The US banking system is still a mess no matter what the regulators and pundits say. From the Volker Rule to Basel III to fraudclosure there are issues that will have to come to ahead at some point in the not so distant future. Specifically, the Financial Times reported that because of the Basel III tier 1 capital requirements the top 35 US banks may be short $100 – $150 billion dollars. This means more capital raises for many of these banks, but don’t worry analysts say this is manageable.
Other parts of the FT’s article states that many of these banks may have to selloff $500B, in total, of assets to avoid the capital raise. The issue is that if all these banks, which the article admittedly says is not equally distributed between the top 35 banks, have to selloff $500B in assets to avoid a capital raise who will buy these assets? If the liability of these assets equals higher capital requirements buyers may be few and far between which means lower prices for the assets being sold or they will have to raise capital. Of note is the shortfall is only because of Basel III and not because of any other issue outstanding.
Remember how so many of these capital requirement issues were supposedly put to rest because of our “stress tests”? Clearly the stress tests, as has been stated time and time again, were worthless. In fact rumors are making their rounds that another round of stress tests are on the way for US banks. What is interesting about this is that the stress tests lack total credibility for 2 reasons. First, look at the EU’s stress tests which passed most banks and look what is happening in Ireland, they were a farce. Second, without good accounting rules, i.e. mark-to-market vs. mark-to-fantasyland, the stress tests are bogus. A loss is a loss and simply pretending it doesn’t exist is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard of and if investors do not do their research it can lead to major losses. In my opinion this is nothing more than state sponsored investor fraud.
What is missing out of all of these bank articles is the whole fraudclosure mess and its impact on the banks. As stated previously there is no remedy for a broken chain of title except to modify the mortgage which starts a new chain of title and eliminates the problem. There are issues with this though. First, doing nothing means that all of those MBS are worthless because there is no cash flow and the creditor cannot collect the collateral, think about that for awhile. Second, if your only option is to modify the mortgage it means that the MBS is worth less than face value. Either way someone somewhere is taking a loss and that means there may be a put back to the originating bank. When the Fed put back bonds to BoA that should concern investors… it’s the Fed telling banks you ripped us off.
If these put backs continue or escalate, which they will because who wants to take a loss on paper that was misrepresented to begin with, that could mean that banks have much larger problems than Basel III capital requirements. If the put back is widely exercised banks will need a lot more money than $100 – $150B. They might need a trillion or more, who really knows anymore? Frankly, Basel III is the last thing anyone should be worried about. People should be worried about what the put back risk is for many of these banks because the put back risk is far greater of an issue than the sub-prime crisis ever was. I believe we will find out if there are indeed “no more bank bailouts” or not. My guess is we will all be shareholders of some big banks in the near future. In the meantime I am waiting for my dividend check from our previously made, wildly profitable, insert sarcasm here, investments into GM, Citi, BoA, Ally…
John Carney at CNBC just put up a piece http://www.cnbc.com/id/39754650 which states: “This is a serious threat to financial stability. There’s no way Tim and Ben let this play out,” a senior banker told me, referring to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke.
In short, Wall Street is betting that the bureaucrats will bail them out again.
I said this yesterday and these executives are right, banks will get bailed out again probably through QE. It is wrong and these banks have earned the right to fail, but the problem is that politicians do not have the will to help them this time. However, the Fed, which is proving itself so independent nowadays, will bail them out. As Zero Hedge reported PIMCO levered up on MBS and they know something, like $500B in QE coming directly to the MBS market, rumor has it. Again, QE will do nothing and while $500B is in the cards for MBS there is no word yet what the Fed will do with long dated treasuries… but they will buy them.
Well, this is beyond me, the DXY is dropping like a rock below the 50 day moving average on horrible news driving futures higher. There is simply no reason for this whatsoever as bad news usually rallies the dollar. What is more odd is gold and silver are also down fairly substantially as well. Frankly, it is not adding up in my book and something stinks. Correlations and inverse correlations don’t just break down for no reason on without any news. Perhaps one should be careful shorting this market today and look for a retest of 1040, the Euro is up large @ 1.24 + 0.0161 when the banks had to barrow a substantial amount for 6 days from the ECB which indicates problems. Stay nimble.
Look, things in the U.S. are certainly better, even though I am bearish on the economy, but they are just a “less worse” type of better rather than a true recovery or whatever you want to call it. Someone once commented that I would not know a V shaped recovery if it sat on my face, or something to that, as the recession in the early 1980’s saw a lag in initial claims of some 6 months before the recovery in employment happened. Boy, I hope that person is reading this because that comment was made in august or September of last year, almost a full year ago, and initial claims barely broke the 500K mark as we speak, is that the ”V” we are looking for? The fact is in a post credit collapse employment is a leading indicator, I said it a year ago and I am saying it now and the only difference is the unemployment rate is HIGHER today than a year ago.
What changed over the last 12 months?
Nothing. Wait, I take that back, a lot. The U.S. is now $3T more in debt, we performed a “stress test,” which we are telling the ECB to do, more on that in a minute, and the Fed expanded its balance sheet by how much? What did we get for all of that? A 5.2% GDP print based on inventory a rebuild that was probably premature, if we take away the stimulus would firms have rebuilt their inventories so much? I think not. Unemployment is slightly better thanks to temporary jobs and government hiring, not exactly what I would call “robust” at all. The bottom line is all my criticism of the stimulus was right, it failed.
The banks are better you say, right? Are they? If you think that, well, I just don’t know what to tell you. Did the banks get rid of the “toxic assets?” Did they write all their bad debts off? Did real estate values increase? How about commercial real estate, is that sector flying strong again? No. Are banks loaning money again? Sure, if you have a credit score of 850 or better and don’t need the money they will gladly make a loan to you. However, if you need to refinance your home you better hope you qualify for a government program or you are out of luck. The “stress test” was a joke and meant nothing because we are at the outer limits of the stress test, remember, 10% unemployment, etc., etc.? What saved the banks was one thing and one thing only, the repeal of mark-to-market account, period, end of story.
If we brought back mark-to-market accounting today we would have a handful of big institutions left, I guarantee it. Just look at Wells Fargo’s balance sheet with the “Pick-A-Pay Loans” they inherited, worse, they bought, from Wachovia, the LTV’s, except for Texas, God Bless Texas, are all horrible. I am not saying WFC would fail, I am just saying they would have to realize pretty significant losses is all. It is no coincidence that right after, literally right after, the repeal of mark-to-market accounting rules by the FASB, by Congressional pressure I might add, bank earnings went through the roof. What replaced mark-to-market accounting? Mark-to-model accounting, do you know who made that model famous? Enron, need I say more?
Europe
Now, Timmy Geithner is over in Europe telling the Europeans to do a “stress test” to let the world know all is well. Sorry Tim, I do not think this will work since it is technically not the banks in question, but rather the sovereign debt that they are holding. Why not do a stress test on governments instead, maybe that will solve the problem. This is a banking problem, again, that was brought on by huge deficit spending and countries inability to service their debt loads, this is big, huge actually. While this will impact banks it is not really banks that caused it, but politicians who decided to bribe the people with their own money.
It is likely that one of the PIGS, or whatever we are calling them now, will default given the issues they have and the inability of politicians to say no to spending. It is just odd, it always has been, that the people demand all this gravy from the government in the form of give a ways, tax credits or straight cash in some form. Don’t these people realize that they are only getting back their own money? Actually, if governments spent less and had lower debts that means they would have lower overall taxes which means the people would have more money on their own… they would be better off! However, the people insist on being bribed with their own money and politicians are only too happy to oblige.
The point is that this bigger than the banks as we are talking about the solvency of countries now. Bailouts are much more difficult to do for countries and the implications of a default by any country has widespread ripples that most people have no idea can or would occur. Even if Hungary or Greece defaults it is a huge deal and will impact governments and banks all over the world. I have been saying this for months now, Greece is a big deal and all those people saying it is not are, well, disqualified to render their opinions anymore as the markets have spoken and they have sided with me.
Run a stress test, it doesn’t matter because it really doesn’t matter Tim. The problem is with government spending this time and I do not think mark-to-model accounting can fix this problem.
The real problem
The real problem is I do not know where the sovereign debt problems will end, I know it will get worse. I know that more European countries will succumb to this very same issue as most European countries are socialist by their very nature and their debt levels are very high. As the weaker countries fall they will drag the stronger countries down with them, it is just how it works. I made a call that the Euro will fall to 1.18, we are about there. Do I think it will go lower? Yes, to parity in the near future. I think 1.16 is the next level, but the ECB will have to intervene and China has to intervene as a weak Euro is a major problem, it is, another story for another time. The currency will not survive without a mechanism to eject the weak states, period.
After the carnage in Europe is done, I do not have a timetable for that, it could be tomorrow or 10 years from now, but more than likely it will be sooner rather than later, the debt problems will spread, to the U.S. We have $13T in debt and an economy that is not recovering, I am not happy about that, but those are the facts. We are spending $4.9B a day, 3 times the amount George Bush, not exactly the face of fiscal conservatism I might add, was spending. We are in major trouble and what are our politicians doing? Trying to figure out how to get stimulus 3 out the door, that’s what.
I have been saying for months that our debt to GDP level is almost at parity, but it takes the Drudge Report for people to start listening? OK, at least people are listening now. The problem is we have no politicians willing to take the steps to fix out problems. Go ahead, elect the Republicans, look what they did from 2000-2006, they really helped to speed the process up, in my opinion. Of course, out current President and Congress has surely kicked what the Republicans did into hyper drive as they added 30% to our debt load in less than 2 years, that is $3T, an astounding figure. Neither of these parties really want to fix the problems, in my opinion, because they have a vested interest in perpetuating the problems so they can stay in power, it is just how it works.
What this means is we are all in very big trouble. I am not talking about, oh, gee, go buy an ounce of gold and protect yourself from inflation, I am talking about the Weimar Republic, hyperinflation, type of trouble. I see no way out besides inflation and in a big way. As Paul Krugman points out, there is a big difference between Greece and the U.S., we can print our own money. We also know Ben Bernanke has no problem with hitting that print money either. I am also confident that the Fed is, basically, completely incompetent.
If we cannot go to the market to finance our debt, which we have trillions of dollars of that most of it matures in under 10 years, the Fed will monetize it. That is how we will deal with our sovereign debt crisis, we will print our way out of it and it will be the very worst thing we can do. Instead of cutting our government, spending or doing anything else that is logical, because politicians want to get reelected, they will choose to inflate their way out. Will gold protect you? Yes, but so will food and any other useful commodity including toilet paper. It disturbs me to no end that we are where we are and that the President is listening to the likes of Mr. Krugman who thinks deficits don’t matter, they do, and that since we can print money it is OK, printing money is not OK.
In the meantime I am still short the market. We will have a bounce I am sure and I almost took a nice broad long position today, but I passed. While I am sure we will have that bounce I did not think the risk reward was worth it. My target is still 900 on the S&P 500.
We all know the answer to that question, but he really has taken the cake today. As Goldman defends itself against this lawsuit Cramer had a piece on CNBC titled “Cramer: Goldman Invested Own Money in CDO.” In this article he cites an unnamed source, which is the first red flag, that stated Goldman did not short this CDO. Well, who cares as that is not the allegation. The allegation is that Goldman allowed Paulson to pick out lousy mortgages to short, in order to create the synthetic CDO, and did not disclose to investors that this CDO was created by a guy who wanted to short the market. The charges claim that the marketing of this CDO was said to have been picked by an “independent” third party which is patently false, unless Paulson & Co. wanted to lose money. As an aside, this is right about the time Goldman started to short the sub-prime market according to my sources, you know, publically available information.
The question is about whether Goldman did this, I think they did, and what other banks might have done the same thing, they all copy each other and the synthetic CDO market was a very esoteric vehicle to invest in. The CDO market was also controlled by a few main banks, Goldman, Morgan, BoA, Deutsche Bank, Citi and a few others. These banks kept the prices of the CDS swaps low, meaning the buyers, i.e. Paulson, was not making any money, as the market was collapsing which shows that the banks were deluding themselves about the reality of the market. Most CDO’s only needed a 5% default rate to blow up, banks did not move the prices of the CDS’s in the buyers favor until well after that 5% default rate, read The Big Short to verify. In other words, these guys controlled the market, created a product they knew was crap (the short sellers picked what they wanted to short!) and then sold these synthetic products to unwitting clients, they had to invest in some of them because by 2007 all the suckers were less likely to buy synthetic products.
My point is simple, no one claimed Goldman shorted this specific CDO, but misled investors to buy it by distorting the facts about it. Are they guilty? More than likely, but I am sure the case will be settled with admission of guilt. Does this mean AIG and other investors might have a claim? Yup, so go buy some GS Cramer, I am sure he will tell you that later tonight. Did other banks do the same thing? More than likely. It is hard to believe GS was the only bank that did this when they were a relatively small player in that business, compared to Citi, Merrill Lynch and others. Does Cramer grasp those facts or thoughts? I don’t think so.
After all, this is the guy who thinks the market going up every day for a month and a half is a good thing. Then again, Cramer, whose selective memory will omit this in a week or tonight, did this on his show last night:
I guess Cramer never made money shorting stocks… yeah right. I respect Cramer the hedge fund manager, but this other guy, what he turned into, is disingenuous.
Be the First to Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
