The trade of the decade?

Posted by Ray on July 31, 2010 under Economy, Main, The Federal Reserve | Read the First Comment

The 2Q10 GDP report came out and it was an eye opener for many people as it showed that the recession, depression, was deeper than most believed and things are surely not as rosy as we are being told. Aside from the inventory rebuild there is not much else going on, final sales are dead as a door nail and some firms, like Samsung, are reporting good earnings, but warning of weaker times ahead. I take the Samsung warning pretty seriously as they are a large or the largest supplier of electronics which had shown signs of strength recently. So when they say things may not be rosy in the near future I suspect that will apply to more than just TV sales.

What made the news cycle this week was a report by Fed President Bullard about the threat of a Japanese style deflation here in America. I am kind of shocked that people were caught so of guard by this news, about 10 economic data points already indicated this to be if not already occurring a very real near-term threat. I suspect we are in for some really tough times ahead and worse yet I suspect we will see the Fed start moving towards quantitative easing, again. As I have said, repeatedly, this will not do anything to boost economic demand as we must wait for the deleveraging cycle to be completed by the consumer before demand will return. Zero Hedge just wrote a piece about this tonight which illustrates exactly what I have been saying for a month now, but no one is listening. Here is what they said:

“In other words, all those who say QE2.0 will do nothing to stimulate the economy are correct, as all such a greenlighted action would encourage is the warehousing of yet more cash by banks. And since banks have no incremental incentives to lend it out, it doesn’t matter if the Fed’s liabilities are $2.5 trillion or $2.5 quadrillion. Instead of stimulating inflation, which is the end goal, all such an action would do is to create further doubts about the stability of the dollar, which in turn, as Ambrose Evans-Pritchard discussed, is a sure way to go to hyperinflation without first passing either Go, or inflation.”

They also indicate my thoughts exactly, we bypass money velocity inflation and go straight to dollar devaluation, i.e. currency crisis, hyperinflation. The irony is that you would only feel this pain on imported goods and we do consume 87% of what we produce domestically so it may take some time before any real currency devaluation hits home. Regardless, Bullard indicated along with prior reports by Ben Bernanke himself that QE is on the table. The question is what kind of QE, treasury purchases or other asset purchases? Also, how much, I bet $3-5T in total purchases, but who knows.

What we do know, compliments of David Rosenberg, is that Ben Bernanke said IF we hit a Japanese style deflation that the target rate on the 30 year treasury would be 2.5%. Rosenberg says that if we hit that rate, down from the current 4% yield, one would receive about a 30% rate of return. I think he is right and if one followed his recommendations of treasuries and gold, along with high yield stocks, you would have avoided much volatility this year and had nice returns. I am happy to say I bought 2’s and 5’s when the yield was 1.10% and well over 2% so I am happy. I suspect the rally in treasuries will continue and if QE happens, wow.

The trade of the century, although risky, would be to leverage a long position into the 20+ year treasury market, UBT (2X bull) or TMF (3X bull). IF Rosenberg and I are right and this happens, QE, deflation or a major selloff in equities, those positions would do very well. However, they are risky, they are leveraged ETF’s, but if you time it right I believe that you could do very well. I also believe that the bull market in bonds is in full force again, very similarly to the summer of 2008 I might add which adds a bit of mystery to the rally in treasuries. The mystery is, what is going on and is the bond market telling you that something really bad is coming?

A look at the chart above looks like there is something going on in the bond market. We broke above the 123/4 mark on the 30 year futures and now that is support. I believe it goes higher because of, at least, of deflationary pressures and, at worst, because of QE. However, while I am short-term bullish on treasuries I hate them long-term since it will be impossible for the U.S. to meet its long-term debt obligations which means they will default somehow in the future, in my opinion. I also believe, as stated earlier, that QE will wreck our currency maybe not now, but at some point in the near future which makes gold very attractive as well. If QE is announced treasuries will go nuts and so will gold. If one is levered into treasuries you could do well, if you want the risk.

What QE means for stocks, I do not know. I would think QE would be bad for stocks as it signals things are not good and the economy is weak, but we are living in bizzaro world where good news is fantastic and bad news is even better.

The Death of M3

Posted by Ray on July 15, 2010 under Economy, Main, The Federal Reserve | Be the First to Comment

All the talk of the town is deflation, disinflation or disinflationary trends, what does all of this mean, is it bad and more importantly, should the Federal Reserve try to stop it? First, deflation is negative price growth year-over-year, we are not there yet even though I often say we are in a deflationary period, because we will get there, in my opinion. Disinflation or disinflationary trends are signals that show prices are declining and is how many economists or snarky bloggers, like myself, describe the trend before we hit outright deflation. In a nutshell, deflation is demand destruction or no end demand which means companies must drop prices in order to attract business. The most commonly referenced period of deflation is the 1930’s where, sadly, food was cheap, but people starved, houses were cheap, but people went homeless. Deflation has been framed as ugly, horrible and something that must be avoided at all costs.

Deflation during the good times is fine and we all reap the rewards, such as cheaper technology, i.e. cell phones or computers, which become cheaper because of competition from outsourcing and technological advances. No one minds paying lower prices during these periods of times and the Fed even doesn’t mind deflation during these periods, but they like it to remain in check. Because lower prices do not mean people are not buying the products, the opposite is typically true. Plus, other indicators usually show that only certain items are prone to deflation under normal conditions, usually technology related items. The Fed would only be concerned if they saw other items start to lose pricing power and the money supply shrinking, people saving more money, basically.

When people save their money, in an economy such as the U.S., it is devastating because such a large portion of our domestic growth comes from spending money freely on stuff we really don’t need. When we save we stop that wasteful spending this grinds our economy to a halt. In order to get sales going again companies start to offer incentives to get shoppers in the door. This usually means lower prices through either temporary or permanent sales on the price of the products they sell. Since these products are not selling the stores are not ordering new products which mean the raw materials to make the clothes or whatever begin to decline. Even if the product begins to move at reduced prices the company selling to the end user begins to demand lower prices for the product and even if they don’t ask for it the orders are so much smaller prices would fall anyhow. Essentially it is a chain reaction, this is pretty common knowledge, but it comes from one simple thing happening, people saving their money.

The other part of the equation of people saving their money is that money is taken out of circulation. This sounds counterintuitive to those who rail against the fractional reserve banking system since this system allows for more loans to be made if the deposit base grows. However, if the economy is bad banks simply do not make loans because they fear not getting repaid. Therefore, a higher savings rate means lower monetary circulation, commonly referred to as M3, which the Fed no longer produces by the way. In order to boost the money supply the Fed will try to encourage banks to make riskier loans by lowering interest rates. By lowering interest rates banks make lower rates of returns for doing nothing with their money so by loaning out the money to borrowers banks can make higher interest rates. In turn the borrower will go out and spend that money which will ultimately boost the money supply and, hopefully, boost final demand.

That is how things work in normal business cycles, but that is not what we have now. We have a very abnormal business cycle that happens once every few generations where we go through this huge leveraging cycle and then have to live through a period when we deleverage all the debt. The last time we went through this was in the 1930’s and the time before that was about 60 years before the 1930’s so about every 60 to 80 years we go through a super cycle of debt leverage that blows up. During these super cycles the consumer has so much debt that they just try to pay it off and does not waste much money on other items. This is bad for our economy which is built on a consumption model to the tune of 70% of our GDP. This lack of demand or demand destruction means people just will not spend unless it makes absolute sense to them, i.e. a generous tax credit from Uncle Sam. This demand destruction leads to lower prices which starts out as disinflationary forces, moves to deflation when prices finally start dropping YoY, which will happen soon.

No matter what the central bank does, the Fed, it on its own cannot change this deflationary trend when it has spent all of its ammo. When interest rates hit zero there is nothing the Fed can do to spur demand from a monetary policy point of view. Remember, this is a very unusual situation because in these super cycles not only are consumers saddled with debt, but so are the banks and the banks are usually saddled with worthless debts which make them insolvent. That was true 80 years ago and the same thing is true today because banks are not making loans nor do they want to. So what can the Fed do? They have insolvent banks and consumers that don’t want to spend and are trying to shed their debt loads.

Some people say more quantitative easing will be helpful. I ask how? We already did how much QE? $2T+ that we know of and that did nothing. In fact, mortgage rates have dropped even more after QE stopped and we have falling demand for housing so what will another round of QE do? All it would do is cripple the dollar and trust me, the dollar is going to be in trouble soon enough anyhow because of the bloated balance sheet the Fed has and our national debt load. QE will not boost money velocity at all. It might give banks more money for their balance sheets, but other than that it will not boost the overall money supply so I am totally perplexed as to why anyone thinks QE will work. We have no problem selling our debt right now either, so it is a total waste of time and resources. The negatives far outweigh the positives.

What else can the Fed do? Nothing. They are done or have done everything they can do. Sure, they can roll out with TALF again, but the market has no problem placing junk paper right now so what would the point be? The problem is simple, the consumer does not want to spend. Businesses do not want to spend. Does anyone know why this is happening? I think it is pretty simple, no one knows what is going to happen. The President is keeping everyone in the dark about where taxes are going to go, heck, we are not even going to get a budget for 2010, unreal! We still have no idea how health care reform is really going to impact us yet, how much will it cost, etc. The business environment is weak at best and CEO’s are too afraid to admit it, look how they get treated by the administration, as traitors!

The consumer, well, I wonder why they aren’t spending. We have weekly initial unemployment claims coming in at well over 400K, 4 week average is 455K. We have more firings than hiring’s going on right now. The work week declined and so did wages. There are 6 people for every open job. It is taking 35 weeks to find a new job if you get fired. People were feeling more secure about their job, but when initial claims began to heat up again that confidence disappeared, even H-P started laying people off again and I bet Google will announce layoffs very soon. Their debt loads are through the roof and banks raised all their fees on the consumer so it is taking longer to pay down debt. Foreclosures, delinquencies and now a story broke tat home owner associations are foreclosing on homes for pennies on the dollar over the dues not being paid, come on. To top it all off the Senate is not extending unemployment benefits, but they can pass a 2,300 page Fin Reg bill with no problem, what is wrong with those people?

It is fair to say that there are plenty of reasons to not spend money from the consumer’s point of view. From corporate America’s point of view there is also little reason to spend money and even if they did it is so little of GDP it doesn’t even matter. The bottom line is how do we get M3 to increase? Can money velocity get positive again and should we even try? In my opinion, I do not believe we can get money velocity to get positive again without a drastic event such as WWII. These super cycles have to work themselves out and that takes time and the more tinkering we do the longer it takes. Look at housing, if we did not do the tax credit we might have bottomed in housing prices already, but we will never know now.

The Depression lasted as long as it did because of the tinkering and those who say we had a relapse because stimulus was removed in 1937-38 simply do not get it. If we cannot attract buyers to the housing market at 4.5% interest rates and prices significantly lower than the peak it just is not going to happen for some time to come. The market has to find its own bottom and it will be painful, but we cannot simply throw money at it and hope it works out. We could do that in the 1930’s because we had savings and we had manufacturing, we have neither now. We started out in a horrible position, greatly in debt, and to get ourselves out we are advocating going much deeper in debt. The problem is we cannot grow our way out of the debt we have, we cannot afford another New Deal. The most important thing to remember about the New Deal to begin with was that it did not work, it was a majorly failed policy.

As painful as it is going to be I say we have to let it be. No more QE and I hope we do not do another stimulus, but we will, look for a Bush style check coming right around October. Money velocity will sort itself out when the deleveraging is over and that could be as fast as next year or as long as 2015, no one knows except the collective minds of the consumers. The bottom line is we may come out, the consumer and corporate America, stronger than when we came into this thing with less debt and important lessons learned. Our government and the Fed, well, I do not believe they learned anything and look for QE and stimulus money just in time to buy your vote in November.

Quantitative Easing 2.0

Posted by Ray on July 8, 2010 under Economy, The Federal Reserve | Be the First to Comment

I have written about money velocity at length and what I think will eventually happen and much of my thesis is about to be put to the test. For whatever reason the market seems to think massively shrinking consumer credit is a good thing and that the Federal Reserve will be starting a new QE process very soon, which is the news this afternoon that coincided with the parabolic move late in the day. However, I cannot disagree with this more and believe that any quantitative easing will do nothing to help expand credit or increase the money supply to the public. We have at the very least disinflationary forced if not outright deflation and the Fed is already running negative real interest rates.

If you recall about a year ago there was a paper from a Fed of IMF official, the authors name escapes me, that recommended real interest rates to run at -5% annually. At the time everyone thought the man was nuts and he was/is in my opinion, but the only way to get real rates that low is through loose money policy and quantitative easing. The Fed has maintained, and will continue to maintain a zero interest rate policy forever as far as I can tell, a loose monetary policy and performed the only quantitative easing policy the U.S. has ever seen, $1.5T in agency and U.S. treasury paper. Unfortunately we still have no idea what the long-term impact of these policies will be, but they cannot be good. These policies are causing real rates to go negative and mortgage rates to plummet.

In order to get the target rate to -5% the Fed will need to buy much more paper than it owns now. My guess is another $2-3T in additional paper and, again, we will not know what the impact of this QE program will be to our economy or currency for some time, but it will not be good. I am not sure why the Fed or this President cannot figure out that interest rates really don’t matter and declining credit is actually a good thing. In fact, all of the “bad news” is really long-term good news as far as the consumer is concerned, not the employment or housing data, but consumer credit. This de-leveraging is just what is needed as we were all awash in debt and most people cannot or could not ever repay their debts. I have never seen a government so desperate to reignite indebtedness of the public like we are seeing right now, it makes no sense long-term.

So, the Fed will start QE again, what will this do? Nothing. Will it increase the money supply? Yes, but not the public’s money supply merely the banking sectors balance sheet which is supposedly flush with cash anyhow. Banks are not lending money because they know they will not get repaid, but borrowers simply do not want more debt either, a good thing! We have mortgage rates below 4.6% and there is no demand, it just doesn’t get much better than that right now, although I think mortgage rates go sub 3% soon. Quantitative easing will do nothing to improve that situation and it certainly will not boost the confidence in the USD which is more than likely the goal, remember, the only way to double exports in 5 years is to devalue the dollar, but it will not work.

The point is that all the QE in the world will not put money in your pocket or your employer’s bank account to give you a raise. Essentially, from a monetary point of view the Fed is done as it cannot get money into the system. QE will merely create inflation, but not the kind of inflation Ben wants, Ben wants wage inflation and QE will merely create dollar devaluation which is Weimar Republic type of inflation. The public also does not want more games or trickery from the government and it frightens me to think what could happen if Ben goes down this reckless path. Remember, just because there is not an impact from his current policies today does not mean there will not be negative implications from these idiotic policies a year or 5 years from now.

What Ben will tell Obama is to create a direct QE program, i.e. a Bush style stimulus, a big one. I do not believe this will go over very well nor do I think voters are in any mood to be bribed with their own money this year, but if one is unemployed and offered $2,000 could or would they say no? Probably not. This type of stimulus would create what Ben is looking for, wage inflation and money velocity, but make no mistake it will be a short-term boost only. We have a long time before we are out of this mess and we have much pain ahead of us. We need to suck it up and deal with it. Contrary to popular belief it is not Bush’s fault, it is all politicians fault going back 30 years and the only cure is pain.

We will still look for an easy way out and probably do QE with another stimulus, but make no mistake that will be suicide for our countries long-term financial health and our currency will be in major trouble if we choose that path. I hate to say it, I have friends who are unemployed, but we must take the pain as it will be shorter than looking for the quick fix. We are all credit junkies and we got to kick the habit.

Bad news and the dollar… falls?

Posted by Ray on July 1, 2010 under Economy, Markets, The Federal Reserve | Be the First to Comment

Well, this is beyond me, the DXY is dropping like a rock below the 50 day moving average on horrible news driving futures higher. There is simply no reason for this whatsoever as bad news usually rallies the dollar. What is more odd is gold and silver are also down fairly substantially as well. Frankly, it is not adding up in my book and something stinks. Correlations and inverse correlations don’t just break down for no reason on without any news. Perhaps one should be careful shorting this market today and look for a retest of 1040, the Euro is up large @ 1.24 + 0.0161 when the banks had to barrow a substantial amount for 6 days from the ECB which indicates problems. Stay nimble.

The Fed lost its appeal!

Posted by Ray on March 19, 2010 under The Federal Reserve | Read the First Comment

Thanks to Bloomberg and Fox we might now find out who borrowed what and what was provided as collateral to the Fed during the crisis we may finally know thanks to a lengthy legal battle. The Fed might continue to fight, but it may not go much further, just show us already as this data is almost 2 years old, I am sure we can handle the truth.

However, you will see that the Fed took some very questionable items as collateral or so we think. Some bankruptcy documents do show that the Fed did take some stocks and other, well, crap for collateral during the height of the financial crisis. What many people do not know is that it is against the rules for the Fed to take credit risk since it is the U.S. governments bank. These documents will either confirm or deny those rumors, but I am betting on the former, if we ever really get to see them.

Could this be the end of the Fed as we know it? I hope so because since the Fed was enacted, in secret in 1913, we have witnessed the dollar lose 97% of its value, a depression in 1920-21, the crash of 1929 leading to the Great Depression (now known to be the Fed’s fault for tightening credit), more boom-bust cycles than any other time in history, the 1970’s (really, need I say more about the 70’s? I think they introduced bell bottoms too, but I cannot prove it), the 1980 near collapse of the U.S. treasury market, the first banking crisis, Long-Term Capital, the dotcom bubble, loose monetary policy for the last 30 years, the housing bubble, the complete meltdown of the financial system, and, for its final act, complicity to destroy the dollar’s value with its current balance sheet.

Really, I cannot think of any reason why we need to reform the Federal Reserve system.