By Ray on March 3, 2010
Haven’t we learned anything about legacy political leaders after the Bush years and countless other Congressional leaders who “inherited” their seat from a parent? Part of the reason the US is in shambles is because we elect these people, why I do not know, and they are ignorant about the problems the country faces. It is no secret that Mario Cuomo was extremely liberal and responsible, in my view, for NY States horrible financial condition because of his socially liberal programs. While I was young during his reign even I knew he was a terrible governor, but we elected Pataki twice so New Yorkers are not known for picking the better candidates.
Now we might be living under another Cuomo who is also a terrible leader and, as Dick Bove claims, largely responsible for the GSE’s collapse. According to Bove, Cuomo’s relentless pursuit to force Freddie and Fannie to loan to the poor led to the GSE’s into buying sub-prime mortgages and eventually their collapse. Frankly, in my opinion, Mr. Bove is correct, you will not hear me agree with Bove much I might add. Cuomo took the GSE’s and many banks to court because of discrimination, some of which I am sure is true, but his main problem was that banks were not loaning money to the poor. Now, I am not a rocket scientist, but I do know if you loan money to poor people who do not have the ability to pay back loans they will eventually default. The banks knew this and that is why they did not lend money to the poor, yes, some discrimination probably existed though.
Because of his zealous behavior we know have had to guarantee Freddie and Fannie for unlimited losses, which is also why the Fed will stop buying MBS’s as well because the GSE’s can now pick up the slack. With NY in such dire straits, and we are, is it wise to elect another lawyer to the governors position? I think not. Surprisingly, I actually like our current governor, who is a Democrat, because for all of his faults he realizes what a horrible position NY is in. He is actually trying to cut spending, but is met with the same corrupt response from the unions and Assembly that usually appears when you try to take money away from their interests.
Patterson is a mess and not the best person for the job, but I would vote for him over Cuomo any day of the week. Of course, Obama and other NY Democrats want him out, are you really surprised over the recent scandals breaking? My belief is that these timely scandals are appearing because Patterson is trying to cut spending which will impact many social programs like schools and welfare. Those are the Democrats pet projects and by cutting spending there, which is the primary reason for our fiscal distress I might add, he was a marked man and is now out.
Cuomo will be a party man upping the spending as much as the market will allow, but that will not be too much more given our deficits. He will do what he is told and not make those hard decisions because he is just like his father, a tax and spend liberal without the knowledge on how to pay for it. It is far easier to get reelected when you make your base happy and paper over the major problems. However, our problems here are so severe they cannot be papered over any longer. They have already robbed the highway and bridge trust fund to pay for the interest on our debt, that money was supposed to be secured for, well, highways and bridges.
How anyone can look to this man or to the Democratic Party in NY is beyond me. They have shown themselves to be horrible when it comes to financial issues and refuse to make the hard decisions. I am referring to NY Democrats not Democrats nationwide. I will not vote for him and I will find it difficult to vote for the Republican challenger, Rick Lazio is potentially the R’s candidate, because politics in NY have not changed. They simply pick the next person in line who is ‘due’ for the next run at a major office. I almost hope we go into receivership as it will let some sane court appoint conservator to get rip of the ridiculous contracts the unions have and, ultimately, uncover all of the corruption we know exists, but has been masterfully hidden from the public.
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
LS Blogs
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in Politics | Tagged Andrew Cuomo, banks, congressional leaders, democrat, governors, gse, liberal programs, mario cuomo, mr bove, NY state governor, NYS, political leaders, sub prime mortgages
By Ray on March 2, 2010
Senator Jim Bunning who was more upset over missing a basketball game than helping his fellow citizens by objecting to an extension of unemployment benefits. Now, keep in mind it was Senator Bunning, (R) from Kentucky, who prevented himself from seeing his precious game and could have easily DVR’d it, or better yet just stopped his foolish objection to the measure. I just do not get how this guy could balk at a minor, considering the size of other bills recently passed, $10B in spending that goes directly to the people and not to banks is simply beyond me.
Mr. Bunning could have stopped the spending of hundreds of billions of dollars in the past, but decided that this measure, a true sign of how horrible the economy really is, was the time to take a stand against spending. He had no problem voting for Bush’s crazy spending without those programs being paid for, but this $10B for an extension of unemployment benefits, wow. There is simply not much to say about this guy except e will not be missed when he retires this year. I am willing to bet that if we add up all the freebies he gave to corporate America this extension of unemployment benefits probably would be close to the bottom of the list as far as the price tag is concerned.
I am totally against spending without paying for it, I think we all are, but there are exceptions to the rule. When you are cutting off millions from badly needed benefits that pay the mortgage and put food on the table for those who are unemployed I think that qualifies you for being heartless. There are currently 6 people searching for every 1 job in America. The percentage of people collecting unemployment benefits for 26 weeks or longer has never been higher. We are 2 years into this recession and we are still losing jobs and this is the type of representation we have in Congress?
I think there is no wonder why Americans, and the Brits now, are signing on to the Tea Party, at least they are not the same 2 irresponsible parties we have to choose from now. I realize what the Tea Party is and am not a huge believer in it, but I get what the average person believes, it is something different than the status quo. Unfortunately, the founders are probably a bunch of right wing nut jobs trying to bring the country back to a hard right path. Regardless, with leadership like we have now there is no wonder why people are seeking something new and different, but we should always be careful what we wish for.
The bottom line is that Senator Bunning is a jackass and whatever axe he has to grind he should leave the American people out of it. When you think about it, you must really be a screw-up when your own party says that you do not represent the body of the whole and side with the opposition against you. Think about that Jimmy.
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
LS Blogs
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in Politics | Tagged billions of dollars, collecting unemployment benefits, congress, corporate america, jim bunning, objection, recession, senator bunning, senator jim bunning, tea party, unemployment
By Ray on March 1, 2010
I just read a story where Larry Summers, White house economic advisor, is blaming the weather for a potentially ‘distorted’ jobs report this Friday. Seriously, we are still going with the bad weather? It must be snowing everywhere, the UK, Greece, China, the Ukraine, Dubai, etc. The data all over the world, including today’s ISM number, is rolling over and in some areas it is just plain scary. I got news for you, it has nothing to do with the weather, at all.
Over the past few weeks more and more companies announced layoffs, not a good sign, and the initial claims data went way up over the past 4 weeks. The data started to roll over before the snow hit the ground. Not to mention, but the last time I checked it usually snowed in the winter time anyhow. I realize we had a few days of snow, but nothing major and it is beyond me how snow would be firing people. I will say that the weather impacted retail sales, but not all this other data.
Let’s not forget that the vast majority of the bad weather was also in the Northeast so I am very excited how the bad weather in NY caused California to have increased unemployment figures. Never in my life have I seen such a snow job being perpetrated by the talking heads and now Washington blaming bad weather for horrible economic data. What will happen next month when we have even more layoffs and there is no weather to blame? Maybe we will blame the sunshine because people are so broke they cannot afford sunglasses… wait that kind of admits the economy stinks, never mind.
My point is that the data, well before the snow, rolled over viciously and it is the economy that is the problem. We are over 2 years into this thing, recession/depression, whatever, and we are still losing jobs, that is not good. The unfortunate part is we spend trillions only to be in a position where employment is continuing to contract. It is fair to say that the stimulus probably helped a little, but clearly it was not as big of a help as the administration claims. As an aside, it will be interesting to see if some municipalities file for bankruptcy in the next couple of weeks, maybe that is because of the bad weather as well.
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
LS Blogs
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in Economy | Tagged bad weather, depression, economic advisor, economic data, initial claims, ISM, larry summers, layoffs, recession, stimulus, unemployment figures, white house
By Ray on February 28, 2010
As I conduct my regular daily readings of various blogs and news sites I cannot help to get a very uneasy feeling brewing out there. The negativity is running very high in the political realm and from those who report on economic events. I keep seeing tag lines like; “expect more social unrest” when people report on things like the Berkley protests, which are disturbingly violent I might add. When I hit my favorite Libertarian blogs the feeling is more uneasy as I keep seeing words like revolution being used.
When you add in the Washington factor where our elected leaders are going to hammer unpopular legislation through, with no compromise, it makes me even more uneasy. There is no doubt that we need to make painful decisions in order to get our fiscal house in order, but that usually means less spending, not more. Unfortunately, our current political leaders do not see it that way and are hammering through more spending, in particular the health care reform bill. Look, I know we need to do something, but not this. Deducting money from Medicare and then adding it back in to other areas is not rational, this bill is not paid for and will make costs rise not fall.
Regardless, people are not happy about unpopular legislation being thrown down their thoughts. The kicker is that people like Nancy Pelosi come out and say that programs like Social Security and Medicare were unpopular when they were enacted. I guess what she means is that politicians know what is best for Americans and we should keep our mouths shut. We all know how right politicians are their track record speaks for itself just look at the stellar decisions they made over the last 10 years. Iraq was a great decision, the prescription drug coverage was fantastic (albeit unpaid for), the PATRIOT Act was a winner, free speech zones were fantastic, how many stimulus bills did we have again – they worked out well, eliminating a paper trail for voting is a sure disaster waiting to happen, and need I go on?
Politicians do not know what is good for Americans, they know what is good for them and getting reelected. Well, they did used to know how to get elected until now. If they pass this next unpopular batch of legislative nightmare on the docket they are in for a rude awakening come November because the people are coming for them. My only hope is that people come for them at the polls and not in any other way. Based on what I have read combined with the recent plane crash in Texas into the IRS building I think we might see more people going out to make a statement. Meaning, some nut job will more than likely blow something up or worse.
Who knows what will happen in the future, but we know that the average person feels left out right now. Wall Street got their massive bonuses and, for them, nothing really changed with the exception of having to play defense in the media. At the end of the day, the average person knows they got nothing over the past 2 years except for a higher future tax bill and, maybe, they got to keep their job, but we know about 20% of Americans were not so lucky as they are either unemployed or underemployed. Wall Street though, they are fine. Washington, well, they are doing OK as well as campaign contributions, from Wall Street, are still coming in and many have received raises. Clearly, there is a double standard and John Edwards was completely right when he said there are 2 Americas.
Discontent is here and that discontent could become a powder keg if not rectified. The unfortunate thing is I do not see how the public can be pacified, especially as this thing we are in deepens as we are now seeing. Things could get ugly and politicians need to figure out that they are representing the people and start acting that way. It is beyond me how they cannot see that Americans view them as being on the wrong path, but, again, that is politics and they will be surprised if they get voted out in November.
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
LS Blogs
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in Politics | Tagged free speech, health care reform, medicare, Nancy Pelosi, patriot act, political leaders, politicians, protests, social security and medicare, social unrest, stimulus
By Ray on February 26, 2010
It was funny to see many of the pundits spin bad data on the weather. This equates to my daughter saying the dog ate her homework. It is hard to believe the snow is to blame for higher initial jobless claims when we are in the middle of winter. However, I will concede that retail sales will be pretty horrible because of the weather, but other pieces of data, well, not so much of that weak data can be blamed on some snow.
Housing starts stink because the housing market is in trouble and even massive government stimulus is not helping. My guess is this data will probably improve in March to April because of the last minute rush to buy homes, but I would not count on that being much of a bump. What is worse is that the President wants a permanent moratorium on foreclosures which is doing no one any good and, in fact, will hurt banks that would not be able to collect or sell an asset that is earning them anything. I am referring to Obama’s demand that before a foreclosure can happen it has to pass through the re-modification process. Capitalism is officially being suspended until further notice.
As far as jobless claims are concerned, they are going to get worse as far as I can see. I am basing this on antidotal evidence of firms continuing to announce layoffs and a jump in the mass layoff indicator a few days ago. It is crazy to think employment will improve when you have blue chip companies announcing layoffs and claims are heading back above 500K a week. This is not because of the weather it is because the economy stinks. David Rosenberg calls this a Houdini recovery and he is correct. Besides a statistical recovery and a rally in equities, which is odd considering the dismal news over the past 2 weeks, the average person is worse off than they were last year. Again, unless it has been snowing for 8 months it cannot be blamed on the weather.
Perhaps it is snowing in Greece as well, that will explain their financial problems. It is true that the weather hurts certain things, but it has a rather limited impact on employment. After all, snow removal companies would probably be hiring. The weather might hurt retail sales, but with more people using the internet, me included, to shop I would not buy the soon to be claim that the weather killed retail sales. This is all about uncertainty in the world and to deny that there is uncertainty is simply crazy.
We have problems all over the place from domestic issues to possible sovereign defaults. Let us not forget we will witness municipal bankruptcies in the near future as well, chapter 9 is the more likely bankruptcy procedure. Health care reform is back and will be passed, whether you like it or not, and believe me you should be careful what you wish for because this means higher premiums for everyone. Do you really think Anthem raised prices 39% because they wanted to? Nope, it is because, I as speculated months ago, they know they are out of business in 4 years. All of these things mixed with tight credit conditions means tons of uncertainty.
Why the markets are not down 200 points, I do not know. However, it appears that Goldman Sachs was a huge buyer or S&P 500 futures yesterday, according to Zero Hedge reports, which made this a futures driven rally, check out the trading between 3 and 6AM for more weird futures action. I do not want to spread conspiracy theories, but all I am saying is the markets are trading very odd right now. I am still very bearish, how could anyone be bullish with the horrible data we have seen as of late? This is not 1 week of bad data, but 2 months worth of bad data and the market ignores it, weird.
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
LS Blogs
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in Main | Tagged capitalism, david rosenberg, Economy, foreclosure, foreclosures, housing market, housing starts, initial jobless claims, layoffs, Markets, moratorium, obama, retail sales, stimulus
Feedback