Smoot-Hawley Anyone?

Posted by Ray on September 29, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Here we are some 81 years after the Great Crash of 1929 and what turned out to be the beginning of the Great Depression which ushered in unusual monetary policy and solidified Keynesian economics. Part of the reason for the Depression was probably the best intentioned, yet most ridiculous, legislation which placed tariffs on imported goods, Smoot-Hawley. The idea was to protect America and to bring us economic riches, but the exact opposite happened. While not all of the Depression can be blamed on that legislation pretty much everyone agreed that it was a major contributing factor as it triggered trade wars. 81 years later and we are repeating the same mistake, politicians never, ever, learn.

I was shocked when the bill passed committee, well, not shocked, but surprised, but I am dumbstruck by the fact that it went to the House for a vote… and passed! I am referring to the brain child of Lindsey Graham and one Mr. Charles Schumer, 2 peas definitely not alike with the exception of being idiots. The bill I am referring to is Schumer-Graham, the new Smoot-Hawley, which will force Treasury to impose tariffs on countries they feel are manipulating their currency lower, in this case against China. One wonders if the U.S. will feel the wrath of the bill since we are sinking our own currency, but we would never manipulate our dollar lower, yeah, right.

I had spoke about a brewing trade war with China about a year ago as we leveled tariffs on some steel imports and tires. China responded with claims of dumping cars and chicken products and we retaliated, etc., etc. The politicians will not feel, yet, the fallout of this idiotic move, but the people who are struggling sure will. This will essentially guarantee that we will place tariffs on cheap products made in China, I wonder if the iPhone will fall in this category, which impacts the shoppers of Walmart the most, or Target or insert your favorite low cost store here.

I wonder, why does Washington hate the poor? Because that is exactly who they are punishing with this legislation, the poor. They will have to pay higher prices for what used to be low cost goods, money they do not have I might add. While the guise of this bill is to protect American jobs, read protectionism, it will likely do the opposite as China will retaliate in some fashion, I am sure of it. It also makes little sense to give your largest creditor a hard time and to alienate the fastest growing, or one of the fastest growing, economies in the world. Well, Washington is brain dead and probably never thought this far ahead, but still, how could they not?

China already made claims about other chicken products, this is a new claim a couple days ago, which shows that they are willing to do something to return the favor. What that is, who knows, but perhaps they will void more financial contracts with U.S. banks or ban some products. What I am sure of is this will pave the way for more protectionism worldwide and that is not good. You cannot legislate your way to prosperity and punishing a country for keeping their currency cheap is just wrong. I have stated many times before that a major revaluation of the yuan will lead to mass bankruptcies in China, but this is what the U.S. wants, not a strong dollar, but a strong yuan, who cares about the dollar anyhow.

It will not create jobs domestically for one simple reason, Vietnam has favorable currency rates, so does Indian, Indonesia, Peru, Mexico, Malaysia and many other countries. What are we going to do when our corporations move to these other countries? Are we going to tax them or simply place general tariffs on the products manufacturer there? Are you getting the point yet? Capital will flow to the next easier place to do business and Congress can continue to throw up road blocks, but they will fail. Not to mention that we want to double our exports in 5 years, according to Obama, and if we slap China do you really think they will let us have free reign or trade with them? Nope.

This is a job killer and will turn the troubled economy into deeper mud, there is simply no way to deny this. I just cannot believe Congress passed this bill this far, it makes zero sense. I know the Democrats are desperate for votes and this is a populous bill, but most people will see it, if they at least paid attention in high school history class, as a major problem for us. Especially since most Americans know China is our largest lender. Worse is that only 70 or so in the House voted against it… how can there be that many stupid people in Congress?

The bottom line is that our sugar daddy is going to be upset and probably cut us off because of this. We will now have fewer jobs and little financing of our massive deficits. Nice job guys, perhaps you would like to come to each Americans home and kick them in the shin as a follow-up because I do not see how they can top this idiotic move.

Well, what do you know?

Posted by Ray on June 30, 2010 under Economy, Markets | Be the First to Comment

Apparently it is now fashionable to be bearish since the S&P’s smashing, as in breaking below the 1040 level and 1035 for that matter, performance over the past few days. I hate to break it to everyone, but the time to be bearish was at 1120 and when the VIX was at 15, now, well, be bearish, but be careful. Those looking to jump on the short wagon might find themselves over paying for their positions and they might get squeezed out in the next few days. Don’t get me wrong, my S&P 500 target price is still 900, but I fully expect a retest of the 1040 mark in the very near term.

How bad is the economy?

Anyone even questioning how bad the economy is has their eyes closed and their head stuck in the sand. All the data is rolling over, look at the Chicago PMI today which came in at 59.1, sure, it met expectations, but it is down from where it was and is establishing a declining trend. The leading indicators are down and probably going to look horrible in the near future. I am sure initial claims will still be well over 450K tomorrow, oh, the ADP data stank to high heaven today as well so forget about an upside surprise on Friday. There is some housing data out tomorrow morning and I am sure it will not be good, it is May contract data, but never fear because Congress is attaching an extension of the home buyers tax credit to the unemployment extension, fantastic!

In short, things are much better than, say, September 2008, but things are not good and we are heading for either a double dip or very slow growth in the second half of this year. Treasury yields are telling us we got serious problems ahead and deflation, sound familiar yet, is an immediate threat. However, remember that inflation will come on very fast at some point in the future, you will never see it coming. The good news was that the ECB lending news was not as bad as I was expecting, but let’s face it, the news is still not good in Europe and the risks are very high. Spain may be downgraded, it will be very soon, which I am sure is surprising and people are wondering why such a fiscally sound country be downgraded?

The only thing I am surprised about is the U.S. and the U.K. still have the ‘AAA’ ratings after their drunken stupor of a spending spree, with much more to come before the majority is kicked out in November. After all, once your vote is cast and they lose their jobs what do they care if you dislike them or not? Expect another stimulus which is sure to extend our pain well into 2011. In the end all we will have found is that we have spent a lot of money with very poor results, just like the 1930’s. Let’s just hope this time it does not end like it did in 1941, there seems to be a correlation between poor economic stretches and wars.

What should give bulls some fuel is that everyone is so bearish it is bound to be a contrarian indicator. Am I going to bet on that? No, not yet at least. I spent the majority of this morning dumping everything I absolutely did not love to own building cash and some short positions, the markets were up this AM. While I am sure we will get a bounce in equities I am not so sure we will get it this week, a notable bounce at least. There will be short covering before the 3 day weekend, but at the same time I do not believe any one wants to be long either. What does that mean? We go lower, in my opinion at this very moment, but we could very well get a sharp bounce tomorrow before we go lower. If we break above 1040 we might go higher, but we are certainly not going to make new highs again this year, from what I see right here and now. Things are much worse than they appear unless you are 100% treasuries, suddenly that call I made back in April doesn’t look so crazy anymore either.

The Crisis Has Just Begun, But…

Posted by Ray on April 6, 2010 under Economy, Main | Be the First to Comment

There is some hope that the next aftershock might be muted, a little bit at least. The President just launched his new initiative to save the housing market which involves principal write downs, but no one is asking the really big question, why? With an industry report due out shortly you will see why, according to Diana Olick of CNBC the foreclosure report coming will set a new record. Am I surprised? Nope and you should not be either.

The mortgage mania was an era that will probably never be repeated again by private lenders, it continues through the FHA though. Many believe or believed the worst was over for mortgages blowing up in 2009, but they clearly had not read any meaningful material on the subject. If one read any of the numerous books about the credit crisis, aka lend anyone with a heart beat some money to buy a house they could not afford, they would know that 2009-2010 (the beginning of 2010 at least) was the lull before the storm. Whitney Tilson has probably the best book about the subject with many interesting charts in it, but most telling is that the last 12 months was merely the eye of the storm.

What happens next is really anyone’s guess, but what we all know for sure is that the problems that existed in 2008 are still on the books right now and the problems were merely covered up with the FASB’s suspension of rule 157, mark-to-market accounting rules. As you know firms can now make-to-fantasyland what they feel all that worthless paper is worth, I wish we could run our books like that because I have a painting of some dogs playing poker that I know will be worth millions in a few hundred years. Regardless, the next wave of the crisis is starting to break now as we have resets on prime mortgages, Alt-A’s and even some sub-prime that will begin now.

Why do you think the major banks were so quick to agree with Obama and begin to really renegotiate those loans? It is because they know that the problem is still there and needs to be dealt with since mortgage modifications clearly have not worked, there-default rate is through the roof. Obama knows that the mortgage problem is still very real as well and if the FASB goes back to mark-to-market, well, we are right back to September of 2008 and now the Fed and the government have zero ammo left besides outright nationalization of the banking sector. This is why Obama has offered rich incentives to all parties to begin this program, to help avoid the next wave, but I have little faith that the program will work based on the modification failure. This has nothing to do with politics as I think this is the best plan to deal with the problem, but it is a huge problem and principal write down’s will mean losses for some banks.

The interest rate reset issue is also why you will not see the Fed raise interest rates soon either, along with that other little problem known as the national debt. All the talk about Hoenig getting rid of the “extended period” talk is just a side show. While he might have bubble concerns, rightfully so I might add, he merely wished to change the language, but it means, essentially, the same thing. According to the FMOC minutes here is what was said on the whole dissent issue:

“Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig again dissented on this count, favoring a more flexible commitment to keep rates low “for some time,” according to the minutes, which did not elicit major market reaction.

Fed officials expressed concern about renewed weakness in housing and persistently high unemployment, saying the threat of a vicious cycle had not fully receded.”

His dissent was for the markets, not because he really disagrees with the low interest rate policy. The Fed knows that the housing market is a mess, as they stated in their minutes, and they know that there are plenty of adjustable rate mortgages ready to reset, the terms stink I might add. Sub-prime resets are usually fixed to a maximum of, if memory serves me correctly, 15%, but the real issue is the deterioration of the prime mortgages which has yet to really get started. The prime mortgages, in my opinion, is just one of the reasons rates will not increase as the resets are prime plus (insert risk premium here). If these mortgages can be written down problem solved! Kind of.

Whether or not this new initiative will actually solve the problem remains to be seen, but as I said earlier it is just about all we got left without the government actually buying the houses and letting people pay rent to live in the house. Luckily we are not doing, oh, wait we are doing that to, never mind. Again, another shock to the system will be devastating and this is why the big banks are all over this new modification program, but it is unclear whether or not homeowners will go for the plan or not, see the latest GSE study on how Americans view homeownership. No matter what, unless there is another accounting gimmick, the banks will have to take some losses in the near future albeit smaller losses than a foreclosure.

Of course, the media is not looking at this data and merely parade people wearing rose colored glasses in for their interviews, but this problem is real and it is getting closer. I do not believe it will be as bad as 2008, but it certainly can turn as bad if the problem is not cut off over the next few months. If this new program fails or has a low participation rate that may be a problem. The other unreported issue is the SIV accounts that need to be brought on the banks balance sheets in the near future, those are the accounts that banks “sold” their CDO’s to in order to securitize them, but since 2008 that paper has not moved.

In short, the problems have not changed or gone away. All those who told you everything is fine are either lying or do not have a clue what was written. With 4 negative days in the past month and a rising tide still lifting all boats I think that alone should be a warning that we are still in very unusual times. Let’s face it, markets never go parabolic without having a not so bullish ending and with the banking system still impaired I believe there is a recipe for disaster in the not so distant future.

Please pass the calculator

Posted by Ray on March 18, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Those are words you will never hear in Washington because, from what I gather, they have no idea how a calculator actually works. I just started reviewing this new bill, you know, the one so popular that the phone lines to Congress were jammed all week long, and it does not add up. I shouldn’t say that it does not add up, I should say that the assumptions are ridiculous.

They decided the best way to go was to raise the Medicare tax “only” on individuals making over $200,000 a year and couples making over $250,000 a year. The income tax increase is .9% for the Medicare tax, this will be in addition to the other coming tax hikes coming at the end of this year, and there is now an unearned income Medicare tax. So, if you make a lot of money and have dividends or interest you will have to pay an additional 3.8% tax on those investments, so much for investors buying dividends stocks.

Here is the problem, the Democrats claim this tax hike will raise $210B paying for roughly 20% of this bill. Are these people for real? Why would investors hold income producing investments if they will lose 3.8% on the interest earned? They will not because they will buy a variable annuity or growth stocks that pay nothing in dividends. That blows that $210B figure right out of the water, but the Medicare income tax hike is hard to get around. Unless you can control how much you are getting paid you will have to pay that tax, but it will surely have repercussions.

For the first time ever we have an administration who is going to impose one of the largest tax increases on Americans during a recession. I take that back, this did happen twice before, the 1930’s and the 1970’s and both decades were terrible. I can hear many of you now, it is only on the rich! Well, I got news for you first, there has never been one estimate from Congress on taxation, revenue generated and cost that has ever been right. Second, there is no way that only people making over $299K a year can pay for this program, it is impossible. That $200K number will trickle down to, my guess at least, to the sweet spot of $150K for individuals and $175K for couples which is a lot of people I might add.

Insanity does not begin to describe what is happening right now. I mean, sure the President signed an $18b jobs bill today and is about to urge the passing of a trillion dollar spending bill, do you see something wrong with that? It is a bit disproportionate and, frankly, right now the country needs jobs. At this point I just hope we have a real up or down vote on this bill so we know where our Congressional member stands and we do not go through with this sneaky backdoor deemed to pass vote.

I cannot wait to read the full bill, but, unfortunately, I will not have time until well after it is passed. I do know that ultimately this is bad news for all of the country because it was not put together properly. All the people wanted was for Congress to start over and do this the right way, no one is in the “do nothing camp.” Unfortunately, that is not to be and we are on the verge of expanding upon already existing failed programs. Essentially, it is like taking Medicare, which is almost broke, and giving it to everyone, good idea! Actually, that is Alan Greyson’s idea right now, Medicare for all is what he says, but, as most lawyers are, he is illiterate to just how ugly the balance sheet of the government or Medicare really is. Good luck!

Health care

Posted by Ray on March 17, 2010 under Politics | Be the First to Comment

I have been on the phone trying to get through to my Congressman, Dan Maffei (D), all day long to voice my opposition to what is going on in Washington. His phone was busy and I finally got his voice mail which was full, but I wanted to give him a piece of my mind so I kept calling until I got through. I left him a scathing message with less than polite language so if you do not hear from me send care packages to GITMO c/o Ray. I really do not care what side of the issue you are on, but I hope you are voicing your opinion to your representative. I am opposed to the current bill and want them to start over. I am not in the camp of “there is nothing wrong here,” but this thing has gotten way out of hand.

Many of you know my position on this bill, it is bad news for the country, and even more shockingly is the fact that Congress went back into hiding to hammer out the details again. This whole thing is like watching a plane crash and you have 2 choices, get in front of it so it ends quickly or stay where you are and risk catching fire, both choices are bad. What is worse is the fact that they may not actually vote on the bill itself, but use a procedure that “deems it approved” which is crazy. Again we are hearing, well the Republicans did it hundreds of times, I am sure that is true, but on something this big? I think not.

The people deserve to know how their representatives are voting on this bill, either for or against, so the voter can voice their opinion at the polls in November, either for or against. To me this whole thing is just amazing and unreal as we just wrapped up the worst 8 years in American history, well, that I have been alive for at least, and now just as we thought we got rid of a tone deaf administration another tone deaf administration has taken its place. What makes this dangerous is the fact that Obama is an ego maniac, in my opinion, and refuses to admit that he is going against the peoples will, so much for change.

As many of you know, I have also been in the insurance industry for many years, I know how this stuff works. I am well connected in the research area and do a ton of consulting, which is why I am not posting as often now. I often get calls from Senators or Congress members seeking opinions on various topics, they know who I am. Now, here we are in the midst of one of the most important legislative changes ever to hit the insurance industry and guess how many calls I have received? None. Not only have I not received any calls, but neither have any of my other geeky friends who work in this industry. Now, how can this be? How can this bill be vetted by people in the industry when, myself not necessarily included, some of the brightest people I know of in the insurance industry never got one call from even the lowliest intern from Congress?

It makes no sense and it should make you concerned because lawyers are great at lawyer stuff, but they are not good at figuring out insurance issues. Most probably do not even know what the mortality tables look like or what tables we are even using now. They have no idea on how to balance risk or spread it around and I got news for you, there is no way you can insure everyone, pre-existing conditions or otherwise, without raising premiums through the roof. Especially if you eliminate annual or lifetime caps, it is just not possible because you need to pool the risk. To make matters worse, if we continue with the archaic state system that we have now it will be a complete disaster as there is no way to spread geographical risk. It makes my head hurt just thinking about what they are doing.

We need to do something, I agree with that, but this is insane and I guarantee you it is not what you think. Premiums will go higher now until 2014 and then, who knows what will happen because we have not seen the bill yet, however I am sure it is not good news for you. I am extremely sensitive to this topic as it impacts me more than it does the average person, but it is not possible to insure everyone and maintain good quality care. This is where I get into the argument I hear a lot from the left, they claim the U.N. says we are 37^th in terms of the quality of health care. First, the U.N. holds little weight with me as they seem to not really like us. Second, how can we add another 31M people to the system and expect to improve the quality of health care? It is not possible.

If what I think happens actually happens, many doctors will leave, the New England Journal of Medicine says one third of doctors will leave the business if this thing passes. Again, how would this increase the quality of care? With Dennis Kucinich all of a sudden signing on to this thing it makes me wonder what really happened when he was on Air Force One. Dennis is a public option fan and he was dead set against this bill, which is the Senate bill, but again, who really knows. Did Obama promise that the public option was on the way in the future? I suspect it is at some point and if it is doctors will leave the business. Medicare pays $26 an office visit, do you think doctors can stay in business at $26 a pop? Not a chance.

Maybe we could do it better than a Canada or a UK, but at the end of the day, I am not a fan of the government involved in my life. I do not want the government to know what drugs I am on, prescription I mean, or what health issues I might have. We also know that Medicare is a favorite for politicians to cut funding from, they tend to do it a lot, so when it becomes so large, on top of our debt, what do you think they will do to save money? They will cut health care, it is that simple. History shows what our elected officials will do and it is always in their best interests, never yours. I do not want even a stepping stone to a single payer system. However, I want some things down and you cannot tell me that you could not win an up or down vote on outlawing a preexisting condition clause on insurance contracts.

The last thing we need is more secrecy in Washington, but that is what we are getting. We have lazy politicians who do not want to start over because it is too hard, they do work for us you now, but that is what needs to be done. I highly recommend you call your representative and let them know where you stand and that you will remember their vote in November. However, I encourage you to say no to this bill, mostly because they keep changing it (!) and tell them to start over.