidays. In fact, I am shocked that we saw claims as high as we saw today which reinforces my thought that the employment picture is not getting any better, I know I wouldn’t know a V shaped recovery if it hit me in the head because employment is a lagging indicator. That would be true for an inventory recession, but not for a credit collapse or do I have my type of recessions mixed up?
These initial claims and the ISM data is still not consistent with the magical -11K employment report we got in November, sorry for being a doubter. I simply do not trust government data and neither should you because the BLS along with this administration, any administration for that matter, will do anything to make themselves look better. For example, even though banks are not lending the BLS insists that 30K people started their own businesses in November, really, that is what the birth/death model says. Go back a year ago when things were really bad and the numbers are even higher, 100K+ people were starting their own businesses when the credit markets were frozen solid, so trust those BLS numbers all you want, I don’t.
To further illustrate this point, last month the BLS reduced the number of people in the work force by some 130K, they just took them out of the work force, why? Because they gave up looking for a job, or could not find one, and that is how you get a -11K employment report and massively revised prior reports. I wish we could all doctor our books like the government as we would all be rich. However, did you hear Steve Liesman tell you about how the BLS removed people from the workforce? Nope, you did not. Santelli told you about it and Santelli told you about how retail sales were doctored, but none of the other talking heads, why? I don’t have an answer, I really want to know why. I get that no one wants all bad news all the time, even I don’t want that, but I do want the truth.
My point is that last week and this week we will see soft initial claims numbers and December’s employment report will probably be OK, unless they doctor it up again. If they doctor the report, which will be unnecessary, it will be spectacular and completely unbelievable which will be the problem. Moving forward credibility will be an issue for the government, kind of like the USSR in the 1980’s when they said everything was fine and we knew it wasn’t, we are trying to do the same freaking thing. The thing is when 20% of the population is unemployed/underemployed, 1 out of 5 people, you cannot lie your way out of that and you will pay through the elections. This AM on Squawk even Liesman finally admitted that the Bush “economic recovery” was very poor and we are right where we were at the beginning of the decade. We need massive job growth, 300K+ a month now to turn this around and that is not going to happen.
The economy is bad and without government intervention there is no green shoots, period. The housing data yesterday proves that because that was the first look at housing starts without the tax credit, starts were down 11% when expectations were for +6%, ouch. That is quantifiable proof that the private sector is doing nothing right now and it is 110% government intervention growing the economy which has zero multiplier effect, it actually destroys wealth especially when your country has to borrow 100% of the money. That one data point on its own destroys the V shapers story, but if you combine it with any other data point it completely buries it. Let us not forget that if this was a V shape the Fed would have at least changed its language during the last meeting, but nope they did not even do that. Keep in mind I want out of this to, but I am just not delusional. Sure stocks are higher, but that doesn’t mean the economy is OK and in fact it means there is pain coming hard and fast somewhere along the way. Oh, where’s the volume?
Just how bad are things? Well, banks aren’t lending to the wealthy either. I spoke to a very wealthy friend of mine yesterday in Florida which is telling of what is really going on in the mortgage market right now. Now, I know how lending works, but there is simply no excuse for what he is going through right now in trying to refinance his condo in Florida, I know it is a hard hit area, but hear out the story before passing judgment. His condo was worth 7 figures before, but now in the high 6 figures and he has zero debt, $2M in cash, 790 FICO score and he is self employed. Now his self employed status is an issue because he has inconsistent income, $40K a year to $400K a year which is wild swings, but not bad considering he only wants to refinance $200K.
Here is the thing, he cannot get any financing from any bank anywhere. He wants to refi a portion of his condo, so it is totally secured, he has cash, credit, no debt and income with no bank wanting the business. Keep in mind I am not talking about a second lien where if he filed for bankruptcy the bank gets nothing, we are talking first lien here. So, how can this be if banks are ‘eager’ to lend, the credit markets are fully functional or the economy is just fine? It is not possible as this guy is prime to lend to. Now, if a bank is not going to lend to him, which is a collateralized loan I might add, then they are not going to lend to a small business or consumers in general.
All of this points to much tighter credit and much higher unemployment coming soon. Especially since banks are dumping TARP as fast as they can because they do not want to be told to lend by the administration or they want that one last big payday before the whole thing comes down. Actually, my belief is that why wouldn’t banks not want to repay TARP since they know they could get it back anytime they want. Either way, banks do not want to lend and they are not going. No lending, no growth.
It is always fun to make forward looking statements or predictions even though no one knows what is really going to happen. I decided to write this piece because Dennis Kneale was bragging about his wonderfully generic and completely mindless 2009 predictions he wrote last year which he claims was 90% accurate, even though it was the equivalent of a John Edwards show accurate list of junk.
Sorry, but predicting ‘corporate smashup,’ which I am not even sure if that is an actual technical term or not, but regardless, is as pretty generic as you can get as the government was passing out bailout money like mad. My other favorite prediction was that the Big 3 would get bailout funds as they were begging Congress for, drum roll please, a bailout, I mean seriously. The mindlessness went on of course, but that is Dennis for you, so I figured I would actually go out on a limb and make real predictions, and not use general ‘corporate smashup’ terminology.
I am not picking on Dennis, ok I am, but its fun! In all fairness to Dennis 2009 was a tough year for him as CNBC teased him with his own show only to take it away from him. He clearly is putting all that weight back on again, hey we all face the battle of the bulge at one point or another though. He got smacked by multiple guests for being an idiot because, well, he’s an idiot. The real irony is his 2010 prediction of Twitter going under is already in the can as they just inked 2 deals worth millions, wrong again Dennis and it is not even 2010 I guess VC money is a lot smarter than you, go figure.
Here we go, 2010 predictions:
Sovereign debt issues will escalate in Eastern Europe, meaning defaults because no one cares about that area. Dubai will not receive more exceptional help because they will be “made an example of” by its neighbors. Greece will be bailed out by the EU, go figure. However, emerging market debt will be OK.
Unemployment does not improve and will reach 11.2%, unfortunately. U-6 unemployment/underemployment will reach 20%+.
A third party will be formed in the US, but not in time for the midterm elections.
Democrats will lose the majority in the Senate and the super majority in the House, but not the majority.
Obama’s approval ratings will mirror Bush’s as he pushes cap and trade which is unnecessary and punitive to the American people. He will learn that there is a price for over exposure, seriously, we do not need to see him every day and he is no FDR. Unfortunately, if we give anyone any credit for the BS growth we are witnessing it is the, I can’t believe I am going to say this, the Fed.
Bank failures will reach over 300 for the full year.
We will see a spectacularly large bank failure next year, obviously not a too big to fail, but a large institution. I actually would place the FHA in this category, but it could also be a large regional about the size of a Key Bank, I refuse to give my prediction because of legal reasons and Key Bank is for comparative purposes only, but they are not in great shape.
We will see inflation and the Fed will be unable to raise interest rates due to the unemployment picture. For the first time we will have a recession, or whatever we are calling it by then, with rising prices.
Health care premiums will go sky high because the biggest sham of “reform” just got past by our elected officials who do not understand how the system actually works.
Some nut job attempts to shoot investment bankers because of high bonuses they will receive. I am not advocating it, I think it is stupid and it will be senseless, but there is a high probability that some nut job will do it.
High frequency trading, dark pools and other questionable practices will be regulated or severely restricted by Congress through legislation. Whether or not this is a good thing remains to be seen, but I would suspect it is.
The market suffers a sharp and severe correction as people realize that stocks do not go straight up and the markets actions have deviated from the realities of the economic conditions. When this happens is anyone’s guess, but it will happen.
We may see a 5% GDP print, but those numbers will be severely revised down and we will see the weakest ‘recovery’ ever in the history of recoveries from recessions. After we had spent some $2T+ fighting this economic downturn which will astound the public. The average recovery in terms of GDP growth is well above 6%, but the latest revision for 3Q09 GDP is 2.2% which is appalling. Remove government spending, just forget it because you don’t want to know.
The dollar will have some strength before the Fed realizes that it must double its balance sheet again and we will then see new lows in the DXY by year end.
Gold will reach new nominal highs.
The debt ceiling will be raised again to $16T before they eliminate the debt ceiling completely. I am kind of kidding here, but seriously why have a ceiling when as soon as they hit it they just raise it?
Emergency tax hikes will be enacted by summer bringing top marginal rates to 40%. Capital gains tax rates will increase to 25% and dividends will revert to ordinary income. I would not be surprised to see a VAT enacted as well, just because.
Google takes over the world because Android is really a secret mind control device that when Eric Schmidt gives the secret command, I hear the word is ‘snicker doodle,’ everyone with an android phone will do Google’s bidding.
Obama will finally fess up and admit that he was born in Kenya followed up with the following statement; “what are you going to do about it?”
Mark Haines finally snaps on the air and starts babbling incoherently to himself while swatting at invisible bugs… wait he already does that.
There you have, Ray’s long list of predications for 2010. Some will happen, most won’t, but they are fun to guess at. I also have a wish list that involves people joining that 11.2% projected unemployment rate because they deserve it, but since its Christmas I will refrain from printing such a negative list. However, I am sure you have guessed that one of those wishes, projections, is that Dennis’s contract will expire at CNBC and we never see him again, I can dream. However, as we have seen from other failures like Ron Insana no matter how bad you screw up that network will always take you back. Man, how do I get a job there? Merry Christmas, yeah I am not politically correct.
There is good news and bad news to this mess. The good news is it is almost over and the bad news is that is it is almost over. No matter what side of the fence you are on the one thing I can assure you of is that it is going to pass tomorrow morning. Even though I can also assure you that it is a budget buster, see the Republican CBO inquiry today for proof, and you should all know by now that the CBO is garbage in, garbage out group. What I mean is that if you feed it the sequence of data you want results for you are certain to get the desired results you want.
The real unbiased results were from the actuary that submitted his results a couple weeks ago, sorry, but actuaries know insurance and are key to determining costs, risks and results. His report shows that the costs for premiums will go sky high, I guarantee that to be the case as well, I know a thing or two about insurance as well. Basically, we have lawyers writing a bill that is math intensive and that is a major mistake, for proof look at Medicare deficits, Social Security, National Flood Insurance or any other government run program. For those who think this bill will reduce health insurance premiums ask yourself this one question, how can it is they did not take out the federal anti-trust exemption for insurance companies?
Seriously, without taking out that one exemption it is next to impossible to lower insurance premiums because it restricts citizens from buying policies across state lines. That means that insurers who have a lock on some states will still have a lock on those states, give me a break. Not only that, but now these same insurers must add millions of sick people to the roles and cannot charge them higher premiums, specifically, so that means all of our premiums will go up. This bill is the greatest gift to the insurance industry ever created. The only government gift to the private industry that was better, and it was not even close, was the no bid contracts to Halliburton under Bush. If this thing passes, buy insurance companies because for the first time in history the Federal government will mandate that citizens will be forced to buy a product from private companies to the tune of a trillion dollars over the next 10 years, give or take a few billion.
Because premiums will go sky high and our brilliant elected officials are incapable of doing simple math the subsidized premiums we will have to pay will blow those sweet deficit reducing estimates right out of the water within 3 to 4 years. If the administration and Congress decided to work with the industry, people like me who are truly impartial, they could have built a real reform bill, but since they think they know everything they have just put the final nail in the coffin of the US, from a fiscal point of view. Medicare will be insolvent or eliminated much faster than currently projected and the budget deficits will be through the roof by 2016 as the new taxes make people rethink how much money they want to earn. Oh, I am also assuming that we are actually in a recovery I might add, but if we are not in a real recovery, which the housing numbers today shows that without government help we are still in trouble, then the trouble comes much earlier.
What is that you say, AARP and the AMA support this bill so it must be OK? Let me tell you something about those organizations, in my opinion, they would sell their grand kids for an extra dollar and I am not kidding. AARP had a Medicare Advantage plan that they endorsed pulled from the market because it was so bad. They endorsed the product, it got pulled from the market and I can assure you that Medicare Advantage contract was a lot shorter than 2,100 pages long so it is highly unlikely they even know what is in the health care reform bill, but they know they can profit from it somehow. They hate variable annuity contracts, but love immediate annuity contracts because they have a GA contract with NY Life. Basically, if they can profit from it they will endorse it, period.
The AMA, who knows what they see in it except that they probably think they will get a permanent Doc Fix Bill passed or they like the idea of mandatory private insurance much better than a public option. Let’s face it, $26 per office visit from Medicare must stink versus the $50 or $90 per visit from private insurance. If you combine that an additional 30M new patients, or 40M depending who you listen to or where you get your uninsured number from, that equals some major money for the AMA and its members.
Clearly, this whole bill revolves around money for everyone. Everyone who loves it is getting paid big time to endorse it or vote for it. However, you, the person who pays for everything, is not in favor of this bill according to every poll conducted. I wonder why you are not in favor of it? Maybe because you know your Congress person is receiving tons of money from special interest groups to push things through, check opensecrets.org to see, or that Bernie Sanders, a socialist, sold out for $10B, way to be a socialist, Ben Nelson sold out for less, and of course we have the Louisiana Purchase take II. However, you have to pay your taxes plus the health insurance premiums and Congress wonders why you don’t want this thing, incredible.
What I find interesting is that New York, who is on the verge of bankruptcy, should have held out against this thing. Where was Schumer and Gillibrand on this? Why didn’t they say no way on this bill and get out Medicaid paid for? It work for Ben Nelson and Bernie I am sure it would have worked for NY. Oh yeah, Chuck was busy making the media rounds and calling flight attendants “bitch” instead of doing is fiduciary responsibility to his home state. I dislike the Republicans, I mean abortion that is the best defense against this thing you can come up with, however I agree with them that this bill is the train wreck of the century. Why is China moving towards capitalism, but the US appears to be moving towards socialism?
Clearly socialism did not and does not work, but here we are. For those who want the socialist lifestyle I urge you to seek out the countries that live under those types of regimes. I admit the US has problems, nothing is perfect, but here is the thing most countries want what we have, not the other way around. We could fix health care the right way if we took our time and did things in the open, as Obama promised he would do, but that never happened. Instead we decided to use a sledge hammer to itch our nose and it is not going to end well. Unfortunately it will take 4 years for me to be proven correct.
Mort Zuckerman was just on Power Lunch, clearly he was the smartest man on the show, but nevertheless his comments regarding the Audit the Fed Bill makes me wonder, is he retarded? He runs newspapers for a living so clearly, well you would think anyhow, he can read, but he obviously has never read the Audit the Fed Bill because he puts up the same paper defense as every other opponent to the bill does. He claims it will take away the ‘independence’ of the Fed and make it a political entity.
Is he serious? The Fed has lobbyists which mean it already is political and when we are talking about auditing what the Fed is taking in for collateral, how they are arriving at interest rate decisions and basically removing the veil of secrecy it is not taking away their independence. Especially since the audits are 6 MONTHS AFTER the fact. I am sorry, 6 months after a decision is made does not mean Congress will have any impact on any decision Uncle Ben makes, period end of story.
Mr. Zuckerman also claims it will weaken the dollar, excuse me? Clearly the man is retarded because the dollar only strengthened last year because we were going to blow up. We were only going to blow up because the Fed screwed up so badly, end of story Mr. Zuckerman. Uncle Ben is going to print the USD out of existence because that is his plan, read my other posts, I know what he is trying to do and believe me he has Obama’s blessing to do it. However, like everything else Uncle Ben has tried to do he will fail and kill the USD.
Finally, Mr. Zuckerman, I guess you did not have history in your remedial classes in school, so let me fill you in on a few events. We had a chaotic system before hand, mostly with bank failures, but even those ‘panics,’ as they were called, were few and far between, i.e. the panic of 1907. The Fed was supposed to end those problems with the banking system, right? Let me answer that for you, yes it was. Well, need I remind you of the little thing called the Great Depression? We had massive bank failures and the Depression itself was caused by the Fed, just like the problems we have now.
In fact, since the Fed was created we have had more serious problems at an ever increasing rate than at any other time in our history, period. If you knew anything, Mr. Zuckerman, you would know that was 100% true. I admit that we need a lender of last resort, but that can easily be accomplished by the Treasury department, but having a simple solution or, more to the point, a public, open solution, is not in the banks best interests. So, Mr. Zuckerman, you clearly are on the side of the elites, not the peoples which is ironic since you peddle your product to the masses. Do us all a favor, stay behind a desk and keep your uninformed opinions to your freaking self you moron.
Be the First to Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
