Listening to the talking heads TV and our political leaders about this debt crisis is merely subjecting you to unneeded heartburn. First and foremost, the USA is not “defaulting” on anything on August 2nd, period. The USA will not be downgraded on August 2nd by any of the ratings agencies, even though we should not be carrying the AAA rating to begin with. Bonds only default is interest or principal payments which will not happen on August 2nd as the Treasury brings in enough money to cover our debt payments on a monthly basis. Social Security checks and Medicaid/care checks will go out and the sun will rise in the East and set in the West.

All that happens on August 2nd is the Treasury Department looses the ability to issue new debt beyond the stated debt ceiling. I have not witnessed such scare tactics in my entire life and the misinformation the media and politicians are giving the public is shameful. In fact this entire debate is shameful as we are not having an honest discussion about debt and the US government. Everything you hear being discussed is merely kicking the can further down the road and I believe the markets will not let this can kicking continue on forever. Everything comes to an end at some point and our crazy spending will have to end and we all need to pay the Piper.

Let’s get real about our debt problem. We are hearing all sorts of nonsense about $4T in deficit reducing spending cuts or a combination of cuts with higher taxes over a ten year period. That means we are raising taxes or cutting spending, or a combination thereof, of $400B a year, big deal. If we subtract the $400B a year from our recent annual deficits we are still running $1 to $1.2T of deficits per year for as far as we can see. These tax hikes and spending cuts are meaningless to our long-term financial health and all the talk we are hearing from Washington or the other experts is meaningless until they lay out the facts like I just did. In my opinion even if we raised taxes and cut spending by $400B a year the USA will be downgraded within 2 years anyhow, which is what should have happened a long time ago.

The talk we are hearing from the left about wasted tax surpluses is so far off base it is ridiculous. The talk from the right about spending controls and how a 4% tax increase will kill jobs is equally as moronic. The surpluses in the late 1990’s and in 2000 were bogus to begin with. We had massive surpluses on Social Security and Medicare which the government simply took and replaced the entitlement surpluses with IOU’s and called them budget surpluses. It was accounting gimmickry and those surpluses should have remained in the entitlement programs. Do tax cuts really spur more jobs? I don’t think so and there is no proof that it does either. What spurred job growth in the 1990’s was technology. What spurred job growth in the 2000’s was housing, both bubbles I might add, but in both cases it was a new “killer app” that spurred economic growth and I do not believe we have anything like that in today’s world. Not to say we couldn’t have a new technology or other “killer app” materializes as fast as tomorrow, but there simply is nothing I see right now that will spur growth and jobs which is the real problem here.

Most people do not want to hear this, but taxes do need to go up, I hate taxes for the record. To prove my point we often hear the right complain that 47% of the USA’s citizens do not pay anything in taxes. Well, if you are going to use that line you simply cannot support tax cuts. Why would I say such a thing? Well, it was the Bush Tax cuts that caused 47% of people to not pay anything, which is not exactly true either, in taxes. The reductions in middle class tax rates were massive and the lowest tax bracket was erased. It is also important to realize that 20-30% of the population will never pay taxes because they do not earn enough to live on.

The Bush tax cuts, all of them, cost the USA $3.7T over a 10 year period or $370B a year, interesting figure don’t you think? The left says the rich need to pay more, but the rich in terms of the Bush tax cuts only account for $700B over 10 years. Raising the top income tax brackets only raises $70B a year which is nothing when we are spending $4T a year. Simply raising taxes on the rich will do nothing to solve our problems as it is the totality of the Bush tax cuts that are part of the problem. I do not like taxes, but let’s get real about this, OK? We cannot reduce our debt with phantom spending cuts and tax increases on a select few people, everyone needs to pay up.

We are in serious trouble and no one has put it all together yet. It is unreal to me that the President can say; “I cannot guarantee that Social Security checks will go out on August 3rd” and no one questioned him about why that would be. Social Security was supposed to be fine until 2036 and self funded but if we cannot issue new debt the checks will not go out… what! Well, our Einstein news anchors and the political talking heads simply do not want you to know that Social Security has no money in it, it is broke. I just talked about this earlier, our political leaders took the surpluses in Social Security and spent it replacing those surpluses with IOU’s. Since Social Security has only IOU’s in order for checks to go out the government must issue debt. That should scare you to death, we have to fund Social Security with debt. That is also why Social Security can never be privatized either. However, no one has put this together yet, unreal.

The fact that the US government cannot do anything without issuing new debt should be a real wake up call for the citizens of the USA, but no one seems to get it. The USA, the so called richest nation in the world, is bankrupt! If we cannot survive without using the credit card we are technically insolvent, if I am wrong what would you call it? The USA has also never paid of our debt, except for when Andrew Jackson was president, and simply rolled over all of our national debt year after year and this was hidden from you by using certain terms like we retired the 30 year treasury instead of we called in and paid off all of our 30 year treasuries, we simply rolled that debt into shorter term debt instruments. The USA also has “grown” our way out of recessions and past debt problems. Growing our GDP is a great way to hide the debt problem and it causes the government to do everything possible to always grow our GDP which is why hedonics accounts for over $2T of our annual GDP, hedonics is made up benefits for certain things like free checking, Google it.

You should be terrified about what you are seeing and not because we are going to “default” but because this whole show is basically telling you how bankrupt the USA really is. If our world shuts down because we cannot issue new debt we are in huge trouble and that is exactly what is happening now. The reasons I have listed here are the reason why everyone should own gold and silver as it is the ultimate hedge against out of control government spending and if the truth was ever told we have already defaulted on our debt through depreciation of the dollar and by simply rolling over old debt into new debt. If we ever really got real about our debt issues I can assure you that the story is even scarier than what I have just laid out. Luckily we have politicians that will always lie to us and hide the truth until it is so obvious you already knew it and it is too late to do anything about it. Good day and good luck.

I am not a fan of the current administration, I think most people know this by now and no I am not a racist or anti-government, but the action lately has just gone over the top of prudent governance. Joe Biden, at a fund raising event, said that the economy will be adding 500,000 jobs a month in the near future. Joe, whatever you are smoking, please pass it because you are feeling no pain and I could use that for a little while.

The notion that this economy will create 500K jobs a month in the “next few months” is absurd and irresponsible. How in the world will this happen? We are still seeing 450K+ a week in initial claims which shows that employers are still laying people off. The work week is still well below 40 hours, coming in at a little over 33 hours a week, and wages are starting to deflate. If this economy was going to create 500K jobs in the next few months we would not be seeing what we are seeing. I understand this administration is under tremendous pressure to boost employment, but there is a difference between giving people hope and flat out lying, Joe is doing the latter.

I suspect he made this statement because census hiring will kick into high gear for April and with the passage of the health care bill the government will begin hiring for the new agencies being created. However, those jobs are not “real” jobs, yes they pay people and they do work, but they are not private sector jobs which actually create products or services. Government jobs create nothing and are actually a drain on the citizens of the country as the salaries for these positions must be paid for by some type of tax or fee which sucks capital out of the economy.

Clearly Joe was being Joe when he made that statement because, as usual, it was reckless and inaccurate, like most of the things Mr. This is a Big F****** Deal says. I see a trend with this administration that is eerily like that of FDR’s administration, please read The Great Depression: A Diary by Benjamin Roth to see the similarities, which would not stand for criticism of any kind. I get many do not like the Tea Party because there are a few nut jobs in the crowd, as with any crowed, but look at what they are doing to them. They branded them anti-government, racist and dumb which is largely unfounded accusations and I seem to recall liberal rallies which were supported by the Democrats as citizens exercising their right to free speech. However, when the speech is criticizing the Democrats, well, they can’t have that now, can they?

Regardless, let’s take a look at another report about the health care bill. A new report from the Associated Press today says the bill will cost far more than what was projected by the CBO and by the Democrats, are you really surprised by this? The bill will cost $311B between 2010 – 2019 and, which the CBO already admitted, will raise premiums for everyone. However, there is way more cost than most people think about, let’s take a look at some back of the envelope costs.

The bill mandates that everyone has to have coverage or face a fine, but because of this mandate the government will offer generous subsidies up to individuals/couples making $88K a year. Who knows if these subsidies get bigger or smaller in the future, but we will use what we know for sure. The good news is that the poor will get “free” coverage and as your income increases so will the amount you will have to pay. The range of premiums owed is based on a sliding scale and will cost you between, assuming you make less than $88K, 3% – 9.5% of your income.

That is a heavy burden on a family even making $88K a year and for the kind of poor, making, say, $50K a year, you are taking a big chunk of a person’s income which they have no choice but to pay. On $50K a year they will end up paying about $1,500 a year for health insurance, $125/month, that is a lot of money considering the bi-weekly pay is about $1,200 for someone in that income range. This means that money will impact their standard of living perhaps preventing them from even owning a home. At the very least this bill will pull billions out of the economy every year, that is not what we need right now.

If we look at the 32M this bill will insure times the estimated about they will have to pay, the number gets pretty ugly. If we assume the average person will pay $3,500 a year in premiums, who much money will that take out of the economy? The answer, $112,000,000,000, almost 1% of the current GDP. If we look at the average subsidy you will receive, which the government, i.e. other taxpayers, will provide people, how much would that be? The answer, $288,000,000,000 (32M x $9,500 – average subsidy by my calculations based on current insurance premiums on an annual basis). I am not sure how Congress came up with the cost of this bill being only $930B or so, but I do not want whoever crunched those numbers to do my taxes.

The point I am making is that this bill which is being bragged about by the Democrats is not good for business and not good for the middle class. Let’s not forget that the real middle class, couple, will more than likely make more than $88K per year which means no subsidy at all for them. Paying for a $12K or $1,000 a month for a health insurance policy is a lot to ask. Most people do not realize that making $100K in today’s world is not that much money, after taxes, mortgage payments, property taxes, energy costs, kids and so forth.

The worst part is that the GAO has estimated that by 2020 93 cents on every dollar collected by the government through taxes will have to go towards entitlement programs. That means only a small portion will be available to go towards everything else we have, you know, like debt servicing costs. Does anyone think taxes on everyone are not going to go higher? I know, they promised that only the rich will pay higher taxes, news flash, politicians lie, shocking. If we do not have a VAT, value added tax, it will have to come from higher income taxes and, more than likely, we will end up with a VAT AND income taxes which would be horrible. I am not even going to go into the tax base they used to calculate this, but I will say it is absurd.

No one did not want to reform health care we just wanted it done right. I think people would have been for the stimulus if it was done right. The problem is that these programs were not done right and will cost us all dearly in the future. This is not about party lines, the Republicans stink as well, this is about the countries very survival. To put this into perspective, Obama just said I walked into a bad situation with trillion dollar deficits and $8T in national debt. Well, it is Obama’s second year in office and the national debt is now reaching $13T and somewhere along the way we are being told that 2 wrongs make a right, because bush did it first.

This is unsustainable and I mean any annual deficit is now unsustainable. Adding even $500B a year is irresponsible and will have catastrophic consequences let alone adding trillions more to this figure. People say we have to run deficits because we have trade deficits. What they don’t tell you is our trade deficits are not that big and we have enough debt outstanding that would cover our trade deficits for a very, very long time. I believe we are past the point of no return and freezing spending after increasing the budgets of government agencies by 20% is doing nothing to reduce our long-term debt obligations. Just like we are seeing in Greece now, this will all come to ahead very soon and who will bail us out?

In the meantime, if you actually believe we will have 500K a month job growth in the next few months while initial claims come in at 450K per week, pass me whatever you’re smoking.



I have been on the phone trying to get through to my Congressman, Dan Maffei (D), all day long to voice my opposition to what is going on in Washington. His phone was busy and I finally got his voice mail which was full, but I wanted to give him a piece of my mind so I kept calling until I got through. I left him a scathing message with less than polite language so if you do not hear from me send care packages to GITMO c/o Ray. I really do not care what side of the issue you are on, but I hope you are voicing your opinion to your representative. I am opposed to the current bill and want them to start over. I am not in the camp of “there is nothing wrong here,” but this thing has gotten way out of hand.

Many of you know my position on this bill, it is bad news for the country, and even more shockingly is the fact that Congress went back into hiding to hammer out the details again. This whole thing is like watching a plane crash and you have 2 choices, get in front of it so it ends quickly or stay where you are and risk catching fire, both choices are bad. What is worse is the fact that they may not actually vote on the bill itself, but use a procedure that “deems it approved” which is crazy. Again we are hearing, well the Republicans did it hundreds of times, I am sure that is true, but on something this big? I think not.

The people deserve to know how their representatives are voting on this bill, either for or against, so the voter can voice their opinion at the polls in November, either for or against. To me this whole thing is just amazing and unreal as we just wrapped up the worst 8 years in American history, well, that I have been alive for at least, and now just as we thought we got rid of a tone deaf administration another tone deaf administration has taken its place. What makes this dangerous is the fact that Obama is an ego maniac, in my opinion, and refuses to admit that he is going against the peoples will, so much for change.

As many of you know, I have also been in the insurance industry for many years, I know how this stuff works. I am well connected in the research area and do a ton of consulting, which is why I am not posting as often now. I often get calls from Senators or Congress members seeking opinions on various topics, they know who I am. Now, here we are in the midst of one of the most important legislative changes ever to hit the insurance industry and guess how many calls I have received? None. Not only have I not received any calls, but neither have any of my other geeky friends who work in this industry. Now, how can this be? How can this bill be vetted by people in the industry when, myself not necessarily included, some of the brightest people I know of in the insurance industry never got one call from even the lowliest intern from Congress?

It makes no sense and it should make you concerned because lawyers are great at lawyer stuff, but they are not good at figuring out insurance issues. Most probably do not even know what the mortality tables look like or what tables we are even using now. They have no idea on how to balance risk or spread it around and I got news for you, there is no way you can insure everyone, pre-existing conditions or otherwise, without raising premiums through the roof. Especially if you eliminate annual or lifetime caps, it is just not possible because you need to pool the risk. To make matters worse, if we continue with the archaic state system that we have now it will be a complete disaster as there is no way to spread geographical risk. It makes my head hurt just thinking about what they are doing.

We need to do something, I agree with that, but this is insane and I guarantee you it is not what you think. Premiums will go higher now until 2014 and then, who knows what will happen because we have not seen the bill yet, however I am sure it is not good news for you. I am extremely sensitive to this topic as it impacts me more than it does the average person, but it is not possible to insure everyone and maintain good quality care. This is where I get into the argument I hear a lot from the left, they claim the U.N. says we are 37^th in terms of the quality of health care. First, the U.N. holds little weight with me as they seem to not really like us. Second, how can we add another 31M people to the system and expect to improve the quality of health care? It is not possible.

If what I think happens actually happens, many doctors will leave, the New England Journal of Medicine says one third of doctors will leave the business if this thing passes. Again, how would this increase the quality of care? With Dennis Kucinich all of a sudden signing on to this thing it makes me wonder what really happened when he was on Air Force One. Dennis is a public option fan and he was dead set against this bill, which is the Senate bill, but again, who really knows. Did Obama promise that the public option was on the way in the future? I suspect it is at some point and if it is doctors will leave the business. Medicare pays $26 an office visit, do you think doctors can stay in business at $26 a pop? Not a chance.

Maybe we could do it better than a Canada or a UK, but at the end of the day, I am not a fan of the government involved in my life. I do not want the government to know what drugs I am on, prescription I mean, or what health issues I might have. We also know that Medicare is a favorite for politicians to cut funding from, they tend to do it a lot, so when it becomes so large, on top of our debt, what do you think they will do to save money? They will cut health care, it is that simple. History shows what our elected officials will do and it is always in their best interests, never yours. I do not want even a stepping stone to a single payer system. However, I want some things down and you cannot tell me that you could not win an up or down vote on outlawing a preexisting condition clause on insurance contracts.

The last thing we need is more secrecy in Washington, but that is what we are getting. We have lazy politicians who do not want to start over because it is too hard, they do work for us you now, but that is what needs to be done. I highly recommend you call your representative and let them know where you stand and that you will remember their vote in November. However, I encourage you to say no to this bill, mostly because they keep changing it (!) and tell them to start over.

Haven’t we learned anything about legacy political leaders after the Bush years and countless other Congressional leaders who “inherited” their seat from a parent? Part of the reason the US is in shambles is because we elect these people, why I do not know, and they are ignorant about the problems the country faces. It is no secret that Mario Cuomo was extremely liberal and responsible, in my view, for NY States horrible financial condition because of his socially liberal programs. While I was young during his reign even I knew he was a terrible governor, but we elected Pataki twice so New Yorkers are not known for picking the better candidates.

Now we might be living under another Cuomo who is also a terrible leader and, as Dick Bove claims, largely responsible for the GSE’s collapse. According to Bove, Cuomo’s relentless pursuit to force Freddie and Fannie to loan to the poor led to the GSE’s into buying sub-prime mortgages and eventually their collapse. Frankly, in my opinion, Mr. Bove is correct, you will not hear me agree with Bove much I might add. Cuomo took the GSE’s and many banks to court because of discrimination, some of which I am sure is true, but his main problem was that banks were not loaning money to the poor. Now, I am not a rocket scientist, but I do know if you loan money to poor people who do not have the ability to pay back loans they will eventually default. The banks knew this and that is why they did not lend money to the poor, yes, some discrimination probably existed though.

Because of his zealous behavior we know have had to guarantee Freddie and Fannie for unlimited losses, which is also why the Fed will stop buying MBS’s as well because the GSE’s can now pick up the slack. With NY in such dire straits, and we are, is it wise to elect another lawyer to the governors position? I think not. Surprisingly, I actually like our current governor, who is a Democrat, because for all of his faults he realizes what a horrible position NY is in. He is actually trying to cut spending, but is met with the same corrupt response from the unions and Assembly that usually appears when you try to take money away from their interests.

Patterson is a mess and not the best person for the job, but I would vote for him over Cuomo any day of the week. Of course, Obama and other NY Democrats want him out, are you really surprised over the recent scandals breaking? My belief is that these timely scandals are appearing because Patterson is trying to cut spending which will impact many social programs like schools and welfare. Those are the Democrats pet projects and by cutting spending there, which is the primary reason for our fiscal distress I might add, he was a marked man and is now out.

Cuomo will be a party man upping the spending as much as the market will allow, but that will not be too much more given our deficits. He will do what he is told and not make those hard decisions because he is just like his father, a tax and spend liberal without the knowledge on how to pay for it. It is far easier to get reelected when you make your base happy and paper over the major problems. However, our problems here are so severe they cannot be papered over any longer. They have already robbed the highway and bridge trust fund to pay for the interest on our debt, that money was supposed to be secured for, well, highways and bridges.

How anyone can look to this man or to the Democratic Party in NY is beyond me. They have shown themselves to be horrible when it comes to financial issues and refuse to make the hard decisions. I am referring to NY Democrats not Democrats nationwide. I will not vote for him and I will find it difficult to vote for the Republican challenger, Rick Lazio is potentially the R’s candidate, because politics in NY have not changed. They simply pick the next person in line who is ‘due’ for the next run at a major office. I almost hope we go into receivership as it will let some sane court appoint conservator to get rip of the ridiculous contracts the unions have and, ultimately, uncover all of the corruption we know exists, but has been masterfully hidden from the public.

Senator Jim Bunning who was more upset over missing a basketball game than helping his fellow citizens by objecting to an extension of unemployment benefits. Now, keep in mind it was Senator Bunning, (R) from Kentucky, who prevented himself from seeing his precious game and could have easily DVR’d it, or better yet just stopped his foolish objection to the measure. I just do not get how this guy could balk at a minor, considering the size of other bills recently passed, $10B in spending that goes directly to the people and not to banks is simply beyond me.

Mr. Bunning could have stopped the spending of hundreds of billions of dollars in the past, but decided that this measure, a true sign of how horrible the economy really is, was the time to take a stand against spending. He had no problem voting for Bush’s crazy spending without those programs being paid for, but this $10B for an extension of unemployment benefits, wow. There is simply not much to say about this guy except e will not be missed when he retires this year. I am willing to bet that if we add up all the freebies he gave to corporate America this extension of unemployment benefits probably would be close to the bottom of the list as far as the price tag is concerned.

I am totally against spending without paying for it, I think we all are, but there are exceptions to the rule. When you are cutting off millions from badly needed benefits that pay the mortgage and put food on the table for those who are unemployed I think that qualifies you for being heartless. There are currently 6 people searching for every 1 job in America. The percentage of people collecting unemployment benefits for 26 weeks or longer has never been higher. We are 2 years into this recession and we are still losing jobs and this is the type of representation we have in Congress?

I think there is no wonder why Americans, and the Brits now, are signing on to the Tea Party, at least they are not the same 2 irresponsible parties we have to choose from now. I realize what the Tea Party is and am not a huge believer in it, but I get what the average person believes, it is something different than the status quo. Unfortunately, the founders are probably a bunch of right wing nut jobs trying to bring the country back to a hard right path. Regardless, with leadership like we have now there is no wonder why people are seeking something new and different, but we should always be careful what we wish for.

The bottom line is that Senator Bunning is a jackass and whatever axe he has to grind he should leave the American people out of it. When you think about it, you must really be a screw-up when your own party says that you do not represent the body of the whole and side with the opposition against you. Think about that Jimmy.

As I conduct my regular daily readings of various blogs and news sites I cannot help to get a very uneasy feeling brewing out there. The negativity is running very high in the political realm and from those who report on economic events. I keep seeing tag lines like; “expect more social unrest” when people report on things like the Berkley protests, which are disturbingly violent I might add. When I hit my favorite Libertarian blogs the feeling is more uneasy as I keep seeing words like revolution being used.

When you add in the Washington factor where our elected leaders are going to hammer unpopular legislation through, with no compromise, it makes me even more uneasy. There is no doubt that we need to make painful decisions in order to get our fiscal house in order, but that usually means less spending, not more. Unfortunately, our current political leaders do not see it that way and are hammering through more spending, in particular the health care reform bill. Look, I know we need to do something, but not this. Deducting money from Medicare and then adding it back in to other areas is not rational, this bill is not paid for and will make costs rise not fall.

Regardless, people are not happy about unpopular legislation being thrown down their thoughts. The kicker is that people like Nancy Pelosi come out and say that programs like Social Security and Medicare were unpopular when they were enacted. I guess what she means is that politicians know what is best for Americans and we should keep our mouths shut. We all know how right politicians are their track record speaks for itself just look at the stellar decisions they made over the last 10 years. Iraq was a great decision, the prescription drug coverage was fantastic (albeit unpaid for), the PATRIOT Act was a winner, free speech zones were fantastic, how many stimulus bills did we have again – they worked out well, eliminating a paper trail for voting is a sure disaster waiting to happen, and need I go on?

Politicians do not know what is good for Americans, they know what is good for them and getting reelected. Well, they did used to know how to get elected until now. If they pass this next unpopular batch of legislative nightmare on the docket they are in for a rude awakening come November because the people are coming for them. My only hope is that people come for them at the polls and not in any other way. Based on what I have read combined with the recent plane crash in Texas into the IRS building I think we might see more people going out to make a statement. Meaning, some nut job will more than likely blow something up or worse.

Who knows what will happen in the future, but we know that the average person feels left out right now. Wall Street got their massive bonuses and, for them, nothing really changed with the exception of having to play defense in the media. At the end of the day, the average person knows they got nothing over the past 2 years except for a higher future tax bill and, maybe, they got to keep their job, but we know about 20% of Americans were not so lucky as they are either unemployed or underemployed. Wall Street though, they are fine. Washington, well, they are doing OK as well as campaign contributions, from Wall Street, are still coming in and many have received raises. Clearly, there is a double standard and John Edwards was completely right when he said there are 2 Americas.

Discontent is here and that discontent could become a powder keg if not rectified. The unfortunate thing is I do not see how the public can be pacified, especially as this thing we are in deepens as we are now seeing. Things could get ugly and politicians need to figure out that they are representing the people and start acting that way. It is beyond me how they cannot see that Americans view them as being on the wrong path, but, again, that is politics and they will be surprised if they get voted out in November.

I was reflecting on events this past weekend trying to put a game plan together and weighing what is going on in the world. I can honestly admit that I do not know what will happen, no one ever really knows, but I do know that things are very uncertain in our world. We are all in the same boat and trying to make decisions that are best for our families, our wallets and our piece of mind. Unfortunately many of the things we are planning for are outside of our control.

It is reasonable safe to assume that our futures never depended more on the decisions that are coming out of Washington, well, at least not since the 1930’s at least. However, Washington is now only one piece of the pie as our world is walking in stride as one. While decisions in Washington directly impact our lives, for the love of God pay attention to what they are doing, now we are also faced with the consequences of decisions that come from China and the EU. Decisions made overseas will have a direct impact on what happens here in the USA and on our investments. Never before have the world markets have been so in tune with each other. In fact, you would be surprised to see that the correlations between all the markets follow each other so closely over the past 6 years or so.

This correlation has really put the efficient frontier and diversification risk reduction strategy into question. In other words, diversification between international and domestic equities might not reduce risk as much as we think, I will get charts to prove that when I get the go ahead to publish them. The irony is that it is not so much markets ruling the day, but politics. The decisions that come from governments now impact the markets much more than you might care to realize. This is important considering that government stimulus from around the world is largely responsible for propping up global growth at this point in time.

Domestically, I was watching parts of CPAC this weekend and was extremely disappointed in what I saw. Granted, I did not watch the whole thing, but enough to know that the R’s, as in Republicans, have no idea what they are doing. Unfortunately, either do the D’s, as in Democrats, know what they are doing either. Both parties fail to take responsibility for their actions and neither party really understands the issues facing the country at this point in time. Sure, they talk a good game about fiscal responsibility, but neither is serious and, frankly, the R’s have grown government way more than the D’s have over the past 30 years. In fact, Ronald Reagan had grown the deficit by a whopping 189% yet we credit him with being a fiscal conservative, huh?

While many of you may think I am a right winger I am not, I am a political atheist. It is not that I do not take a stand on any issues or beliefs I have just come to the conclusion that the party I would belong to simply does not exist at this time. If I were to align myself with any party it would be the Libertarian Party on the strong money principle, but I also recognize that the free markets will never be able to regulate themselves. The proof of this was 2003-2007 as the free market rolled on and some Einstein somewhere thought it would be a good idea to push no document loans to anyone who would be foolish enough to take one. You cannot honestly tell me that these incredibly smart people did not know these things were bad loans at the time. They knew and they also knew that they only needed a couple multimillion dollar bonuses to be happy.

My point is that we have no real political leadership and they simply are pushing what they believe is the right policies. However, they do not know what they do and they do not understand that the problems facing America are those silly policies to begin with. To them, though, it is all about reelection and keeping their power, if that is not a true statement then we would have had term limits on Congress instituted decades ago, but we don’t. It comes down to the real fundamental problem in America is that we do not have the will to make those tough decisions. I really believe that the products we buy demonstrate our beliefs and we have way to many “I” products being bought which means we all only care about ourselves.

All of this adds to the uncertainty that I feel and the feeling I have in my gut is growing by the day. There are so many problems out there that are not being addressed and when we do address them we simply throw billions of dollars at it which merely wallpapers over the roots of the problems we face. The very problem that we have is that we are waiting for Washington to solve our problems. How can we expect self serving Congressman or Senators to solve the problems we face? Half of them are multimillionaires and the other half are probably on the take somewhere along the way. Yet we trust them to solve our problems or understand the average person, good luck with that.

I watched this weekend as former politicians lambasted Obama while they ignored their roles in the problems we have. I watched them blatantly distort the facts about where we are and how we got here, sorry folks, but it took a whole lot longer than 1 year to get to where we are. I watched them roll out with no new ideas or inspirational speeches and I distinctly got the feeling that they simply think that because they have an R in front of their name they will get elected because they are different from the President’s party. Maybe they will, but I think it will be much harder than they think because 10% unemployment, 18% by U-6 or much higher if we re-add the people the BLS removed from the labor force, is a real problem that both parties have to take responsibility for.

On top of the domestic political uncertainty we have global uncertainty. We have Europe in or on the brink of a major crisis with the PIGS. We have China who is really upset over us, do you blame them (?), over selling weapons to Taiwan and the Dali Lama, not to mention the mini trade war we have brewing. China is also taking their stimulus off the table, or so it appears, along with India. Those economies play a huge role in the global growth story and if they are tightening their belts this is a problem for that story.

Finally we have Iran, of how I love the nut jobs in Iran, whose leaders are actively seeking to become a nuclear country. While they technically are a nuclear country they want to take this to a much higher level with missiles and warheads. Call me crazy, but I have a real problem with a country that has loose cannons running it and they have reached a level where they have nuclear fuel along with a missile that can reach orbit. Sorry folks, but the story about the mouse they launched into space was not about a mouse and it shows their intentions which should make us all very nervous. Thank God I do not have to make policy decisions about what to do about them. I just hope Obama and company make the right decisions in regards to handling them.

All of this uncertainty is not being felt by me alone, but by millions of people. There seems to be no end to it and as each day passes more uncertainty gets added to the fire. The odd thing about this is that the markets just do not care. I guess when computers trade some 60% of the volume on the exchanges, according to CNBC, the uncertainty does not matter. Regardless, it is clear that no matter who is in charge or making the decisions their options are becoming very limited and the outcomes are all looking the same. The best case scenario I foresee is massive inflation and dollar devaluation, over a few years time, and the best case scenario is massive inflation and dollar devaluation.

As I stated earlier, the only thing we can do is pay attention to what is going on and make the best decisions we can for ourselves and our families. I have several friends, smart people I might add with CFA’s and MBA’s, who are leaving the country or adhering to the guns, gold and God philosophy. I have honestly never seen such smart people head for the hills like this before. I am not in that camp, although I do love gold and precious metals, but they might just be right. However, it is possible, I guess, that all of this uncertainty will pass by and everything will be fine, but mathematically speaking, well, I give that a very low probability.

We are all a little biased towards ourselves and most people are likely to not judge themselves harshly. Even mass murderers tend to justify or view their actions as moral or for the greater good, well many of them anyhow. My point is that when we are faced with a question about our performance we tend to spin it in the best possible light, another great example is Goldman Sachs spinning their huge bonuses as God’s work. The reason why I bring this up is because our President was asked to grade himself during an interview a few weeks ago and he gave himself a “solid B+” which is absurd.

The reason why he should have avoided the question altogether is because he has not completed one campaign promise to the people, except for higher taxes. Health care was done behind closed doors, Gitmo is open, Iraq is still somewhere, Afghanistan is getting more involved 9a big mistake I might add), and unemployment is sky high (add back in those “marginally attached” people and we are pushing 11%). Let us not forget that the annual deficit is 4 times what it was under the last President, who was certainly no peach, and we are quickly approaching 100% debt to GDP, not good.

All of this while Democrats keep blaming Bush for everything and the Republicans accept that argument, what? Oh, how quickly we forget the recent past. Before I go any further I did not like Bush, at all, and firmly believe he was one of the worst President’s of all time, so save the hate mail. However, Democrats are just as guilty of where we are today as the Republicans as they were ushered into power in 2006 in congress, the real power in politics. They rebuffed any attempt to rein in the GSE’s and they rubber stamped all of bush’s policies for 2 years. So, to say “we inherited this problem” is utter nonsense and has to stop.

When you have the power to say no and stop crazy spending and you do not you are just as guilty as the person who proposed it. That is exactly what the Democrats did for 2 years and to make matters worse, they simply allowed things to continue the way they were without a peep. Don’t believe me, check YouTube.com for the GSE hearing meetings or go check Democrat voting records for raising the debt ceiling, 7 times. They did not inherit anything, they helped create it, end of story.

If you actually believe that they inherited all these messes and did nothing to create them then you have a poor knowledge of politics, history or simply are blinded by partisan politics. I, on the other hand, do not care as I see all politicians for what they are, parasites on the backs of the American people who care about 2 things, reelection and power, not necessarily in that order. To sit here now and say that the stimulus is working is simply crazy, babbling, rabid partisan bickering because it is clear that it did not. If it did work GDP would not be at 2.2% in 3Q09, I know we will get an initial estimate of 4 or 5% for 4Q09, but that to will be adjusted lower and will be all government heroin.

Never before had the US government spent $787B in any stimulus plan and not seen any results. Instead the best argument Democrats can muster is that it stopped us from going over the abyss, oh really? Are these the same Democrats who said that not all the money has come into the system yet so we don’t know how well the stimulus is working? So, how can you say that on one hand it stopped us from falling off a cliff, but on the other hand say we don’t know how well it is going to work? You can’t because that is political double talk for we spent a bunch of money on stuff and we made many mistakes, but will not admit it. Instead, they decide to lie to us and then launch secret stimulus packages, i.e. the jobs bill passed at the dead of night.

What no one ever talks about is this, what would have happened if the stimulus was not enacted? I am willing to bet that things would have probably followed about the same track it is following now. Well, I think there would have been an exception to that, employment would have bottomed sooner and we would be seeing real recovery a lot sooner. Considering even Jim Cramer has admitted that the CEO’s he has spoken to have not seen one dime of stimulus I am pretty sure that the stimulus did not work at all. I mean, even the government is not adding tons of jobs, yet, until the census begins. Of course we do have more government employees making over 100K than ever before in history, but who cares, right?

If the original stimulus saved us and is going to get us back to growth then why in the world do we need a second stimulus? Simple, the first one was the greatest fleecing of America next to TARP in the history of the world. However, never fear because it is all Bush’s fault, a year later. I absolutely hated it when Bush blamed Clinton for the recession in 2000 just as much as I hate Obama blaming Bush now for one simple reason, the President has very little to do with the economy. I say that with a caveat, unless they implement policies that impact the economy like ridiculous stimulus packages, unpaid for tax cuts or Medicare advantage plans and things like that. What I mean is that the last 2 administrations, in my opinion, have had a greater impact on the economy than previous administrations mostly because of their lackeys in Congress happen to be in power at the same time.

Because of the absurdity of what is going on, even though I cannot stand the hypocritical Republicans, I am praying the Republicans take all of Congress in November and grid lock this thing for the next couple of years. Why would I want that to happen? Simple, I do not want my currency to be toilet paper around the world and I certainly do not want more spending. I also do not want more unionization of government employees, we need more firings in government, not hiring’s or raises. What I am trying to say is that we need balance restored back in Washington, it worked in 1994 and perhaps it could work again.

In the meantime, our President should not be issuing any grades for himself as he certainly did not earn a “solid B+” as I am pretty sure his math teacher would have flunked based on his estimates on health care costs and budget deficits. I am fairly sure a big “I” is what the President should have given himself for incomplete since he has not even kept the transparency promise he made. When C-SPAN says what is going on, you got an image issue Mr. President. So, keep some promises, fire some government workers, starting with all of you Czars, and let’s really figure out the deficit before the dollar does crash.

As you may know I support Peter Schiff in Connecticut in the upcoming Senatorial race. Even if Schiff wasn’t running I would be saying this anyhow, don’t re-elect Chris Dodd or ant incumbent for that matter. Mr. Dodd received the V.I.P. treatment from Countrywide and it did not raise any red flags with him. This is the same Chris Dodd who was on the Ethics Committee and was supposed to be regulating these mortgage underwriters. If he did not know he was getting preferential treatment he shouldn’t be re-elected because that would mean he is the dumbest man on the planet. Even Kent Konrad even admitted he knew he was getting a “good deal.”

Help Peter and DONATE to his campaign today. I get nothing for you donating to Peter Schiff’s campaign.

And, of course, this hit piece from Sean Hannity, who I do not like, but he is good at digging up dirt.

The bill is targeting bonuses of top executives of banks, but could have wide implications. I agree that the bill is a nice gesture to pacify the populist outrage of Americans who funded the recovery of such institutions as Goldman Sachs, which we still fund through the FDIC guarantee program and the fed discount window, but this bill could impact hedge funds as well.

Government is meant to put some restrictions on bad behavior and to watch out for the people, but they have failed, repeatedly and miserably. Mostly because these people looking out for the people are taking campaign money from the people who are out to bilk us and consistently pass laws to help them or strip away legislation that kept their risk under wraps, Glass-Steagall.

Now they want to pass this new bill that will restrict bonuses for top executives in the banks, which will never get past the Senate and Obama will definitely veto it, he received $23 million from financial services firms during the elections. While you may be for such restrictions you have to remember that this is a slippery slope and could have unintended consequences to be determined in the future. Additionally, how much government do you really want in business?

The only good thing about the bill is the shareholder vote on pay, but the shareholder vote is merely ceremonial and can be rejected by the company. Shareholders are the only ones that should have a voice on compensation, with the exception of firms who take government funds to survive. However, Congress took the only thing good about the bill and made it nonbinding, which is where the populist outrage should be directed towards.

Lastly, the populist outrage should be directed towards Congress as they sat by and let these banks get away with murder over the last decade. Most of the people responsible for this mess have consistently been reelected for decades, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, etc. and since the people reelect these clowns they only need to be mad at themselves.

We need term limits simply because the longer one stays in government the more corrupt they become. This is not a government by the people and for the people, but rather for who can raise the most money for their campaign or, simply, who gave me the most money and what do they want. We went from a country that treated its citizens extremely well to a country that has taken away its basic freedoms, see the P.A.T.R.I.O.T., Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism, Act. We voted for change, but all we got was more of the same with way more government than we ever expected.