I suppose it was back in the late fall and reiterated again in mid-winter that I believed the market would simply go up for no real reason until QE2 ended and then it would begin to decline as liquidity ended. It looks as though I was somewhat accurate in that prediction although you did not have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out unless you were a permabull with your blinders on and absolute faith in the government and the Fed in which case please move along.
The Fed knew the same thing I and many others did and that is why at the last meeting they emphasized that they would continue to reinvest maturing paper and interest from the existing portfolio, kind of a QE infinity if you will, but on a small scale. I do believe they will let QE2 go and not announce anything new until the fall when they see the economy really weaken. I think a couple months of sub 100K jobs reports, with a healthy BLS birth/death adjustment, along with softening other indicators such as the PMI and so forth the Fed will get the point and step in with $1T in QE since $600B did not work.
That is how it works as one QE is ineffective the next one gets bigger. The really unfortunate part is that Japan has done the same thing and it did not work but there is a big difference between the US and Japan, we are the reserve currency and they aren’t. In other words, Japan could print all they wanted because their citizens bought their own debt and the world settled trades in dollars. However, the US is limited in what they can really do in QE because as the value of the dollar sinks, and we really had a nice scare a week or so ago, the world will pick a new reserve currency on its own. You know how that story ends.
Ben knows this and he knows that his QE options are limited and he can probably only get away with 1 more so it will be big, it has to be. If that one does not work and spur growth, well, the Fed is done and completely out of bullets in a traditional sense. We would see some new things coming to the table like in 2008 with all the new facilities and such, but I have no idea what they will be or what they will look like since we do not know how things will play out.
What I do know is that we should get a nice bounce in the dollar here sending commodities lower for a bit. This will give Ben and Washington a little relief and you an opportunity to buy, buy, buy every commodity you like. I love silver, still, wheat, gold, palladium, soybeans and corn (unless the subsidy is pulled). If those go on sale buy them either directly or via the growers or agricultural ETF’s.
In the mean time enjoy watching Ben sweat it out as he will not have answers for the weakness in the economy or the weakness is ‘transitory’ which is the longest transitory period I have ever seen. Kind of like this recovery it is the longest start of a recovery ever as it gains steam and loses steam every other week. Good luck.
The world is in a very tough spot right now and the word of the day is social unrest. On top of the news from the Middle East we got some, in my opinion, pretty bad jobs numbers on Friday. Of course if it was a good report it is because of the ‘economic recovery’ and when the report is bad it is because of snow, rain, wind, Earth or whatever else they want to say instead of the truth, the economy stinks.
There was not one good piece in the jobs report, not one. Sure, an unemployment rate of 9% was the headline given to us, but doesn’t this strike you as being odd since the BLS just added in some 300K under reported job losses from last year? On top of that we had, unadjusted, horrible initial claims reports for January and even the adjusted reports stunk. Even though the economy did add jobs governments are laying people off which is a problem as this will likely continue on into the future. Overall, there is still some 5 people for every open job right now, think about that and then think about how long it will take for unemployment to actually come down, especially with new workers coming into the work force through population growth.
We are not going anywhere in the near future and for proof of this look at Bernanke’s speech the other day when he basically guaranteed QE3. As an aside, I love how he said QE2 worked because asset prices, stocks, and bond yields were going up. Umm, wasn’t QE2 supposed to create negative real interest rates? And since when do we use the stock market as a barometer for economic growth? In fact, QE2 did work if you thought it would benefit stocks, but it has failed miserably for the other areas it was supposed to help, i.e. jobs, economic growth and negative real interest rates.
However, QE2 did have a successful side effect that only a few people have realized, it has overthrown a couple of governments and probably will topple a few more in short order. Remember how I said you can get inflation without money velocity? It is kind of happening and just imagine what will happen when banks actually lend again. Now, Ben says food prices are from emerging market demand which is true, but it is also because of bad harvests, which will continue, and the fact that commodities are valued in USD’s which have been sliding down in recent weeks.
This means food prices have risen for the poorest countries in the world to levels that are just unsustainable. When food prices rise in America we can weather the storm for a while, but in some countries food at lower prices consume 50%+ of the average families budget so they do not have the luxury of riding out the storm or cutting back they simply go without. They can only do this for a little while before something gives and we have witnessed what happens when that something gives way. I also believe we have only seen the beginning of the problem as no one has figured out that this year’s wheat harvest is likely to be very, very, bad and we will see much higher prices in a few months. The weather is whacky and I have a strong suspicion that the Midwest will not produce what we are used too this year. If that happens things could get very interesting and perhaps, just maybe, we will stop paying farmers to grow food in order to turn it into fuel, use sugar instead which we pay farmers to not grow… get the picture yet?
Things are getting interesting and I am trying to stick around to see how it all ends. In the meantime I believe that one must be long commodities, silver and softies for sure, and stocks until QE is over, which is likely to be never. I say that with a caveat as I believe if QE3 does happen stocks might get very choppy and at some point people will figure out that ZIRP + interest on excess reserves + QE = Really Bad News and is bad monetary policy. Then again, only a few have figured it out so far so maybe I am too optimistic.
I just read John Mauldlin’s weekly newsletter and he apparently got into a discussion over the much misunderstood and hated, by myself and many others, birth/death model used by the BLS. I have not been receiving the newsletter on a regular basis, some type of server issue I guess, but someone did not like what he had to say about it and I guess John misspoke about it. The whole thing about the birth/death model is it is meant to be a smoothing mechanism, I know that, everyone knows that, but it stinks and is not accurate which is what John ultimately said it was in his letter or at least it has not been accurate the last few years.
Now, I may have misspoke or led many to misunderstand what the birth/death model is and does. It is this little provision that helps the BLS make up for data they either do not receive back by survey participants or never receive, but it leaves room for interpretation and is never fixed in real time. In fact, they wait until February of the following year to correct any errors in the birth/death model that it may have had on the unemployment rate, fantastic, right? The model is not seasonally adjusted so when the BLS says 83,000 jobs were created it is not as if they added in the 147,000 (June’s B/D adjustment) figure to come up with that figure, that would be lying and a government agency would never do that.
Instead, what they do is add in the not seasonally adjusted B/D figure to the not seasonally adjusted employment figure and THEN seasonally adjust it. Now, you are thinking, big deal that shouldn’t make a big difference. Well, you may be right and you may be wrong. If you are talking 1M as a figure and the B/D adjustment is 50K it is no big deal, but if you are talking about a headline figure of 800K and the B/D adjustment is 147K (June figure) or 241K (May figure) well, you tell me, would that impact the seasonally adjusted figure? I would say yes it would. I have history on my side on this as well.
You see, in the fall of 2008 when Lehman collapsed and the world came to an end we all saw unemployment shoot to the moon, remember? Well, the BLS thought since so many people were losing their jobs and the business environment was so good that must be why so many survey respondents did not get back to them, they were busy making money! So, they added in hundreds of thousands of jobs from September of 2008 until the end of 2009. They were so aggressive in their B/D modeling they underestimated unemployment by 880,000 people, that is a pretty large underestimation by anyone’s standards considering the total ‘official’ unemployment total is 14M people and the underestimate for that time frame was about 10% of the total of the newly unemployed.
One could say, well, that is within the margin of error, but I don’t buy that since the government is the one who processes unemployment benefits and receives the initial claims data. In other words, it is pretty easy to correlate the data within a reasonable time frame, in my mind at least, but I am not a bureaucrat, so what do I know. Basically, if one removes the B/D figures from the non-seasonally figures and seasonally adjusts them you would have a bit of a difference in the monthly numbers. The series would be much more volatile, but it would also, in my mind, be more accurate and real time which seems to be something no one wants anymore with this figure which is why Santelli and Liesman get into screaming matches about it every first Friday of the month.
The bottom line is the adjustments matter, they boost the jobs number every month and they don’t come clean about any adjustments until the next year. That does not help anyone except for politicians and when more and more people are saying employment is now a leading indicator we need a better way to report unemployment. At the very least the BLS can correlate with the state data bases along with the household survey and that might give us a better view of what is going on. I think it is pretty much a proven fact that when we have the government guessing at any figure it is pretty much going to be wrong so why anyone would defend the B/D model is beyond me. The idea is fine, I guess, but how the BLS does it and how no one questions it, especially when it creeps up month after month when it really shouldn’t be, is very odd as, again, the only people who truly benefit from it is the political class.
As I had suspected, months ago, jobless claims are rising rapidly every week now. We are almost back at 500K a week for initial claims as all those temporary workers are let go from retail, that is my suspicion at least. I remember claims that once the initial claims fell below 500K we would see job creation. However, the only creation of jobs were the wonderful accounting gimmicks from the BLS as they take more and more people out of the workforce, dropping the unemployment rate and making the monthly employment report look much better than it really is.
The trend is clear now, unemployment is getting worse. Even though the initial claims data is volatile it is the best barometer to what the employment number is going to look like. Unless the government has hired far more census workers than reported I expect the employment number to look pretty bad next week. Of course, there is the ever transparent way the BLS does remove people from the roles, but most people now look for that. It is also clear that the 1M jobs the BLS were forced to add to the unemployment number in February shows that their models are broken and should be adjusted, perhaps remove the birth/death model altogether.
There is no way that the ‘backlog of filings’ is to blame as they made the claim, a couple weeks ago, that they were all caught up. The only real reason for the worsening situation is that the job market is worsening. Even the mass layoff indicator is way up again, not a good sign, which means the employment number will get much worse. The good news is that no trader believes the data coming out of Washington and, based on the confidence numbers we saw, the public is also not buying that things are better. The man on the street usually has a better grasp on how things are out there versus the ivory tower economist who does not have a clue, usually.
On the bright side durable goods orders were through the rook, until you ex-out autos or transportation altogether. However, that number really is volatile and is not indicative of any real recovery, unless you are Dennis Kneale. There has been some improving data out there, but this is a statistical recovery and nothing more. From my perspective this makes equities very overvalued.
If you believe the recession is not over or we are due for a double dip then this employment report was certainly bullish for put options or leveraged bearish ETF’s. If you are a long only bull today’s report should make you move a bit more defensively. While the rate of firings has certainly been declining the real question is why are we losing this many jobs at this stage of the supposed recovery? I can hear it now, employment is a lagging indicator, sure, for an inventory led recession you would be correct, but not for a credit collapse, sorry.
More on the employment report in a second, I love government data, but there was a piece of a lesser reported report data released today as well. Credit contracted at a hefty $15B clip last month compared to the consensus estimated $5B, this is a problem for the V shapers. Contracting credit at this level means that consumers are still deleveraging and it indicates that they will be buying less iPods and Kindles in the near future. However, consumers shedding debt is a good thing because debt is wealth destruction and maybe the government will begin to figure out what the majority of Americans have already figured out, spending money you do not have is not a good idea.
Do we really have 10% unemployment? Not a chance, it is much higher. The BLS is constantly taking people out of the employment pool which lowers the unemployment rate, except on the U-6 report. Let’s not forget about the BLS’s birth/death model which is constantly giving us a major fudge factor for jobs. For example, in December this model added 59K jobs, meaning the BLS estimates that 59K people started their own companies. It gets better, if you go to the BLS website birth/death page it shows that during April of 2009 it estimates 226K people started their own business, when no credit was available. This fudge factor was so bad that the BLS will have to adjust the numbers at some point in time, like February 2010 when the BLS will add, officially, 800K to the unemployment rolls, because even they cannot hide how bad it was/is forever.
The length of time it takes people to find work is at record levels, the medium time frame is 20 weeks, but it takes about 40% of unemployed people 29+ weeks to find a job, if they find one. This is where it gets interesting because the longer it takes to find a job the more discouraged you get and the less you look. The less you look, the less “attached” you are to the labor forest and the BLS will just remove you if you stop looking for work, see no evil, hear no evil…
Basically, if the BLS left the “marginally attached” people in the employment report the official unemployment report would have grown to about 10.4%. Now, after spending $1.6T in stimulus and job creation bills this is just getting less encouraging and downright scary, unless you are delusional to reality. There was one bright spot in the report, well 2 bright spots, November was revised to positive 4K, which is completely unbelievable and inconsistent with all the data for the month of November, and temporary help increased for December. I want to say this again, at this stage f the recovery, how can we still be shedding jobs when every pundit has said that firms have cut to the bone or over fired? Clearly they were wrong.
While I do not believe the November employment report, simply because it does not match any of the interim data, let’s assume it is correct and we had +4K in job creation, so what? Sure, that might make some feel better for potential future job growth, but it was, in large part, due to temporary employment hiring for the holidays, so it is relatively meaningless. Even with all this infrastructure spending and stimulus we are still losing a construction job, which is not good. With productivity at a mythical 9% we are still losing manufacturing jobs, which is horrible. Temporary employment is just that, temporary and meaningless.
Everyone is making a big deal over this temporary employment hiring because it is a precursor to more hiring, supposedly. No, it is not, sorry. I would like to agree with everyone that large seasonal temporary hiring will lead to more hiring in the future, but it is not, period. Here is why, these temporary jobs were created exactly when most temporary jobs were created, October, November and December, this is for the holiday shopping season. I would expect these people to start being laid off in the middle of January after the shopping season is done.
My view on temporary help is pretty simple and I know many will disagree with me and that is fine, but temporary help is brought on to keep costs low and, in this case, to prepare for the inventory rebuild. After that is done the temporary help is let go and the company does not have to pay any severance or, while they are working for the firm, any benefits and they pay temporary workers a lot less than their fulltime counterparts. I do not believe it is leading up to fulltime employment or a precursor to more hiring in the future in this case. In the past that may have been true, but in this recession or depression we are going to have a very uneven recovery or a double dip and firms know this so temporary help is just as the name implies, temporary.
If CEO’s really believed in a V shaped recovery like most of the pundits why in the world are they net sellers of their stock? My point is pretty simple, if employment was going to improve and demand was going to pick up CEO’s, who know their companies and industries the best, would be buyers of their stocks, they are not. If they are not buying their own stock they surely are not going to hire these temporary workers, sorry.
To sum up today’s employment report, it was horrible. I was not expecting a report this bad and I am a bear. The absolute irony is that the market did shrug off this bad news so it is likely that we will see 11,500 or maybe 12,000 on the Dow and 1,200 on the S&P 500 before the big selloff comes, but don’t kid yourself, there is going to be a selloff. That is unless you think the markets are supposed to go straight up and break all resistance with absolutely zero volume? The unfortunate part is that by the time the correction comes there will be many more unsuspecting people sucked into the market only to suffer more losses. Regardless, let us hope we do not have more employment reports like this, if we do I do not know what to tell you because that would be a signal of a major fundamental problem with the economy.
Be the First to Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
