The dollar is dead

We have witnessed the Middle East go up in flames and the troubles in Europe start to percolate again, but the dollar is not doing anything. I am only surprised that it is happening so soon, I thought there was more time. While I highly doubt that anyone will rush back into the greenback it could happen. The world’s faith in the US has been shaken by our inability to seriously discuss our deficit and debt problems. A perfect example is the latest round of talks encompasses cutting some tens of billions of dollars from a mere 12% of our total budget leaving the entitlements and military spending off the table, is it any wonder why no one trusts us to seriously address our debt issues?

If people are not buying dollars what are they buying? Gold and silver. The prices do not lie and both metals have moved significantly over the past few weeks as the Middle East began to demand regime changes. All the while the USD has basically treaded water or moved slightly down. Not only does the lack of interest coincide with the latest budget battle but it also coincides with the fact that we are right in the middle of QE2 which was frowned upon by most nations. The double whammy of our inability to seriously deal with our debt and our very own central bank monetizing large amounts of our debt, over mythical low inflation figures I might add, makes other countries stop and think about how to allocate their assets during times of uncertainty.

Overall the US total debt and monetary policy is also inflationary which makes an inflation protected asset more attractive than UST’s and dollars. Why would investors choose gold and silver over TIPS? Because no one trusts the government to actually track inflation honestly which is why you are seeing lower inflation expectations in TIP yields right now. Again, gold and silver fit the bill as an alternative as a flight to safety. Granted, gold is considered safer than silver, but lately silver has picked up more prestige and I believe silver will make some spectacular moves in the near future. In other words, gold has likely picked up more of the safe haven assets than silver but it is clear that both metals have outperformed the dollar and may be replacing the dollar until something else comes along.

So, is the dollar dead? I think it is one its way if we do not address our debt and annual deficits this year. The deficits are so bad, so outrageous and so dangerous that ignoring them for one more year may be devastating. Our total national debt, officially, if 100% of GDP and our unfunded liabilities is tens of trillions of dollars… we got serious problems. Adding insult to injury is the whole QE situation which is debt monetization no matter how you slice it. This shows weakness and is highly inflationary which will drive foreign investors away from the USD. Why would you buy an asset today that you know will be worth less in the future? You wouldn’t and either will other countries when it comes to USD’s.

The fact that we have had a few governments get toppled and a few more on the way in the most volatile region in the world and the dollar has not rallied is kind of scary. Instead we have seen commodities continue to rally, stocks (I guess the only source of our economic success) go straight up, and the dollar trend a bit lower. In the meantime gold and silver are being treated as currencies and when turmoil kicks up they go up in value. I have known for a long time that the dollar is in trouble and would blow up because we have a lack of leadership in Washington who do not want to make hard choices and the Federal Reserve who seemingly has lost its mind and has missed every major issue with our economy over the last 10 years who has decided to monetize our debt.

This will end with high inflation and the fact that the Fed disagrees is exactly why you should agree with me. Gold and silver make sense, own them physically, along with other soft commodities. I fear that the dollar has seen its best days and while I do not know exactly what will come in the longer term I do know it will not be pretty. I think you will know who to blame by then, I hope at least.

Sphere: Related Content

Who are the patriots?

Social unrest has swept the globe and the only surprise to this fact is that it has taken some 3 years for it to happen. In foreign lands which many have never even heard of the name of the countries the people want change, real change. Some are fighting because of political repression and others because of higher food prices, thanks Ben, and they are politically oppressed. Regardless of the reasons people are on the move and America is not immune from this change.

In Madison Wisconsin we are witnessing the first of what I predict will be many protests over public union contracts. It is simply amazing that the unions are so upset over modest changes to healthcare and pension premiums, 12% is the magic number there. However, it seems the real sticking point is that Wisconsin wants to reform the collective bargaining arrangement which has consistently favored labor for the last 50 years and, in my opinion, has allowed for unions to make demands that have led to higher taxation of the people because the pension funds were so underfunded, as participants did not have to add any money to it, and healthcare costs rocketed to the moon, again, participants had to add little to no money to their health insurance plan. On top of these fantastic benefits they have job security meaning they literally cannot be fired.

In a nutshell, states are going bankrupt in order to pay a few peoples pensions, often 70-80% of the last 3 years of the employee’s highest earning pay. Oh, did I mention that they also got mandatory 4-5% cost of living adjustments during their working years and during their retirement? It is a good deal and getting these public sector jobs are difficult and you typically have to know someone to get one. You also get nice vacation time as well, often starting off with up to 3 or 4 weeks and earning more as time goes on. When things do not go well you strike to get your way.

Unions are what drove GM and Chrysler out of business and their bankruptcies allowed them to start over with their contracts. Since those contracts were redone both firms are doing much better, go figure. Ford forced unions to the table threatening bankruptcy and got their contracts redone and look what is happening there. In all 3 cases the union employees are happy. Sure, they are not as happy as they were when the Job Bank was there, they got paid for months at normal rates if they were laid off, but they have hobs, goof benefits and in GM’s case they got the biggest bonus ever, I believe, last year. This is evidence that when you take the power away from unions it actually benefits the employees, but only time will tell if this continues but so far it looks pretty good.

The public sector though, well, should they be unionized at all? I personally do not believe so, but at the same time when dealing with the government some protection is warranted so I would say a nontraditional union is needed not the super strong unions we currently see that curry state and the federal government into bankruptcy. If you are paying attention to the Madison situation it is very interesting especially from the media’s perspective.

I have been watching a lot of MSNBC lately who was classic for smashing and ridiculing the Tea Party last year. I have to say that their coverage of Madison is much, much different than their coverage of the Tea Party events. For starters the Tea Party events were all nonviolent, completely peaceful open gatherings where kooks were chased away. Contrary to all reports no racists were there and I saw plenty of nonwhite people attend and, in short, they were people who cared about the country and wanted to restore some sanity in the government which is a noble cause in my mind. They were described by MSNBC as America hating racists who want to destroy this country, all we stand for and are violent, not one report of violence was ever reported to my knowledge.

Compare that to Madison which is all white, ironic in my opinion, they spat upon state senators, pushed them around, shouted them down, shouted for an Egyptian style revolution and held signs of the usual Hitler pictures. MSNBC said these people were being stripped of their civil rights and are fighting for democracy even though their elected officials fled the state so a vote could not take place. The protesters were teachers who walked out of their jobs, that they love, supposedly, to protest for a week straight so kids are now without school which means parents are paying for daycare or babysitting. These people are not fighting for work, they are not fighting against a massive pay cut or furloughs what they are fighting about is paying an extra 12% for their benefits that are outstanding and still way underpriced.

Keep in mind that if this bill does not go through some 6,000 people will lose their jobs, think about that for a minute. Instead of giving up 12% and the right to strong arm the state later on they instead decided to walk off their jobs, spit and shove people, and cost 6,000 people their jobs. Oh, the 12% benefit hike was on the table last fall and the union rejected it and they are trying to get it back now because of the removal of the collective bargaining language in this bill, keep in mind that the senate only got rid of the collective bargaining language because they rejected the 12% then, but decided to take it when the state decided to play hardball. What the new language does is gives the state more equal say in negotiations with unions instead of the unions having 90% of the power like they have now. It is time to reduce their power especially in the public sector where we all pay for these people through our tax dollars.

As far as who are the patriots I would have to say the Tea Party wins hands down. You may not agree with their politics, but I can guarantee you they will always be polite to you, respect your views, not spit on you, shove you and they will defend your right to say whatever and gather wherever you want just as the Constitution allows. I am not so sure about the Madison people I have a feeling if you agree with them they will like you, but if you disagree with them get out of their way and that is not patriotic, American or the sign of a healthy Democracy. I had to say m peace. Thank you.

Sphere: Related Content

The Bulls Still Have to Make Their Case

I have stated that you have to be long this market until the Fed pulls the ample liquidity it has been pumping into the markets for the few months now. Before the Fed announced QE2 I was right to be bearish as the indices were heading lower under numerous stresses from both domestic and foreign sources. It was in August when Ben gave his speech about asset purchases and then the next meeting which started them that caused the markets to take off. Up until that point there was no real reason to be bullish.

Frankly, outside of the excess liquidity, there is still little reason to be bullish. Just because stocks move higher it does not mean that the economy is all better, sorry, but it does not work that way. I believe that the economic data we are seeing is heavily distorted and if we are in fact having 3-4% GDP growth, like several Fed officials claim, where are the jobs? That is a huge jump in GDP growth and that would certainly create jobs, but here we are witnessing the greatest exodus from the job market since the data has been tracked. The U-6 data is way up over 17% and Shadow Stats says we are saddled with 20%+ of unemployed/underemployed.

If we are experiencing 3-4% GDP growth why in the world are we still experiencing ZIRP and QE of any kind? It makes no sense at all. I know, because “inflation is too low.” Inflation as defined by Ben Bernanke and not by people who have to buy food and energy every day. The fact that we are arguing over the definition of inflation is asinine. Normal, sane people, would define inflation as the normal cost of living items, but the insane people say that inflation should be measured by the cost of computers and flat screen TV’s, that makes sense. The bottom line is Ben is distorting everything with this insane monetary policy and is causing food prices to rise around the world, including right here in the USA.

The economy is better, I have admitted this for some time now, but it is still sick and not functioning correctly. What we are seeing now with runaway government spending and excess Fed easing is a serious risk to the US dollar. I realize that every country wants a weaker currency so they can export their way to prosperity or so they can grow their way out of their debt problems, but this will not work for the US. The US debt issues are so large and the trade imbalances are so out of balance that it is impossible for the US to grow its way out of its debt problems.

While Ben tells Congress that the US must get the deficits under control immediately, a first I might add, it is impossible to do so. Have you ever wondered why the US cannot cut annual spending? They tell you it is because of entitlement programs, right? They also say these entitlement programs are solvent, at the moment at least, right? Wrong. The proof of this is in the annual deficits. When you received your paycheck there were federal income taxes withheld and FICA taxes withheld, for Social Security and Medicare. Supposedly the FICA taxes went into separate accounts to be used at a later date but our leaders used that surplus money to plug holes in previous deficits and gave the SSA and Medicare IOU’s instead. Now the SSA and Medicare are cashing in those IOU’s which is why the government cannot cut the annual deficit and it proves that the programs are insolvent.

All of this is evidence that the economy and economic health of the US is not good. We are still in trouble and all we did in 2008-2009 was transfer the bad debts from the banks to the US government, kicking the can down the road, and the banks are still in bad shape. The economy is not replacing lost jobs and probably never will replace all those jobs lost in the last few years. The only way the unemployment numbers will get better is because of how the BLS calculates the unemployed, i.e. not counting the ones that fall off the rolls.

The bulls need to make the case that the economy has really recovered. I am a bear and I said to own stocks, and commodities, and I was right too, but I am under no illusion that things are that much better. A stock market going up doesn’t really mean anything especially when the Fed is giving primary dealers billions of dollars every week to do something with. Not to mention that rising stock prices only help the investing class anyhow which is a shrinking portion of America nowadays.

Sphere: Related Content

Schizophrenia, that sums up

Here we are in a New Year and as is tradition we see countless forecasts for what will transpire this year. My personal feeling is that they are all worthless since no one knows what the Fed is going to do and there is no denying that the Fed and the Fed alone has total control over the markets. Without the Fed we would not have seen positive returns in 2010, IMHO, and we only got those returns because the central bank flooded the market with extraordinary liquidity, again. The irony is that everyone knows something isn’t quite right, but they seemingly cannot put their finger on what is not normal.

As the weekly headlines come and go they are almost humorous now and completely contradict previous headlines. It is this that is contributing to that unsettling feeling most people have but cannot identify right now. Any given day you read about the recovery, often from a heavily seasonally adjusted figure, which signals a recovery in the economy, even though the unseasonal adjusted figure shows the data is not so hot, and everyone is bullish again. The next week we get a data point that is horrible and the world is coming to an end. Perhaps this is what many economists mean when they say this is a ‘muddle through economy.’ Regardless, things are better there is little question about that, but I would say we have stabilized ourselves in a less bad environment versus a real economic recovery.

I had previously said stocks would move higher and they did, but that is only because of the liquidity the Fed bestowed upon us and not because of truly better data points. We have seen unprecedented stimulus over the past 3 years from the federal government and the Federal Reserve which explains pretty much any positive data point. When you examine the real economy, i.e. Walmart, it is a different story. Frankly, when Walmart which has the largest customer base in the US is struggling when so many are preaching the resilient consumer something isn’t right. I know the high end retailers are doing OK and that proves my point which I made about a year ago that the recovery, thanks to the bailouts, and I use that term loosely, was lopsided to only the wealthy and not to Joe Six Pack.

This is also reflected in the unemployment figures and pretty much anywhere else you want to look. The rich are doing just fine thank you very much, but if you are in the middle class or poor the SNAP program is this way. While this is not fair it simply is what it is and is not going to change anytime soon, sorry. Perhaps that is what scares me the most right now, the inequality of wealth in America, don’t get me wrong I am a capitalist through and through, but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to read history and what happens when the wealth gap gets this wide. On top of the middle class and poor becoming poorer we are now seeing what I thought was going to happen, inflation without an increase in money velocity.

Those who thought it was impossible for a country to experience inflation without money being in the hands of the people, well, you were wrong. When the central bank plays games, untested games, like QE it hurts the currency which drives up currency sensitive items, food and energy. When prices rise and wages stay the same it will more than likely exacerbate the underlying problems we are suffering from and may lead to civil unrest. We have food prices at the highest level ever and oil about to burst through $100/barrel, where is the outrage from the media on this, and people already feel poor, not a good combination. Again, all of that without an increase in money velocity, go figure.

Now, there are other reasons for the rise in commodities, but they are irrelevant in my opinion since Joe Blow could care less about why prices are rising he just cares about being able to feed his family. What is frustrating to Joe is that he is being told how great things are when he feels poor, is probably going to lose his house, can barely afford food, gas or his power bill. Joe is wondering what planet the commentators on CNBC are from when it is plain as day that things are not right in the real world. What Joe doesn’t understand is that the ivory tower announcers and the Fed are looking at the core CPI which says everything is hunky dory. The question is, do you think Joe cares that deflation is occurring in LED TV’s as much as Ben Bernanke does? Of course not because Joe looks at food and energy, but all economists look at is core CPI which excludes food and energy. That is where the disconnect is coming from, partly.

The public is slowly starting to not believe what they are being told anymore and that is a good thing. Remember how we were told that retail sales were going to be fantastic? They did not look so hot today, except for some high end retailers I might add. What I am getting at is simple, the real economy is catching up with the market. The really sick part is that when the economy does improve the Fed will have to kill the liquidity which will crush stocks. Those that preach stocks are a win-win because the Fed will pump money when the data is bad which is good for stocks or when the economy improves stocks should go higher are wrong, pure and simple.

This is the largest liquidity driven rally in the history of mankind or what TVland would call a bubble. Stocks are expensive and only going higher because of the Fed. However, when the Fed stops feeding free money to the banks it will end, badly. You can disagree with me all you want, that is what makes a market, but you know it is true. This is not a win-win situation for stocks. How can it be when just 6 months ago when liquidity was drying up the market tanked? We only saw a rebound when Ben spoke at Jackson Hole and said he would print and then he followed through, that is not the sign of a healthy market.

What we have is still a whole lot of uncertainty going on in the whole world. Nothing is certain except that central banks will merely print us into oblivion. Europe is a mess, we have some countries wishing to slow down fund flows to them, Korea’s on the brink of war, again, China is not buying UST’s like they once did, the US is awash in debt, which will not be solved by the Republicans, rising prices for food and oil about to go ballistic again. All that stuff is off the top of my head and I know I left a ton of stuff out, but this is enough, hopefully, to make one stop and think.

I said before that stocks will move higher and I continue that thought until one of two things happen, either the data really does improve or until QE2 ends in 2Q11. Both items are basically indications that the punch bowl or liquidity will dry up. I also believe stocks will underperform commodities, specifically silver and copper, in 2011 simply because the Fed will never stop the printing presses, they cannot. We are in a very odd period of time and, frankly, these are scary times with so many unknowns out there and a public slowly waking up to the fact that things are not as they seem, but that is a good thing, IMHO.

2011 will be a rollercoaster year with the schizophrenia kicking into high gear as far as the media is concerned, the world will be growing or coming to an end every other day, which should add more volatility to stocks. I also think we will see some things come to the forefront of discussion this year. How it ends is anyone’s guess and I will not even venture agues at the results. What I do know is that it probably will not be good. Here are my issues I think will be front page news this year:

-          Food prices continue to rise to scary levels

-          Treasuries begin to see a steep selloff

-          The US’s national debt will be a hot issue with China downgrading us, rightfully so, to junk level

-          The US is put on negative ratings watch by Fitch, but who cares about Fitch… right?

-          The tax cut extensions will prove to be a horrible idea, they really were to begin with

-          The Social Security tax break everyone gets moves up the date of depletion of the trust fund to, “officially,” the 2020 decade

-          Oil breaks through $100 probably eclipsing 2008 record price

-          The dollar will rally hard before it falls

-          Food shortages around the world will be a major problem

-          The Fed looses massive amounts of money on their treasury holdings

-          China openly sells US treasuries

Sphere: Related Content

Another $100 – $150 billion needed?

The US banking system is still a mess no matter what the regulators and pundits say. From the Volker Rule to Basel III to fraudclosure there are issues that will have to come to ahead at some point in the not so distant future. Specifically, the Financial Times reported that because of the Basel III tier 1 capital requirements the top 35 US banks may be short $100 – $150 billion dollars. This means more capital raises for many of these banks, but don’t worry analysts say this is manageable.

Other parts of the FT’s article states that many of these banks may have to selloff $500B, in total, of assets to avoid the capital raise. The issue is that if all these banks, which the article admittedly says is not equally distributed between the top 35 banks, have to selloff $500B in assets to avoid a capital raise who will buy these assets? If the liability of these assets equals higher capital requirements buyers may be few and far between which means lower prices for the assets being sold or they will have to raise capital. Of note is the shortfall is only because of Basel III and not because of any other issue outstanding.

Remember how so many of these capital requirement issues were supposedly put to rest because of our “stress tests”? Clearly the stress tests, as has been stated time and time again, were worthless. In fact rumors are making their rounds that another round of stress tests are on the way for US banks. What is interesting about this is that the stress tests lack total credibility for 2 reasons. First, look at the EU’s stress tests which passed most banks and look what is happening in Ireland, they were a farce. Second, without good accounting rules, i.e. mark-to-market vs. mark-to-fantasyland, the stress tests are bogus. A loss is a loss and simply pretending it doesn’t exist is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard of and if investors do not do their research it can lead to major losses. In my opinion this is nothing more than state sponsored investor fraud.

What is missing out of all of these bank articles is the whole fraudclosure mess and its impact on the banks. As stated previously there is no remedy for a broken chain of title except to modify the mortgage which starts a new chain of title and eliminates the problem. There are issues with this though. First, doing nothing means that all of those MBS are worthless because there is no cash flow and the creditor cannot collect the collateral, think about that for awhile. Second, if your only option is to modify the mortgage it means that the MBS is worth less than face value. Either way someone somewhere is taking a loss and that means there may be a put back to the originating bank. When the Fed put back bonds to BoA that should concern investors… it’s the Fed telling banks you ripped us off.

If these put backs continue or escalate, which they will because who wants to take a loss on paper that was misrepresented to begin with, that could mean that banks have much larger problems than Basel III capital requirements. If the put back is widely exercised banks will need a lot more money than $100 – $150B. They might need a trillion or more, who really knows anymore? Frankly, Basel III is the last thing anyone should be worried about. People should be worried about what the put back risk is for many of these banks because the put back risk is far greater of an issue than the sub-prime crisis ever was. I believe we will find out if there are indeed “no more bank bailouts” or not. My guess is we will all be shareholders of some big banks in the near future. In the meantime I am waiting for my dividend check from our previously made, wildly profitable, insert sarcasm here, investments into GM, Citi, BoA, Ally…

Sphere: Related Content