“ In contrast, the Asian FX complex is selling off. Risk assets are not responding to this week’s apparent good news: the Chinese peg announcement (has anyone noticed that yuan forwards are actually …. weakening?)”
Whether this is a real trend or not is unknown, but I fully expect the yuan to appreciate before it really falls anyhow, gotta get Congress off their backs for now. No matter what a strong yuan is not in China’s interests right now and China’s ruling party wants to remain the ruling party so are they going to fear Congress or a billion Chinese storming the Peoples House? You get my point.
To further make my point about the troubles in the EU and in China, moreover how this is a global issue now, Rosenberg went on to say:
“ There are all sorts of news reports in today’s FT discussing how the problem countries in Europe are in such bad shape that their banks are increasingly relying on the ECB for their funding survival. Portuguese banks reportedly doubled their borrowing from the central bank in May as a sign that this is not just a Greek tragedy. We have reached a stage where countries representing 18% of Eurozone GDP is accounting for 68% of the growth in ECB funding. Is that a currency you really want to own?”
What does all of this mean? It means big trouble and the markets are telling us that the problems from around the world are about to wash up on our shores. The irony is it is all coming full circle because we kicked it off with our credit induced sugar coma over a 5 year period which made risky paper seem safe and led foreign banks to buy it. Later everyone found out that safe paper was worth far less than the paper it was printed on and the write downs, globally, were enormous, with more to come. That triggered a collaborative global bailout of the entire financial system, but the ones who funded the bailouts are now in trouble and the recipients of the bailouts were never really in such great shape even after they received hundreds of billions in aid.
While we allowed our banks to extend and pretend, mostly because we have the luxury of printing our own money and we are the reserve currency, foreign banks bought seemingly safe sovereign government debt instead of treasuries, for the obvious reasons. Well, that debt became no good and we are where we are with a potential funding problem across the pond and a healthy exposure to European banks. We had exported our “safe debt” which ended up being toxic to the Europeans and they, more or less, did the same thing to us! Except theirs was disguised as safe government paper instead of CDO’s and CLO’s.
I believe the proper name for such a thing is “circle jerk,” but I am not 100% sure on that. Either way it is definitely heading this way and only a fool would deny that fact. In today’s world it no longer matters if a problem starts 10,000 miles away because everything is handled via the internet in microseconds and exposure can go from nil to billions in the blink of an eye. All this means is that we are exposed and the market knows this. Why else would treasuries be doing what they are doing while gold is rising and stocks are declining, the interesting thing is the stocks declining part is new and all 3 were once going up at one time, how odd. All 3 asset classes could not be right, but 2 out of the 3 asset classes were bearish for stocks so directionally speaking a downward move should not be overly surprising to anyone, but it is, interesting.
The past 2 weeks we have seen the markets do things that simply do not seem natural from freefall flash crashes to intraday 300 point turn around rallies. However, there is one thing that is pretty clear, I would not buy this pull back. As David Rosenberg points out and a few other non-perma bull market strategists, not that there are many left, point out is that these wild swings are not normal in a bull market.
Think back to the market of late 1999 to the early 2000 and you will remember such swings, but do you remember how it ended? If you bought on those dips you never made your money back, ever if you bought the NASDAQ and you would have barely broke even in the S&P 500 if you sold at the peak in 2007. I think it is safe to assume that this market action is a sign of a sick overbought market trying to lure you in to buy one more time before it robs you blind, don’t do it. To be clear, I believe the broad market will move lower, I think 900 to 950 is not an unreasonable target, but we could move much lower than that. Before you say it, no the fundamentals are not so strong that we could not see the lows of last March, more on that in a minute.
I am not saying do not buy great individual companies, not at all, I am bearish on the market, but I like some individual names. I am bullish in the biotech area as there are tons of patents expiring in the next few years and you will see big pharma buy many of these names, but I also like big pharma too. Look at the yields and the rock bottom P/E’s, they are dirt cheap and you should look at some of these names, but biotech is not a prisoner to the business cycle, as long as it is well funded and near approval for a drug. I also like consumer staples that pay dividends, boring names, but they pay you to hold them and no matter what the economy is doing you will always need toilet paper and a toothbrush, I hope at least. I also still like high quality bonds and can make a case for treasuries right now, but use your own discretion, I would stay away from high yield, I sold mine a couple months ago.
Why do I think boring and income is the best model right now? Well, the market is going to correct even more than it already has, kind of a simple explanation. Income strategies, which I have been on the record for supporting since last year, makes sense because we are living in disinflationary, possibly deflationary, times where real yields are much higher than what we think. I am a long-term inflationist, come on look at all the money being printed and Obama wants to double exports in 5 years, you cannot do that with a strong dollar, but right now deflation is the name of the game and income makes sense. Deflation also means stocks need to be trading at much lower multiples than most people think and that is why I think this correction will potentially be much deeper than most people believe. Time will tell who is right about that.
The Fundamentals!
What about the fundamentals? Are they better than a year ago? Sure. Do they support a 20 P/E multiple on the S&P 500? Nope. Do you really think the housing data since the homeowner tax credit implementation was actually real data? No way. How about unemployment, do you believe temporary jobs are going to lead America to the next level of prosperity? Well, all the amazing job growth has been only in the temporary job area, let’s not forget that the actual employment report numbers are tinkered with via the birth/death model which added 188K jobs to last month’s employment report. For those of you who don’t know, the birth/death model are estimates the BLS uses to predict how many new business are started based on how many business died and population growth, it is fantasyland stuff basically.
What about corporate earnings? They have been good, but I do not believe they are sustainable. First, the stimulus is running out, that is a very important thing to remember moving forward. Second, a cool 30% of the S&P 500’s earnings come from Europe and up until lately U.S. companies enjoyed, globally, a weaker dollar which is over since the new sovereign debt issues are driving the value of the dollar higher. In technology a large percentage of earnings came from Asia and I do not believe that will continue much longer because of what is happening in Europe, Greece was a big deal indeed.
You see, Europe represents 20% of the worlds GDP and, believe it or not, China’s top importer is not the U.S. it is the EU. So, if the EU is going to have lower growth because of austerity measures, which they will, it will automatically be a drag on world GDP, but it will specifically hurt China. If China begins to slow down that is very bad news since China is “the recovery story of the world” or some other tag line the media gave it. In other words, China will be buying less from the U.S., exporting less to the EU and the EU will be buying less from the U.S. Also, China will be running, more than likely, trade deficits not surpluses which means they do not need to buy our debt. Can you see the problem now?
Greece is/was a big deal not on its own, but because it was locked in with the other PIIGS which were locked into the EU as a whole. It is all very bad news and no matter what CNBC says we are all still coupled with each other. It is the interlocking of the global economy, especially in the debt markets, that is the problem and there is no escaping it. I am afraid that even when governments guarantee debts that may not be enough anymore because, as the price of gold is proving, people are losing faith in money. Our whole system is based on faith and when that faith is damaged that is when problems get out of control and I believe we are just about at that point. The rumor yesterday was a .50% rate cut, how is that good for the Euro? If anything that would have brought it closer to parity to the USD. Printing another trillion just won’t calm markets because it means nothing. At this point I cannot see much of anything from Europe that will calm the markets.
The only things they can do is let the PIIGS default on their debt and kick them out of the EU, not necessarily in that order. Anything else will just prolong the problem and the printing press is the cause of the problem, not the solution.
Greece received its bailout today, pending an approval from some EU members which should prove interesting. Do European politicians care about reelection as much as U.S. politicians? If that is the case I suspect the longer term bailout is in question. Even in Greece itself the bailout is not widely accepted, who would figure that the unions would be opposed to higher retirement ages and lower payments. The current system is kind of insane, 14 annual payments, there are only 12 months, even in Greece, and the minimum retirement age was 53, new proposed retirement age is 67, welcome to the real world.
The primary issue, as I see it, is that we are curing debt with more debt. The EU member countries will have to pay for this bailout through higher debt to GDP ratios and higher taxes. This is why in Germany the bailout is unpopular, as it should be. At the end of the day all they are doing is saving France and other Greek debt holders, they should not be rewarded for speculation, but that is what is happening. As David Rosenberg said, we should all be opposed to bailouts, the madness must end. By allowing failed states or companies to survive when the free market decided otherwise has never worked long-term.
On top of the ridiculous bailout of Greece we now have to worry about the other PIIGS. Are they going to get bailed out? If so the EU and IMF will need another few hundred billion Euro’s. I suspect that Spain and Portugal spreads will widen tonight and tomorrow as the Greek issue is temporarily resolved, but their issues are now at the forefront of concerned world citizens. Bailing out these countries will be a huge mistake as it condones bad behavior. Let them fail or implement an ejection mechanism to the EUM Constitution.
I am sure the markets will be positive tomorrow as the crisis was “averted” and the good times are here again. Although I believe Friday’s selloff was unrelated to the Greek tragedy, but in reality the markets are facing a very overbought situation. Whether you want to believe this or not is your choice, but the markets are not supposed to go up every day or week. In fact, the past 2 months have been very, very abnormal to say the least, but the bulls will disagree, of course, citing some preposterous data point or use a forward looking P/E, which is just dumb I might add. But those of us living in reality know that conditions are not that good and the underlying economic data really does not support a parabolic move in the markets.
However, those in reality will look at the Greek tragedy and say, how can you fix one countries debt load by increasing another countries debt load? It just does not work and eventually we will see defaults. When that will be? I do not know, but soon I am sure. I am also confident that the Greece issue will spread first to Spain and Portugal, then to Italy and finally to France, since no one can bailout all those countries. Where it goes from there, I do not know, but I do know that it will eventually travel around the world as debt crisis usually do. This is why gold is going to go parabolic in the very near future… Got Gold?
It was funny to see many of the pundits spin bad data on the weather. This equates to my daughter saying the dog ate her homework. It is hard to believe the snow is to blame for higher initial jobless claims when we are in the middle of winter. However, I will concede that retail sales will be pretty horrible because of the weather, but other pieces of data, well, not so much of that weak data can be blamed on some snow.
Housing starts stink because the housing market is in trouble and even massive government stimulus is not helping. My guess is this data will probably improve in March to April because of the last minute rush to buy homes, but I would not count on that being much of a bump. What is worse is that the President wants a permanent moratorium on foreclosures which is doing no one any good and, in fact, will hurt banks that would not be able to collect or sell an asset that is earning them anything. I am referring to Obama’s demand that before a foreclosure can happen it has to pass through the re-modification process. Capitalism is officially being suspended until further notice.
As far as jobless claims are concerned, they are going to get worse as far as I can see. I am basing this on antidotal evidence of firms continuing to announce layoffs and a jump in the mass layoff indicator a few days ago. It is crazy to think employment will improve when you have blue chip companies announcing layoffs and claims are heading back above 500K a week. This is not because of the weather it is because the economy stinks. David Rosenberg calls this a Houdini recovery and he is correct. Besides a statistical recovery and a rally in equities, which is odd considering the dismal news over the past 2 weeks, the average person is worse off than they were last year. Again, unless it has been snowing for 8 months it cannot be blamed on the weather.
Perhaps it is snowing in Greece as well, that will explain their financial problems. It is true that the weather hurts certain things, but it has a rather limited impact on employment. After all, snow removal companies would probably be hiring. The weather might hurt retail sales, but with more people using the internet, me included, to shop I would not buy the soon to be claim that the weather killed retail sales. This is all about uncertainty in the world and to deny that there is uncertainty is simply crazy.
We have problems all over the place from domestic issues to possible sovereign defaults. Let us not forget we will witness municipal bankruptcies in the near future as well, chapter 9 is the more likely bankruptcy procedure. Health care reform is back and will be passed, whether you like it or not, and believe me you should be careful what you wish for because this means higher premiums for everyone. Do you really think Anthem raised prices 39% because they wanted to? Nope, it is because, I as speculated months ago, they know they are out of business in 4 years. All of these things mixed with tight credit conditions means tons of uncertainty.
Why the markets are not down 200 points, I do not know. However, it appears that Goldman Sachs was a huge buyer or S&P 500 futures yesterday, according to Zero Hedge reports, which made this a futures driven rally, check out the trading between 3 and 6AM for more weird futures action. I do not want to spread conspiracy theories, but all I am saying is the markets are trading very odd right now. I am still very bearish, how could anyone be bullish with the horrible data we have seen as of late? This is not 1 week of bad data, but 2 months worth of bad data and the market ignores it, weird.
I first came to the conclusion that temporary hiring was not the forward looking indicator it may have once been, actually I always thought it was a poor forward indicator for more employment. However, most pundits, friends and even some commenter’s felt I was wrong, but I never wavered on my belief that today’s temporary hiring was merely a cost cutting method and not indicative of a better job market in the near future. Apparently the Associated Press now feels the same way along with some other sources, i.e. David Rosenberg, and such.
My belief was that employers were simply hiring temporary workers for pure financial reasons, they are less costly, easy to terminate and right now you can get highly skilled workers for a fraction of the cost by hiring them temporarily. It was more than that though as inventories dropped to such low levels the need to restock, a large portion of that mythical 5.7% 4Q GDP print, which made employers hire people. However, why hire a fulltime employee when employers know the business cycle is severely damaged and restocking is a short-term boost only? Employers know their business and they know what real demand is meaning they know there is no real end demand at this stage of the game. Yes, deflation is here to stay for now.
My theory was confirmed by the AP’s article and some of the economists quoted. Here is what a portion of the article said:
“I think temporary hiring is less useful a signal than it used to be,” says John Silvia, chief economist at Wells Fargo. “Companies aren’t testing the waters by turning to temporary firms. They just want part-time workers.”
The reasons vary. But economists and business people say the main obstacle is that employers lack confidence that the economic rebound has staying power. Many fear their sales and the overall economy will remain weak or even falter as consumers spend cautiously.
Companies also worry about higher costs related to taxes or health care measures being weighed by Congress and statehouses. That’s what Chris DeCapua, owner of employment firm Dawson Careers in Columbus, Ohio, is hearing from clients.
That basically hits the nail right on the head and then some. There is just no way to know if the recovery is real or a stimulus induced liquidity rush. On top of that, the unknown about taxes and health care are a huge problem for employers as they do not know if having more employees will cost much more than just a year ago. Yes, Washington is working on a jobs bill to reduce taxes on employers, but that bill was slashed by the Senate leadership from some $85B to $15B, I mean why bother with a $15B jobs bill anyhow?
I have advocated for the government to stop their Keynesian policies as they will create much bigger problems than we have now, but I even concede that we need a jobs bill now. Tax breaks would be a start for hiring, but do not kid yourself this is a short-term fix, see Jimmy Carter’s same attempt and its aftermath. No company is even going to hire until real demand actually comes back anyhow so we need to spark demand. How we could do this is by simply reducing patrol taxes and income tax rates and implement a TEMPORARY, I cannot stress that enough, national sales tax. This way the government will not sacrifice tax revenue and people will feel richer with the tax break.
I do not expect Washington to embrace any reasonable solution and that temporary sales tax would end up being permanent so it is not the best idea ever, but it is certainly better than what they are trying now. Perhaps if they mandated the tax had to expire in a year it might fly, but I doubt it. The primary problem with trying to spur job growth is that it needs to involve tax cuts, but we cannot cut taxes as it will kill the deficit, see Greece for the end result. This is why we would need to replace one tax with another unassuming tax for now as one would certainly make up for the other. Again, it is not perfect, but it is much better than what is being proposed in Washington.
Unemployment will continue to weaken for sometime into the future. Yes, we will have decent unemployment numbers over the next couple of months for the Census, but, again, don’t kid yourself as those jobs are very temporary. The caveat to the higher unemployment figure is that the BLS continues to take people out of the workforce which means if the government has its way we could be at 5% “official” unemployment by the end of next year. It doesn’t mean it’s true, but let’s face the facts, governments around the world do what they have to do to make things “look good” in order to not create a panic. Again, look at Greece for the lengths a government will go to in order to make things look good.
While demand is weak, unemployment is high and deflation is here to stay, for now, I still believe precious metals are a fantastic play. I like Palladium, silver, platinum and gold, in that order, for precious metals as I do believe we are in for a bumpy ride in the FX market. As the dollar strengthens these prices will come down and be a screaming buy, in my opinion. I see deflation being the current conditions for prices I also foresee some problems in the currency market which will benefit precious metals in a positive way in the near future. Plus, the summer time is usually the best time for precious metal prices. I am now a buyer again, scratch that, I am a selective buyer now of most metals.
Be the First to Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
