How anyone is really surprised by the possibility of a further decline in economic activity is puzzling to me. Perhaps it is all the distortions in the data that is coming from the government supporting the economy. Maybe it is because their vested interest is to have you invest in their funds. Perhaps they just drank the Kool-Aid. No matter what it is almost a certainty, in terms of forecasting, that the economy will either stagnant here or decline.

The main indicator that has been telling us there were problems for some time now is the initial claims data and the lack of private payroll growth. Sure, we saw a bump up in payrolls with the 5%+ GDP print, thanks to inventory restocking, but 1Q10 GDP shows signs of significant weakness. What has held true is initial claims, first they got better with the big GDP print, but now they are soft with the constant downward revisions to 1Q10 GDP. The ECRI data also points to weakness in the economy as well which correlates with initial claims data. From my lens, employment is not a lagging indicator, I have been pounding the table on this for a year now, it is a leading indicator in a post credit collapse scenario.

Friday’s employment report is now being telegraphed by Bloomberg to be weak, -110K is the forecast, especially since the Census hiring is done and they are now laying off workers. All of this is not surprising if you track initial claims and use it as a leading indicator. To put the monthly initial claims data into perspective 1,850,000 are filing claims for the first time and that means there needs to be about 2M jobs created every month to offset the ones just lost and we also have to contend with population growth as well. To be blunt, full employment is a figment of one’s imagination at this point for at least the next 5-8 years. Unemployment will be our greatest problem for a long, long time and there is little the government can do since end demand is the issue.

There is simply no way the Fed can raise rates for the foreseeable future either since one of their mandates is full employment. Yes, I know they said they would raise rates before employment recovered, but they won’t for political reasons. Obviously, that might change depending on what happens in the future, but for right now there simply is no reason to raise interest rates, at all, from their perspective. Worse is the fact that the Senate did not extend unemployment insurance last week which means a million plus people will lose benefits very soon. After their drunken spending binge to bailout the banks after they created this it is beyond me how they would let a million people just wither and die. There are 6 people for every job opening out there so it is not like these people are actively NOT trying to find work, so enough with that whole theatrical display of utter idiocy. Keep in mind I am a deficit hawk, but there is a difference between government wasting money and government helping those who cannot find work.

The loss of those benefits will have a huge impact on the economy as a whole since that money will not be spent. Retail sales will continue to slide and foreclosures will continue to rise, how many of those million plus people are barely hanging on? I am not sure how so many people can claim that the unemployed are simply freeloaders looking to live the highlife on such a meager government stipend which is what you hear often on other blogs or by the ultra rightwing. Considering that there are so many people looking for work the competition for a job, any job, is extremely high which reduces the odds of a person actually getting a new job anytime soon. Not to mention that unemployment benefits are usually around $300 – $500 a week I find it hard to believe that anyone is living the highlife on such a low amount, but that is the case. I am sure that there are abuses, but this is one of those give me a break moments and I am definitely right of center.

The other reason many believe a double dip is out of the question is that companies have extraordinary amount f cash on their balance sheets. Well, all I have to say is how long has that cash been on their balance sheet and it has not gone to work yet? This is like the temporary employment is a bullish indicator, if it is not happened yet the odds of it happening anytime soon are dwindling. The cash on the balance sheet is also part of the deleveraging cycle as companies pay down debt and hoard cash. Perhaps the main reason that companies have so much cash on hand is they think that business is going to get very tough in the near future. After all, many of our best companies have roots going back beyond the Depression and they know the value of having cash on hand to make it through the storms. Of course, they could spend it all tomorrow, but I ask again, what are they waiting for and why hasn’t it happened yet?

The bottom line is that it is really shocking to see so many smart people caught off guard about a potential double dip recession. All of the signs have been around for a longtime that the thought should have entered their mind at some point in time in recent months. There is a chance that we could avoid it, but I do not see how. I should point out the fact that I never bought the idea that we actually made it out of the first one, other than a statistical recovery that is. Time will tell on this one, but if Friday’s report is worse than expectations we will be well on our way to S&P 900.

From David Rosenberg’s morning musing’s today:

“ In contrast, the Asian FX complex is selling off. Risk assets are not responding to this week’s apparent good news: the Chinese peg announcement (has anyone noticed that yuan forwards are actually …. weakening?)”

Whether this is a real trend or not is unknown, but I fully expect the yuan to appreciate before it really falls anyhow, gotta get Congress off their backs for now. No matter what a strong yuan is not in China’s interests right now and China’s ruling party wants to remain the ruling party so are they going to fear Congress or a billion Chinese storming the Peoples House? You get my point.

To further make my point about the troubles in the EU and in China, moreover how this is a global issue now, Rosenberg went on to say:

“ There are all sorts of news reports in today’s FT discussing how the problem countries in Europe are in such bad shape that their banks are increasingly relying on the ECB for their funding survival. Portuguese banks reportedly doubled their borrowing from the central bank in May as a sign that this is not just a Greek tragedy. We have reached a stage where countries representing 18% of Eurozone GDP is accounting for 68% of the growth in ECB funding. Is that a currency you really want to own?”

What does all of this mean? It means big trouble and the markets are telling us that the problems from around the world are about to wash up on our shores. The irony is it is all coming full circle because we kicked it off with our credit induced sugar coma over a 5 year period which made risky paper seem safe and led foreign banks to buy it. Later everyone found out that safe paper was worth far less than the paper it was printed on and the write downs, globally, were enormous, with more to come. That triggered a collaborative global bailout of the entire financial system, but the ones who funded the bailouts are now in trouble and the recipients of the bailouts were never really in such great shape even after they received hundreds of billions in aid.
While we allowed our banks to extend and pretend, mostly because we have the luxury of printing our own money and we are the reserve currency, foreign banks bought seemingly safe sovereign government debt instead of treasuries, for the obvious reasons. Well, that debt became no good and we are where we are with a potential funding problem across the pond and a healthy exposure to European banks. We had exported our “safe debt” which ended up being toxic to the Europeans and they, more or less, did the same thing to us! Except theirs was disguised as safe government paper instead of CDO’s and CLO’s.

I believe the proper name for such a thing is “circle jerk,” but I am not 100% sure on that. Either way it is definitely heading this way and only a fool would deny that fact. In today’s world it no longer matters if a problem starts 10,000 miles away because everything is handled via the internet in microseconds and exposure can go from nil to billions in the blink of an eye. All this means is that we are exposed and the market knows this. Why else would treasuries be doing what they are doing while gold is rising and stocks are declining, the interesting thing is the stocks declining part is new and all 3 were once going up at one time, how odd. All 3 asset classes could not be right, but 2 out of the 3 asset classes were bearish for stocks so directionally speaking a downward move should not be overly surprising to anyone, but it is, interesting.

SNL Financial came out with a report today that said 90 banks have missed at least 1 TARP dividend payment, that is about 11% of all TARP recipients have defaulted for those of you keeping count. Keep in mind that about 829 institutions received TARP funds and about 50+ have repaid TARP funds, mostly the big name institutions that we all know and love. What is critical to note is that the defaults, I would call missing a payment a default since banks call a borrower who misses a payment to be in default, are increasing, not decreasing, as we approach the 2 year anniversary of the historic TARP legislation.

What that tells me is that not everything is fine when we are 2 years into the largest bailout in the history of bailouts and we have banks defaulting, remember only the “strongest banks” were getting bailed out, and bank closures accelerating as well. All of this while the pundits talk about “the greatest V shaped recovery in history” which is laughable. If we were in recovery mode wouldn’t these banks be earning their way out of this mess? They have the greatest accounting gimmick, mark to model, at their disposal and they are defaulting and being taken over by regulators at an increasing rate, how can that be? Perhaps the system is not as strong as we are told, that sounds about right to me.

We have to face the facts and the fact is that the data does not lie, banks are defaulting and failing. Real estate prices, both residential and, especially, commercial are falling which means more problems for banks. The banking industry as a whole is much larger than Citi, Bank of America and JP Morgan, and I am hard pressed to make the statement that those banks are largely benefiting from proprietary trading, government bond underwriting and the ability to mark to model. In other words, the bailout failed with the exception of the too big to fails and, as we already knew, the bailout was really just a selective bailout anyhow. How could Bear, Sterns be allowed to be acquired, but Lehman fail? Just days after Lehman fails AIG gets bailed out, the proof is pretty overwhelming about the selectivity of the bailouts, in my opinion, and TARP was designed to make the big banks flourish and the rest of the banks, well who cares because no one cares about the rest of the banks. I mean, who ever heard of Midwest Banc Holdings anyhow, except for the depositors.

So, as the ECB gets ready to release useless stress test results, which I am sure will show Greek and Spanish banks in trouble, but everything else hunky dory, consider the fact that our stress test and bailouts were completely and utterly useless. In other words, if you cannot trust our results, it has taken almost 2 years for the failures to show up, how can you trust the ECB’s results? Geithner knows this which is why he pushed for the stress test. He knew you can fool the markets for a little while with useless stress test and a seemingly huge bailout fund. However, the results cannot be hidden forever and our results are public, for those willing to look for the statistics, and prove that their strategy just kicks the can down the road and still leads to failure. Unless you consider accelerating defaults and closures a success, I am sure some talking head somewhere will see it as a stunning success, but in the real world most people see escalating failure for what it is, failure.

In another testament to the resilience of this V shaped recovery the U.S. is currently experiencing there is news that New York State might not pass the emergency budget, which has been keeping the state alive for the past couple of months, on Monday. For those of us who live in NY we know that they never pass a budget on time, this is not news and it amazes me that the same people always get reelected, but now this is a serious situation. If they do not pass the emergency budget on Monday the entire state will shutdown, everything.

First off, NY State is in rough shape and is going to go broke without a federal bailout, period. For all the talk about NY is going to make it, CA as well, is all wishful thinking. No one wants to make the tough decisions and because of that, and years of spending well beyond the states means, here we are facing a shutdown because of NYS fiscal condition. The deficit NY faces is huge and will only get worse because even in the face of everything going on no one wants to really cut spending which is a bit insane. Sure, they will make concessions here and there, but nothing really meaningful or that will improve our situation in the future. The worst part of it all is that if, that is a big if, things ever get back to “normal” the state will just ramp up spending again like nothing ever happened. Hey, if people will lend you the money, why not.

However, this shutdown is major and will serve as a wakeup call to most people in the state who thought this would/could never happen here. According to the Associate Press here is what is at stake in the shutdown:

What would a New York state government shutdown look like?

No one is sure. But they agree a shutdown, possible if the Legislature fails to approve an emergency spending bill Monday, would include:

-Suspension of lottery games, safety inspections of cabins for youth, and other nonessential services.

-Closing of parks and campgrounds, courts and unemployment offices.

-Businesses wouldn’t get paid for goods and services provided after June 13.

-Social service payments for children and family services including welfare and food stamps would be frozen.

-Schools wouldn’t get funding for education of homeless children.

-153,000 state employees wouldn’t get paid on June 23 as scheduled.

Prisons and state police patrols would continue, but likely with reduced staffing.

What is happening in Albany? Well, a couple of Democrat Senators are deciding to vote against the emergency budget which will cause the shutdown. The likelihood that they will actually follow through on their threats is minimal, but possible. The one thing you can count on about all politicians is that they like to be reelected and no one wants to be the one responsible for shutting down the state, but anything is possible. That being said, the list above is inevitable simply because there is no way the state can solve its fiscal problems and the debt markets, at some point, will demand a premium for the state’s debt to be issued.

I can attest that the population is already overtaxed and is unwilling to pay more in state income taxes, property taxes or sales taxes. What will happen is people will vote with their feet, they already are as illustrated by my daughters kindergarten class of which 1/5^th of the students are moving out of state for economic reasons. That is a huge number and this being my second child through elementary school, I can say that this is unprecedented in my experience. Businesses are not going to stay in NY because it is not a business friendly state from a tax point of view so there are layers of problems, not just that taxes are too high.

I await Monday’s vote to see the outcome, but rest assured the emergency budget will pass. Also rest assured that at some point the listed shutdown items above will be implemented because of insolvency because our elected leaders do not know how to manage money o government. It all goes back to my previous statement, politicians bribe us with our own money and we fall for it, not realizing we are better off if we say “no” to it so we are not taxed to pay for the bribe we just gave to ourselves.

Look, things in the U.S. are certainly better, even though I am bearish on the economy, but they are just a “less worse” type of better rather than a true recovery or whatever you want to call it. Someone once commented that I would not know a V shaped recovery if it sat on my face, or something to that, as the recession in the early 1980’s saw a lag in initial claims of some 6 months before the recovery in employment happened. Boy, I hope that person is reading this because that comment was made in august or September of last year, almost a full year ago, and initial claims barely broke the 500K mark as we speak, is that the ”V” we are looking for? The fact is in a post credit collapse employment is a leading indicator, I said it a year ago and I am saying it now and the only difference is the unemployment rate is HIGHER today than a year ago.

What changed over the last 12 months?

Nothing. Wait, I take that back, a lot. The U.S. is now $3T more in debt, we performed a “stress test,” which we are telling the ECB to do, more on that in a minute, and the Fed expanded its balance sheet by how much? What did we get for all of that? A 5.2% GDP print based on inventory a rebuild that was probably premature, if we take away the stimulus would firms have rebuilt their inventories so much? I think not. Unemployment is slightly better thanks to temporary jobs and government hiring, not exactly what I would call “robust” at all. The bottom line is all my criticism of the stimulus was right, it failed.

The banks are better you say, right? Are they? If you think that, well, I just don’t know what to tell you. Did the banks get rid of the “toxic assets?” Did they write all their bad debts off? Did real estate values increase? How about commercial real estate, is that sector flying strong again? No. Are banks loaning money again? Sure, if you have a credit score of 850 or better and don’t need the money they will gladly make a loan to you. However, if you need to refinance your home you better hope you qualify for a government program or you are out of luck. The “stress test” was a joke and meant nothing because we are at the outer limits of the stress test, remember, 10% unemployment, etc., etc.? What saved the banks was one thing and one thing only, the repeal of mark-to-market account, period, end of story.

If we brought back mark-to-market accounting today we would have a handful of big institutions left, I guarantee it. Just look at Wells Fargo’s balance sheet with the “Pick-A-Pay Loans” they inherited, worse, they bought, from Wachovia, the LTV’s, except for Texas, God Bless Texas, are all horrible. I am not saying WFC would fail, I am just saying they would have to realize pretty significant losses is all. It is no coincidence that right after, literally right after, the repeal of mark-to-market accounting rules by the FASB, by Congressional pressure I might add, bank earnings went through the roof. What replaced mark-to-market accounting? Mark-to-model accounting, do you know who made that model famous? Enron, need I say more?

Europe

Now, Timmy Geithner is over in Europe telling the Europeans to do a “stress test” to let the world know all is well. Sorry Tim, I do not think this will work since it is technically not the banks in question, but rather the sovereign debt that they are holding. Why not do a stress test on governments instead, maybe that will solve the problem. This is a banking problem, again, that was brought on by huge deficit spending and countries inability to service their debt loads, this is big, huge actually. While this will impact banks it is not really banks that caused it, but politicians who decided to bribe the people with their own money.

It is likely that one of the PIGS, or whatever we are calling them now, will default given the issues they have and the inability of politicians to say no to spending. It is just odd, it always has been, that the people demand all this gravy from the government in the form of give a ways, tax credits or straight cash in some form. Don’t these people realize that they are only getting back their own money? Actually, if governments spent less and had lower debts that means they would have lower overall taxes which means the people would have more money on their own… they would be better off! However, the people insist on being bribed with their own money and politicians are only too happy to oblige.

The point is that this bigger than the banks as we are talking about the solvency of countries now. Bailouts are much more difficult to do for countries and the implications of a default by any country has widespread ripples that most people have no idea can or would occur. Even if Hungary or Greece defaults it is a huge deal and will impact governments and banks all over the world. I have been saying this for months now, Greece is a big deal and all those people saying it is not are, well, disqualified to render their opinions anymore as the markets have spoken and they have sided with me.

Run a stress test, it doesn’t matter because it really doesn’t matter Tim. The problem is with government spending this time and I do not think mark-to-model accounting can fix this problem.

The real problem

The real problem is I do not know where the sovereign debt problems will end, I know it will get worse. I know that more European countries will succumb to this very same issue as most European countries are socialist by their very nature and their debt levels are very high. As the weaker countries fall they will drag the stronger countries down with them, it is just how it works. I made a call that the Euro will fall to 1.18, we are about there. Do I think it will go lower? Yes, to parity in the near future. I think 1.16 is the next level, but the ECB will have to intervene and China has to intervene as a weak Euro is a major problem, it is, another story for another time. The currency will not survive without a mechanism to eject the weak states, period.

After the carnage in Europe is done, I do not have a timetable for that, it could be tomorrow or 10 years from now, but more than likely it will be sooner rather than later, the debt problems will spread, to the U.S. We have $13T in debt and an economy that is not recovering, I am not happy about that, but those are the facts. We are spending $4.9B a day, 3 times the amount George Bush, not exactly the face of fiscal conservatism I might add, was spending. We are in major trouble and what are our politicians doing? Trying to figure out how to get stimulus 3 out the door, that’s what.

I have been saying for months that our debt to GDP level is almost at parity, but it takes the Drudge Report for people to start listening? OK, at least people are listening now. The problem is we have no politicians willing to take the steps to fix out problems. Go ahead, elect the Republicans, look what they did from 2000-2006, they really helped to speed the process up, in my opinion. Of course, out current President and Congress has surely kicked what the Republicans did into hyper drive as they added 30% to our debt load in less than 2 years, that is $3T, an astounding figure. Neither of these parties really want to fix the problems, in my opinion, because they have a vested interest in perpetuating the problems so they can stay in power, it is just how it works.

What this means is we are all in very big trouble. I am not talking about, oh, gee, go buy an ounce of gold and protect yourself from inflation, I am talking about the Weimar Republic, hyperinflation, type of trouble. I see no way out besides inflation and in a big way. As Paul Krugman points out, there is a big difference between Greece and the U.S., we can print our own money. We also know Ben Bernanke has no problem with hitting that print money either. I am also confident that the Fed is, basically, completely incompetent.

If we cannot go to the market to finance our debt, which we have trillions of dollars of that most of it matures in under 10 years, the Fed will monetize it. That is how we will deal with our sovereign debt crisis, we will print our way out of it and it will be the very worst thing we can do. Instead of cutting our government, spending or doing anything else that is logical, because politicians want to get reelected, they will choose to inflate their way out. Will gold protect you? Yes, but so will food and any other useful commodity including toilet paper. It disturbs me to no end that we are where we are and that the President is listening to the likes of Mr. Krugman who thinks deficits don’t matter, they do, and that since we can print money it is OK, printing money is not OK.

In the meantime I am still short the market. We will have a bounce I am sure and I almost took a nice broad long position today, but I passed. While I am sure we will have that bounce I did not think the risk reward was worth it. My target is still 900 on the S&P 500.

So, your state is bankrupt and needs to make serious budgetary action and what does the legislature do? Moves to ban plastic bags from grocery stores. You can’t make this stuff up. If anything California should be encouraging more plastic bags in their stores because they would be collecting more taxes. Plus, can you think of a state that is more hypocritical than California to begin with?

This is a state that pushes green technology on everyone, like making sure you have energy efficient TV’s, and they drive their hybrid cars while the bulk of their economy depends on the movie business. Considering the movie business uses more electricity in a day than I use probably in a month on top of wasting water, in a state that has little fresh water to begin with, on every scene of a movie it is a little bizarre that they ban plastic bags to go green while they are so wasteful with the bulk of their other resources.

At the end of the day it is nice to see that the state is still so concerned about their financial well being that they have time with this nonsense. On the bright side I think we only have a few more months of either the first state to go bust, ever, or the first Federal bailout of a state, ever. Glad they can worry about plastic bags though.

Oh, wait, criminal charges may be filed against BP, but the crooks and liars from Wall Street are just fine. Is it me or do you see the supreme hypocrisy around this whole situation? BP is doing everything under the sun to correct its wrong, I know, it is not enough, but nevertheless they are paying people who lost their livelihood, paying for the cleanup and doing everything in their power to stop the flow of crude from the well and they may face civil and criminal charges. However, the banks, ratings agencies and other related crooks who bilked trillions in bailouts from governments, i.e. the taxpayer, that is you and I, on fraudulent loans and bonds are getting bonuses.

What is going on? What is the difference between BP and Goldman Sachs? Well, for one thing it is the money. Wall Street, collectively, gave Obama $23M in campaign contributions in 2008, the most out of any candidate running in the series that year. Compare that towards the oil and gas industry and it really just does not compare at all, Wall Street has the cash and if you think that has nothing to do with it you are naïve or blind to the hard facts of life. I am not saying BP, which as of yesterday I am a shareholder of, did nothing wrong, but they hardly blew up the financial system and drove millions out of jobs, their homes, blew up retirement plans and the list goes on, but Wall Street did all of that.

Where are the kangaroo trials for Wall Street? Where is that change I can believe in? I do not see it. I see the green lobby getting their kangaroo trials, but not the American people who lost trillions. We got Bernie Madoff which is not exactly a shining example of government efficiency as a whistle blower tried to turn him in 10 years ago, but other than that we got nothing other than an exploding deficit. The bankers got their bonuses last year, actually, if you think about it, they got their bonuses in 2008 as well and were really not impacted at all by the financial crisis in the least. Sure, some lost their jobs, lower level people, but not the main players who made it happen and they are still making millions a year.

The ratings agencies are still doing what they always do, rating paper on fantasyland assumptions which are far from reality and there is zero reform going on there. Goldman is going whatever Goldman does, perfect trading days for all of 2010, how does that happen? Citi is getting right back into the game of packaging and selling CLO’s again, more garbage to go into your mutual fund, how exciting! Yet, Chuck Prince still has his millions, John Mack still has his millions, all the executives at Lehman are still wealthy, same at Bear Sterns, but what about their bond holders and shareholders? What about Repo 105?

Give us 1 freaking show trial! Instead we are getting BP under investigation, great. I am sure the granola kids will love that show trial, but for those of us who actually pay taxes, work and actually show up to vote, well, we are mad and want some Wall Street heads on a platter still. Preferably Lloyd’s, but I will take John Mack’s just the same, I am not picky.

I was reading Zero Hedge yesterday, a post in regards to gold where Peter Schiff was part of the topic, and there were some interesting comments. One caught my attention as being somewhat ludicrous which is not unusual, but is was because the author is a contributor to the site. Unfortunately the comment was flagged as junk, I hate it when that happens because counterpoints are always good things to have and I do not mean to rip him apart, but rather correct years of misinformation he probably picked up from school or TV armchair economists.

One comment he made was:
“On gold to the moon: Peter you’ve been talking up your gold positions for years, but once calm is restored, you’re going to take a major haircut on gold.”
Another was:
“On the US economy “not growing”: Has he looked at the ISM, employment (not just payrolls but household survey), industrial production, and the leading indicators over the last ten months?”
And the other one was referencing that as soon as the trillions in bailouts the banks received hits the economy it will calm the economies or something to that effect. He also indicated that as long as confidence remains in the system everything will be fine, which is true, but how much will it take to keep that confidence or instill that confidence? Also, the more money we inject to create confidence the more confidence it actually erodes, it is a zero sum game in the end. Part of the comment was that the EU was trying to avoid a “deflationary death spiral” or something similar, this is why people should not flag things as junk because they are not junk, which is what really bothered me.

People are thoroughly confused by deflation and deflationary death spirals and what that means. Deflation is a problem, we have deflation now, but it is not a huge problem. However, a deflationary death spiral is what we had in the 1930’s and is what keeps Ben Bernanke up at night. We will not, I do not think, have that deflationary death spiral and I think we need to understand what that death spiral was, what caused it and why we will not have it. After that I want to address the rest of the comments he made above.

What we suffered fro in the 1930’s was horrible and something I hope we never see again. To understand more about what it was like in the Depression please Read The Depression: A Diary by Benjamin Roth and stay away from the academic stuff. However, during the depression dollars were scarce because fo the massive bank failures and deposits were frozen or simply lost when the bank closed down. On top of that the stock market wiped out millions of peoples savings which had a domino effect into the real estate market which is what caused the banking crisis, somewhat reversed from today’s crisis I might add.

What this did was literally wipe dollars out of existence, they just disappeared and were not transferred to anyone else. Today one persons loss is likely another’s gain through derivatives or other hedging instruments known as bailouts, but that was not the case in the 1930’s. Since these dollars were gone or frozen and the U.S. was on the gold standard we did not have a Helicopter Ben to get dollars into the system, at first the Fed tightened credit, who knows why, but they later tried to reverse that decision, but it was too little too late. What we had was complete demand destruction and people saving whatever dollars they had, which was strange because people would rather starve than spend their money.

In fact, while people were starving crops were on or at a record pace, prior to the dust bowl fiasco of course. It was a simple fact that the U.S. was tied to the gold standard and could not put more dollars into the system and people just did not want to spend what they had saved because who knew what tomorrow would bring. We also had no safety systems in place such as unemployment insurance, welfare or Social Security, until FDR was elected a few years into the Depression. By not having those safety nets in place it made things much, much worse and that is why we had such massive deflation.

This was not the run of the mill demand deflation, which is what we have now, this was the death spiral lack of dollars in circulation plus no demand deflation. So for people to draw a comparison to 1930’s deflation to todays is a bit ridiculous to say the least. We have those safety programs now so people will not starve instead of spending money, ironically our poor actually have cable TV, go figure, and we have other safety nets in place. This is why we will not see 1930’s deflation and this is also why we can hide the evidence of our current Depression, if we do not have to see the soup lines they are not there, right? Never mind the fact that 1 in 8 Americans receives some form of Food Stamp assistance, if that is not a Depression statistic I am not sure what is.

The banking system is still suffering from after shocks much like we saw in the 1930’s, closures did not stop for years after the crash of 1929 as real estate continued to decline in value, sound familiar? We are still suffering from similar bouts of bank closures today because of declining real estate prices and that is unlikely to change. Many of these banks were bailed out, funny how some “too big too fail” are now failing after they were bailed out. How can, as his comment claimed, the markets be calmed because of trillions in bailouts will build confidence when those banks who were bailed out are still failing? This is very similar to the 1930’s when many banks who received aid under the first Hoover plan still failed. The point being is that it will take a long time for the system to heal itself and with the government propping it up it will take much longer. The Depression lasted some 10 years, 7 with major government help, our current problem got help on day 1, how long will our recovery really take?
With the massive stimulus and government spending in the banking system it is nothing more than inflationary measures. The comment that “when the trillions making it into the economy will only build confidence,” is a bit absurd, in my opinion, as it points out that the issues were very bad for a very longtime. Also, when the trillions, a bigger and more accurate statement would had been if the trillions, make it into the economy it will create inflation, period. There is really no doubt that the measures taken by all the central banks were to stem the tide of the aforementioned deflationary spiral and it did work, but the central banks cannot stem the tide of the inflation that they created. After all, central banker’s primary mandate is to inflate the currency at about a 3% annual rate to begin with so they have no real mechanism to dis-inflate a currency anyhow. Sure, they can raise rates and do reverse repos, but serious, that will do little.

In fact, for all the money spent on bailouts and stimulus measures I would argue we have received a very poor return on our investment. We had a sharp mini-V of a +5% GDP print, but that appears to be it. We had spend far less in the past and had averaged far higher GDP prints, about a 7% print after major interventions, so, sure, you got a V, but it is one side of a W, sorry Charlie. People had been bragging about the ISM Survey’s for some time until the Ism survey’s failed to support their claims, but they fail to support my claims as well. In fact, they are neutral, but well below what we would call normal expansion averages. Not to mention, these are survey’s and should be calculated as survey’s, as in this is how people feel at this point in time, not as this is what will happen in the future.

My main point is that we do have growth and things are better, but no where near where the bulls think they are and we are not heading to where they think we are going. The comment also pointed to the leading economic indicators as a “bright spot.” Funny, Kudlow and company have not brought up the LEI for sometime now because, well, the number rolled over a couple months ago now and has been heading lower, funny what happens when Uncle Sam cuts off the money. So, I am not sure what LEI the commenter is looking at, but the one everyone else is looking at is pointing to the South, not the North, good luck if you think down is up and up is down because you got Vertigo my friend.

The global economy is about to end its amazing recovery, sorry folks. Europe is 20% of the global economy and they are instituting massive austerity measures right now and these are only the start, more is needed. If 20% of the world’s buyers have less money you will see economists start lowering forecasts very soon, trust me on that one. You know how the U.S. is pestering China to revalue its RMB? Well, it is pegged to the U.S. dollar, right? Do you know who China’s largest trading partner is? Hint, it is not the U.S., it is the EU. That means Chinas products are now more expensive in the EU than they were just 2 months ago. Wasn’t China credited for the global recovery? Isn’t China in the middle of a liquidity bubble? Won’t not selling products hurt their exports causing an artificial popping of their bubble which could cause more problems for the world than originally thought? I think so, but we are still pressuring them to revalue and spreading the falsehood that we are their largest trading partners, what baloney.

It is kind of funny to see people dismiss all this information and keep economic events locally when this is a global economy, I mean, there is a reason why when the U.S. market tanks foreign markets go down as well and why when we go into a recession so do other countries. Decoupling will happen, but not until the rest of Asia emerges like China did, but until that happens China is dependent upon the U.S. and the EU. However, let us mak sure we are clear, the EU is, for sure, China’s biggest trading partner and a falling Euro is a big problem for China as well. Keep an eye on that, I am.

On to the topic of the day, gold. Peter Schiff has been bullish on gold since, well, forever now and has taken much heat for it since it climbed from $250 to $1,240, yes, taking heat for something that quadrupled. The commenter stated that gold will take a haircut, a major one, when markets calm down, maybe he is right, but let’s take a look so far. Trillions have been spent on the banks, that has not calmed the markets and now you have governments in trouble, what is going to calm the markets even if small governments start defaulting? Even beyond that, look at 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010. During most of those years the markets were considered “calm” and in a “goldilocks” period upon a new wave of global liquidity never before seen, what happened to the price of gold? Oh, yeah, it quadrupled.

The one big down year gold had was in 2008, when it first hit $1,000 I might add, when everything was in liquidation because of a global margin call. If the Fed did not start dropping money from helicopters we would have had our 1930’s deflationary spiral on our hands, but that is not what happened. What happened was things were supported by the government and long before the markets shot back up 70% gold was on its way back up to it’s previous $1,000 high. So, Peter Schiff can hold on to his gold trade all he wants, it worked for him as he lost little during the collapse by holding it and it returned more than the S&P, from January 1, 2009 to December 31st, 2009, than the S&P 500 did without the volatility. Comments like the ones made by the person in question show that they do not look at the facts and simply do not like the asset class, or do not understand it, and end up looking silly at the end of the day.

Do I think gold will go down? Yes. Why wouldn’t it? Everything rises and falls, but I think it will be much high 10 years from now than today. We know that central banks inflate the currency, that is a fact. We know, especially right now, that sovereign default risk is real and confidence in currencies is really a fleeting thing, we have merely been lucky for 38 years since the gold standard was eliminated, we know that turmoil will always exist and we know gold, silver or other commodities are a finite resource that has much higher demand that supply could ever meet. In my opinion, only a fool would not want to own gold, just look at APMEX.com, all their smaller American Eagle coins are sold out for crying out loud, is that the confidence in the global system we are looking for? Is that the sign of a growing global economy? Nope.

As I watch the pre-market activity and commentary from the airheads on CNBC it just boggles the mind. Last week these same people said the world is coming to an end, which meant buy to me, but today the “market is soaring.” Investors must get confused when they watch this porno for the mind as they flip-flop every day. Cramer says do not buy until Dow 9,000, but tonight he will say I told you to buy on Friday! He did not, he was a bear, which is why I thought I should buy. This market is bipolar and, to me, and the commentary you hear is insane. I am bearish on the market, but like individual companies.

We went from market crashing last week to the market is the place to be, today at least. I think this is a strong bounce rally before it declines more, I would not commit new money today or yet unless you are renting this market. The only reason we are getting a bounce today is because of a $1T bailout of Europe, ouch! I do not believe this is a real bounce and volume will be pitifully light, as all up days are, and this market is really just responding to short-term oversold conditions. This will be a good time to de-risk ones portfolio, IMHO.

The problem in Europe is not resolved, anyone who thinks it is needs to check their meds, as the funding package is merely treating the symptoms of the crisis not the source of the problem. Essentially, the bad behavior of the PIIGS is being rewarded, but they should be punished, and all the ECB is doing is taking the risk off of the speculators, rewarding their behavior as well, and giving that risk to the central bank. On top of that, the number should be shocking to the markets, $1T is a very large number and above where most people saw it. Not to mention, a good chunk of that is coming from the IMF, a.k.a. the U.S. which is the top funder of the IMF.

The U.S. is broke and borrows all of our capital, like most countries nowadays, so we are simply bailing out debt by issuing more debt. Who does that make sense? It does not. This bailout will not fix the problem long-term and merely kicks the can down the road for a little while. It will blow up at some point and now the bond vigilantes will look at other countries, i.e. the UK, U.S. or Japan, IMHO. They should have left the situation alone and let the PIIGS default to introduce a mechanism to kick them out of the EMU, but no, we are going down the bailout route, again! Not only that, but they are spreading the risk around to other countries now, unreal.

But the fundamentals of the U.S. economy are strong, say the bulls, which is why the market will scream today. Well, I will say things are much better, but not enough to justify the markets run-up and not strong enough to send the market up whatever percent today, this is a technical rally based on some, IMHO, troubling news. I look at the NFP figures from Friday, which I called a fraud and I stand by that comment since 188K were “made up estimates” from the BLS. When one subtracts out the 188K birth/death model figures, which NO commenter on the TV is talking about, except Rick Santelli, we have a figure of +102K. That is a great number right? Not really. Consider this, if we back out the 188K make believe BLS numbers, remember the birth/death model is responsible for the BLS revising unemployment up by 800K in February. We have a baseline number of 102K. If we subtract out government jobs, which are most temporary as well, think Census, we are down to about +48K. You could subtract out temporary hiring as well, but they are jobs, just not permanent, IMHO. No matter how one looks at it, except for CNBC, the ADP figure was accurate and the employment report was less robust than most think, but hey, let’s not let the facts get in the way of buy, buy, buy.

Overall, I fail to see how many classify this as a strong recovery after we spent trillions and 2 years later we are still at 10% unemployment and we have an anemic recovery at best. I am not saying things are not getting better, rather I am saying we have stabilized for really bad to just less bad. I believe a double dip is coming and this market is so not priced for a double dip. If we add in the Europe craziness the market is much less attractive, IMHO. The $1T, which should scare you in the U.S. as you are on the hook for a large portion of that because we are the top funders of the IMF, is a huge number and underscores how bad of shape the EU is really in. We have merely are fighting a debt crisis with more debt, sure there are austerity measures, but they are not going to fix the problem and the Greeks are apparently great at hiding assets.

Yet again, we are socializing the profits of speculators which were lambasted in the European media via the governments over the weekend, unreal. Instead of bailing out the PIIGS they should have instituted an ejection mechanism instead, that would save the Euro, but now they kicked the can down the road and are making other countries issue debt to fix the debt crisis, no sovereign country has cash on hand so they borrow it, see the problem? Austerity measures or not, it is a problem that will be with us for a long time. This is a reflexive rally built on a news event which was actually bad news. How does one support its currency by issuing a slush fund for bailouts? You can only defend a currency through higher rates or taxation, that really is not the case here as Greece will still have debt-to-GDP ratio of 150% by 2014, or there about.

This rally is somewhat justified, but I would be extremely careful with buying into this. Tonight Cramer will revise his call from Friday and Kudlow will continue with his “V” shaped recovery nonsense, but the problems are still there lurking in the background waiting to reappear. Buy gold because this is not over and what the EU did was inflationary, when that inflation will hit, I do not know, but it will in the EU and in the U.S. The other issue is, where will the vigilantes go next? The UK, U.S., Japan or will they stay in the EU? At the end of the day it was probably best to let the PIIGS default so the market can clear the bad debt, but let’s not have the market solve the problem, let’s tinker with it so another bomb can blow up somewhere else.

Oh, let’s not forget one of our GSE’s, which are “sound,” requested another $10B from the government. Yup, a sure sign of how strong things are.

Greece received its bailout today, pending an approval from some EU members which should prove interesting. Do European politicians care about reelection as much as U.S. politicians? If that is the case I suspect the longer term bailout is in question.  Even in Greece itself the bailout is not widely accepted, who would figure that the unions would be opposed to higher retirement ages and lower payments. The current system is kind of insane, 14 annual payments, there are only 12 months, even in Greece, and the minimum retirement age was 53, new proposed retirement age is 67, welcome to the real world.

The primary issue, as I see it, is that we are curing debt with more debt. The EU member countries will have to pay for this bailout through higher debt to GDP ratios and higher taxes. This is why in Germany the bailout is unpopular, as it should be. At the end of the day all they are doing is saving France and other Greek debt holders, they should not be rewarded for speculation, but that is what is happening. As David Rosenberg said, we should all be opposed to bailouts, the madness must end. By allowing failed states or companies to survive when the free market decided otherwise has never worked long-term.

On top of the ridiculous bailout of Greece we now have to worry about the other PIIGS. Are they going to get bailed out? If so the EU and IMF will need another few hundred billion Euro’s. I suspect that Spain and Portugal spreads will widen tonight and tomorrow as the Greek issue is temporarily resolved, but their issues are now at the forefront of concerned world citizens. Bailing out these countries will be a huge mistake as it condones bad behavior. Let them fail or implement an ejection mechanism to the EUM Constitution.

I am sure the markets will be positive tomorrow as the crisis was “averted” and the good times are here again. Although I believe Friday’s selloff was unrelated to the Greek tragedy, but in reality the markets are facing a very overbought situation. Whether you want to believe this or not is your choice, but the markets are not supposed to go up every day or week. In fact, the past 2 months have been very, very abnormal to say the least, but the bulls will disagree, of course, citing some preposterous data point or use a forward looking P/E, which is just dumb I might add. But those of us living in reality know that conditions are not that good and the underlying economic data really does not support a parabolic move in the markets.

However, those in reality will look at the Greek tragedy and say, how can you fix one countries debt load by increasing another countries debt load? It just does not work and eventually we will see defaults. When that will be? I do not know, but soon I am sure. I am also confident that the Greece issue will spread first to Spain and Portugal, then to Italy and finally to France, since no one can bailout all those countries. Where it goes from there, I do not know, but I do know that it will eventually travel around the world as debt crisis usually do. This is why gold is going to go parabolic in the very near future… Got Gold?