Here we are in a New Year and as is tradition we see countless forecasts for what will transpire this year. My personal feeling is that they are all worthless since no one knows what the Fed is going to do and there is no denying that the Fed and the Fed alone has total control over the markets. Without the Fed we would not have seen positive returns in 2010, IMHO, and we only got those returns because the central bank flooded the market with extraordinary liquidity, again. The irony is that everyone knows something isn’t quite right, but they seemingly cannot put their finger on what is not normal.

As the weekly headlines come and go they are almost humorous now and completely contradict previous headlines. It is this that is contributing to that unsettling feeling most people have but cannot identify right now. Any given day you read about the recovery, often from a heavily seasonally adjusted figure, which signals a recovery in the economy, even though the unseasonal adjusted figure shows the data is not so hot, and everyone is bullish again. The next week we get a data point that is horrible and the world is coming to an end. Perhaps this is what many economists mean when they say this is a ‘muddle through economy.’ Regardless, things are better there is little question about that, but I would say we have stabilized ourselves in a less bad environment versus a real economic recovery.

I had previously said stocks would move higher and they did, but that is only because of the liquidity the Fed bestowed upon us and not because of truly better data points. We have seen unprecedented stimulus over the past 3 years from the federal government and the Federal Reserve which explains pretty much any positive data point. When you examine the real economy, i.e. Walmart, it is a different story. Frankly, when Walmart which has the largest customer base in the US is struggling when so many are preaching the resilient consumer something isn’t right. I know the high end retailers are doing OK and that proves my point which I made about a year ago that the recovery, thanks to the bailouts, and I use that term loosely, was lopsided to only the wealthy and not to Joe Six Pack.

This is also reflected in the unemployment figures and pretty much anywhere else you want to look. The rich are doing just fine thank you very much, but if you are in the middle class or poor the SNAP program is this way. While this is not fair it simply is what it is and is not going to change anytime soon, sorry. Perhaps that is what scares me the most right now, the inequality of wealth in America, don’t get me wrong I am a capitalist through and through, but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to read history and what happens when the wealth gap gets this wide. On top of the middle class and poor becoming poorer we are now seeing what I thought was going to happen, inflation without an increase in money velocity.

Those who thought it was impossible for a country to experience inflation without money being in the hands of the people, well, you were wrong. When the central bank plays games, untested games, like QE it hurts the currency which drives up currency sensitive items, food and energy. When prices rise and wages stay the same it will more than likely exacerbate the underlying problems we are suffering from and may lead to civil unrest. We have food prices at the highest level ever and oil about to burst through $100/barrel, where is the outrage from the media on this, and people already feel poor, not a good combination. Again, all of that without an increase in money velocity, go figure.

Now, there are other reasons for the rise in commodities, but they are irrelevant in my opinion since Joe Blow could care less about why prices are rising he just cares about being able to feed his family. What is frustrating to Joe is that he is being told how great things are when he feels poor, is probably going to lose his house, can barely afford food, gas or his power bill. Joe is wondering what planet the commentators on CNBC are from when it is plain as day that things are not right in the real world. What Joe doesn’t understand is that the ivory tower announcers and the Fed are looking at the core CPI which says everything is hunky dory. The question is, do you think Joe cares that deflation is occurring in LED TV’s as much as Ben Bernanke does? Of course not because Joe looks at food and energy, but all economists look at is core CPI which excludes food and energy. That is where the disconnect is coming from, partly.

The public is slowly starting to not believe what they are being told anymore and that is a good thing. Remember how we were told that retail sales were going to be fantastic? They did not look so hot today, except for some high end retailers I might add. What I am getting at is simple, the real economy is catching up with the market. The really sick part is that when the economy does improve the Fed will have to kill the liquidity which will crush stocks. Those that preach stocks are a win-win because the Fed will pump money when the data is bad which is good for stocks or when the economy improves stocks should go higher are wrong, pure and simple.

This is the largest liquidity driven rally in the history of mankind or what TVland would call a bubble. Stocks are expensive and only going higher because of the Fed. However, when the Fed stops feeding free money to the banks it will end, badly. You can disagree with me all you want, that is what makes a market, but you know it is true. This is not a win-win situation for stocks. How can it be when just 6 months ago when liquidity was drying up the market tanked? We only saw a rebound when Ben spoke at Jackson Hole and said he would print and then he followed through, that is not the sign of a healthy market.

What we have is still a whole lot of uncertainty going on in the whole world. Nothing is certain except that central banks will merely print us into oblivion. Europe is a mess, we have some countries wishing to slow down fund flows to them, Korea’s on the brink of war, again, China is not buying UST’s like they once did, the US is awash in debt, which will not be solved by the Republicans, rising prices for food and oil about to go ballistic again. All that stuff is off the top of my head and I know I left a ton of stuff out, but this is enough, hopefully, to make one stop and think.

I said before that stocks will move higher and I continue that thought until one of two things happen, either the data really does improve or until QE2 ends in 2Q11. Both items are basically indications that the punch bowl or liquidity will dry up. I also believe stocks will underperform commodities, specifically silver and copper, in 2011 simply because the Fed will never stop the printing presses, they cannot. We are in a very odd period of time and, frankly, these are scary times with so many unknowns out there and a public slowly waking up to the fact that things are not as they seem, but that is a good thing, IMHO.

2011 will be a rollercoaster year with the schizophrenia kicking into high gear as far as the media is concerned, the world will be growing or coming to an end every other day, which should add more volatility to stocks. I also think we will see some things come to the forefront of discussion this year. How it ends is anyone’s guess and I will not even venture agues at the results. What I do know is that it probably will not be good. Here are my issues I think will be front page news this year:

-          Food prices continue to rise to scary levels

-          Treasuries begin to see a steep selloff

-          The US’s national debt will be a hot issue with China downgrading us, rightfully so, to junk level

-          The US is put on negative ratings watch by Fitch, but who cares about Fitch… right?

-          The tax cut extensions will prove to be a horrible idea, they really were to begin with

-          The Social Security tax break everyone gets moves up the date of depletion of the trust fund to, “officially,” the 2020 decade

-          Oil breaks through $100 probably eclipsing 2008 record price

-          The dollar will rally hard before it falls

-          Food shortages around the world will be a major problem

-          The Fed looses massive amounts of money on their treasury holdings

-          China openly sells US treasuries

The US banking system is still a mess no matter what the regulators and pundits say. From the Volker Rule to Basel III to fraudclosure there are issues that will have to come to ahead at some point in the not so distant future. Specifically, the Financial Times reported that because of the Basel III tier 1 capital requirements the top 35 US banks may be short $100 – $150 billion dollars. This means more capital raises for many of these banks, but don’t worry analysts say this is manageable.

Other parts of the FT’s article states that many of these banks may have to selloff $500B, in total, of assets to avoid the capital raise. The issue is that if all these banks, which the article admittedly says is not equally distributed between the top 35 banks, have to selloff $500B in assets to avoid a capital raise who will buy these assets? If the liability of these assets equals higher capital requirements buyers may be few and far between which means lower prices for the assets being sold or they will have to raise capital. Of note is the shortfall is only because of Basel III and not because of any other issue outstanding.

Remember how so many of these capital requirement issues were supposedly put to rest because of our “stress tests”? Clearly the stress tests, as has been stated time and time again, were worthless. In fact rumors are making their rounds that another round of stress tests are on the way for US banks. What is interesting about this is that the stress tests lack total credibility for 2 reasons. First, look at the EU’s stress tests which passed most banks and look what is happening in Ireland, they were a farce. Second, without good accounting rules, i.e. mark-to-market vs. mark-to-fantasyland, the stress tests are bogus. A loss is a loss and simply pretending it doesn’t exist is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard of and if investors do not do their research it can lead to major losses. In my opinion this is nothing more than state sponsored investor fraud.

What is missing out of all of these bank articles is the whole fraudclosure mess and its impact on the banks. As stated previously there is no remedy for a broken chain of title except to modify the mortgage which starts a new chain of title and eliminates the problem. There are issues with this though. First, doing nothing means that all of those MBS are worthless because there is no cash flow and the creditor cannot collect the collateral, think about that for awhile. Second, if your only option is to modify the mortgage it means that the MBS is worth less than face value. Either way someone somewhere is taking a loss and that means there may be a put back to the originating bank. When the Fed put back bonds to BoA that should concern investors… it’s the Fed telling banks you ripped us off.

If these put backs continue or escalate, which they will because who wants to take a loss on paper that was misrepresented to begin with, that could mean that banks have much larger problems than Basel III capital requirements. If the put back is widely exercised banks will need a lot more money than $100 – $150B. They might need a trillion or more, who really knows anymore? Frankly, Basel III is the last thing anyone should be worried about. People should be worried about what the put back risk is for many of these banks because the put back risk is far greater of an issue than the sub-prime crisis ever was. I believe we will find out if there are indeed “no more bank bailouts” or not. My guess is we will all be shareholders of some big banks in the near future. In the meantime I am waiting for my dividend check from our previously made, wildly profitable, insert sarcasm here, investments into GM, Citi, BoA, Ally…

The long awaited decision was announced today by the Fed, $600B in fresh money printing followed by continued reinvestment of proceeds from its first round of easing. This equals about $900B in total QE by our monetary masters. Speculation is rampant in the media about its success or how it will be an epic failure. The funny thing is, no one really knows what will actually happen. Personally, I am still perplexed as to why they are doing it at all, it is stupid.

The Fed is also completely out of ammo which many have stated, myself included, and all they have is the printing press. I want to stress something here and you should pay attention, this whole QE thing is experimental and no country that has ever tried has succeeded. Therefore, I have a predetermined outcome, but at the end of the day you or I have zero idea if it will work. I will lay out a case for its failure based on what I know. I am sure many will disagree and that is fine, but in time one of us will be right.

The economy has a demand problem, not a liquidity problem. Over 2 years ago we had a massive liquidity problem which is why Lehman failed, but now the Fed has dumped trillions into the system along with the federal government. All of that money dumping ended the liquidity crisis and now banks, supposedly, have excess reserves just sitting at the Fed waiting to be loaned out to that sucker who wants to pay 15% interest on money the bank got for free in order to buy that new LED flat screen TV that is just calling his or her name. The problem is the sucker doesn’t want to buy that TV because he doesn’t know if he will have a job next week or is worried about retirement, etc.

We have a demand problem, not a money shortage. I say that with a grain of salt because money velocity is dropping which technically means there are dollar shortages. However, I contend that that dollar shortage is because people are paying off debt to simply saving their money somewhere 9under the mattress??). Regardless of the reason no one wants to buy big ticket items and I do not blame them. After all we got here because of excess debt and no one wants to leverage up to buy senseless items. No amount of QE will change this, sorry, but it won’t. Job security and rising wages will create demand, but that is not happening either. Demand is stuck where it is, weak.

The Fed knows this and they know QE will not change this so why did they do it? I really do not know. Sure, everyone has their own reasons for it, but at the end of the day it is all speculation. I know what they are trying to do, create wage inflation and inflation in general, which they will do eventually, but by their chosen path, QE, they are creating the worst possible outcome, inflation without wage inflation. Stop laughing, it can happen. How you may ask, simple dollar devaluation is inflation, but dollar devaluation does not guarantee wage growth. The only way to get wage growth is through demand with inflation, what the Fed did will not do this. Frankly, everyone should be terrified of Mr. Bernanke and he should be punished for lying to Congress when he said he would not monetize the debt, he is.

I can rattle off all sorts of conspiracy theories as to why the Fed is doing QE, but they are too laughable to mention. I do think one thing makes sense, it is a back door bailout of the banking system, again. There is a little issue I am sure you are familiar with, the foreclosure crisis, and this crisis is a huge, enormous, problem. If you are a bondholder it is one thing to have a borrower default on the debt, the cash flow ends and you get to take the collateral, a home in this case, to recover your capital. However, this whole chain of custody issue, there is no legal remedy for it and all those pundits who claim that this is no big deal are either stupid or scared to admit the truth, means that there is no collateral to collect now. Essentially the borrower can keep the house and screw the lender if the paperwork is messed up, how would you like to own a MBS now? Your bonds are worthless… or are they?

If there was fraud in the loan, as we are now seeing, the bondholder can put back the bond and be repaid their original capital. This is the problem that is starting to rear its ugly head, the put back, and it could be huge. Think about all the paper the banks would have to buy back and now think of all the synthetic derivatives that were written against that bond. What a mess. A big costly web of a mess. I do not know how big the problem can be, but I think part of the QE might help these banks by either allowing the bank to front run the bonds the Fed is buying or by infusing the bank with capital.

It doesn’t matter really, but I think that was one of the reasons for QE2. We have been told for over a year now how great things are now and we are in a recovery so why do QE at all? We have inflation, it is not sky high, but it is there in the PPI and the CPI is still positive. If the CPI were negative I would say we have deflation, but it isn’t and at best we had disinflation which does not justify such a crazy move as monetizing almost a trillion dollars in paper. The Fed sees that no real recovery has happened and maybe that is the reason for the latest round of easing. Regardless, the banks are going to benefit from this, remember the Fed asked them how much they should buy from them.

I stated about a year ago that we can have inflation without wage inflation. We are about to see if that once crazy theory of mine is right. The Fed has now monetized trillion’s in debt and I can say, with history on my side, this has never ended well for any country who has ventured down this path. America is a special place because of our freedoms, but we are not so special that math and history doesn’t pertain to us. All of the people warning about the Fed’s insane moves might be right and the sky very well might be falling. Heck, if things were as great as we have been told over the past few months by the talking heads and our politicians, who no one believes, why are we even having this conversation? Things are not well and I fear we may be in the calm before a very bad storm like we have never seen before.

The President, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and only God knows how many politicians have all said that the Fin Reg bill ends all taxpayer assisted bailouts for Wall Street. Well, the news lately will put that phrase to the test. To think that all of these foreclosures are not an issue was crazy to begin with, but throw in a little foreclosure fraud and overnight you get a $47B putback from BlackRock and the Fed… go figure.

I believe the putback situation we saw yesterday was merely the beginning and there are many more tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars to follow. The banking system cannot handle that type of volume, remember in 2008 it was MBS and derivatives of MBS securities that caused our little problem. There is no easy remedy for this problem, regardless of what JPM or BoA says, since we are talking basic contract law here. Now, Congress did try to sneak through a bill that would have solved the industries problem, H.R. 3808 which would make courts accept all sorts of junk affidavits, but Obama ‘pocket’ vetoed the bill. Do not think that bill went away because it can come back and probably will under a new name, but it will fail in the courts, in my opinion, remember Obama said Congress needed to fix some issues with the bill, a telling statement on his opinion.

Not only does he want Congress to merely make some cosmetic changes to it, but Obama also said that this is just a “minor paperwork snafu.” Oh, how I wish that were true, but it is not a minor snafu. I do not support homeowners who took on irresponsible loans, I have long said they should lose their homes, but I dislike actual fraud even more than irresponsible borrowers. Let’s also not forget that these same lenders often did not verify the borrower’s income either which makes this whole problem a bit ironic as lenders cut corners to give the loan and now they cut corners to foreclose on the collateral. There is a remedy to all of this, as written on Zero Hedge previously, which is a borrower accepts a loan modification which clears the title, guess how successful the HAMP will be now.

If Congress doesn’t create a fix, which they should not, banks will lose foreclosure proceedings to those defendants who decide to fight it. I do not believe anyone really knows how big this problem really is and, frankly, I would not trust anyone who attaches a number to it. After all, these will be the same people who said sub-prime loans were a nonissue a few years ago, the missed that one by a mile, obviously, so they will miss this one as well. Not to mention that this issue will once again be a global issue. Who knows how many of these bonds are sitting on the balance sheet of banks all around the world. Hell, we do not even know what outstanding derivatives are still in play with this paper.

To assume that this will pass with no real material issue to the banks is idiotic. The risk is real and the system is still very, very weak. Perhaps now we know why bank reserves are still so high, did they know this might be an issue? Probably as we know banks do not like to fess up to mistakes until, well, the global financial system is about to implode. The credibility of banks and government has probably never been so low in all of history and that is a problem especially if they need help again. I fully believe another bailout will be needed over this and that means the issues of 2008 will return in 2010 with a vengeance.

Remember, in 2008 it was really the CDO’s and CDS’s on tranches of MBS products that were the problem. We all remember senior and junior tranches that were in the headlines, but back then at least you could get the collateral back to try and sell, albeit at a much lower price. Today if these things are still blowing up and you cannot even get the collateral back that would be a total loss for the investor or bank if it got putback to them. See the problem now? It is just not the banks that have this problem, but the GSE’s as well who may be guaranteeing a lot of this junk now. The GSE’s have $5T in outstanding mortgage guarantees and some say that mortgages as far back as the late 1990’s might not have proper chain of title.

The math is enormous and this should scare people to death. Perhaps it will all go away. Perhaps judges will ignore the 200 year precedents of contract law, they did it with the auto makers, so why not now. However, if this doesn’t go away we are definitely in for a rerun of 2008 again on a much larger scale since even the government is reaching the end of their credit line. Maybe QE2 will buy these securities and that is how the problem will disappear, but if nothing is done the entire mortgage market and perhaps some well known banks are done… again, unless all our politicians lied to us.

I admit I have been delinquent on checking out the Euribor rates lately since the Federal Reserve has me scared to death about QE2, more on that later, but I do not think it will be what you believe it will be in November. However, the Euribor went ballistic thanks to the ‘perfectly safe’ Irish banks began to show that the ‘stress test’ were pure bull. How can a bank pass a stress test a couple of months ago and then do insolvent, basically? That doesn’t happen in a normal world and it proves that the ECB totally flubbed the stress test.

The fraud that the stress tests were showing up in the inter banking lending rates which went from benign to cancerous in a heartbeat.  While the Euribor first continued to climb after the stress tests it did level out later in the summer, but now it went vertical and it probably is not looking back. Considering that European banks are still holding only God knows how much US MBS’s, which our current foreclosure fraud situation may render those MBS’s worthless over time, along with how much Greek, Portugal, Italian and Spanish debt and you got serious problems. The media is not going to touch this, but the bank lending markets talks about it only if you look at them.

The 3 month Euribor rate was below .90% until a week ago when it jumped to about 1%, .993% as I write this, which isn’t much until you consider we are in a zero interest rate policy (ZIRP). Actually, we are in a negative interest rate policy right now if you count all the QE going on. When you factor that in it kind of brings to light that something is wrong in Europe, still. US treasuries for 3 months are yielding about .14% so clearly European banks are pricing in a risk premium. The question is, what is the risk premium for? Clearly default is part of it and I think you will see more issues with banks very soon.

It is impossible to have bank holdings that consist of sovereign debt that is in trouble plus MBS holdings and not have any problems. There certainly will be more insolvency issues, but even if a bank is not insolvent their balance sheets will be impaired further. It is a mess and the real problem is that it is just not European banks, but US banks as well. While US banks do not hold a lot of sovereign debt, they do own tons of MBS holdings, unless the Fed buys them from the banks, which foreclosuregate, I hate these names we have now, will make many of these securities worthless or at the very least impair them well below par.

I do not know what is going to happen, but I am convinced that the serious problems that many thought were behind us never really went away. All we ended up having done was the government and the Fed paper over the problems. This went on all over the world with the ECB following suit as well. The Eurubor is telling us something, are many listening? Nope. Stocks are moving higher on some idiotic belief that inflating our way out of this mess will work, it might in nominal terms, but not in real terms. Phony stress tests clearly are not the answer as the fraud gets uncovered when banks that passed suddenly need a bailout. How central banks and governments have any credibility is simply beyond me. When a fraud is uncovered people usually talk about it, but the news on some financial channels is mute on the issue. When lending costs climb rapidly it usually makes news, did you hear about it? Nope. It is all just one big farce out there. I personally believe that the only safe haven seems to be commodities and I believe stocks are not as safe as people believe.

How anyone is really surprised by the possibility of a further decline in economic activity is puzzling to me. Perhaps it is all the distortions in the data that is coming from the government supporting the economy. Maybe it is because their vested interest is to have you invest in their funds. Perhaps they just drank the Kool-Aid. No matter what it is almost a certainty, in terms of forecasting, that the economy will either stagnant here or decline.

The main indicator that has been telling us there were problems for some time now is the initial claims data and the lack of private payroll growth. Sure, we saw a bump up in payrolls with the 5%+ GDP print, thanks to inventory restocking, but 1Q10 GDP shows signs of significant weakness. What has held true is initial claims, first they got better with the big GDP print, but now they are soft with the constant downward revisions to 1Q10 GDP. The ECRI data also points to weakness in the economy as well which correlates with initial claims data. From my lens, employment is not a lagging indicator, I have been pounding the table on this for a year now, it is a leading indicator in a post credit collapse scenario.

Friday’s employment report is now being telegraphed by Bloomberg to be weak, -110K is the forecast, especially since the Census hiring is done and they are now laying off workers. All of this is not surprising if you track initial claims and use it as a leading indicator. To put the monthly initial claims data into perspective 1,850,000 are filing claims for the first time and that means there needs to be about 2M jobs created every month to offset the ones just lost and we also have to contend with population growth as well. To be blunt, full employment is a figment of one’s imagination at this point for at least the next 5-8 years. Unemployment will be our greatest problem for a long, long time and there is little the government can do since end demand is the issue.

There is simply no way the Fed can raise rates for the foreseeable future either since one of their mandates is full employment. Yes, I know they said they would raise rates before employment recovered, but they won’t for political reasons. Obviously, that might change depending on what happens in the future, but for right now there simply is no reason to raise interest rates, at all, from their perspective. Worse is the fact that the Senate did not extend unemployment insurance last week which means a million plus people will lose benefits very soon. After their drunken spending binge to bailout the banks after they created this it is beyond me how they would let a million people just wither and die. There are 6 people for every job opening out there so it is not like these people are actively NOT trying to find work, so enough with that whole theatrical display of utter idiocy. Keep in mind I am a deficit hawk, but there is a difference between government wasting money and government helping those who cannot find work.

The loss of those benefits will have a huge impact on the economy as a whole since that money will not be spent. Retail sales will continue to slide and foreclosures will continue to rise, how many of those million plus people are barely hanging on? I am not sure how so many people can claim that the unemployed are simply freeloaders looking to live the highlife on such a meager government stipend which is what you hear often on other blogs or by the ultra rightwing. Considering that there are so many people looking for work the competition for a job, any job, is extremely high which reduces the odds of a person actually getting a new job anytime soon. Not to mention that unemployment benefits are usually around $300 – $500 a week I find it hard to believe that anyone is living the highlife on such a low amount, but that is the case. I am sure that there are abuses, but this is one of those give me a break moments and I am definitely right of center.

The other reason many believe a double dip is out of the question is that companies have extraordinary amount f cash on their balance sheets. Well, all I have to say is how long has that cash been on their balance sheet and it has not gone to work yet? This is like the temporary employment is a bullish indicator, if it is not happened yet the odds of it happening anytime soon are dwindling. The cash on the balance sheet is also part of the deleveraging cycle as companies pay down debt and hoard cash. Perhaps the main reason that companies have so much cash on hand is they think that business is going to get very tough in the near future. After all, many of our best companies have roots going back beyond the Depression and they know the value of having cash on hand to make it through the storms. Of course, they could spend it all tomorrow, but I ask again, what are they waiting for and why hasn’t it happened yet?

The bottom line is that it is really shocking to see so many smart people caught off guard about a potential double dip recession. All of the signs have been around for a longtime that the thought should have entered their mind at some point in time in recent months. There is a chance that we could avoid it, but I do not see how. I should point out the fact that I never bought the idea that we actually made it out of the first one, other than a statistical recovery that is. Time will tell on this one, but if Friday’s report is worse than expectations we will be well on our way to S&P 900.

From David Rosenberg’s morning musing’s today:

“ In contrast, the Asian FX complex is selling off. Risk assets are not responding to this week’s apparent good news: the Chinese peg announcement (has anyone noticed that yuan forwards are actually …. weakening?)”

Whether this is a real trend or not is unknown, but I fully expect the yuan to appreciate before it really falls anyhow, gotta get Congress off their backs for now. No matter what a strong yuan is not in China’s interests right now and China’s ruling party wants to remain the ruling party so are they going to fear Congress or a billion Chinese storming the Peoples House? You get my point.

To further make my point about the troubles in the EU and in China, moreover how this is a global issue now, Rosenberg went on to say:

“ There are all sorts of news reports in today’s FT discussing how the problem countries in Europe are in such bad shape that their banks are increasingly relying on the ECB for their funding survival. Portuguese banks reportedly doubled their borrowing from the central bank in May as a sign that this is not just a Greek tragedy. We have reached a stage where countries representing 18% of Eurozone GDP is accounting for 68% of the growth in ECB funding. Is that a currency you really want to own?”

What does all of this mean? It means big trouble and the markets are telling us that the problems from around the world are about to wash up on our shores. The irony is it is all coming full circle because we kicked it off with our credit induced sugar coma over a 5 year period which made risky paper seem safe and led foreign banks to buy it. Later everyone found out that safe paper was worth far less than the paper it was printed on and the write downs, globally, were enormous, with more to come. That triggered a collaborative global bailout of the entire financial system, but the ones who funded the bailouts are now in trouble and the recipients of the bailouts were never really in such great shape even after they received hundreds of billions in aid.
While we allowed our banks to extend and pretend, mostly because we have the luxury of printing our own money and we are the reserve currency, foreign banks bought seemingly safe sovereign government debt instead of treasuries, for the obvious reasons. Well, that debt became no good and we are where we are with a potential funding problem across the pond and a healthy exposure to European banks. We had exported our “safe debt” which ended up being toxic to the Europeans and they, more or less, did the same thing to us! Except theirs was disguised as safe government paper instead of CDO’s and CLO’s.

I believe the proper name for such a thing is “circle jerk,” but I am not 100% sure on that. Either way it is definitely heading this way and only a fool would deny that fact. In today’s world it no longer matters if a problem starts 10,000 miles away because everything is handled via the internet in microseconds and exposure can go from nil to billions in the blink of an eye. All this means is that we are exposed and the market knows this. Why else would treasuries be doing what they are doing while gold is rising and stocks are declining, the interesting thing is the stocks declining part is new and all 3 were once going up at one time, how odd. All 3 asset classes could not be right, but 2 out of the 3 asset classes were bearish for stocks so directionally speaking a downward move should not be overly surprising to anyone, but it is, interesting.

SNL Financial came out with a report today that said 90 banks have missed at least 1 TARP dividend payment, that is about 11% of all TARP recipients have defaulted for those of you keeping count. Keep in mind that about 829 institutions received TARP funds and about 50+ have repaid TARP funds, mostly the big name institutions that we all know and love. What is critical to note is that the defaults, I would call missing a payment a default since banks call a borrower who misses a payment to be in default, are increasing, not decreasing, as we approach the 2 year anniversary of the historic TARP legislation.

What that tells me is that not everything is fine when we are 2 years into the largest bailout in the history of bailouts and we have banks defaulting, remember only the “strongest banks” were getting bailed out, and bank closures accelerating as well. All of this while the pundits talk about “the greatest V shaped recovery in history” which is laughable. If we were in recovery mode wouldn’t these banks be earning their way out of this mess? They have the greatest accounting gimmick, mark to model, at their disposal and they are defaulting and being taken over by regulators at an increasing rate, how can that be? Perhaps the system is not as strong as we are told, that sounds about right to me.

We have to face the facts and the fact is that the data does not lie, banks are defaulting and failing. Real estate prices, both residential and, especially, commercial are falling which means more problems for banks. The banking industry as a whole is much larger than Citi, Bank of America and JP Morgan, and I am hard pressed to make the statement that those banks are largely benefiting from proprietary trading, government bond underwriting and the ability to mark to model. In other words, the bailout failed with the exception of the too big to fails and, as we already knew, the bailout was really just a selective bailout anyhow. How could Bear, Sterns be allowed to be acquired, but Lehman fail? Just days after Lehman fails AIG gets bailed out, the proof is pretty overwhelming about the selectivity of the bailouts, in my opinion, and TARP was designed to make the big banks flourish and the rest of the banks, well who cares because no one cares about the rest of the banks. I mean, who ever heard of Midwest Banc Holdings anyhow, except for the depositors.

So, as the ECB gets ready to release useless stress test results, which I am sure will show Greek and Spanish banks in trouble, but everything else hunky dory, consider the fact that our stress test and bailouts were completely and utterly useless. In other words, if you cannot trust our results, it has taken almost 2 years for the failures to show up, how can you trust the ECB’s results? Geithner knows this which is why he pushed for the stress test. He knew you can fool the markets for a little while with useless stress test and a seemingly huge bailout fund. However, the results cannot be hidden forever and our results are public, for those willing to look for the statistics, and prove that their strategy just kicks the can down the road and still leads to failure. Unless you consider accelerating defaults and closures a success, I am sure some talking head somewhere will see it as a stunning success, but in the real world most people see escalating failure for what it is, failure.

In another testament to the resilience of this V shaped recovery the U.S. is currently experiencing there is news that New York State might not pass the emergency budget, which has been keeping the state alive for the past couple of months, on Monday. For those of us who live in NY we know that they never pass a budget on time, this is not news and it amazes me that the same people always get reelected, but now this is a serious situation. If they do not pass the emergency budget on Monday the entire state will shutdown, everything.

First off, NY State is in rough shape and is going to go broke without a federal bailout, period. For all the talk about NY is going to make it, CA as well, is all wishful thinking. No one wants to make the tough decisions and because of that, and years of spending well beyond the states means, here we are facing a shutdown because of NYS fiscal condition. The deficit NY faces is huge and will only get worse because even in the face of everything going on no one wants to really cut spending which is a bit insane. Sure, they will make concessions here and there, but nothing really meaningful or that will improve our situation in the future. The worst part of it all is that if, that is a big if, things ever get back to “normal” the state will just ramp up spending again like nothing ever happened. Hey, if people will lend you the money, why not.

However, this shutdown is major and will serve as a wakeup call to most people in the state who thought this would/could never happen here. According to the Associate Press here is what is at stake in the shutdown:

What would a New York state government shutdown look like?

No one is sure. But they agree a shutdown, possible if the Legislature fails to approve an emergency spending bill Monday, would include:

-Suspension of lottery games, safety inspections of cabins for youth, and other nonessential services.

-Closing of parks and campgrounds, courts and unemployment offices.

-Businesses wouldn’t get paid for goods and services provided after June 13.

-Social service payments for children and family services including welfare and food stamps would be frozen.

-Schools wouldn’t get funding for education of homeless children.

-153,000 state employees wouldn’t get paid on June 23 as scheduled.

Prisons and state police patrols would continue, but likely with reduced staffing.

What is happening in Albany? Well, a couple of Democrat Senators are deciding to vote against the emergency budget which will cause the shutdown. The likelihood that they will actually follow through on their threats is minimal, but possible. The one thing you can count on about all politicians is that they like to be reelected and no one wants to be the one responsible for shutting down the state, but anything is possible. That being said, the list above is inevitable simply because there is no way the state can solve its fiscal problems and the debt markets, at some point, will demand a premium for the state’s debt to be issued.

I can attest that the population is already overtaxed and is unwilling to pay more in state income taxes, property taxes or sales taxes. What will happen is people will vote with their feet, they already are as illustrated by my daughters kindergarten class of which 1/5^th of the students are moving out of state for economic reasons. That is a huge number and this being my second child through elementary school, I can say that this is unprecedented in my experience. Businesses are not going to stay in NY because it is not a business friendly state from a tax point of view so there are layers of problems, not just that taxes are too high.

I await Monday’s vote to see the outcome, but rest assured the emergency budget will pass. Also rest assured that at some point the listed shutdown items above will be implemented because of insolvency because our elected leaders do not know how to manage money o government. It all goes back to my previous statement, politicians bribe us with our own money and we fall for it, not realizing we are better off if we say “no” to it so we are not taxed to pay for the bribe we just gave to ourselves.

Look, things in the U.S. are certainly better, even though I am bearish on the economy, but they are just a “less worse” type of better rather than a true recovery or whatever you want to call it. Someone once commented that I would not know a V shaped recovery if it sat on my face, or something to that, as the recession in the early 1980’s saw a lag in initial claims of some 6 months before the recovery in employment happened. Boy, I hope that person is reading this because that comment was made in august or September of last year, almost a full year ago, and initial claims barely broke the 500K mark as we speak, is that the ”V” we are looking for? The fact is in a post credit collapse employment is a leading indicator, I said it a year ago and I am saying it now and the only difference is the unemployment rate is HIGHER today than a year ago.

What changed over the last 12 months?

Nothing. Wait, I take that back, a lot. The U.S. is now $3T more in debt, we performed a “stress test,” which we are telling the ECB to do, more on that in a minute, and the Fed expanded its balance sheet by how much? What did we get for all of that? A 5.2% GDP print based on inventory a rebuild that was probably premature, if we take away the stimulus would firms have rebuilt their inventories so much? I think not. Unemployment is slightly better thanks to temporary jobs and government hiring, not exactly what I would call “robust” at all. The bottom line is all my criticism of the stimulus was right, it failed.

The banks are better you say, right? Are they? If you think that, well, I just don’t know what to tell you. Did the banks get rid of the “toxic assets?” Did they write all their bad debts off? Did real estate values increase? How about commercial real estate, is that sector flying strong again? No. Are banks loaning money again? Sure, if you have a credit score of 850 or better and don’t need the money they will gladly make a loan to you. However, if you need to refinance your home you better hope you qualify for a government program or you are out of luck. The “stress test” was a joke and meant nothing because we are at the outer limits of the stress test, remember, 10% unemployment, etc., etc.? What saved the banks was one thing and one thing only, the repeal of mark-to-market account, period, end of story.

If we brought back mark-to-market accounting today we would have a handful of big institutions left, I guarantee it. Just look at Wells Fargo’s balance sheet with the “Pick-A-Pay Loans” they inherited, worse, they bought, from Wachovia, the LTV’s, except for Texas, God Bless Texas, are all horrible. I am not saying WFC would fail, I am just saying they would have to realize pretty significant losses is all. It is no coincidence that right after, literally right after, the repeal of mark-to-market accounting rules by the FASB, by Congressional pressure I might add, bank earnings went through the roof. What replaced mark-to-market accounting? Mark-to-model accounting, do you know who made that model famous? Enron, need I say more?

Europe

Now, Timmy Geithner is over in Europe telling the Europeans to do a “stress test” to let the world know all is well. Sorry Tim, I do not think this will work since it is technically not the banks in question, but rather the sovereign debt that they are holding. Why not do a stress test on governments instead, maybe that will solve the problem. This is a banking problem, again, that was brought on by huge deficit spending and countries inability to service their debt loads, this is big, huge actually. While this will impact banks it is not really banks that caused it, but politicians who decided to bribe the people with their own money.

It is likely that one of the PIGS, or whatever we are calling them now, will default given the issues they have and the inability of politicians to say no to spending. It is just odd, it always has been, that the people demand all this gravy from the government in the form of give a ways, tax credits or straight cash in some form. Don’t these people realize that they are only getting back their own money? Actually, if governments spent less and had lower debts that means they would have lower overall taxes which means the people would have more money on their own… they would be better off! However, the people insist on being bribed with their own money and politicians are only too happy to oblige.

The point is that this bigger than the banks as we are talking about the solvency of countries now. Bailouts are much more difficult to do for countries and the implications of a default by any country has widespread ripples that most people have no idea can or would occur. Even if Hungary or Greece defaults it is a huge deal and will impact governments and banks all over the world. I have been saying this for months now, Greece is a big deal and all those people saying it is not are, well, disqualified to render their opinions anymore as the markets have spoken and they have sided with me.

Run a stress test, it doesn’t matter because it really doesn’t matter Tim. The problem is with government spending this time and I do not think mark-to-model accounting can fix this problem.

The real problem

The real problem is I do not know where the sovereign debt problems will end, I know it will get worse. I know that more European countries will succumb to this very same issue as most European countries are socialist by their very nature and their debt levels are very high. As the weaker countries fall they will drag the stronger countries down with them, it is just how it works. I made a call that the Euro will fall to 1.18, we are about there. Do I think it will go lower? Yes, to parity in the near future. I think 1.16 is the next level, but the ECB will have to intervene and China has to intervene as a weak Euro is a major problem, it is, another story for another time. The currency will not survive without a mechanism to eject the weak states, period.

After the carnage in Europe is done, I do not have a timetable for that, it could be tomorrow or 10 years from now, but more than likely it will be sooner rather than later, the debt problems will spread, to the U.S. We have $13T in debt and an economy that is not recovering, I am not happy about that, but those are the facts. We are spending $4.9B a day, 3 times the amount George Bush, not exactly the face of fiscal conservatism I might add, was spending. We are in major trouble and what are our politicians doing? Trying to figure out how to get stimulus 3 out the door, that’s what.

I have been saying for months that our debt to GDP level is almost at parity, but it takes the Drudge Report for people to start listening? OK, at least people are listening now. The problem is we have no politicians willing to take the steps to fix out problems. Go ahead, elect the Republicans, look what they did from 2000-2006, they really helped to speed the process up, in my opinion. Of course, out current President and Congress has surely kicked what the Republicans did into hyper drive as they added 30% to our debt load in less than 2 years, that is $3T, an astounding figure. Neither of these parties really want to fix the problems, in my opinion, because they have a vested interest in perpetuating the problems so they can stay in power, it is just how it works.

What this means is we are all in very big trouble. I am not talking about, oh, gee, go buy an ounce of gold and protect yourself from inflation, I am talking about the Weimar Republic, hyperinflation, type of trouble. I see no way out besides inflation and in a big way. As Paul Krugman points out, there is a big difference between Greece and the U.S., we can print our own money. We also know Ben Bernanke has no problem with hitting that print money either. I am also confident that the Fed is, basically, completely incompetent.

If we cannot go to the market to finance our debt, which we have trillions of dollars of that most of it matures in under 10 years, the Fed will monetize it. That is how we will deal with our sovereign debt crisis, we will print our way out of it and it will be the very worst thing we can do. Instead of cutting our government, spending or doing anything else that is logical, because politicians want to get reelected, they will choose to inflate their way out. Will gold protect you? Yes, but so will food and any other useful commodity including toilet paper. It disturbs me to no end that we are where we are and that the President is listening to the likes of Mr. Krugman who thinks deficits don’t matter, they do, and that since we can print money it is OK, printing money is not OK.

In the meantime I am still short the market. We will have a bounce I am sure and I almost took a nice broad long position today, but I passed. While I am sure we will have that bounce I did not think the risk reward was worth it. My target is still 900 on the S&P 500.