Listening to the talking heads TV and our political leaders about this debt crisis is merely subjecting you to unneeded heartburn. First and foremost, the USA is not “defaulting” on anything on August 2nd, period. The USA will not be downgraded on August 2nd by any of the ratings agencies, even though we should not be carrying the AAA rating to begin with. Bonds only default is interest or principal payments which will not happen on August 2nd as the Treasury brings in enough money to cover our debt payments on a monthly basis. Social Security checks and Medicaid/care checks will go out and the sun will rise in the East and set in the West.

All that happens on August 2nd is the Treasury Department looses the ability to issue new debt beyond the stated debt ceiling. I have not witnessed such scare tactics in my entire life and the misinformation the media and politicians are giving the public is shameful. In fact this entire debate is shameful as we are not having an honest discussion about debt and the US government. Everything you hear being discussed is merely kicking the can further down the road and I believe the markets will not let this can kicking continue on forever. Everything comes to an end at some point and our crazy spending will have to end and we all need to pay the Piper.

Let’s get real about our debt problem. We are hearing all sorts of nonsense about $4T in deficit reducing spending cuts or a combination of cuts with higher taxes over a ten year period. That means we are raising taxes or cutting spending, or a combination thereof, of $400B a year, big deal. If we subtract the $400B a year from our recent annual deficits we are still running $1 to $1.2T of deficits per year for as far as we can see. These tax hikes and spending cuts are meaningless to our long-term financial health and all the talk we are hearing from Washington or the other experts is meaningless until they lay out the facts like I just did. In my opinion even if we raised taxes and cut spending by $400B a year the USA will be downgraded within 2 years anyhow, which is what should have happened a long time ago.

The talk we are hearing from the left about wasted tax surpluses is so far off base it is ridiculous. The talk from the right about spending controls and how a 4% tax increase will kill jobs is equally as moronic. The surpluses in the late 1990’s and in 2000 were bogus to begin with. We had massive surpluses on Social Security and Medicare which the government simply took and replaced the entitlement surpluses with IOU’s and called them budget surpluses. It was accounting gimmickry and those surpluses should have remained in the entitlement programs. Do tax cuts really spur more jobs? I don’t think so and there is no proof that it does either. What spurred job growth in the 1990’s was technology. What spurred job growth in the 2000’s was housing, both bubbles I might add, but in both cases it was a new “killer app” that spurred economic growth and I do not believe we have anything like that in today’s world. Not to say we couldn’t have a new technology or other “killer app” materializes as fast as tomorrow, but there simply is nothing I see right now that will spur growth and jobs which is the real problem here.

Most people do not want to hear this, but taxes do need to go up, I hate taxes for the record. To prove my point we often hear the right complain that 47% of the USA’s citizens do not pay anything in taxes. Well, if you are going to use that line you simply cannot support tax cuts. Why would I say such a thing? Well, it was the Bush Tax cuts that caused 47% of people to not pay anything, which is not exactly true either, in taxes. The reductions in middle class tax rates were massive and the lowest tax bracket was erased. It is also important to realize that 20-30% of the population will never pay taxes because they do not earn enough to live on.

The Bush tax cuts, all of them, cost the USA $3.7T over a 10 year period or $370B a year, interesting figure don’t you think? The left says the rich need to pay more, but the rich in terms of the Bush tax cuts only account for $700B over 10 years. Raising the top income tax brackets only raises $70B a year which is nothing when we are spending $4T a year. Simply raising taxes on the rich will do nothing to solve our problems as it is the totality of the Bush tax cuts that are part of the problem. I do not like taxes, but let’s get real about this, OK? We cannot reduce our debt with phantom spending cuts and tax increases on a select few people, everyone needs to pay up.

We are in serious trouble and no one has put it all together yet. It is unreal to me that the President can say; “I cannot guarantee that Social Security checks will go out on August 3rd” and no one questioned him about why that would be. Social Security was supposed to be fine until 2036 and self funded but if we cannot issue new debt the checks will not go out… what! Well, our Einstein news anchors and the political talking heads simply do not want you to know that Social Security has no money in it, it is broke. I just talked about this earlier, our political leaders took the surpluses in Social Security and spent it replacing those surpluses with IOU’s. Since Social Security has only IOU’s in order for checks to go out the government must issue debt. That should scare you to death, we have to fund Social Security with debt. That is also why Social Security can never be privatized either. However, no one has put this together yet, unreal.

The fact that the US government cannot do anything without issuing new debt should be a real wake up call for the citizens of the USA, but no one seems to get it. The USA, the so called richest nation in the world, is bankrupt! If we cannot survive without using the credit card we are technically insolvent, if I am wrong what would you call it? The USA has also never paid of our debt, except for when Andrew Jackson was president, and simply rolled over all of our national debt year after year and this was hidden from you by using certain terms like we retired the 30 year treasury instead of we called in and paid off all of our 30 year treasuries, we simply rolled that debt into shorter term debt instruments. The USA also has “grown” our way out of recessions and past debt problems. Growing our GDP is a great way to hide the debt problem and it causes the government to do everything possible to always grow our GDP which is why hedonics accounts for over $2T of our annual GDP, hedonics is made up benefits for certain things like free checking, Google it.

You should be terrified about what you are seeing and not because we are going to “default” but because this whole show is basically telling you how bankrupt the USA really is. If our world shuts down because we cannot issue new debt we are in huge trouble and that is exactly what is happening now. The reasons I have listed here are the reason why everyone should own gold and silver as it is the ultimate hedge against out of control government spending and if the truth was ever told we have already defaulted on our debt through depreciation of the dollar and by simply rolling over old debt into new debt. If we ever really got real about our debt issues I can assure you that the story is even scarier than what I have just laid out. Luckily we have politicians that will always lie to us and hide the truth until it is so obvious you already knew it and it is too late to do anything about it. Good day and good luck.

I have been writing about the decaying economic data for some time now and have taken some heat for being a pessimist or a permabear, but now it appears that I was correct. It is also striking that almost a year ago I called this current economic funk we are in a Depression. I said one of the reasons why we do not recognize a modern Depression is because there is no need for soup lines and the like. In today’s world everything is automated with food stamps, 40M Americans are currently on food stamps a huge YoY increase, we have unemployment benefits (99 weeks currently), the HAMP (loan modifications), energy assistance, public housing and a slew of other safety nets available to those in absolute need.

Since we have all of those programs our growing economic troubles can remain out of sight and mind. We can be told things are improving because the data says it is. Never mind the fact that unemployment is “only” at 9.5% because people are so discouraged that they left the workforce. To me the most telling sign is the food stamp data which is just unbelievably high with almost 12% of Americans in need of public assistance just to feed themselves, think about that for a minute. That kind of takes the wind out of my sails about being right about the current economic climate. I never wanted to be right, but the data was never strong nor did it point to a sustainable recovery, which was merely a statistical recovery to begin with.

I have been silent for a few weeks because I have not felt so hot and I was letting the data set in. I think it is clear now that the recovery was not really a recovery and when the stimulus stops we are in deep trouble. As Rosenberg said, when businesses are dependent upon government spending for growth we got serious problems, I am paraphrasing the statement, but it is close enough. He was right all along and the permabulls have a rude awakening coming their way in the near future. Whether it is the Hindenburg Omen or just a slew of bad data, which will get worse, stocks are way overpriced, period. We will or the market will correct this error for us by forcing a multiple compression and it will either happen all at once or over a period of days, but it is coming.

My last call was to look into leveraged ETF’s for long dated treasuries, UBT or TMF, and gold, GLD or physical. This trade was profitable, UBT, which I own, was about $86 and it is now $102.43 and GLD was about $116, it is currently $120. Those were good trades that required guts in the face of deflationary forces and the fact that you were looking at a leveraged ETF, which are very dangerous, but they worked. I suspect that it will continue to work, but I would not, besides gold, buy the pair trade here. The Fed told us what they were going to do, monetize some debt on the longer end of the curve, and I suspect they will continue in the near future, we might now Friday for sure, but if they do more QE look for a $1-2T figure.

Ben Bernanke wants to flatten the yield curve to force lending by banks, but it will not work. It is a good theory for Ben, but the reality is banks do not want to lend and consumers do not want to borrow. QE will also not do anything to boost money velocity and I am not sure why anyone would possibly think it would. Banks will merely do what they did before the credit crisis and take on more risk so they can play a different yield curve other than treasuries. As we know, that did not work the last time so why anyone would think it will work now is beyond me, but I am sure that banks will take more risk to boost profits. After all, they are too big to fail.

The outlook for the markets is not good as Ireland just got downgraded and I think we will see some weak data at 8:30 tomorrow as well. Unemployment claims, a leading indicator according to, well, me and PIMCO, are rising and another week +500K will be devastating. Also, the employment report survey was out the very week we saw that 500K print, not good news for the unemployment figure out a week from this Friday. The Philly Fed, Richmond Fed and the Empire Report’s were not very good and I think we will see close to 50 on the ISM survey out next week, perhaps lower than 50 so be ready. All the data is pointing to very, very weak near-term economic pain ahead, there is little doubt about that.

I realize that balance sheets are rich with cash right now, but that means nothing as companies are merely hoarding cash at this point. It is, the cash on hand, good for corporate bonds though, which I still love. The outlook from CEO’s is also becoming more mixed, John Chambers from Cisco was not optimistic, this should scare you because this guy is always optimistic. Basically, much like in 2000, CEO’s merely did not foresee a slowdown in the immediate future, which is very surprising and takes down the credibility of many corporate leaders, in my opinion.

Because of all of this I am more bearish now than I have ever been in the past. I am positioned for a correction and pulled most longs off the table. I am in longer duration treasuries along with my UBT play, long gold, silver, corporate bonds (no high yield to speak of), some international holdings (frontier markets), a few biotechs, and inverse ETF’s. My long holdings are all dividend paying stocks with very low P/E’s and strong balance sheets. Blind belief that the market is going to head higher is insane and, frankly, we have just seen an insane rise in equity prices to begin with. That time is now over and the bears will come back to take control. I find it difficult to believe no one saw this coming, I have written about it and many others as well. The data never lies, ever, but the people reading the data usually have a reason to spin it in their favor.

The 2Q10 GDP report came out and it was an eye opener for many people as it showed that the recession, depression, was deeper than most believed and things are surely not as rosy as we are being told. Aside from the inventory rebuild there is not much else going on, final sales are dead as a door nail and some firms, like Samsung, are reporting good earnings, but warning of weaker times ahead. I take the Samsung warning pretty seriously as they are a large or the largest supplier of electronics which had shown signs of strength recently. So when they say things may not be rosy in the near future I suspect that will apply to more than just TV sales.

What made the news cycle this week was a report by Fed President Bullard about the threat of a Japanese style deflation here in America. I am kind of shocked that people were caught so of guard by this news, about 10 economic data points already indicated this to be if not already occurring a very real near-term threat. I suspect we are in for some really tough times ahead and worse yet I suspect we will see the Fed start moving towards quantitative easing, again. As I have said, repeatedly, this will not do anything to boost economic demand as we must wait for the deleveraging cycle to be completed by the consumer before demand will return. Zero Hedge just wrote a piece about this tonight which illustrates exactly what I have been saying for a month now, but no one is listening. Here is what they said:

“In other words, all those who say QE2.0 will do nothing to stimulate the economy are correct, as all such a greenlighted action would encourage is the warehousing of yet more cash by banks. And since banks have no incremental incentives to lend it out, it doesn’t matter if the Fed’s liabilities are $2.5 trillion or $2.5 quadrillion. Instead of stimulating inflation, which is the end goal, all such an action would do is to create further doubts about the stability of the dollar, which in turn, as Ambrose Evans-Pritchard discussed, is a sure way to go to hyperinflation without first passing either Go, or inflation.”

They also indicate my thoughts exactly, we bypass money velocity inflation and go straight to dollar devaluation, i.e. currency crisis, hyperinflation. The irony is that you would only feel this pain on imported goods and we do consume 87% of what we produce domestically so it may take some time before any real currency devaluation hits home. Regardless, Bullard indicated along with prior reports by Ben Bernanke himself that QE is on the table. The question is what kind of QE, treasury purchases or other asset purchases? Also, how much, I bet $3-5T in total purchases, but who knows.

What we do know, compliments of David Rosenberg, is that Ben Bernanke said IF we hit a Japanese style deflation that the target rate on the 30 year treasury would be 2.5%. Rosenberg says that if we hit that rate, down from the current 4% yield, one would receive about a 30% rate of return. I think he is right and if one followed his recommendations of treasuries and gold, along with high yield stocks, you would have avoided much volatility this year and had nice returns. I am happy to say I bought 2’s and 5’s when the yield was 1.10% and well over 2% so I am happy. I suspect the rally in treasuries will continue and if QE happens, wow.

The trade of the century, although risky, would be to leverage a long position into the 20+ year treasury market, UBT (2X bull) or TMF (3X bull). IF Rosenberg and I are right and this happens, QE, deflation or a major selloff in equities, those positions would do very well. However, they are risky, they are leveraged ETF’s, but if you time it right I believe that you could do very well. I also believe that the bull market in bonds is in full force again, very similarly to the summer of 2008 I might add which adds a bit of mystery to the rally in treasuries. The mystery is, what is going on and is the bond market telling you that something really bad is coming?

A look at the chart above looks like there is something going on in the bond market. We broke above the 123/4 mark on the 30 year futures and now that is support. I believe it goes higher because of, at least, of deflationary pressures and, at worst, because of QE. However, while I am short-term bullish on treasuries I hate them long-term since it will be impossible for the U.S. to meet its long-term debt obligations which means they will default somehow in the future, in my opinion. I also believe, as stated earlier, that QE will wreck our currency maybe not now, but at some point in the near future which makes gold very attractive as well. If QE is announced treasuries will go nuts and so will gold. If one is levered into treasuries you could do well, if you want the risk.

What QE means for stocks, I do not know. I would think QE would be bad for stocks as it signals things are not good and the economy is weak, but we are living in bizzaro world where good news is fantastic and bad news is even better.

Much has been made about the death cross of late, the 50 day moving average crossing through the 200 day moving average, although I think and know it is a significant event it is nothing compared to something else I have noticed. We are all aware of the primary reason of the bull run over the past 12 months, massively oversold markets, combined with marginally better economic data and, most importantly, a weakening dollar. Why the dollar weakened is important to note, quantitative easing via the Federal Reserve’s asset purchases or the printing of money. Although we will not know the long-term implications of QE for some time to come it is safe to assume it accomplished its goal, weaken the dollar and boost the economic data through negative interest rates, essentially.

We all know the market action of late, a horrendous selloff which was only a surprise to the parade of bulls on CNBC and those who kept their heads buried in the sand, but those out in the real world knew it was coming. What was unexpected was the 4^th of July rally that took us back up some 7% on the backdrop of pretty bad economic data. Some of the bounce was because of a technical bounce and some of it was because of the expectations of stronger earnings which started last week. I fully expected 2Q10 earnings to be good, but I expected to see more top line misses and the outlook from CEO’s to be downgraded as well. So far, it is a mixed bag, but the outlook or guidance remains very bullish for many firms, however, a look back through prior earning announcements, particularly 2000 releases, as Mark forwarded to me, shows that Intel did not foresee a slowdown there either, so trust the economic data rather than CEO guidance going forward.

Back to what is going on in the equities market and why the dark cross is less important than the other ‘grey swan’ that is going on. First, everyone and their grandmother knows or knew about the dark cross, not that it takes away from its importance, but when everyone knows about it very rarely does the market deliver the results we are looking for. Except the market kind of did deliver, but stopped short and rallied all the way back to some important moving averages where it failed to break through, very bearish from my lens. At the same time we saw the selloff begin the dollar was moving towards the 89 mark on the DXY, but it stalled after a dramatic breakout and reversed course. Not only did the DXY reverse course, but it got crushed moving down from 89ish to about 82.5, not an insignificant move.

Exhibit 1-1 2 Month DXY Chart

Why is this a big deal? It is a big deal because stocks went up on a weak dollar trend which meant a better environment for U.S. companies to sell products abroad. Basically, a weaker dollar is better for U.S. exports and sales as we become more competitive in the world. It made sense for the markets to not like the move of the DXY from the low 70’s to 89, but to not like the move from 89 to 82.5, well, I am perplexed. The market should love this and we should be flying to at least 1,100 on the S&P 500, but we are not. This is a huge warning sign that stocks cannot rally on a weak dollar and it means more than the dark cross.

Exhibit 1-2 1 Year S&P 500 and DXY

The charts show the trends pretty clearly, lower dollar higher equity prices, higher dollar, lower equity prices, but over the past couple of months things have been out of whack. What else is going on during this time period? Treasury yields are collapsing to historic lows. We have the 2 year treasury under .60%, the 10 year under 3% and the 30 year under 4% which is a sign of 2 things, risk aversion and fear of deflation. My belief is deflation is the clear danger as of right now, it is fairly evident from my lens and the market is pricing it in as we speak. The credit markets have been pricing it in for some time and will continue to, I am bullish on debt securities, have been for some time now, but the equities markets, well, it has not priced in any real deflationary pressure at all.

Exhibit 1-3 Yield Curve

Granted, we have not seen total deflation yet, just the beginning sign of it, but the evidence is pointing towards it. Here is the rub, everyone says the Fed will do QE2, but they won’t do it. See my other posts as to why they will not do it, but from my lens they would be insane to even attempt QE2 at this point. The problems in the U.S. economy has nothing to do with what is happening in Europe, a little I suppose, but not directly related. My past posts about Europe relate directly to actual defaults by countries and to corporate earnings. I think anyone will find it hard to believe that the Jones’s are not buying that new car because they are worried about Hungary being kicked out of the IMF-EU rescue package. They are not buying a car because they are worried about their job and do not want to take on much debt or because their credit score is so lousy they cannot get financing, 25% of Americans have a credit score below 600 now. Instead the Jones’s are paying off debt and buying what they need, not what they want which is deflationary.

This trend will continue and so far only the credit markets are pricing this in, the equity markets are in La-La Land, still. The DXY – S&P cross is very bearish if the trend continues and will mean a big correction in the near future especially if commodities head lower as well. Commodities are not performing well and that is reflected in the Baltic Dry Index and combine that in with the above information and it is putting the explanation point on the whole theory. So far the only strategist I know for sure who is putting all of these pieces together, and has been ridiculed relentlessly by the bulls on CNBC and such, is David Rosenberg. All of the rest of the strategists are telling you to buy the dips even when they see everything I presented to you, they know what it means and, to top it off, they know the ECRI is rolling over and housing is going down the tubes. It is incredible to say the least. Be ready for some fireworks soon unless this trend breaks.

What works in a deflationary environment? Income and dividends, pure and simple. I like (and own) the following: CTL, MO, PM, WM, PFE, MRK, LLY, BPT, RYU, PEY, INB, DNH, CGO, VZ, high quality corporate bonds, strategic income bond funds, emerging market debt funds (PCY has been good to me), short and intermediate term treasury funds. Many of the above mentioned stocks have underperformed, which I like, and pay very nice dividend yields, which I love, but may not do well in an inflationary environment. This is why one has to hedge with precious metals or, at the very least, TIPS.

All the talk of the town is deflation, disinflation or disinflationary trends, what does all of this mean, is it bad and more importantly, should the Federal Reserve try to stop it? First, deflation is negative price growth year-over-year, we are not there yet even though I often say we are in a deflationary period, because we will get there, in my opinion. Disinflation or disinflationary trends are signals that show prices are declining and is how many economists or snarky bloggers, like myself, describe the trend before we hit outright deflation. In a nutshell, deflation is demand destruction or no end demand which means companies must drop prices in order to attract business. The most commonly referenced period of deflation is the 1930’s where, sadly, food was cheap, but people starved, houses were cheap, but people went homeless. Deflation has been framed as ugly, horrible and something that must be avoided at all costs.

Deflation during the good times is fine and we all reap the rewards, such as cheaper technology, i.e. cell phones or computers, which become cheaper because of competition from outsourcing and technological advances. No one minds paying lower prices during these periods of times and the Fed even doesn’t mind deflation during these periods, but they like it to remain in check. Because lower prices do not mean people are not buying the products, the opposite is typically true. Plus, other indicators usually show that only certain items are prone to deflation under normal conditions, usually technology related items. The Fed would only be concerned if they saw other items start to lose pricing power and the money supply shrinking, people saving more money, basically.

When people save their money, in an economy such as the U.S., it is devastating because such a large portion of our domestic growth comes from spending money freely on stuff we really don’t need. When we save we stop that wasteful spending this grinds our economy to a halt. In order to get sales going again companies start to offer incentives to get shoppers in the door. This usually means lower prices through either temporary or permanent sales on the price of the products they sell. Since these products are not selling the stores are not ordering new products which mean the raw materials to make the clothes or whatever begin to decline. Even if the product begins to move at reduced prices the company selling to the end user begins to demand lower prices for the product and even if they don’t ask for it the orders are so much smaller prices would fall anyhow. Essentially it is a chain reaction, this is pretty common knowledge, but it comes from one simple thing happening, people saving their money.

The other part of the equation of people saving their money is that money is taken out of circulation. This sounds counterintuitive to those who rail against the fractional reserve banking system since this system allows for more loans to be made if the deposit base grows. However, if the economy is bad banks simply do not make loans because they fear not getting repaid. Therefore, a higher savings rate means lower monetary circulation, commonly referred to as M3, which the Fed no longer produces by the way. In order to boost the money supply the Fed will try to encourage banks to make riskier loans by lowering interest rates. By lowering interest rates banks make lower rates of returns for doing nothing with their money so by loaning out the money to borrowers banks can make higher interest rates. In turn the borrower will go out and spend that money which will ultimately boost the money supply and, hopefully, boost final demand.

That is how things work in normal business cycles, but that is not what we have now. We have a very abnormal business cycle that happens once every few generations where we go through this huge leveraging cycle and then have to live through a period when we deleverage all the debt. The last time we went through this was in the 1930’s and the time before that was about 60 years before the 1930’s so about every 60 to 80 years we go through a super cycle of debt leverage that blows up. During these super cycles the consumer has so much debt that they just try to pay it off and does not waste much money on other items. This is bad for our economy which is built on a consumption model to the tune of 70% of our GDP. This lack of demand or demand destruction means people just will not spend unless it makes absolute sense to them, i.e. a generous tax credit from Uncle Sam. This demand destruction leads to lower prices which starts out as disinflationary forces, moves to deflation when prices finally start dropping YoY, which will happen soon.

No matter what the central bank does, the Fed, it on its own cannot change this deflationary trend when it has spent all of its ammo. When interest rates hit zero there is nothing the Fed can do to spur demand from a monetary policy point of view. Remember, this is a very unusual situation because in these super cycles not only are consumers saddled with debt, but so are the banks and the banks are usually saddled with worthless debts which make them insolvent. That was true 80 years ago and the same thing is true today because banks are not making loans nor do they want to. So what can the Fed do? They have insolvent banks and consumers that don’t want to spend and are trying to shed their debt loads.

Some people say more quantitative easing will be helpful. I ask how? We already did how much QE? $2T+ that we know of and that did nothing. In fact, mortgage rates have dropped even more after QE stopped and we have falling demand for housing so what will another round of QE do? All it would do is cripple the dollar and trust me, the dollar is going to be in trouble soon enough anyhow because of the bloated balance sheet the Fed has and our national debt load. QE will not boost money velocity at all. It might give banks more money for their balance sheets, but other than that it will not boost the overall money supply so I am totally perplexed as to why anyone thinks QE will work. We have no problem selling our debt right now either, so it is a total waste of time and resources. The negatives far outweigh the positives.

What else can the Fed do? Nothing. They are done or have done everything they can do. Sure, they can roll out with TALF again, but the market has no problem placing junk paper right now so what would the point be? The problem is simple, the consumer does not want to spend. Businesses do not want to spend. Does anyone know why this is happening? I think it is pretty simple, no one knows what is going to happen. The President is keeping everyone in the dark about where taxes are going to go, heck, we are not even going to get a budget for 2010, unreal! We still have no idea how health care reform is really going to impact us yet, how much will it cost, etc. The business environment is weak at best and CEO’s are too afraid to admit it, look how they get treated by the administration, as traitors!

The consumer, well, I wonder why they aren’t spending. We have weekly initial unemployment claims coming in at well over 400K, 4 week average is 455K. We have more firings than hiring’s going on right now. The work week declined and so did wages. There are 6 people for every open job. It is taking 35 weeks to find a new job if you get fired. People were feeling more secure about their job, but when initial claims began to heat up again that confidence disappeared, even H-P started laying people off again and I bet Google will announce layoffs very soon. Their debt loads are through the roof and banks raised all their fees on the consumer so it is taking longer to pay down debt. Foreclosures, delinquencies and now a story broke tat home owner associations are foreclosing on homes for pennies on the dollar over the dues not being paid, come on. To top it all off the Senate is not extending unemployment benefits, but they can pass a 2,300 page Fin Reg bill with no problem, what is wrong with those people?

It is fair to say that there are plenty of reasons to not spend money from the consumer’s point of view. From corporate America’s point of view there is also little reason to spend money and even if they did it is so little of GDP it doesn’t even matter. The bottom line is how do we get M3 to increase? Can money velocity get positive again and should we even try? In my opinion, I do not believe we can get money velocity to get positive again without a drastic event such as WWII. These super cycles have to work themselves out and that takes time and the more tinkering we do the longer it takes. Look at housing, if we did not do the tax credit we might have bottomed in housing prices already, but we will never know now.

The Depression lasted as long as it did because of the tinkering and those who say we had a relapse because stimulus was removed in 1937-38 simply do not get it. If we cannot attract buyers to the housing market at 4.5% interest rates and prices significantly lower than the peak it just is not going to happen for some time to come. The market has to find its own bottom and it will be painful, but we cannot simply throw money at it and hope it works out. We could do that in the 1930’s because we had savings and we had manufacturing, we have neither now. We started out in a horrible position, greatly in debt, and to get ourselves out we are advocating going much deeper in debt. The problem is we cannot grow our way out of the debt we have, we cannot afford another New Deal. The most important thing to remember about the New Deal to begin with was that it did not work, it was a majorly failed policy.

As painful as it is going to be I say we have to let it be. No more QE and I hope we do not do another stimulus, but we will, look for a Bush style check coming right around October. Money velocity will sort itself out when the deleveraging is over and that could be as fast as next year or as long as 2015, no one knows except the collective minds of the consumers. The bottom line is we may come out, the consumer and corporate America, stronger than when we came into this thing with less debt and important lessons learned. Our government and the Fed, well, I do not believe they learned anything and look for QE and stimulus money just in time to buy your vote in November.

Alcoa is infamous for having lousy numbers and missing its estimates, even Cramer came out today saying who cares about Alcoa, they have lousy numbers. Last quarter they had lousy numbers, but everyone else had great numbers, so what does this mean? To me, it means that Alcoa is the contrarian play since they beat their numbers and raised guidance. Although one analyst says he was not happy with the results as he thought they would guide higher and attributed last quarter’s beat to the airline and auto industries higher demand, basically he said the rest of the year would be weak. I have not looked through the company’s numbers because I do not own Alcoa and I do not want to own Alcoa, so why bother.

Alcoa had good earnings, at least good headline earnings, and CSX had good earnings, which is no surprise since the rail reports have been looking better, but I think we are in for some serious outlook shocks moving forward. All the initial signs are there as the economy is cooling off, frankly it was never that hot to begin with, as retail sales are not stellar, consumer credit is contracting and unemployment remains incredibly high. For some reason the unemployment aspect has become a new normal that most people are immune to, 454,000 initial claims last week was not good and a 466,000 4 week average is not good, in fact it is disturbing that more people are not concerned about this. Not to mention, unemployment benefits for some 3M people are about or have already ran out, not good at all for future earnings outlook, in my opinion, or maybe this fits into a V shaped recovery story somewhere along the way, I get confused nowadays.

One surprise last week was the news that Wells Fargo was closing down 638 stores that catered to non-prime, a.k.a. sub-prime, borrowers, I thought they got out of that business 2 years ago? The firm is expected to has a $.02 charge because of this closure which leads me to believe there may be more losses which led to the closure of the division, not a stretch, I know. Also considering that their pick-a-pay mortgage portfolio still looks terrible I think there is more to the story, but, frankly, with the suspension of mark-to-market accounting what does a bad loan really mean anymore? I will say even with the accounting gimmickry that a bad loan still impairs the balance sheet even if it ‘looks’ good in the reporting and over time a loss will catch up to the bank it is just a matter of how long. I also suspect that there is probably no more perfect quarters for the trading desks f Goldman and JP Morgan, my heart bleeds for them. What I am trying to say is that we might be shocked to find that financials do not perform as well as expectations and their outlook gets more cautious.

There is also technology which has been on fire for the past year, there is no denying that. Earnings have been fantastic and growth has been abundant for pretty much anyone in the technology arena, but will it continue? I fear, no. One of the dirty little secrets is the fact that for the bulk of the last years Asia has been the driving force of growth and these firms have had the benefits of a declining dollar which meant a lot of positive FX results. This is true for Google to Intel who all had several hundred million in earning kickers thanks to a depreciating dollar, but that trend stopped at the end of 1Q10 when Europe started to really catch on fire. I am sure 2Q earnings are going to be good, but guidance might not be as robust as many believe and there is now greater possibility for misses on the top or bottom line as well.

There is also Europe to contend with, I know, everyone says Europe is no big deal and the impact in the U.S. will be minimal. Well, the same people also said the sub-prime crisis was contained in 2007 as well, how did that work out for you? The fact of the matter is that 30% of the S&P 500 earnings are coming from Europe and they are going to stop spending as much, that is just a fact. This slow down will have an impact on earnings moving forward, how much? I do not know, no one knows which is why guidance will probably be more cautious this quarter. You may be saying, well Asia is growing like a weed and I will agree with you, but only somewhat.

I will say that the population in Asia will probably be more liberal with their wallets than businesses will be. China has a lot to contend with right now between property bubbles blowing up, banks worrying about capital requirements, loans becoming harder to come by, profit margins being squeezed by employees wanting higher pay, but their top importer, the EU, has a falling currency and the U.S. consumer is also not buying as much either. They probably are not going to be buying as much as they would be or had in the past. A good barometer of this is the Baltic Dry Index which has plummeted over the past few weeks. China is the reason why the BDI expands and contracts, for the most part, and it shows that China is importing less because they are uncertain or at the very least done stockpiling for now. I believe that means Chinese companies are not doing much capex right now, I could be wrong, but I just don’t see it happening.

The other thing I know people will rip me apart on is the $1.7T, or there about, in cash U.S. companies has on its balance sheets. Many believe all that money will be spent or used to hire, well, what planet are you living on? How long has that money been there for? 6 – 9 months maybe a year now? This is like the cash on the sideline argument, it doesn’t hold water. I agree that eventually that money will go to work somewhere, but not now there is simply too much uncertainty out there. These companies will not go out and hire people, why would they do that, they just fired them? They don’t hire people just to give people jobs, that what governments do. The bottom line is there is no end demand right now, all the evidence shows that as the consumer is deleveraging and so are companies.

That money is sitting on the balance sheet right now because firms are worried about what is going to happen. Most firms paid down debt and are preparing to hunker down for a bad business environment for a long period of time which is why they are not raising dividends to much higher levels or buying new equipment. There is simply no reason to invest right now when the current employee level and technology can met their needs which is the problem with deflationary depressions. Over time this may change, but given what we see right now and the sharp drop in the leading indicators, drop in retail sales, etc. companies are just going to hold that cash until they absolutely have to spend it. I hope I am wrong, but it doesn’t look that way.

I believe that we have plenty of reasons to be worried this earnings season. There has been tremendous technical damage done to the S&P and unless we get stellar earnings and good guidance I do not see the markets going higher. The headwinds are just too strong right now and there is little sign that things are getting better, the opposite is true. I believe we are heading for an immense P/E multiple compression and that is a good thing for value investors, bad for those who own AAPL though. Speaking of which, AAPL is also another reason to be weary of the market right now, it is the only alpha holding out there, take that bad boy out and it will be like trying to get an elephant through an eye of a needle. Plus, if AAPL broke the trust they have with their users who can the people trust? Look for lower guidance.

I just read John Mauldlin’s weekly newsletter and he apparently got into a discussion over the much misunderstood and hated, by myself and many others, birth/death model used by the BLS. I have not been receiving the newsletter on a regular basis, some type of server issue I guess, but someone did not like what he had to say about it and I guess John misspoke about it. The whole thing about the birth/death model is it is meant to be a smoothing mechanism, I know that, everyone knows that, but it stinks and is not accurate which is what John ultimately said it was in his letter or at least it has not been accurate the last few years.

Now, I may have misspoke or led many to misunderstand what the birth/death model is and does. It is this little provision that helps the BLS make up for data they either do not receive back by survey participants or never receive, but it leaves room for interpretation and is never fixed in real time. In fact, they wait until February of the following year to correct any errors in the birth/death model that it may have had on the unemployment rate, fantastic, right? The model is not seasonally adjusted so when the BLS says 83,000 jobs were created it is not as if they added in the 147,000 (June’s B/D adjustment) figure to come up with that figure, that would be lying and a government agency would never do that.

Instead, what they do is add in the not seasonally adjusted B/D figure to the not seasonally adjusted employment figure and THEN seasonally adjust it. Now, you are thinking, big deal that shouldn’t make a big difference. Well, you may be right and you may be wrong. If you are talking 1M as a figure and the B/D adjustment is 50K it is no big deal, but if you are talking about a headline figure of 800K and the B/D adjustment is 147K (June figure) or 241K (May figure) well, you tell me, would that impact the seasonally adjusted figure? I would say yes it would. I have history on my side on this as well.

You see, in the fall of 2008 when Lehman collapsed and the world came to an end we all saw unemployment shoot to the moon, remember? Well, the BLS thought since so many people were losing their jobs and the business environment was so good that must be why so many survey respondents did not get back to them, they were busy making money! So, they added in hundreds of thousands of jobs from September of 2008 until the end of 2009. They were so aggressive in their B/D modeling they underestimated unemployment by 880,000 people, that is a pretty large underestimation by anyone’s standards considering the total ‘official’ unemployment total is 14M people and the underestimate for that time frame was about 10% of the total of the newly unemployed.

One could say, well, that is within the margin of error, but I don’t buy that since the government is the one who processes unemployment benefits and receives the initial claims data. In other words, it is pretty easy to correlate the data within a reasonable time frame, in my mind at least, but I am not a bureaucrat, so what do I know. Basically, if one removes the B/D figures from the non-seasonally figures and seasonally adjusts them you would have a bit of a difference in the monthly numbers. The series would be much more volatile, but it would also, in my mind, be more accurate and real time which seems to be something no one wants anymore with this figure which is why Santelli and Liesman get into screaming matches about it every first Friday of the month.

The bottom line is the adjustments matter, they boost the jobs number every month and they don’t come clean about any adjustments until the next year. That does not help anyone except for politicians and when more and more people are saying employment is now a leading indicator we need a better way to report unemployment. At the very least the BLS can correlate with the state data bases along with the household survey and that might give us a better view of what is going on. I think it is pretty much a proven fact that when we have the government guessing at any figure it is pretty much going to be wrong so why anyone would defend the B/D model is beyond me. The idea is fine, I guess, but how the BLS does it and how no one questions it, especially when it creeps up month after month when it really shouldn’t be, is very odd as, again, the only people who truly benefit from it is the political class.

I have written about money velocity at length and what I think will eventually happen and much of my thesis is about to be put to the test. For whatever reason the market seems to think massively shrinking consumer credit is a good thing and that the Federal Reserve will be starting a new QE process very soon, which is the news this afternoon that coincided with the parabolic move late in the day. However, I cannot disagree with this more and believe that any quantitative easing will do nothing to help expand credit or increase the money supply to the public. We have at the very least disinflationary forced if not outright deflation and the Fed is already running negative real interest rates.

If you recall about a year ago there was a paper from a Fed of IMF official, the authors name escapes me, that recommended real interest rates to run at -5% annually. At the time everyone thought the man was nuts and he was/is in my opinion, but the only way to get real rates that low is through loose money policy and quantitative easing. The Fed has maintained, and will continue to maintain a zero interest rate policy forever as far as I can tell, a loose monetary policy and performed the only quantitative easing policy the U.S. has ever seen, $1.5T in agency and U.S. treasury paper. Unfortunately we still have no idea what the long-term impact of these policies will be, but they cannot be good. These policies are causing real rates to go negative and mortgage rates to plummet.

In order to get the target rate to -5% the Fed will need to buy much more paper than it owns now. My guess is another $2-3T in additional paper and, again, we will not know what the impact of this QE program will be to our economy or currency for some time, but it will not be good. I am not sure why the Fed or this President cannot figure out that interest rates really don’t matter and declining credit is actually a good thing. In fact, all of the “bad news” is really long-term good news as far as the consumer is concerned, not the employment or housing data, but consumer credit. This de-leveraging is just what is needed as we were all awash in debt and most people cannot or could not ever repay their debts. I have never seen a government so desperate to reignite indebtedness of the public like we are seeing right now, it makes no sense long-term.

So, the Fed will start QE again, what will this do? Nothing. Will it increase the money supply? Yes, but not the public’s money supply merely the banking sectors balance sheet which is supposedly flush with cash anyhow. Banks are not lending money because they know they will not get repaid, but borrowers simply do not want more debt either, a good thing! We have mortgage rates below 4.6% and there is no demand, it just doesn’t get much better than that right now, although I think mortgage rates go sub 3% soon. Quantitative easing will do nothing to improve that situation and it certainly will not boost the confidence in the USD which is more than likely the goal, remember, the only way to double exports in 5 years is to devalue the dollar, but it will not work.

The point is that all the QE in the world will not put money in your pocket or your employer’s bank account to give you a raise. Essentially, from a monetary point of view the Fed is done as it cannot get money into the system. QE will merely create inflation, but not the kind of inflation Ben wants, Ben wants wage inflation and QE will merely create dollar devaluation which is Weimar Republic type of inflation. The public also does not want more games or trickery from the government and it frightens me to think what could happen if Ben goes down this reckless path. Remember, just because there is not an impact from his current policies today does not mean there will not be negative implications from these idiotic policies a year or 5 years from now.

What Ben will tell Obama is to create a direct QE program, i.e. a Bush style stimulus, a big one. I do not believe this will go over very well nor do I think voters are in any mood to be bribed with their own money this year, but if one is unemployed and offered $2,000 could or would they say no? Probably not. This type of stimulus would create what Ben is looking for, wage inflation and money velocity, but make no mistake it will be a short-term boost only. We have a long time before we are out of this mess and we have much pain ahead of us. We need to suck it up and deal with it. Contrary to popular belief it is not Bush’s fault, it is all politicians fault going back 30 years and the only cure is pain.

We will still look for an easy way out and probably do QE with another stimulus, but make no mistake that will be suicide for our countries long-term financial health and our currency will be in major trouble if we choose that path. I hate to say it, I have friends who are unemployed, but we must take the pain as it will be shorter than looking for the quick fix. We are all credit junkies and we got to kick the habit.

It is official, bad news is now permanently good news. I am not sure how this happened or why this happened, but this is the case as CNBC just confirmed that 454,000 initial claims were below expectations and continuing claims declined by 224,000. This sounds like great news until you realize that, well, continuing claims fell off because Congress did not reauthorize extended unemployment benefits, which has happened before I might add, and initial claims came in light because of the holiday week, just as I thought. Nevertheless, how we can be 3 years into this thing and think a print of -454,000 on initial claims with over $1T in stimulus spending is a good thing is disingenuous and, in all honesty idiotic. However, this is what we are being told by the talking heads, 454,000 initial claims are a good thing in the new normal.

One must trade the market that is in front of them regardless of what the data says, even though one knows the data smacks of a double dip or at least a massive slowdown at the least. Retail sales figures came in as well and if you were paying attention only the nice figures were making headlines, like JW Nordstrom +14.1% vs. 9% est. and Abercrombie +9% vs. 2.8% est., but these numbers were not encouraging as total expectations were for retail sales to come in at 3.2% and they came in at 2.8%. The really sad news is that these numbers were reduced in recent weeks because analysts knew the figures would be weak and the stores had pretty good sales as well. Consumers just are not buying the way they were used to and I know the argument is going to be, well this is June and the numbers are always weak in June. Sure, I will give you that, but the analysts know this and adjust accordingly and, more importantly, the chains know this and run deeper discounts to drive traffic. Look what happened, not very encouraging.

The discounters were even a mixed bag, Target missed estimates by 1% to the downside, Kohl’s missed by .5% to the downside, TJX missed by 1.2% to the downside, BJ’s Wholesale was off by 1.2%, the Gap was off by 3.4% and Costco was off 2.6%. I guess the bright spot was the high end retailer who had some solid numbers, Macy’s beat by .4%, Saks beat by .5%, Nordstrom’s beat by 4.5%, the Limited beat by 2.8% and Dillard’s, not really high end, but throwing it in, beat by 3%. This is a pretty big disparity between the discounters and the higher end retailers which raises the question of why the difference is so large.

The answer is pretty simple, first the wealthy shoppers are still wealthy and are more than likely taking advantage of deeper discounts at the high end stores. Don’t kid yourself, the high end retailers are cutting prices to drive traffic, everyone is including Walmart. Second, the discounters customers who were relying on their unemployment benefits had the rug pulled out from under them in some cases or knew it was coming so they cut back even more. The wealthy shopper can spend more and the less wealthy are still tightening their belts and this trend will continue for the foreseeable future.

Overall, this was one month of data, but the trend is on track, frugality. Same store sales did disappoint and I am a little surprised, actually I am not, that no one is mentioning the overall miss of .4% (overall expectations of 3.2% versus actual of 2.8%). Instead expect to hear about Nordstrom’s all day long today as the beacon of light in the retail world as the consumer comes flooding back to the stores as if they don’t have a care in the world. Even though some 454,000 just got their pink slip last week before our nations fabled birthday, for the record, last week’s claims were revised UP to 475K and the 2 week total for Americans receiving their pink slips were 929,000. So, congratulations all you lucky people, the world is turning around because apparently you being fired is great news for the economy, or just Wall Street. We officially live in Bizarro World now.

Today was interesting to say the least, a massive rally on the back of no real news, I guess stress tests that really don’t stress banks balance sheets were the primary driver along with a technical bounce, but other than that all the other news was negative. Let’s review the bullish news that moves the markets 3%. Dallas Fed President Fisher calls out Congress and the President by saying they are inhibiting growth by creating confusion, no surprise there. Delinquencies on homes are stabilizing at extremely high levels, CNBC.com. Reis Inc. released a report showing that retail shopping center vacancies are rivaling all-time highs at 10.9% and rents are dropping, they should recovery by 2016, somehow that must be bullish. Lindsay Lohan is going to jail, I guess, for 90 days, now that really is bullish for whoever makes the drugs to sober people up.

I guess on the heels of all that bullish news it is little wonder that the market rallied so hard today. The only other piece of news that would have sent us to 11,000 for sure is if we declared war on Iran, based on this track record.  We blew through several layers of resistance on the SPY, which I am short and yes today did hurt, thank you for asking, and we could reach as high as $107.12 on the SPY, but overall it is still in a bearish trend, sorry. The volume was nothing to write home about today either and, frankly, yesterday’s mammoth reversal speaks volumes about the condition of this market, it is structurally unsound. However, we have some pretty big news coming up Thursday morning, retail sales and initial claims data will dominate the headlines.

First, if you watched CNBC this morning and caught El-Erain from PIMCO he said something you might have heard before. He said; “Unemployment is no longer a lagging indicator, but a leading indicator.” Any idea where you would have read that? I have been saying that for months now and many have said some pretty nasty things to me about making that claim. What El-Erain and PIMCO have figured out and the people who have no clue that a “V” shaped recovery does not exist have not figured out is that in a post credit collapse world unemployment is not a symptom of the cancer, but part of the actual cancer itself. If the credit collapse occurred because people could not pay their bills it would stand to reason that the more people who are unemployed the worse the problem will get. Perhaps this is why mortgage modifications are failing and defaults are picking up on credit products, depending on how a default is actually measured nowadays. It is just nice to have a high profile person repeat what you have been saying even though he has no clue who I am.

As for the initial claims tomorrow, my guess is that they will be ugly, again, as in +450,000, but less than the 472,000 from the week before because of the July 4^th holiday. Employers tend not to fire people before the holidays, but they will be elevated in my opinion. If, for some reason, initial claims are above 470,000 that will be horrible news and my guess is that will merit a reversal of fortunes in the markets. It is just amazing that we are coming up on 3 years into this thing and we are still seeing initial claims coming in at well over 400K a week. I know the President likes to make the claim that when he came into office over 750,000 people were filing for initial claims a week, but that was for only a few weeks during the peak of the crisis and, frankly, the fact that we have stabilized at 450K a week is nothing to really brag about, sorry.

To make matters worse the emergency extension of unemployment benefits were not passed before Congress went home for the holiday. That left almost 2M people without unemployment benefits and, in my opinion, that will have an impact on retail sales. How much of an impact? I do not know, but more than most people think. The other major thing people have to remember about retail sales is that many retailers closed a ton of underperforming stores so you are looking at retail sales numbers from the top performing stores they have to offer. No longer can we say that these figures include the dogs of the industry which means the figures you see can actually be much weaker, or stronger, than they initially appear. Regardless, credit is still contracting, unemployment is still sky high and that means retail sales are probably not going to be as strong as most people think, but analysts knew this and started heavily revising estimates lower. Not to mention that retailers have zero pricing power so even if sales are good their margins are going to be miniscule.

There is little to be bullish about out there as all the data has been bad and should not be read any differently than being bad. The ISM was bad, the employment report was bad, the housing data is horrible, the political picture is uncertain and the charts are certainly bearish, just look at the RUT. I am not saying don’t own stocks, but be careful what you own, strong balance sheets and dividends are key. Anyone outright bullish on this market is either selling you a fund or is simply out of their mind. Patience is key and there is no need to jump into any stock for any reason as we are in for a bumpy ride. I don’t even think earnings season will do much for us, sure 2Q10 earnings will be good, but the outlook will be not so bullish.