A new report was released today showing significant improvement in the labor market today. As you know, there were 6 people unemployed for every 1 job opening not too long ago, but that has changed. Now there are only 5.5 people for every 1 job opening, let the good times roll! While this is good news it is not at all very promising considering the government is hiring thousands upon thousands for the census.

Does anyone even ask themselves if the recent positive data is only indicative of a low quality unsustainable recovery? From my point of view that is all it is, a low quality unsustainable growth spurt. How a negative 36K job report last week was considered good is beyond me as most bulls predicted positive job growth now. What I found very interesting is the fact that all the pundits were blaming bad weather for a bad jobs report when there were no or limited snow storms when the survey was conducted. Furthermore, snow really does not cause a huge decline in payrolls, a statistically significant impact anyhow, but let’s not let the facts get in the way of a recovery story.

There have also been many large firms still forewarning of layoffs coming in the near future. While this may make for higher profit margins it is not good news for a country that is over 2 year into a recession, or whatever we want to call it now, and we are still losing jobs, albeit at a lower rate. Less bad is not good, but that is how the data is being spun which is ridiculous. It is not that I want the market to crash or that I want things to get worse, quite the opposite in fact, I just want an honest take on what is happening out there. Telling people that they have lying eyes is just crazy, but that is what everyone is doing.

This is true of the government data which has conveniently reduced the workforce in order to reduce the unemployment number. I just saw a report which shows that if you add in all the people the government takes out, because they are discouraged, the unemployment rate jumps to 11-11.5%, but even that is low. If we go by the U-6, which we should, as that is the equivalent of what we used during the 1930’s, the rate is sky high. We just came off of a low quality recovery from the 2000-2003 recession which spurred the current recession and clearly the further we kick the can the worse the problem becomes. Stop kicking the can and let people know how bad it is, stop the government intervention (we are now paying people to short sell their homes!) and let the bad debt get cleaned away by the system.

If we do this the problem may not just get kicked down the road, but it might get fixed. Of course, health care is now taking the spot light so who cares about jobs or what is happening in the real world. While I do not favor political intervention in the economy I want Congress to really pass a jobs bill, i.e. a comprehensive bill that provides employers tax cuts, what can I say, I am optimistic.

I just read a Time Magazine article today about the U.S. debt and how it is no big deal the U.S. has so much debt. In fact, Zachary Karabell actually believes that our debt is a good thing. I have actually met Mr. Karabell last year at a conference we both spoke at, although he was paid and I was merely on a panel, but it is unlikely he would remember me. Regardless, I have to humbly disagree with the conclusions he came up with in his article.

Debt can be a good thing, but only in small amounts and for productive reasons. For example, a business that takes out a loan to hire a new employee to expand their business would be productive debt as it contributes to society, hopefully. However, taking out a loan to buy a 50” high definition TV is, in my opinion, a terrible reason to add debt to ones balance sheet. The U.S. government borrows money, recently, to hire people and encourage spending, but the government is not creating productive jobs because it creates nothing and it must tax the people in order to pay off the debt for the job it created. The government actually destroys wealth through taxation and wasteful spending. Basically, the government is borrowing money to buy big screen TV’s, bad debt.

The U.S. government does need to carry debt because we are the reserve currency and carry trade deficits. Debt for a government could be a good thing if that country is the reserve currency, but there is a point where too much debt is the ultimate problem. The impact of too much debt over time during strong economic times may not be a major problem because a growing GDP means more tax revenue is being collected and should increase over time as long as conditions are good. However, any economy has cycles where there are good and bad times, we are currently experiencing bad times, and when times get bad that large debt load becomes a problem and is no longer good, Greece is a good example of this, kind of.

Excess debt during poor economic times means tax revenues decline and the government will have to run deficits to pay for its spending, I am way over simplifying this. Generally, a government will spend much more during these bad times to spur the economy, known as the Keynesian Theory, but this spending, in my opinion, is not the way to spur the economy. As the debt builds and the central bank cuts interest rates the debt during these bad times might not seem so bad because the country has artificially lowered the cost of borrowing, again to spur growth. The key word is “artificially” lowered interest rates and the current interest rate may not actually reflect the current economic conditions or the risk of holding said countries government debt. The reason people ignore deficits more during lower interest rate periods is because the cost to carry the debt is so low, like now.

The U.S. currently has over $12T in debt, heading much higher rapidly, but the carrying costs of that debt is about $500B a year. Keep in mind this is because the Fed Funds Rate is at .25% which means yields on the U.S. government debt is very low, artificially low. The government can currently borrow money for 30 years, for those crazy enough to buy it, for less than 5%, not a bad deal, right? However, what happens if the bulls are right and the economy is recovering and rates have to increase? A 1% increase in Fed Funds would mean the aggregate increase on our debt would be roughly .70%, most of our debt matures in less than 10 years, not good I might add. That means our debt servicing costs, the interest we pay, would increase to about $600B a year, still not bad.

The problems start to get real bad when the Fed increases rates to say 3% or so. The cost to borrow on the 30 year treasury would go up dramatically to about 6%, on the conservative side, and even out short-term interest rates on our bills and notes would go substantially, everything is relative, higher. Before I go further you have to remember that debt is a deadly circular beast because the more you borrow the more you have to pay back and during rising interest rates in order to make all of your payments you either have to tax the people or have more deficit spending, guess which will win in the U.S.? If rates go to 3% because of a hot economy the interest on our debt servicing costs will quickly rise to about $800-$900B, depending. It will take no time at all for the interest payments to reach $1T and considering our debt mostly matures 10 years or less you cannot forget the refunding that must take place. The CBO just did an estimate on a lot of this in the past few days, I did not read the report, but I know the final numbers without a lot of obvious assumptions end up close to what I just said.

Karabell makes the argument that the U.S. would use the borrowed money to retrain our workforce and rebuild our infrastructure. That may be the case, but to fully upgrade our infrastructure, not including pie in the sky green energy items, would cost about $2T. I believe the last stimulus only applied a small portion of what is needed, so the infrastructure idea Karabell had does not pan out in my book. Plus, there is no return on infrastructure immediately, over time yes because it makes commerce easier, but that takes time. He also made the case that China and India are flush with cash and building their infrastructure now and, I think, was indicating that since the U.S. is so stable that excess cash will end up here, which is reasonable to assume, for now.

What he failed to address is the fact that the money they are flush with is ours from them exporting goods to us. Because they have such huge exports to the U.S. we have a trade deficit with them and they need to buy our debt to balance it out. It is a case of vendor financing and all vendor financing ends up with someone getting hurt, guess who in our case? The point I am making is that the Chinese and Indians will buy our debt now because treasuries are going up in value, thank you deflation, but how long will that continue for? Not only that, but if China un-pegs their currency from ours it will appreciate and their treasury holding, in RMB terms, will decline. Why would one invest in treasuries if your currency is rising and the country you are loaning money to as a declining currency, you wouldn’t do that.

Essentially, all gravy trains end and there is a limit to how much a country can borrow. Consider the U.S. has implicit guarantees on not only our debt, but also on banks, insurance companies and the mother of all bad investments the GSE’s. Oh, and if you ever expect to see GM pay back the money they got, well, I wouldn’t hold my breath on that one. All of those guarantees are about $23T, not including the national debt and the entitlement guarantees we have. Again, my point is the limit to what the market will allow a country to borrow cannot be far off. At the very least we will need to pay a greater risk premium on our debt which means the interest rates on our government bonds will detach from where the Fed sets them at and go through the roof.

I get what Karabell is saying, but he is speaking in the here and now which is suicide when talking about so much money. You must look forward in order to see the real problems and it is kind of crazy to think that all this borrowing will go towards retraining the people and vastly improving our infrastructure. The government is the worst at spending money efficiently and much of that money goes to wasteful projects like DNA research on bears in Montana, no offense to bears, but I just do not care about their DNA. On top of all that, who knows if we will actually emerge from this downturn, sorry I do not buy an inventory rebuild as a real economic recovery. If we do not exit this thing in the next10 months our problems will be bigger than we think.

On top of all of this there is the whole impact to our currency, which is not good. The more debt we issue the more we dilute our currency and at some point the world will demand some type of other reserve currency, it is being talked about now. If we lose our reserve currency status we are in a heap of trouble, I know that could ‘never happen.’ All of these problems or these potential problems leave me a couple of conclusions, besides the fact that bulls will spin even really dangerous debt problems positively, that; 1) Precious metals are cheap and 2) The Fed will never raise the Funds rate to a reasonable level again.

Little attention has been given to the main Friday events this year, I am guilt of not reporting on it either, which is bank failures. I guess everyone, me included, has become complacent with the fact that banks are failing at a very scary rate still. I am thinking that the Fed should have left the discount rate along as we are now up to 25 bank closures this year, 3 tonight (see below). At this rate we will see, assuming February is the example of what the rest of the year holds, we will see upwards of 180 bank failures for 2010. I thought the crisis was over?

Clearly there are major structural problems within the banking system still. Although the “too big to fails” will remain, well, too big to fail the smaller banks are up the creek without a paddle. Clearly whatever plan the administration had in mind for these smaller institutions has not worked or the problems are so severe that no one wants to talk about them. I think the latter is probably more likely than the former. Either way, these failures are a major problem especially as the FDIC is technically bankrupt, what else do you call an organization that has a substantial negative net worth? Obviously that lifeline with the Treasury will have to be tapped in order to guarantee the $250,000 per deposit.

Tonight’s winners are:

I guess the losses are not that bad, but given the sorry state of the FDIC I think any loss is bad news. So much for the FDIC’s national savings week push, why save when your bank goes out of business?

Waterfield Bank had no buyer, apparently, but the other 2 banks did have buyers. As you can see the losses are pretty severe given the asset size of the banks. All told losses could hit $808.1M if the FDIC needs to make good on the loss-share agreements, certainly some of the loss-share will be realized if not all of it. Bank of Illinois was purchased by Heartland Bank and Trust Company out of, get this, Normal Illinois and Sun American Bank was acquired by First-Citizens Bank out of Boca Raton FL.

Centennial Bank and Waterfield Bank had deposits of $1.8M and $407,000, respectively, not covered by the FDIC insurance, keep no more than the maximum insured limit at banks, especially smaller banks. There may be more closures later tonight so check back. Below are the press releases.

Waterfield Bank:

Waterfield Bank, Germantown, Maryland, was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the insured depositors, the FDIC created Waterfield Bank, FA—a new depository institution chartered by the OTS and insured by the FDIC—to take over the operations of Waterfield Bank. The new institution will remain open until April 5, 2010, to allow depositors access to their insured funds and time to move accounts to other insured institutions.

The bank had one branch location. It also took deposits from customers via the Internet and 38 affinity groups.

At the time of closing, the receiver immediately transferred to Waterfield Bank, FA, all insured deposits of the failed bank, except certificates of deposits (CDs) and individual retirement accounts (IRAs). The FDIC will mail checks directly to customers with CDs and IRAs for the amount of their insured funds, on Monday morning, March 8.

Customers with savings accounts, checking accounts and money market deposit accounts will have access to their insured funds as usual during this transitional period. Banking activities, such as direct deposit, check writing, and ATM and debit card use, will continue as normal for the customers with demand deposit accounts until Waterfield Bank, FA, closes on April 5. At the end of this transition period, the FDIC will mail checks to customers who have not closed their accounts or transferred their funds to another institution.

On-line banking services, including bill pay, will be unavailable for transactions over the weekend; however, these systems will be active by Monday morning, March 8.

As of December 31, 2009, Waterfield Bank had $155.6 million in assets and $156.4 million in deposits. At the time of closing, the amount of deposits exceeding the insurance limits totaled about $407,000. This amount is an estimate and is likely to change as the FDIC works with customers of Waterfield Bank. The uninsured deposits were not transferred to the newly chartered institution.

Depositors with more than $250,000 at Waterfield Bank should call the FDIC at (800) 830-4735 to make an appointment to discuss the status of their funds. The phone number will be operational this evening until 11:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., EST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EST.

Customers who would like more information about today’s transaction can call the toll-free number; send an e-mail to waterfieldbankquestions@fdic.gov.

Under the FDI Act, the FDIC may create a new depository institution to ensure that depositors have continued access to their insured funds where no other bank has agreed to assume the insured deposits. This arrangement allows for uninterrupted direct deposits and automated payments from customers’ accounts and allows them time to find another institution with which to do business.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to its Deposit Insurance Fund will be $51.0 million. Waterfield Bank is the 25th bank to fail in the nation this year and the first in Maryland. The last FDIC-insured institution to fail in the state was Bradford Bank, Baltimore, on August 28, 2009.

Bank of Illinois:

Bank of Illinois, Normal, Illinois, was closed today by the Illinois Department of Financial Professional Regulation – Division of Banking, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Heartland Bank and Trust Company, Bloomington, Illinois, to assume all of the deposits of Bank of Illinois.

The two branches of Bank of Illinois will reopen on Saturday as branches of Heartland Bank and Trust Company. Depositors of Bank of Illinois will automatically become depositors of Heartland Bank and Trust Company. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from Heartland Bank and Trust Company that it has completed systems changes to allow other Heartland Bank and Trust Company branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Bank of Illinois can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of December 31, 2009, Bank of Illinois had approximately $211.7 million in total assets and $198.5 million in total deposits. Heartland Bank and Trust Company will pay the FDIC a premium of 3.61 percent to assume all of the deposits of Bank of Illinois. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, Heartland Bank and Trust Company agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.

The FDIC and Heartland Bank and Trust Company entered into a loss-share transaction on $166.6 million of Bank of Illinois’s assets. Heartland Bank and Trust Company will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $53.7 million. Heartland Bank and Trust Company’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. Bank of Illinois is the 24th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the third in Illinois. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was George Washington Savings Bank, Orland Park, on February 19, 2010.

Sun American Bank:

Sun American Bank, Boca Raton, Florida, was closed today by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company, Raleigh, North Carolina, to assume all of the deposits of Sun American Bank.

The 12 branches of Sun American Bank will reopen on Monday as branches of First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company. Depositors of Sun American Bank will automatically become depositors of First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company that it has completed systems changes to allow other First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company branches to process their accounts as well.

This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Sun American Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of December 31, 2009, Sun American Bank had approximately $535.7 million in total assets and $443.5 million in total deposits. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company did not pay a premium to acquire the deposits of Sun American Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.

The FDIC and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company entered into a loss-share transaction on $433.0 million of Sun American Bank’s assets. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.

Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-866-954-9532. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., EST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EST.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $103.8 million. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. Sun American Bank is the 23rd FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the fourth in Florida. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Marco Community Bank, Marco Island, on February 19, 2010.

Centennial Bank:

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) approved the payout of the insured deposits of Centennial Bank, Ogden, Utah. The bank was closed today by the Utah Department of Financial Institutions, which appointed the FDIC as receiver.

The FDIC entered into an agreement with Zions First National Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah, to accept the failed bank’s direct deposits from the federal government, such as Social Security and Veterans’ payments.

The FDIC was unable to find another financial institution to take over the banking operations of Centennial Bank. As a result, checks to the retail depositors for their insured funds will be mailed on Monday. Brokered deposits will be wired once brokers provide the FDIC with the necessary documents to determine if any of their clients exceed the insurance limits. Customers who placed money with brokers should contact them directly for more information about the status of their funds.

As of December 31, 2009, Centennial Bank had approximately $215.2 million in total assets and $205.1 million in total deposits. At the time of closing, the bank had an estimated $1.8 million in uninsured funds. This amount is an estimate that is likely to change once the FDIC obtains additional information from these customers.

Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-889-4976. Customers with accounts in excess of $250,000 also should contact the toll-free number to set up an appointment to discuss their deposits. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m. Mountain Standard Time (MST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. MST; and on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m. MST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. MST.

Beginning on Monday, customers of Centennial Bank with deposits exceeding $250,000 at the bank may visit the FDIC’s Web page “Is My Account Fully Insured?” at https://www2.fdic.gov/drrip/afi/index.asp.

Centennial Bank is the 26th FDIC-insured institution to fail this year and the second in Utah since Barnes Banking Company, Kaysville, was closed on January 15, 2010. The FDIC estimates the cost of the failure to its Deposit Insurance Fund to be approximately $96.3 million.

Haven’t we learned anything about legacy political leaders after the Bush years and countless other Congressional leaders who “inherited” their seat from a parent? Part of the reason the US is in shambles is because we elect these people, why I do not know, and they are ignorant about the problems the country faces. It is no secret that Mario Cuomo was extremely liberal and responsible, in my view, for NY States horrible financial condition because of his socially liberal programs. While I was young during his reign even I knew he was a terrible governor, but we elected Pataki twice so New Yorkers are not known for picking the better candidates.

Now we might be living under another Cuomo who is also a terrible leader and, as Dick Bove claims, largely responsible for the GSE’s collapse. According to Bove, Cuomo’s relentless pursuit to force Freddie and Fannie to loan to the poor led to the GSE’s into buying sub-prime mortgages and eventually their collapse. Frankly, in my opinion, Mr. Bove is correct, you will not hear me agree with Bove much I might add. Cuomo took the GSE’s and many banks to court because of discrimination, some of which I am sure is true, but his main problem was that banks were not loaning money to the poor. Now, I am not a rocket scientist, but I do know if you loan money to poor people who do not have the ability to pay back loans they will eventually default. The banks knew this and that is why they did not lend money to the poor, yes, some discrimination probably existed though.

Because of his zealous behavior we know have had to guarantee Freddie and Fannie for unlimited losses, which is also why the Fed will stop buying MBS’s as well because the GSE’s can now pick up the slack. With NY in such dire straits, and we are, is it wise to elect another lawyer to the governors position? I think not. Surprisingly, I actually like our current governor, who is a Democrat, because for all of his faults he realizes what a horrible position NY is in. He is actually trying to cut spending, but is met with the same corrupt response from the unions and Assembly that usually appears when you try to take money away from their interests.

Patterson is a mess and not the best person for the job, but I would vote for him over Cuomo any day of the week. Of course, Obama and other NY Democrats want him out, are you really surprised over the recent scandals breaking? My belief is that these timely scandals are appearing because Patterson is trying to cut spending which will impact many social programs like schools and welfare. Those are the Democrats pet projects and by cutting spending there, which is the primary reason for our fiscal distress I might add, he was a marked man and is now out.

Cuomo will be a party man upping the spending as much as the market will allow, but that will not be too much more given our deficits. He will do what he is told and not make those hard decisions because he is just like his father, a tax and spend liberal without the knowledge on how to pay for it. It is far easier to get reelected when you make your base happy and paper over the major problems. However, our problems here are so severe they cannot be papered over any longer. They have already robbed the highway and bridge trust fund to pay for the interest on our debt, that money was supposed to be secured for, well, highways and bridges.

How anyone can look to this man or to the Democratic Party in NY is beyond me. They have shown themselves to be horrible when it comes to financial issues and refuse to make the hard decisions. I am referring to NY Democrats not Democrats nationwide. I will not vote for him and I will find it difficult to vote for the Republican challenger, Rick Lazio is potentially the R’s candidate, because politics in NY have not changed. They simply pick the next person in line who is ‘due’ for the next run at a major office. I almost hope we go into receivership as it will let some sane court appoint conservator to get rip of the ridiculous contracts the unions have and, ultimately, uncover all of the corruption we know exists, but has been masterfully hidden from the public.

Senator Jim Bunning who was more upset over missing a basketball game than helping his fellow citizens by objecting to an extension of unemployment benefits. Now, keep in mind it was Senator Bunning, (R) from Kentucky, who prevented himself from seeing his precious game and could have easily DVR’d it, or better yet just stopped his foolish objection to the measure. I just do not get how this guy could balk at a minor, considering the size of other bills recently passed, $10B in spending that goes directly to the people and not to banks is simply beyond me.

Mr. Bunning could have stopped the spending of hundreds of billions of dollars in the past, but decided that this measure, a true sign of how horrible the economy really is, was the time to take a stand against spending. He had no problem voting for Bush’s crazy spending without those programs being paid for, but this $10B for an extension of unemployment benefits, wow. There is simply not much to say about this guy except e will not be missed when he retires this year. I am willing to bet that if we add up all the freebies he gave to corporate America this extension of unemployment benefits probably would be close to the bottom of the list as far as the price tag is concerned.

I am totally against spending without paying for it, I think we all are, but there are exceptions to the rule. When you are cutting off millions from badly needed benefits that pay the mortgage and put food on the table for those who are unemployed I think that qualifies you for being heartless. There are currently 6 people searching for every 1 job in America. The percentage of people collecting unemployment benefits for 26 weeks or longer has never been higher. We are 2 years into this recession and we are still losing jobs and this is the type of representation we have in Congress?

I think there is no wonder why Americans, and the Brits now, are signing on to the Tea Party, at least they are not the same 2 irresponsible parties we have to choose from now. I realize what the Tea Party is and am not a huge believer in it, but I get what the average person believes, it is something different than the status quo. Unfortunately, the founders are probably a bunch of right wing nut jobs trying to bring the country back to a hard right path. Regardless, with leadership like we have now there is no wonder why people are seeking something new and different, but we should always be careful what we wish for.

The bottom line is that Senator Bunning is a jackass and whatever axe he has to grind he should leave the American people out of it. When you think about it, you must really be a screw-up when your own party says that you do not represent the body of the whole and side with the opposition against you. Think about that Jimmy.

I just read a story where Larry Summers, White house economic advisor, is blaming the weather for a potentially ‘distorted’ jobs report this Friday. Seriously, we are still going with the bad weather? It must be snowing everywhere, the UK, Greece, China, the Ukraine, Dubai, etc. The data all over the world, including today’s ISM number, is rolling over and in some areas it is just plain scary. I got news for you, it has nothing to do with the weather, at all.

Over the past few weeks more and more companies announced layoffs, not a good sign, and the initial claims data went way up over the past 4 weeks. The data started to roll over before the snow hit the ground. Not to mention, but the last time I checked it usually snowed in the winter time anyhow. I realize we had a few days of snow, but nothing major and it is beyond me how snow would be firing people. I will say that the weather impacted retail sales, but not all this other data.

Let’s not forget that the vast majority of the bad weather was also in the Northeast so I am very excited how the bad weather in NY caused California to have increased unemployment figures. Never in my life have I seen such a snow job being perpetrated by the talking heads and now Washington blaming bad weather for horrible economic data. What will happen next month when we have even more layoffs and there is no weather to blame? Maybe we will blame the sunshine because people are so broke they cannot afford sunglasses… wait that kind of admits the economy stinks, never mind.

My point is that the data, well before the snow, rolled over viciously and it is the economy that is the problem. We are over 2 years into this thing, recession/depression, whatever, and we are still losing jobs, that is not good. The unfortunate part is we spend trillions only to be in a position where employment is continuing to contract. It is fair to say that the stimulus probably helped a little, but clearly it was not as big of a help as the administration claims. As an aside, it will be interesting to see if some municipalities file for bankruptcy in the next couple of weeks, maybe that is because of the bad weather as well.

As I conduct my regular daily readings of various blogs and news sites I cannot help to get a very uneasy feeling brewing out there. The negativity is running very high in the political realm and from those who report on economic events. I keep seeing tag lines like; “expect more social unrest” when people report on things like the Berkley protests, which are disturbingly violent I might add. When I hit my favorite Libertarian blogs the feeling is more uneasy as I keep seeing words like revolution being used.

When you add in the Washington factor where our elected leaders are going to hammer unpopular legislation through, with no compromise, it makes me even more uneasy. There is no doubt that we need to make painful decisions in order to get our fiscal house in order, but that usually means less spending, not more. Unfortunately, our current political leaders do not see it that way and are hammering through more spending, in particular the health care reform bill. Look, I know we need to do something, but not this. Deducting money from Medicare and then adding it back in to other areas is not rational, this bill is not paid for and will make costs rise not fall.

Regardless, people are not happy about unpopular legislation being thrown down their thoughts. The kicker is that people like Nancy Pelosi come out and say that programs like Social Security and Medicare were unpopular when they were enacted. I guess what she means is that politicians know what is best for Americans and we should keep our mouths shut. We all know how right politicians are their track record speaks for itself just look at the stellar decisions they made over the last 10 years. Iraq was a great decision, the prescription drug coverage was fantastic (albeit unpaid for), the PATRIOT Act was a winner, free speech zones were fantastic, how many stimulus bills did we have again – they worked out well, eliminating a paper trail for voting is a sure disaster waiting to happen, and need I go on?

Politicians do not know what is good for Americans, they know what is good for them and getting reelected. Well, they did used to know how to get elected until now. If they pass this next unpopular batch of legislative nightmare on the docket they are in for a rude awakening come November because the people are coming for them. My only hope is that people come for them at the polls and not in any other way. Based on what I have read combined with the recent plane crash in Texas into the IRS building I think we might see more people going out to make a statement. Meaning, some nut job will more than likely blow something up or worse.

Who knows what will happen in the future, but we know that the average person feels left out right now. Wall Street got their massive bonuses and, for them, nothing really changed with the exception of having to play defense in the media. At the end of the day, the average person knows they got nothing over the past 2 years except for a higher future tax bill and, maybe, they got to keep their job, but we know about 20% of Americans were not so lucky as they are either unemployed or underemployed. Wall Street though, they are fine. Washington, well, they are doing OK as well as campaign contributions, from Wall Street, are still coming in and many have received raises. Clearly, there is a double standard and John Edwards was completely right when he said there are 2 Americas.

Discontent is here and that discontent could become a powder keg if not rectified. The unfortunate thing is I do not see how the public can be pacified, especially as this thing we are in deepens as we are now seeing. Things could get ugly and politicians need to figure out that they are representing the people and start acting that way. It is beyond me how they cannot see that Americans view them as being on the wrong path, but, again, that is politics and they will be surprised if they get voted out in November.

It was funny to see many of the pundits spin bad data on the weather. This equates to my daughter saying the dog ate her homework. It is hard to believe the snow is to blame for higher initial jobless claims when we are in the middle of winter. However, I will concede that retail sales will be pretty horrible because of the weather, but other pieces of data, well, not so much of that weak data can be blamed on some snow.

Housing starts stink because the housing market is in trouble and even massive government stimulus is not helping. My guess is this data will probably improve in March to April because of the last minute rush to buy homes, but I would not count on that being much of a bump. What is worse is that the President wants a permanent moratorium on foreclosures which is doing no one any good and, in fact, will hurt banks that would not be able to collect or sell an asset that is earning them anything. I am referring to Obama’s demand that before a foreclosure can happen it has to pass through the re-modification process. Capitalism is officially being suspended until further notice.

As far as jobless claims are concerned, they are going to get worse as far as I can see. I am basing this on antidotal evidence of firms continuing to announce layoffs and a jump in the mass layoff indicator a few days ago. It is crazy to think employment will improve when you have blue chip companies announcing layoffs and claims are heading back above 500K a week. This is not because of the weather it is because the economy stinks. David Rosenberg calls this a Houdini recovery and he is correct. Besides a statistical recovery and a rally in equities, which is odd considering the dismal news over the past 2 weeks, the average person is worse off than they were last year. Again, unless it has been snowing for 8 months it cannot be blamed on the weather.

Perhaps it is snowing in Greece as well, that will explain their financial problems. It is true that the weather hurts certain things, but it has a rather limited impact on employment. After all, snow removal companies would probably be hiring. The weather might hurt retail sales, but with more people using the internet, me included, to shop I would not buy the soon to be claim that the weather killed retail sales. This is all about uncertainty in the world and to deny that there is uncertainty is simply crazy.

We have problems all over the place from domestic issues to possible sovereign defaults. Let us not forget we will witness municipal bankruptcies in the near future as well, chapter 9 is the more likely bankruptcy procedure. Health care reform is back and will be passed, whether you like it or not, and believe me you should be careful what you wish for because this means higher premiums for everyone. Do you really think Anthem raised prices 39% because they wanted to? Nope, it is because, I as speculated months ago, they know they are out of business in 4 years. All of these things mixed with tight credit conditions means tons of uncertainty.

Why the markets are not down 200 points, I do not know. However, it appears that Goldman Sachs was a huge buyer or S&P 500 futures yesterday, according to Zero Hedge reports, which made this a futures driven rally, check out the trading between 3 and 6AM for more weird futures action. I do not want to spread conspiracy theories, but all I am saying is the markets are trading very odd right now. I am still very bearish, how could anyone be bullish with the horrible data we have seen as of late? This is not 1 week of bad data, but 2 months worth of bad data and the market ignores it, weird.

As I had suspected, months ago, jobless claims are rising rapidly every week now. We are almost back at 500K a week for initial claims as all those temporary workers are let go from retail, that is my suspicion at least. I remember claims that once the initial claims fell below 500K we would see job creation. However, the only creation of jobs were the wonderful accounting gimmicks from the BLS as they take more and more people out of the workforce, dropping the unemployment rate and making the monthly employment report look much better than it really is.

The trend is clear now, unemployment is getting worse. Even though the initial claims data is volatile it is the best barometer to what the employment number is going to look like. Unless the government has hired far more census workers than reported I expect the employment number to look pretty bad next week. Of course, there is the ever transparent way the BLS does remove people from the roles, but most people now look for that. It is also clear that the 1M jobs the BLS were forced to add to the unemployment number in February shows that their models are broken and should be adjusted, perhaps remove the birth/death model altogether.

There is no way that the ‘backlog of filings’ is to blame as they made the claim, a couple weeks ago, that they were all caught up. The only real reason for the worsening situation is that the job market is worsening. Even the mass layoff indicator is way up again, not a good sign, which means the employment number will get much worse. The good news is that no trader believes the data coming out of Washington and, based on the confidence numbers we saw, the public is also not buying that things are better. The man on the street usually has a better grasp on how things are out there versus the ivory tower economist who does not have a clue, usually.

On the bright side durable goods orders were through the rook, until you ex-out autos or transportation altogether. However, that number really is volatile and is not indicative of any real recovery, unless you are Dennis Kneale. There has been some improving data out there, but this is a statistical recovery and nothing more. From my perspective this makes equities very overvalued.

I was reflecting on events this past weekend trying to put a game plan together and weighing what is going on in the world. I can honestly admit that I do not know what will happen, no one ever really knows, but I do know that things are very uncertain in our world. We are all in the same boat and trying to make decisions that are best for our families, our wallets and our piece of mind. Unfortunately many of the things we are planning for are outside of our control.

It is reasonable safe to assume that our futures never depended more on the decisions that are coming out of Washington, well, at least not since the 1930’s at least. However, Washington is now only one piece of the pie as our world is walking in stride as one. While decisions in Washington directly impact our lives, for the love of God pay attention to what they are doing, now we are also faced with the consequences of decisions that come from China and the EU. Decisions made overseas will have a direct impact on what happens here in the USA and on our investments. Never before have the world markets have been so in tune with each other. In fact, you would be surprised to see that the correlations between all the markets follow each other so closely over the past 6 years or so.

This correlation has really put the efficient frontier and diversification risk reduction strategy into question. In other words, diversification between international and domestic equities might not reduce risk as much as we think, I will get charts to prove that when I get the go ahead to publish them. The irony is that it is not so much markets ruling the day, but politics. The decisions that come from governments now impact the markets much more than you might care to realize. This is important considering that government stimulus from around the world is largely responsible for propping up global growth at this point in time.

Domestically, I was watching parts of CPAC this weekend and was extremely disappointed in what I saw. Granted, I did not watch the whole thing, but enough to know that the R’s, as in Republicans, have no idea what they are doing. Unfortunately, either do the D’s, as in Democrats, know what they are doing either. Both parties fail to take responsibility for their actions and neither party really understands the issues facing the country at this point in time. Sure, they talk a good game about fiscal responsibility, but neither is serious and, frankly, the R’s have grown government way more than the D’s have over the past 30 years. In fact, Ronald Reagan had grown the deficit by a whopping 189% yet we credit him with being a fiscal conservative, huh?

While many of you may think I am a right winger I am not, I am a political atheist. It is not that I do not take a stand on any issues or beliefs I have just come to the conclusion that the party I would belong to simply does not exist at this time. If I were to align myself with any party it would be the Libertarian Party on the strong money principle, but I also recognize that the free markets will never be able to regulate themselves. The proof of this was 2003-2007 as the free market rolled on and some Einstein somewhere thought it would be a good idea to push no document loans to anyone who would be foolish enough to take one. You cannot honestly tell me that these incredibly smart people did not know these things were bad loans at the time. They knew and they also knew that they only needed a couple multimillion dollar bonuses to be happy.

My point is that we have no real political leadership and they simply are pushing what they believe is the right policies. However, they do not know what they do and they do not understand that the problems facing America are those silly policies to begin with. To them, though, it is all about reelection and keeping their power, if that is not a true statement then we would have had term limits on Congress instituted decades ago, but we don’t. It comes down to the real fundamental problem in America is that we do not have the will to make those tough decisions. I really believe that the products we buy demonstrate our beliefs and we have way to many “I” products being bought which means we all only care about ourselves.

All of this adds to the uncertainty that I feel and the feeling I have in my gut is growing by the day. There are so many problems out there that are not being addressed and when we do address them we simply throw billions of dollars at it which merely wallpapers over the roots of the problems we face. The very problem that we have is that we are waiting for Washington to solve our problems. How can we expect self serving Congressman or Senators to solve the problems we face? Half of them are multimillionaires and the other half are probably on the take somewhere along the way. Yet we trust them to solve our problems or understand the average person, good luck with that.

I watched this weekend as former politicians lambasted Obama while they ignored their roles in the problems we have. I watched them blatantly distort the facts about where we are and how we got here, sorry folks, but it took a whole lot longer than 1 year to get to where we are. I watched them roll out with no new ideas or inspirational speeches and I distinctly got the feeling that they simply think that because they have an R in front of their name they will get elected because they are different from the President’s party. Maybe they will, but I think it will be much harder than they think because 10% unemployment, 18% by U-6 or much higher if we re-add the people the BLS removed from the labor force, is a real problem that both parties have to take responsibility for.

On top of the domestic political uncertainty we have global uncertainty. We have Europe in or on the brink of a major crisis with the PIGS. We have China who is really upset over us, do you blame them (?), over selling weapons to Taiwan and the Dali Lama, not to mention the mini trade war we have brewing. China is also taking their stimulus off the table, or so it appears, along with India. Those economies play a huge role in the global growth story and if they are tightening their belts this is a problem for that story.

Finally we have Iran, of how I love the nut jobs in Iran, whose leaders are actively seeking to become a nuclear country. While they technically are a nuclear country they want to take this to a much higher level with missiles and warheads. Call me crazy, but I have a real problem with a country that has loose cannons running it and they have reached a level where they have nuclear fuel along with a missile that can reach orbit. Sorry folks, but the story about the mouse they launched into space was not about a mouse and it shows their intentions which should make us all very nervous. Thank God I do not have to make policy decisions about what to do about them. I just hope Obama and company make the right decisions in regards to handling them.

All of this uncertainty is not being felt by me alone, but by millions of people. There seems to be no end to it and as each day passes more uncertainty gets added to the fire. The odd thing about this is that the markets just do not care. I guess when computers trade some 60% of the volume on the exchanges, according to CNBC, the uncertainty does not matter. Regardless, it is clear that no matter who is in charge or making the decisions their options are becoming very limited and the outcomes are all looking the same. The best case scenario I foresee is massive inflation and dollar devaluation, over a few years time, and the best case scenario is massive inflation and dollar devaluation.

As I stated earlier, the only thing we can do is pay attention to what is going on and make the best decisions we can for ourselves and our families. I have several friends, smart people I might add with CFA’s and MBA’s, who are leaving the country or adhering to the guns, gold and God philosophy. I have honestly never seen such smart people head for the hills like this before. I am not in that camp, although I do love gold and precious metals, but they might just be right. However, it is possible, I guess, that all of this uncertainty will pass by and everything will be fine, but mathematically speaking, well, I give that a very low probability.