Well, what do you know?

Posted by Ray on June 30, 2010 under Economy, Markets | Be the First to Comment

Apparently it is now fashionable to be bearish since the S&P’s smashing, as in breaking below the 1040 level and 1035 for that matter, performance over the past few days. I hate to break it to everyone, but the time to be bearish was at 1120 and when the VIX was at 15, now, well, be bearish, but be careful. Those looking to jump on the short wagon might find themselves over paying for their positions and they might get squeezed out in the next few days. Don’t get me wrong, my S&P 500 target price is still 900, but I fully expect a retest of the 1040 mark in the very near term.

How bad is the economy?

Anyone even questioning how bad the economy is has their eyes closed and their head stuck in the sand. All the data is rolling over, look at the Chicago PMI today which came in at 59.1, sure, it met expectations, but it is down from where it was and is establishing a declining trend. The leading indicators are down and probably going to look horrible in the near future. I am sure initial claims will still be well over 450K tomorrow, oh, the ADP data stank to high heaven today as well so forget about an upside surprise on Friday. There is some housing data out tomorrow morning and I am sure it will not be good, it is May contract data, but never fear because Congress is attaching an extension of the home buyers tax credit to the unemployment extension, fantastic!

In short, things are much better than, say, September 2008, but things are not good and we are heading for either a double dip or very slow growth in the second half of this year. Treasury yields are telling us we got serious problems ahead and deflation, sound familiar yet, is an immediate threat. However, remember that inflation will come on very fast at some point in the future, you will never see it coming. The good news was that the ECB lending news was not as bad as I was expecting, but let’s face it, the news is still not good in Europe and the risks are very high. Spain may be downgraded, it will be very soon, which I am sure is surprising and people are wondering why such a fiscally sound country be downgraded?

The only thing I am surprised about is the U.S. and the U.K. still have the ‘AAA’ ratings after their drunken stupor of a spending spree, with much more to come before the majority is kicked out in November. After all, once your vote is cast and they lose their jobs what do they care if you dislike them or not? Expect another stimulus which is sure to extend our pain well into 2011. In the end all we will have found is that we have spent a lot of money with very poor results, just like the 1930’s. Let’s just hope this time it does not end like it did in 1941, there seems to be a correlation between poor economic stretches and wars.

What should give bulls some fuel is that everyone is so bearish it is bound to be a contrarian indicator. Am I going to bet on that? No, not yet at least. I spent the majority of this morning dumping everything I absolutely did not love to own building cash and some short positions, the markets were up this AM. While I am sure we will get a bounce in equities I am not so sure we will get it this week, a notable bounce at least. There will be short covering before the 3 day weekend, but at the same time I do not believe any one wants to be long either. What does that mean? We go lower, in my opinion at this very moment, but we could very well get a sharp bounce tomorrow before we go lower. If we break above 1040 we might go higher, but we are certainly not going to make new highs again this year, from what I see right here and now. Things are much worse than they appear unless you are 100% treasuries, suddenly that call I made back in April doesn’t look so crazy anymore either.

You must remember this period of time

Posted by Ray on June 29, 2010 under Economy | Be the First to Comment

All the talk about the double dip recession is being blamed on not enough stimulus, but that is not true since there is a lot of money being spent right now because of the stimulus. The final spending of the stimulus funds will end this year, right near the elections ironically enough, but it is clear it did not work. We now have Paul Krugman out railing about a deflationary depression because governments are cutting back stimulus efforts. My question to him is, if stimulus is the answer and we are spending it now why are we seeing disinflationary forces? His excuse does not hold water. It is the massive government intervention that is causing the problems, not a lack of stimulus, but too much stimulus.

I am in disbelief how anyone could not have seen these problems coming, the signs were everywhere. Employment was the best indicator, but look at money velocity, what you can piece together at least, and declining credit combined with higher foreclosures, bankruptcies and weak retail sales it is clear as day that at best we stabilized at less bad and at worst we are heading for really tough times. This is not something I wanted to happen I think you would be hard pressed to find anyone wishing pain and suffering on anyone, but the signs were all there. Not to mention the implications of Europe tightening its belt and trying to force China to revalue its currency, talk about insanity, we took it to the next level.

So, Krugman may be right and we may have a deflationary depression, but I am sure it will last for only a little while. Because Bernanke will not stand for a deflationary depression, which is ironic considering Ben is the Great Depression expert and he is creating another one, and he will print our way out settling for an inflationary depression. The unfortunate part is Mr. Krugman has the reasons wrong for the depression we are in and he doesn’t seem to understand that you cannot cure debt problems with more debt, it just doesn’t work. Our debt is so large that is will now be a complete drag on GDP which means lower growth, the new normal anyone? Again, his reasoning is flawed because we just spent $1T, give or take between all the programs, on stimulus and we are not even done spending and he is calling this a deflationary depression because there is no stimulus? Maybe he likes to confuse the less informed or something, but talk about being wrong, wow.

My point is that you need to remember today, what is going on, the money that is being spent, what politicians are saying and blaming because they will, whichever party, will point to right now saying we should have done more or we should have done less. The fact of the matter is we are doing both, stimulus is declining and we are not adding more to it, and keep in mind that the data we are all looking at is still coming from April or May when much more money was being spent. All that data, even further back then April, is also showing significant decline in economic activity when the stimulus was running full speed ahead. To clarify, just because the spending is slowing now don’t blame the negative data on that since the data was generated prior to the slowdown in stimulus spending. Furthermore, employment never recovered or even showed significant improvement given the price tag.

Will the decline of stimulus spending hurt? Yes, a lot, but it needs to stop somewhere. The problem with the stimulus is that it is cruel because it extends the bad periods much longer than they should have lasted by blocking the markets from finding a true bottom. The more you spend, the more it distorts reality and lures people into a false sense of security, but when it stops the real pain begins because those fooled may have to lay more people off and readjust for a post stimulus world. So not only do the long-term unemployed receive the proverbial shaft, but newly hired employees may also receive the same treatment after they thought they caught a break.

Right now you can see what worked and what did not, but in a few months many might not remember. They may point to the 5.6% GDP print and say remember how good things were then? Well, they weren’t that good to the unemployed or those in bankruptcy or losing their homes, but that is how it will e framed and there will be cries for more stimulus. Those cries must be rejected and the only government stimulus that must continue is unemployment insurance. You cannot dump millions of Americans who are not unwilling to find a job it is that no jobs exist for them.

We tend to have very short memories and forget things quickly because of who knows what, I blame TV. You cannot forget what is happening right now because if you do they might talk you into another round of stimulus or God knows what else. We are in trouble, I know this, but we tried Krugman’s way and it failed, let’s give it the “let’s not give it the college try” and see what happens. Besides all of that, we simply cannot afford more spending especially for mediocre results, I am being generous here. While Krugman is grabbing the headlines for using the “D” word, let’s not forget I started using the term depression months ago based on the employment figures, food stamp numbers and the way foreclosures and bankruptcies were growing because I was paying attention and not traveling to my vacation house in the tropics unlike some BY Times economist.

CNBC just doesn’t understand the markets

Posted by Ray on under Main | Be the First to Comment

At 9:50 AM Erin Burnett and Mark Haines were talking about what was driving the selloff in equities today. Erin Burnett says; “If it is the LEI number in China driving the markets, which is a number that was only created in May and just revised down, that shows how pathetic the global markets are.” Well, I hate to be one of those bloggers that the Fed says not to listen to, but the reason we are selling off is because of a failed sanitizing ECB bond offering and the banks in Europe are in trouble. Combine that with horrible housing data, high unemployment, record deficits, bond yields reaching new lows, deflationary forces, slower economic growth, ECRI numbers rolling over and the technical’s of the market being bearish I think you can see why equities are selling off.

This, more or less, proves that CNBC is a cheerleader devoid of understanding what is really happening in the equity markets and they simply do not know how to do basic research. This is what happens when you parade all bulls on your program and shout down their opposition, who have been far more accurate. The situation in Europe is serious and China’s economy is slowing because of a stronger Euro, how no one is putting this together yet is beyond me, and there is simply less end demand for products. The only area where pricing power really exists is in food stuffs and most other industries have zero pricing power. Why? Simple, there is no demand which is why we have deflation right now!

Besides the reporters being completely inept and derelict in their duties, they fail to see the most basic issues confronting us today. As I said before, initial claims data has been a leading indicator, right now, of what is happening out there, again, how this was not seen is beyond me, and showed that the economy is extremely weak and really never recovered.  It is insane that they keep talking about the Chinese LEI versus the real issues surrounding the equities markets, it is part of it, but it is the other issues I pointed out. How they kept on the bandwagon of the ‘recovery’ story is a wonder that helps mark the death of the old media outlets where bias is tried and true and a pretty face is worth more than actual knowledge of what is going on in the world.

Double Dip Surprise

Posted by Ray on June 27, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

How anyone is really surprised by the possibility of a further decline in economic activity is puzzling to me. Perhaps it is all the distortions in the data that is coming from the government supporting the economy. Maybe it is because their vested interest is to have you invest in their funds. Perhaps they just drank the Kool-Aid. No matter what it is almost a certainty, in terms of forecasting, that the economy will either stagnant here or decline.

The main indicator that has been telling us there were problems for some time now is the initial claims data and the lack of private payroll growth. Sure, we saw a bump up in payrolls with the 5%+ GDP print, thanks to inventory restocking, but 1Q10 GDP shows signs of significant weakness. What has held true is initial claims, first they got better with the big GDP print, but now they are soft with the constant downward revisions to 1Q10 GDP. The ECRI data also points to weakness in the economy as well which correlates with initial claims data. From my lens, employment is not a lagging indicator, I have been pounding the table on this for a year now, it is a leading indicator in a post credit collapse scenario.

Friday’s employment report is now being telegraphed by Bloomberg to be weak, -110K is the forecast, especially since the Census hiring is done and they are now laying off workers. All of this is not surprising if you track initial claims and use it as a leading indicator. To put the monthly initial claims data into perspective 1,850,000 are filing claims for the first time and that means there needs to be about 2M jobs created every month to offset the ones just lost and we also have to contend with population growth as well. To be blunt, full employment is a figment of one’s imagination at this point for at least the next 5-8 years. Unemployment will be our greatest problem for a long, long time and there is little the government can do since end demand is the issue.

There is simply no way the Fed can raise rates for the foreseeable future either since one of their mandates is full employment. Yes, I know they said they would raise rates before employment recovered, but they won’t for political reasons. Obviously, that might change depending on what happens in the future, but for right now there simply is no reason to raise interest rates, at all, from their perspective. Worse is the fact that the Senate did not extend unemployment insurance last week which means a million plus people will lose benefits very soon. After their drunken spending binge to bailout the banks after they created this it is beyond me how they would let a million people just wither and die. There are 6 people for every job opening out there so it is not like these people are actively NOT trying to find work, so enough with that whole theatrical display of utter idiocy. Keep in mind I am a deficit hawk, but there is a difference between government wasting money and government helping those who cannot find work.

The loss of those benefits will have a huge impact on the economy as a whole since that money will not be spent. Retail sales will continue to slide and foreclosures will continue to rise, how many of those million plus people are barely hanging on? I am not sure how so many people can claim that the unemployed are simply freeloaders looking to live the highlife on such a meager government stipend which is what you hear often on other blogs or by the ultra rightwing. Considering that there are so many people looking for work the competition for a job, any job, is extremely high which reduces the odds of a person actually getting a new job anytime soon. Not to mention that unemployment benefits are usually around $300 – $500 a week I find it hard to believe that anyone is living the highlife on such a low amount, but that is the case. I am sure that there are abuses, but this is one of those give me a break moments and I am definitely right of center.

The other reason many believe a double dip is out of the question is that companies have extraordinary amount f cash on their balance sheets. Well, all I have to say is how long has that cash been on their balance sheet and it has not gone to work yet? This is like the temporary employment is a bullish indicator, if it is not happened yet the odds of it happening anytime soon are dwindling. The cash on the balance sheet is also part of the deleveraging cycle as companies pay down debt and hoard cash. Perhaps the main reason that companies have so much cash on hand is they think that business is going to get very tough in the near future. After all, many of our best companies have roots going back beyond the Depression and they know the value of having cash on hand to make it through the storms. Of course, they could spend it all tomorrow, but I ask again, what are they waiting for and why hasn’t it happened yet?

The bottom line is that it is really shocking to see so many smart people caught off guard about a potential double dip recession. All of the signs have been around for a longtime that the thought should have entered their mind at some point in time in recent months. There is a chance that we could avoid it, but I do not see how. I should point out the fact that I never bought the idea that we actually made it out of the first one, other than a statistical recovery that is. Time will tell on this one, but if Friday’s report is worse than expectations we will be well on our way to S&P 900.

Confirmation of my thesis

Posted by Ray on June 24, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

From David Rosenberg’s morning musing’s today:

“ In contrast, the Asian FX complex is selling off. Risk assets are not responding to this week’s apparent good news: the Chinese peg announcement (has anyone noticed that yuan forwards are actually …. weakening?)”

Whether this is a real trend or not is unknown, but I fully expect the yuan to appreciate before it really falls anyhow, gotta get Congress off their backs for now. No matter what a strong yuan is not in China’s interests right now and China’s ruling party wants to remain the ruling party so are they going to fear Congress or a billion Chinese storming the Peoples House? You get my point.

To further make my point about the troubles in the EU and in China, moreover how this is a global issue now, Rosenberg went on to say:

“ There are all sorts of news reports in today’s FT discussing how the problem countries in Europe are in such bad shape that their banks are increasingly relying on the ECB for their funding survival. Portuguese banks reportedly doubled their borrowing from the central bank in May as a sign that this is not just a Greek tragedy. We have reached a stage where countries representing 18% of Eurozone GDP is accounting for 68% of the growth in ECB funding. Is that a currency you really want to own?”

What does all of this mean? It means big trouble and the markets are telling us that the problems from around the world are about to wash up on our shores. The irony is it is all coming full circle because we kicked it off with our credit induced sugar coma over a 5 year period which made risky paper seem safe and led foreign banks to buy it. Later everyone found out that safe paper was worth far less than the paper it was printed on and the write downs, globally, were enormous, with more to come. That triggered a collaborative global bailout of the entire financial system, but the ones who funded the bailouts are now in trouble and the recipients of the bailouts were never really in such great shape even after they received hundreds of billions in aid.
While we allowed our banks to extend and pretend, mostly because we have the luxury of printing our own money and we are the reserve currency, foreign banks bought seemingly safe sovereign government debt instead of treasuries, for the obvious reasons. Well, that debt became no good and we are where we are with a potential funding problem across the pond and a healthy exposure to European banks. We had exported our “safe debt” which ended up being toxic to the Europeans and they, more or less, did the same thing to us! Except theirs was disguised as safe government paper instead of CDO’s and CLO’s.

I believe the proper name for such a thing is “circle jerk,” but I am not 100% sure on that. Either way it is definitely heading this way and only a fool would deny that fact. In today’s world it no longer matters if a problem starts 10,000 miles away because everything is handled via the internet in microseconds and exposure can go from nil to billions in the blink of an eye. All this means is that we are exposed and the market knows this. Why else would treasuries be doing what they are doing while gold is rising and stocks are declining, the interesting thing is the stocks declining part is new and all 3 were once going up at one time, how odd. All 3 asset classes could not be right, but 2 out of the 3 asset classes were bearish for stocks so directionally speaking a downward move should not be overly surprising to anyone, but it is, interesting.