Those are words you will never hear in Washington because, from what I gather, they have no idea how a calculator actually works. I just started reviewing this new bill, you know, the one so popular that the phone lines to Congress were jammed all week long, and it does not add up. I shouldn’t say that it does not add up, I should say that the assumptions are ridiculous.

They decided the best way to go was to raise the Medicare tax “only” on individuals making over $200,000 a year and couples making over $250,000 a year. The income tax increase is .9% for the Medicare tax, this will be in addition to the other coming tax hikes coming at the end of this year, and there is now an unearned income Medicare tax. So, if you make a lot of money and have dividends or interest you will have to pay an additional 3.8% tax on those investments, so much for investors buying dividends stocks.

Here is the problem, the Democrats claim this tax hike will raise $210B paying for roughly 20% of this bill. Are these people for real? Why would investors hold income producing investments if they will lose 3.8% on the interest earned? They will not because they will buy a variable annuity or growth stocks that pay nothing in dividends. That blows that $210B figure right out of the water, but the Medicare income tax hike is hard to get around. Unless you can control how much you are getting paid you will have to pay that tax, but it will surely have repercussions.

For the first time ever we have an administration who is going to impose one of the largest tax increases on Americans during a recession. I take that back, this did happen twice before, the 1930’s and the 1970’s and both decades were terrible. I can hear many of you now, it is only on the rich! Well, I got news for you first, there has never been one estimate from Congress on taxation, revenue generated and cost that has ever been right. Second, there is no way that only people making over $299K a year can pay for this program, it is impossible. That $200K number will trickle down to, my guess at least, to the sweet spot of $150K for individuals and $175K for couples which is a lot of people I might add.

Insanity does not begin to describe what is happening right now. I mean, sure the President signed an $18b jobs bill today and is about to urge the passing of a trillion dollar spending bill, do you see something wrong with that? It is a bit disproportionate and, frankly, right now the country needs jobs. At this point I just hope we have a real up or down vote on this bill so we know where our Congressional member stands and we do not go through with this sneaky backdoor deemed to pass vote.

I cannot wait to read the full bill, but, unfortunately, I will not have time until well after it is passed. I do know that ultimately this is bad news for all of the country because it was not put together properly. All the people wanted was for Congress to start over and do this the right way, no one is in the “do nothing camp.” Unfortunately, that is not to be and we are on the verge of expanding upon already existing failed programs. Essentially, it is like taking Medicare, which is almost broke, and giving it to everyone, good idea! Actually, that is Alan Greyson’s idea right now, Medicare for all is what he says, but, as most lawyers are, he is illiterate to just how ugly the balance sheet of the government or Medicare really is. Good luck!

I have been on the phone trying to get through to my Congressman, Dan Maffei (D), all day long to voice my opposition to what is going on in Washington. His phone was busy and I finally got his voice mail which was full, but I wanted to give him a piece of my mind so I kept calling until I got through. I left him a scathing message with less than polite language so if you do not hear from me send care packages to GITMO c/o Ray. I really do not care what side of the issue you are on, but I hope you are voicing your opinion to your representative. I am opposed to the current bill and want them to start over. I am not in the camp of “there is nothing wrong here,” but this thing has gotten way out of hand.

Many of you know my position on this bill, it is bad news for the country, and even more shockingly is the fact that Congress went back into hiding to hammer out the details again. This whole thing is like watching a plane crash and you have 2 choices, get in front of it so it ends quickly or stay where you are and risk catching fire, both choices are bad. What is worse is the fact that they may not actually vote on the bill itself, but use a procedure that “deems it approved” which is crazy. Again we are hearing, well the Republicans did it hundreds of times, I am sure that is true, but on something this big? I think not.

The people deserve to know how their representatives are voting on this bill, either for or against, so the voter can voice their opinion at the polls in November, either for or against. To me this whole thing is just amazing and unreal as we just wrapped up the worst 8 years in American history, well, that I have been alive for at least, and now just as we thought we got rid of a tone deaf administration another tone deaf administration has taken its place. What makes this dangerous is the fact that Obama is an ego maniac, in my opinion, and refuses to admit that he is going against the peoples will, so much for change.

As many of you know, I have also been in the insurance industry for many years, I know how this stuff works. I am well connected in the research area and do a ton of consulting, which is why I am not posting as often now. I often get calls from Senators or Congress members seeking opinions on various topics, they know who I am. Now, here we are in the midst of one of the most important legislative changes ever to hit the insurance industry and guess how many calls I have received? None. Not only have I not received any calls, but neither have any of my other geeky friends who work in this industry. Now, how can this be? How can this bill be vetted by people in the industry when, myself not necessarily included, some of the brightest people I know of in the insurance industry never got one call from even the lowliest intern from Congress?

It makes no sense and it should make you concerned because lawyers are great at lawyer stuff, but they are not good at figuring out insurance issues. Most probably do not even know what the mortality tables look like or what tables we are even using now. They have no idea on how to balance risk or spread it around and I got news for you, there is no way you can insure everyone, pre-existing conditions or otherwise, without raising premiums through the roof. Especially if you eliminate annual or lifetime caps, it is just not possible because you need to pool the risk. To make matters worse, if we continue with the archaic state system that we have now it will be a complete disaster as there is no way to spread geographical risk. It makes my head hurt just thinking about what they are doing.

We need to do something, I agree with that, but this is insane and I guarantee you it is not what you think. Premiums will go higher now until 2014 and then, who knows what will happen because we have not seen the bill yet, however I am sure it is not good news for you. I am extremely sensitive to this topic as it impacts me more than it does the average person, but it is not possible to insure everyone and maintain good quality care. This is where I get into the argument I hear a lot from the left, they claim the U.N. says we are 37^th in terms of the quality of health care. First, the U.N. holds little weight with me as they seem to not really like us. Second, how can we add another 31M people to the system and expect to improve the quality of health care? It is not possible.

If what I think happens actually happens, many doctors will leave, the New England Journal of Medicine says one third of doctors will leave the business if this thing passes. Again, how would this increase the quality of care? With Dennis Kucinich all of a sudden signing on to this thing it makes me wonder what really happened when he was on Air Force One. Dennis is a public option fan and he was dead set against this bill, which is the Senate bill, but again, who really knows. Did Obama promise that the public option was on the way in the future? I suspect it is at some point and if it is doctors will leave the business. Medicare pays $26 an office visit, do you think doctors can stay in business at $26 a pop? Not a chance.

Maybe we could do it better than a Canada or a UK, but at the end of the day, I am not a fan of the government involved in my life. I do not want the government to know what drugs I am on, prescription I mean, or what health issues I might have. We also know that Medicare is a favorite for politicians to cut funding from, they tend to do it a lot, so when it becomes so large, on top of our debt, what do you think they will do to save money? They will cut health care, it is that simple. History shows what our elected officials will do and it is always in their best interests, never yours. I do not want even a stepping stone to a single payer system. However, I want some things down and you cannot tell me that you could not win an up or down vote on outlawing a preexisting condition clause on insurance contracts.

The last thing we need is more secrecy in Washington, but that is what we are getting. We have lazy politicians who do not want to start over because it is too hard, they do work for us you now, but that is what needs to be done. I highly recommend you call your representative and let them know where you stand and that you will remember their vote in November. However, I encourage you to say no to this bill, mostly because they keep changing it (!) and tell them to start over.

Just a week or so ago the overnight LIBOR rate, this is the rate banks loan money to each other at (such as prime plus LIBOR or similar), was a paltry .17% and today it is a whopping .22%. While this is might not seem like a huge issue, and it is not on its own, it is a signal of something. Perhaps it is signaling that the wall of liquidity is coming to an end or that there is more risk lending to institutions than originally thought. Or, perhaps, Zero Hedge’s rumor mill was right and some of the GSE’s cut off 10 European banks from lending which caused the overnight rate to shoot up, it looks like they had it nailed.

I typically do not act or comment on rumors because some 90% are not true, but this one I watched because LIBOR was one of the signals preceding the credit crisis beginning in 2007 to 2008. If this rumor ends up being true, and it looks that way, I think there will be some negative implications for the equity markets as the rally is liquidity driven. However, LIBOR at .22% is nothing to worry about, at all, and unless it climbs higher I would not be worried, but it is on my ‘watch’ screen as it has implications. Also, the LIBOR rate is outside of the Fed’s control, frankly, as they already spent all their ammo in that department.

Well, let me rephrase that, they would need to start up recently closed programs and institute new programs in order to bring down the interbank lending rate. The markets are not fully healed and credit is still tight meaning that trust is still lacking in many areas. Credit is merely trust and, frankly, would you really trust a European bank right now? Who knows how much Greek debt they hold or other PIIG debt they have on the books. If you do not know you cannot trust them. If you can’t trust them you do not extend credit to them or you charge them more for credit to cover the potential risk. It is a vicious cycle and the system cannot handle any other shock or it will be in jeopardy again.

I am not saying there is much to read into, yet, but keep an eye on it as little things like the LIBOR usually signal or are the first sign of potential larger problems. It also looks like the Zero Hedge rumor mill was on to something, I am going to email them to see if they have a follow-up on the story. In the mean time, do not look for anything exciting from the Fed meeting, nothing will happen and the language will not change, which should concern you as well. Trade carefully and the market that is in front of you, I bought August VIX calls today as volatility is way too cheap, historically the VIX is at 20, and there seems to be no one betting it will go down, look at the put action.

Another Friday and another busy night for the FDIC who had to close 3 institutions tonight bringing the total for 2010 to 30. On the bright side of things the FDIC troubled bank list is getting smaller. It was 702 and now it is now in the high 600’s unless they added more to the list. No worries though, everything is fantastic, oh did I mention Kansas City is closing half of its schools and Dade County Florida is under investigation for misleading investors on its finances, makes you wonder about the recent CA bond issue doesn’t it, or not.

Anyhow, tonight’s lucky winners are:

Apparently The Park Avenue Bank had a killer art collection complete with Andy Warhol pieces, I wonder how that will be handled, and its own curator.  Regardless, it was another somewhat large night for the FDIC with assets of the failed institutions totaling over $1B, I am not including Thursday’s closure. While the losses may not be huge they are persistent and it is like a death by a thousand cuts for an institution running a negative balance sheet. Again, no worry as everything is fine.

Now comes the fun part, how much did the FDIC actually lose tonight?

As you can see the losses and loss-share agreements are about $1B altogether so all these little banks add up. All the banks tonight were merged with another so nothing other than the name, and the fees depositors pay, will change tomorrow. While these banks were acquired it is important to realize that not every failed bank is bought. If your bank fails and it is not bought anything over the FDIC guarantee limit may not be covered, food for thought.

The Park Avenue Bank:

The Park Avenue Bank, New York, New York, was closed today by the New York State Banking Department, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Valley National Bank, Wayne, New Jersey, to assume all of the deposits of The Park Avenue Bank.

The four branches of The Park Avenue Bank will reopen during normal business hours beginning tomorrow as branches of Valley National Bank. Depositors of The Park Avenue Bank will automatically become depositors of Valley National Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from Valley National Bank that it has completed systems changes to allow other Valley National Bank branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening and over the weekend, depositors of The Park Avenue Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of December 31, 2009, The Park Avenue Bank had approximately $520.1 million in total assets and $494.5 million in total deposits. Valley National Bank will pay the FDIC a premium of 0.15 percent to assume all of the deposits of The Park Avenue Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, Valley National Bank agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.

The FDIC and Valley National Bank entered into a loss-share transaction on $379.8 million of The Park Avenue Bank’s assets. Valley National Bank will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers

Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-640-2538. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from 9 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time (EDT); and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EDT.

As part of this transaction, the FDIC will acquire a cash appreciation instrument. The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $50.7 million. Valley National Bank’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. The Park Avenue Bank is the 28th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the second in New York. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was LibertyPointe Bank, New, York, New York, on March 11, 2010.

Old Southern Bank:

Old Southern Bank, Orlando, Florida, was closed today by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Centennial Bank, Conway, Arkansas, to assume all of the deposits of Old Southern Bank.

The seven branches of Old Southern Bank will reopen on Monday as branches of Centennial Bank. Depositors of Old Southern Bank will automatically become depositors of Centennial Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their former Old Southern Bank branch until they receive notice from Centennial Bank that it has completed systems changes to allow other Centennial Bank branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Old Southern Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of December 31, 2009, Old Southern Bank had approximately $315.6 million in total assets and $319.7 million in total deposits. Centennial Bank will pay the FDIC a premium of 1.00 percent to assume all of the deposits of Old Southern Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits, Centennial Bank agreed to purchase essentially all of the failed bank’s assets.

The FDIC and Centennial Bank entered into a loss-share transaction on $282.7 million of Old Southern Bank’s assets. Centennial Bank will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.

Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-822-1918. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time Eastern Daylight Time (EDT); and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EDT.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $94.6 million. Centennial Bank’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. Old Southern Bank is the 29th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the fourth in Florida. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Marco Community Bank, Marco Island, February 19, 2010

Statewide Bank:

Statewide Bank, Covington, Louisiana, was closed today by the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Home Bank, Lafayette, Louisiana, to assume all of the deposits of Statewide Bank.

The six branches of Statewide Bank will reopen on Saturday as branches of Home Bank. Depositors of Statewide Bank will automatically become depositors of Home Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their former Statewide Bank branch until they receive notice from Home Bank that it has completed systems changes to allow other Home Bank branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Statewide Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of December 31, 2009, Statewide Bank had approximately $243.2 million in total assets and $208.8 million in total deposits. Home Bank did not pay the FDIC a premium to assume all of the deposits of Statewide Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits, Home Bank agreed to purchase essentially all of the failed bank’s assets.

The FDIC and Home Bank entered into a loss-share transaction on $163.5 million of Statewide Bank’s assets. Home Bank will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.

Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-913-3062. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Central Standard Time (CST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., (CST); on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., Central Daylight Time (CDT); and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., (CDT).

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $38.1 million. Home Bank’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. Statewide Bank is the 30th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the first in Louisiana. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was The Farmers Bank & Trust of Cheneyville, Cheneyville, December 17, 2002

Out of the blue the LibertyPointe Bank in NY was closed tonight and the branches will open under Valley National Bank, who bought the assets, on Friday morning. It is odd that a bank is closed on a Thursday, it happens, but not that often and shows just how troubled the banking industry is. To assume the troubles are over and everything is fine is a bit premature in my book.

Oh, the FDIC only lost a mere $24M tonight and entered a loss-share agreement for $181.5M.

Here is the rundown on LibertyPointe Bank:

LibertyPointe Bank, New York, New York, was closed today by the New York State Banking Department, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Valley National Bank, Wayne, New Jersey, to assume all of the deposits of LibertyPointe Bank.

The three branches of LibertyPointe Bank will reopen on Friday as branches of Valley National Bank. Depositors of LibertyPointe Bank will automatically become depositors of Valley National Bank. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. LibertyPointe Bank customers should continue to use their existing branches until they receive notice from Valley National Bank that it has completed systems changes to allow other Valley National Bank branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening, Friday, and over the weekend, depositors of LibertyPointe Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of December 31, 2009, LibertyPointe Bank had approximately $209.7 million in total assets and $209.5 million in total deposits. Valley National Bank will pay the FDIC a premium of 0.15 percent to assume all of the deposits of LibertyPointe Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits, Valley National Bank agreed to purchase essentially all of the failed bank’s assets.

The FDIC and Valley National Bank entered into a loss-share transaction on $181.5 million of LibertyPointe Bank’s assets. Valley National Bank will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.

Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-591-2820. The phone number will be operational this evening from the time of closing until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., EST; on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time (EDT); and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EDT.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $24.8 million. Valley National Bank’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. LibertyPointe Bank is the 27th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the first in New York. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Waterford Village Bank, Williamsville, July 24, 2009.

H/T to Mark for the tip

Over the past few days Citi (C) has been trading like the internet stocks in 1999 as it climbed from about $3.30 to a close of $4.18 today, not a bad week. The company has poor fundamentals and is not what I would call a “sound” investment it is, in my opinion, a gamble to own the company. Here is the kicker, I am a share holder of Citi, I own the common with a cost basis of $3.32 and I own January 2011 4 calls with a cost average of $.37. My common stock is up 25% and my options doubled.

Don’t get me wrong, I like making money, but even I know something is just not right with this kind of move for a company that has 28.5B shares outstanding and a market cap of just under $120B with horrible earnings. I bought the stock because I figured it was worth about $4.50 if they sell all the assets they claimed and maybe $5 if the hedge funds decided to pick it up for alpha. The problem is the company has not sold the assets yet and the rise in share price is based on rumor of some sales, a rumor the SEC is banning short selling on government owned companies (which is false), Bove and other analysts saying it is undervalued or turned the corner, Pandit claiming the bank is on its way to profitability, the $2B in TRuPs priced @ 8.5% and, the latest, is the firm could earn $20B by 2012. That was a mouthful.

However, very little of that, which is not already debunked, can be verified and much is speculation. I would say it was one mother of a short squeeze and that made momentum player, read high frequency traders, to pick it up and run with it. In short, no pun intended, I do not believe it is sustainable, but I have not sold yet, I am crazy what can I say. I think the momentum and irrational behavior of the markets along with the belief that the common shares will not be diluted, which the CFO said dilution of common shares will likely happen, will carry the stock higher in the near-term. Well, let’s say if I am wrong I will happily take 20% and 80% profit, respectively, on my positions. In other words, I will not cry if it goes down tomorrow.

What I would not do is buy it way up here until there is some confirmation of asset sales or profitability. Even if they report a profit we will not know if it is real because of the marked-to-fantasyland rules in place. In other words, I would not add speculative money to this stock to save my life right now, it is not worth it. If you own it already do whatever you are comfortable with, but do not buy more. Greed is a terrible disease that leads you to make bad decisions so be happy with whatever gains you have and look for other opportunities.

A new report was released today showing significant improvement in the labor market today. As you know, there were 6 people unemployed for every 1 job opening not too long ago, but that has changed. Now there are only 5.5 people for every 1 job opening, let the good times roll! While this is good news it is not at all very promising considering the government is hiring thousands upon thousands for the census.

Does anyone even ask themselves if the recent positive data is only indicative of a low quality unsustainable recovery? From my point of view that is all it is, a low quality unsustainable growth spurt. How a negative 36K job report last week was considered good is beyond me as most bulls predicted positive job growth now. What I found very interesting is the fact that all the pundits were blaming bad weather for a bad jobs report when there were no or limited snow storms when the survey was conducted. Furthermore, snow really does not cause a huge decline in payrolls, a statistically significant impact anyhow, but let’s not let the facts get in the way of a recovery story.

There have also been many large firms still forewarning of layoffs coming in the near future. While this may make for higher profit margins it is not good news for a country that is over 2 year into a recession, or whatever we want to call it now, and we are still losing jobs, albeit at a lower rate. Less bad is not good, but that is how the data is being spun which is ridiculous. It is not that I want the market to crash or that I want things to get worse, quite the opposite in fact, I just want an honest take on what is happening out there. Telling people that they have lying eyes is just crazy, but that is what everyone is doing.

This is true of the government data which has conveniently reduced the workforce in order to reduce the unemployment number. I just saw a report which shows that if you add in all the people the government takes out, because they are discouraged, the unemployment rate jumps to 11-11.5%, but even that is low. If we go by the U-6, which we should, as that is the equivalent of what we used during the 1930’s, the rate is sky high. We just came off of a low quality recovery from the 2000-2003 recession which spurred the current recession and clearly the further we kick the can the worse the problem becomes. Stop kicking the can and let people know how bad it is, stop the government intervention (we are now paying people to short sell their homes!) and let the bad debt get cleaned away by the system.

If we do this the problem may not just get kicked down the road, but it might get fixed. Of course, health care is now taking the spot light so who cares about jobs or what is happening in the real world. While I do not favor political intervention in the economy I want Congress to really pass a jobs bill, i.e. a comprehensive bill that provides employers tax cuts, what can I say, I am optimistic.

I just read a Time Magazine article today about the U.S. debt and how it is no big deal the U.S. has so much debt. In fact, Zachary Karabell actually believes that our debt is a good thing. I have actually met Mr. Karabell last year at a conference we both spoke at, although he was paid and I was merely on a panel, but it is unlikely he would remember me. Regardless, I have to humbly disagree with the conclusions he came up with in his article.

Debt can be a good thing, but only in small amounts and for productive reasons. For example, a business that takes out a loan to hire a new employee to expand their business would be productive debt as it contributes to society, hopefully. However, taking out a loan to buy a 50” high definition TV is, in my opinion, a terrible reason to add debt to ones balance sheet. The U.S. government borrows money, recently, to hire people and encourage spending, but the government is not creating productive jobs because it creates nothing and it must tax the people in order to pay off the debt for the job it created. The government actually destroys wealth through taxation and wasteful spending. Basically, the government is borrowing money to buy big screen TV’s, bad debt.

The U.S. government does need to carry debt because we are the reserve currency and carry trade deficits. Debt for a government could be a good thing if that country is the reserve currency, but there is a point where too much debt is the ultimate problem. The impact of too much debt over time during strong economic times may not be a major problem because a growing GDP means more tax revenue is being collected and should increase over time as long as conditions are good. However, any economy has cycles where there are good and bad times, we are currently experiencing bad times, and when times get bad that large debt load becomes a problem and is no longer good, Greece is a good example of this, kind of.

Excess debt during poor economic times means tax revenues decline and the government will have to run deficits to pay for its spending, I am way over simplifying this. Generally, a government will spend much more during these bad times to spur the economy, known as the Keynesian Theory, but this spending, in my opinion, is not the way to spur the economy. As the debt builds and the central bank cuts interest rates the debt during these bad times might not seem so bad because the country has artificially lowered the cost of borrowing, again to spur growth. The key word is “artificially” lowered interest rates and the current interest rate may not actually reflect the current economic conditions or the risk of holding said countries government debt. The reason people ignore deficits more during lower interest rate periods is because the cost to carry the debt is so low, like now.

The U.S. currently has over $12T in debt, heading much higher rapidly, but the carrying costs of that debt is about $500B a year. Keep in mind this is because the Fed Funds Rate is at .25% which means yields on the U.S. government debt is very low, artificially low. The government can currently borrow money for 30 years, for those crazy enough to buy it, for less than 5%, not a bad deal, right? However, what happens if the bulls are right and the economy is recovering and rates have to increase? A 1% increase in Fed Funds would mean the aggregate increase on our debt would be roughly .70%, most of our debt matures in less than 10 years, not good I might add. That means our debt servicing costs, the interest we pay, would increase to about $600B a year, still not bad.

The problems start to get real bad when the Fed increases rates to say 3% or so. The cost to borrow on the 30 year treasury would go up dramatically to about 6%, on the conservative side, and even out short-term interest rates on our bills and notes would go substantially, everything is relative, higher. Before I go further you have to remember that debt is a deadly circular beast because the more you borrow the more you have to pay back and during rising interest rates in order to make all of your payments you either have to tax the people or have more deficit spending, guess which will win in the U.S.? If rates go to 3% because of a hot economy the interest on our debt servicing costs will quickly rise to about $800-$900B, depending. It will take no time at all for the interest payments to reach $1T and considering our debt mostly matures 10 years or less you cannot forget the refunding that must take place. The CBO just did an estimate on a lot of this in the past few days, I did not read the report, but I know the final numbers without a lot of obvious assumptions end up close to what I just said.

Karabell makes the argument that the U.S. would use the borrowed money to retrain our workforce and rebuild our infrastructure. That may be the case, but to fully upgrade our infrastructure, not including pie in the sky green energy items, would cost about $2T. I believe the last stimulus only applied a small portion of what is needed, so the infrastructure idea Karabell had does not pan out in my book. Plus, there is no return on infrastructure immediately, over time yes because it makes commerce easier, but that takes time. He also made the case that China and India are flush with cash and building their infrastructure now and, I think, was indicating that since the U.S. is so stable that excess cash will end up here, which is reasonable to assume, for now.

What he failed to address is the fact that the money they are flush with is ours from them exporting goods to us. Because they have such huge exports to the U.S. we have a trade deficit with them and they need to buy our debt to balance it out. It is a case of vendor financing and all vendor financing ends up with someone getting hurt, guess who in our case? The point I am making is that the Chinese and Indians will buy our debt now because treasuries are going up in value, thank you deflation, but how long will that continue for? Not only that, but if China un-pegs their currency from ours it will appreciate and their treasury holding, in RMB terms, will decline. Why would one invest in treasuries if your currency is rising and the country you are loaning money to as a declining currency, you wouldn’t do that.

Essentially, all gravy trains end and there is a limit to how much a country can borrow. Consider the U.S. has implicit guarantees on not only our debt, but also on banks, insurance companies and the mother of all bad investments the GSE’s. Oh, and if you ever expect to see GM pay back the money they got, well, I wouldn’t hold my breath on that one. All of those guarantees are about $23T, not including the national debt and the entitlement guarantees we have. Again, my point is the limit to what the market will allow a country to borrow cannot be far off. At the very least we will need to pay a greater risk premium on our debt which means the interest rates on our government bonds will detach from where the Fed sets them at and go through the roof.

I get what Karabell is saying, but he is speaking in the here and now which is suicide when talking about so much money. You must look forward in order to see the real problems and it is kind of crazy to think that all this borrowing will go towards retraining the people and vastly improving our infrastructure. The government is the worst at spending money efficiently and much of that money goes to wasteful projects like DNA research on bears in Montana, no offense to bears, but I just do not care about their DNA. On top of all that, who knows if we will actually emerge from this downturn, sorry I do not buy an inventory rebuild as a real economic recovery. If we do not exit this thing in the next10 months our problems will be bigger than we think.

On top of all of this there is the whole impact to our currency, which is not good. The more debt we issue the more we dilute our currency and at some point the world will demand some type of other reserve currency, it is being talked about now. If we lose our reserve currency status we are in a heap of trouble, I know that could ‘never happen.’ All of these problems or these potential problems leave me a couple of conclusions, besides the fact that bulls will spin even really dangerous debt problems positively, that; 1) Precious metals are cheap and 2) The Fed will never raise the Funds rate to a reasonable level again.

Little attention has been given to the main Friday events this year, I am guilt of not reporting on it either, which is bank failures. I guess everyone, me included, has become complacent with the fact that banks are failing at a very scary rate still. I am thinking that the Fed should have left the discount rate along as we are now up to 25 bank closures this year, 3 tonight (see below). At this rate we will see, assuming February is the example of what the rest of the year holds, we will see upwards of 180 bank failures for 2010. I thought the crisis was over?

Clearly there are major structural problems within the banking system still. Although the “too big to fails” will remain, well, too big to fail the smaller banks are up the creek without a paddle. Clearly whatever plan the administration had in mind for these smaller institutions has not worked or the problems are so severe that no one wants to talk about them. I think the latter is probably more likely than the former. Either way, these failures are a major problem especially as the FDIC is technically bankrupt, what else do you call an organization that has a substantial negative net worth? Obviously that lifeline with the Treasury will have to be tapped in order to guarantee the $250,000 per deposit.

Tonight’s winners are:

I guess the losses are not that bad, but given the sorry state of the FDIC I think any loss is bad news. So much for the FDIC’s national savings week push, why save when your bank goes out of business?

Waterfield Bank had no buyer, apparently, but the other 2 banks did have buyers. As you can see the losses are pretty severe given the asset size of the banks. All told losses could hit $808.1M if the FDIC needs to make good on the loss-share agreements, certainly some of the loss-share will be realized if not all of it. Bank of Illinois was purchased by Heartland Bank and Trust Company out of, get this, Normal Illinois and Sun American Bank was acquired by First-Citizens Bank out of Boca Raton FL.

Centennial Bank and Waterfield Bank had deposits of $1.8M and $407,000, respectively, not covered by the FDIC insurance, keep no more than the maximum insured limit at banks, especially smaller banks. There may be more closures later tonight so check back. Below are the press releases.

Waterfield Bank:

Waterfield Bank, Germantown, Maryland, was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the insured depositors, the FDIC created Waterfield Bank, FA—a new depository institution chartered by the OTS and insured by the FDIC—to take over the operations of Waterfield Bank. The new institution will remain open until April 5, 2010, to allow depositors access to their insured funds and time to move accounts to other insured institutions.

The bank had one branch location. It also took deposits from customers via the Internet and 38 affinity groups.

At the time of closing, the receiver immediately transferred to Waterfield Bank, FA, all insured deposits of the failed bank, except certificates of deposits (CDs) and individual retirement accounts (IRAs). The FDIC will mail checks directly to customers with CDs and IRAs for the amount of their insured funds, on Monday morning, March 8.

Customers with savings accounts, checking accounts and money market deposit accounts will have access to their insured funds as usual during this transitional period. Banking activities, such as direct deposit, check writing, and ATM and debit card use, will continue as normal for the customers with demand deposit accounts until Waterfield Bank, FA, closes on April 5. At the end of this transition period, the FDIC will mail checks to customers who have not closed their accounts or transferred their funds to another institution.

On-line banking services, including bill pay, will be unavailable for transactions over the weekend; however, these systems will be active by Monday morning, March 8.

As of December 31, 2009, Waterfield Bank had $155.6 million in assets and $156.4 million in deposits. At the time of closing, the amount of deposits exceeding the insurance limits totaled about $407,000. This amount is an estimate and is likely to change as the FDIC works with customers of Waterfield Bank. The uninsured deposits were not transferred to the newly chartered institution.

Depositors with more than $250,000 at Waterfield Bank should call the FDIC at (800) 830-4735 to make an appointment to discuss the status of their funds. The phone number will be operational this evening until 11:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., EST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EST.

Customers who would like more information about today’s transaction can call the toll-free number; send an e-mail to waterfieldbankquestions@fdic.gov.

Under the FDI Act, the FDIC may create a new depository institution to ensure that depositors have continued access to their insured funds where no other bank has agreed to assume the insured deposits. This arrangement allows for uninterrupted direct deposits and automated payments from customers’ accounts and allows them time to find another institution with which to do business.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to its Deposit Insurance Fund will be $51.0 million. Waterfield Bank is the 25th bank to fail in the nation this year and the first in Maryland. The last FDIC-insured institution to fail in the state was Bradford Bank, Baltimore, on August 28, 2009.

Bank of Illinois:

Bank of Illinois, Normal, Illinois, was closed today by the Illinois Department of Financial Professional Regulation – Division of Banking, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Heartland Bank and Trust Company, Bloomington, Illinois, to assume all of the deposits of Bank of Illinois.

The two branches of Bank of Illinois will reopen on Saturday as branches of Heartland Bank and Trust Company. Depositors of Bank of Illinois will automatically become depositors of Heartland Bank and Trust Company. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from Heartland Bank and Trust Company that it has completed systems changes to allow other Heartland Bank and Trust Company branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Bank of Illinois can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of December 31, 2009, Bank of Illinois had approximately $211.7 million in total assets and $198.5 million in total deposits. Heartland Bank and Trust Company will pay the FDIC a premium of 3.61 percent to assume all of the deposits of Bank of Illinois. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, Heartland Bank and Trust Company agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.

The FDIC and Heartland Bank and Trust Company entered into a loss-share transaction on $166.6 million of Bank of Illinois’s assets. Heartland Bank and Trust Company will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $53.7 million. Heartland Bank and Trust Company’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. Bank of Illinois is the 24th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the third in Illinois. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was George Washington Savings Bank, Orland Park, on February 19, 2010.

Sun American Bank:

Sun American Bank, Boca Raton, Florida, was closed today by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company, Raleigh, North Carolina, to assume all of the deposits of Sun American Bank.

The 12 branches of Sun American Bank will reopen on Monday as branches of First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company. Depositors of Sun American Bank will automatically become depositors of First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company that it has completed systems changes to allow other First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Sun American Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of December 31, 2009, Sun American Bank had approximately $535.7 million in total assets and $443.5 million in total deposits. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company did not pay a premium to acquire the deposits of Sun American Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.

The FDIC and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company entered into a loss-share transaction on $433.0 million of Sun American Bank’s assets. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.

Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-866-954-9532. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., EST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EST.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $103.8 million. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. Sun American Bank is the 23rd FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the fourth in Florida. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Marco Community Bank, Marco Island, on February 19, 2010.

Centennial Bank:

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) approved the payout of the insured deposits of Centennial Bank, Ogden, Utah. The bank was closed today by the Utah Department of Financial Institutions, which appointed the FDIC as receiver.

The FDIC entered into an agreement with Zions First National Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah, to accept the failed bank’s direct deposits from the federal government, such as Social Security and Veterans’ payments.

The FDIC was unable to find another financial institution to take over the banking operations of Centennial Bank. As a result, checks to the retail depositors for their insured funds will be mailed on Monday. Brokered deposits will be wired once brokers provide the FDIC with the necessary documents to determine if any of their clients exceed the insurance limits. Customers who placed money with brokers should contact them directly for more information about the status of their funds.

As of December 31, 2009, Centennial Bank had approximately $215.2 million in total assets and $205.1 million in total deposits. At the time of closing, the bank had an estimated $1.8 million in uninsured funds. This amount is an estimate that is likely to change once the FDIC obtains additional information from these customers.

Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-889-4976. Customers with accounts in excess of $250,000 also should contact the toll-free number to set up an appointment to discuss their deposits. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m. Mountain Standard Time (MST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. MST; and on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m. MST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. MST.

Beginning on Monday, customers of Centennial Bank with deposits exceeding $250,000 at the bank may visit the FDIC’s Web page “Is My Account Fully Insured?” at https://www2.fdic.gov/drrip/afi/index.asp.

Centennial Bank is the 26th FDIC-insured institution to fail this year and the second in Utah since Barnes Banking Company, Kaysville, was closed on January 15, 2010. The FDIC estimates the cost of the failure to its Deposit Insurance Fund to be approximately $96.3 million.

Haven’t we learned anything about legacy political leaders after the Bush years and countless other Congressional leaders who “inherited” their seat from a parent? Part of the reason the US is in shambles is because we elect these people, why I do not know, and they are ignorant about the problems the country faces. It is no secret that Mario Cuomo was extremely liberal and responsible, in my view, for NY States horrible financial condition because of his socially liberal programs. While I was young during his reign even I knew he was a terrible governor, but we elected Pataki twice so New Yorkers are not known for picking the better candidates.

Now we might be living under another Cuomo who is also a terrible leader and, as Dick Bove claims, largely responsible for the GSE’s collapse. According to Bove, Cuomo’s relentless pursuit to force Freddie and Fannie to loan to the poor led to the GSE’s into buying sub-prime mortgages and eventually their collapse. Frankly, in my opinion, Mr. Bove is correct, you will not hear me agree with Bove much I might add. Cuomo took the GSE’s and many banks to court because of discrimination, some of which I am sure is true, but his main problem was that banks were not loaning money to the poor. Now, I am not a rocket scientist, but I do know if you loan money to poor people who do not have the ability to pay back loans they will eventually default. The banks knew this and that is why they did not lend money to the poor, yes, some discrimination probably existed though.

Because of his zealous behavior we know have had to guarantee Freddie and Fannie for unlimited losses, which is also why the Fed will stop buying MBS’s as well because the GSE’s can now pick up the slack. With NY in such dire straits, and we are, is it wise to elect another lawyer to the governors position? I think not. Surprisingly, I actually like our current governor, who is a Democrat, because for all of his faults he realizes what a horrible position NY is in. He is actually trying to cut spending, but is met with the same corrupt response from the unions and Assembly that usually appears when you try to take money away from their interests.

Patterson is a mess and not the best person for the job, but I would vote for him over Cuomo any day of the week. Of course, Obama and other NY Democrats want him out, are you really surprised over the recent scandals breaking? My belief is that these timely scandals are appearing because Patterson is trying to cut spending which will impact many social programs like schools and welfare. Those are the Democrats pet projects and by cutting spending there, which is the primary reason for our fiscal distress I might add, he was a marked man and is now out.

Cuomo will be a party man upping the spending as much as the market will allow, but that will not be too much more given our deficits. He will do what he is told and not make those hard decisions because he is just like his father, a tax and spend liberal without the knowledge on how to pay for it. It is far easier to get reelected when you make your base happy and paper over the major problems. However, our problems here are so severe they cannot be papered over any longer. They have already robbed the highway and bridge trust fund to pay for the interest on our debt, that money was supposed to be secured for, well, highways and bridges.

How anyone can look to this man or to the Democratic Party in NY is beyond me. They have shown themselves to be horrible when it comes to financial issues and refuse to make the hard decisions. I am referring to NY Democrats not Democrats nationwide. I will not vote for him and I will find it difficult to vote for the Republican challenger, Rick Lazio is potentially the R’s candidate, because politics in NY have not changed. They simply pick the next person in line who is ‘due’ for the next run at a major office. I almost hope we go into receivership as it will let some sane court appoint conservator to get rip of the ridiculous contracts the unions have and, ultimately, uncover all of the corruption we know exists, but has been masterfully hidden from the public.