In an unusual twist from the US’s largest creditor China is demanding the release of Bernie Madoff and want him appointed either as Federal Reserve Chairman or Treasury Secretary immediately. The Chinese demand this to be done because it is becoming increasingly concerned that the current US government is unaware on how to properly run a Ponzi Scheme properly. It seems Beijing is perplexed on how US administration officials and the US media does not seem to understand the difference between annual budget deficits, which is the annual funding gap, versus the reduction of total national debt.
Obviously I am kidding, but there is a chance that the Chinese or other foreign creditors might actually feel this way. Considering the administration started talking about debt reduction and fiscal restraint only to come out with a spending freeze, after they increased those same budgets the year before essentially locking in the budget increases, which will only reduce the annual budget deficit by $250B over 10 years. Notice I said annual budget deficit? That means we are still bleeding red as far as the eye can see and we are doing nothing to reduce the national debt problem we have, which is the largest the world has ever seen, throughout history.
While the administration is at least acknowledging the problem and doing more than Bush ever did they are still doing what politicians do, playing with the words. When regular people hear budget deficit reduction many think this is great, we are paying off our national debt! Wrong. What our wonderful leaders are doing is telling us that they are still going to have to borrow hundreds of billions or trillions a year, but they are reducing the amount of their shortfall on an annual basis. Basically, it means nothing because we are still spending way more than we have. The biggest expenditure that we have is on entitlement programs which everyone admits we cannot cut, but Obama did reduce funding to elderly and disabled housing subsidies which may actually give some credence to the “death panel” argument during the health care debate. I mean if you’re willing to throw grandma out of her home or nursing home than why not have death panels, I am just saying now.
Regardless, what we know is that there is no way any politician will do what is necessary to cut the annual deficit down for real, which means higher entitlement taxes, longer waiting periods for benefits or reduced benefits in general. Instead they will merely grandstand against each other while they slowly, or not so slowly is some projections are correct, destroy the entire country. I do not mean this to be partisan, most know I blame both parties for this mess and pray for a real third party to create some competition in politics, come on 2 parties is not a democracy it is a choice between dumb and dumber. Well, technically we actually live in a Republic anyhow so this basically shows us how limited our politicians are in their actually knowledge when they claim we have the greatest democracy in the world.
The bottom line is that we are adding to the national debt everyday and there is no way to stop it without serious action. The action I speak of will never be taken, not yet at least, but eventually they will happen, if we make it that far. The numbers are simply staggering when you think about it, $14T debt ceiling, $107T in unfunded liabilities and the numbers just get bigger and bigger. The entire US mutual fund industry is $15T so the government could confiscate every mutual fund asset in the US and we would barely payoff our debt, think about that for a minute. In a couple of years that $14T will be much bigger and a large reason that the debt ceiling will have to continually be increased, before the repeal the debt ceiling language that is, is to pay the interest on our debt. The crazy thing is we actually have to borrow money to pay the interest on our debt, talk about insolvency?
To steal a line from Dick and Jane; “Dick, I think were in a bit of a pickle” is completely appropriate right now. We are in the midst of the greatest debt bubble ever created and I have no idea how it will end, but I do know it will end and it will more than likely be very ugly. On an interesting, slightly off-topic, have you noticed the public-private lending facilities being set up with the TARP proceeds? I predicted that would happen a few months ago, I just wanted to say I told you so. Anyhow, there have been lots of interesting happenings lately in politics which I will be writing about very soon. I was incredibly sick for the past 5 days so I apologize for not humoring you with my tasteless jokes, or whatever you call them. In the meantime I am still very bearish, expecting unemployment to be particularly ugly and GDP, well we knew it would be huge, but 5.7%? Expect revisions down to 3%, but if you believe the 5.7% please contact me about fabulous leasing opportunities in Pakistan.
GMAC is apparently close to yet another $3.5B in additional aid from the government. This is on top of the original $12B the firm already received the first go around. Of course, the government will insist that this ‘investment’ will be profitable just like CIT, GM, Chrysler and anyone who invested with Bernie Madoff. This news comes on the heels of the Freddie and Fannie announcement that the government will backstop all, not just the original $400B, of the GSE’s losses which could be trillions at the end of the day.
Of course in the case of Freddie and Fannie the top executives will continue to receive millions in compensation because it takes talent to lose billions, it must because Brewster, of Brewster’s Millions, could barely do it if you remember. I find it hard to believe that anyone could possible argue that these bailouts are not permanent or will end at any point in the future. I think this latest blast of reality from the state owned automaker and mortgage issuer is proof enough that these bailouts will continue indefinitely.
The irony is that we are seeing all of these bailouts or ‘additional investments’ in the face of the greatest economic recovery that never was. Let’s face it, when the fantasy 3.5% GDP was whittled down to 2.8% you could live with that because that meant there was still private sector activity, but now that the official 3Q09 GDP figure is 2.2% that means there was no private sector activity at all. That was also with cash for clunkers and the housing tax credit in full force as well. Of course last week’s housing numbers showed us what the housing numbers will look like without government help, in a single word awful, but imagine when mortgage rates are at 6%. Regardless, if things were rosy then I find it hard to believe that GMAC would need more money.
Oh, I forgot, Citi and the rest of the banks are paying back TARP, sure, that means that banks are doing fantastic. Did you read the beginning of the story, the bailouts are permanent and these banks know 2 things, 1) the government will never let them fail; and 2) TARP is not going anywhere. Not only that, but these banks also carry massive guarantees on their portfolios and FDIC issued debt so the repayment of TARP, I am stealing this from Whitney Tilson, is the greatest scam ever. Basically the banks now can pay themselves whatever they want, they have guarantees on the crap on their books, implied guarantees, can issue guaranteed debt (in some cases), now they pay far less for many of those privileges and the government lost 90% of its leverage – nice job guys.
The payback of TARP does not mean banks are healthy it simply means the banks can go to the market and get other suckers to buy their debt to get Uncle Sam off their back. I did not think it was very hard to figure out, but apparently it was because the media and investors are swallowing this stuff hook line and sinker. The proof is in the pudding and bank stocks have done nothing since August and, frankly, the only good one is JP Morgan and who really knows what is on their offshore books or what they are really on the hook for through Bear? To think there will not be a need for another TARP bailout in the near future is crazy, banks would not be holding all this cash if; 1) the economy was really recovering; and 2) they were really as healthy as they want us to believe.
I may have been wrong about a correction this fall, I admit that, but there is no way that the continuous flow of bailouts can be framed as a good thing. Oh, if you are happy about Freddie and Fannie executives paying themselves millions, I would suggest calling your representatives and letting them know how you feel, especially if your in Barney Frank’s district because he really doesn’t care about you.
Feedback