Houston, you aren’t being told about a problem

Posted by Ray on October 18, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I admit I have been delinquent on checking out the Euribor rates lately since the Federal Reserve has me scared to death about QE2, more on that later, but I do not think it will be what you believe it will be in November. However, the Euribor went ballistic thanks to the ‘perfectly safe’ Irish banks began to show that the ‘stress test’ were pure bull. How can a bank pass a stress test a couple of months ago and then do insolvent, basically? That doesn’t happen in a normal world and it proves that the ECB totally flubbed the stress test.

The fraud that the stress tests were showing up in the inter banking lending rates which went from benign to cancerous in a heartbeat.  While the Euribor first continued to climb after the stress tests it did level out later in the summer, but now it went vertical and it probably is not looking back. Considering that European banks are still holding only God knows how much US MBS’s, which our current foreclosure fraud situation may render those MBS’s worthless over time, along with how much Greek, Portugal, Italian and Spanish debt and you got serious problems. The media is not going to touch this, but the bank lending markets talks about it only if you look at them.

The 3 month Euribor rate was below .90% until a week ago when it jumped to about 1%, .993% as I write this, which isn’t much until you consider we are in a zero interest rate policy (ZIRP). Actually, we are in a negative interest rate policy right now if you count all the QE going on. When you factor that in it kind of brings to light that something is wrong in Europe, still. US treasuries for 3 months are yielding about .14% so clearly European banks are pricing in a risk premium. The question is, what is the risk premium for? Clearly default is part of it and I think you will see more issues with banks very soon.

It is impossible to have bank holdings that consist of sovereign debt that is in trouble plus MBS holdings and not have any problems. There certainly will be more insolvency issues, but even if a bank is not insolvent their balance sheets will be impaired further. It is a mess and the real problem is that it is just not European banks, but US banks as well. While US banks do not hold a lot of sovereign debt, they do own tons of MBS holdings, unless the Fed buys them from the banks, which foreclosuregate, I hate these names we have now, will make many of these securities worthless or at the very least impair them well below par.

I do not know what is going to happen, but I am convinced that the serious problems that many thought were behind us never really went away. All we ended up having done was the government and the Fed paper over the problems. This went on all over the world with the ECB following suit as well. The Eurubor is telling us something, are many listening? Nope. Stocks are moving higher on some idiotic belief that inflating our way out of this mess will work, it might in nominal terms, but not in real terms. Phony stress tests clearly are not the answer as the fraud gets uncovered when banks that passed suddenly need a bailout. How central banks and governments have any credibility is simply beyond me. When a fraud is uncovered people usually talk about it, but the news on some financial channels is mute on the issue. When lending costs climb rapidly it usually makes news, did you hear about it? Nope. It is all just one big farce out there. I personally believe that the only safe haven seems to be commodities and I believe stocks are not as safe as people believe.

Bad news and the dollar… falls?

Posted by Ray on July 1, 2010 under Economy, Markets, The Federal Reserve | Be the First to Comment

Well, this is beyond me, the DXY is dropping like a rock below the 50 day moving average on horrible news driving futures higher. There is simply no reason for this whatsoever as bad news usually rallies the dollar. What is more odd is gold and silver are also down fairly substantially as well. Frankly, it is not adding up in my book and something stinks. Correlations and inverse correlations don’t just break down for no reason on without any news. Perhaps one should be careful shorting this market today and look for a retest of 1040, the Euro is up large @ 1.24 + 0.0161 when the banks had to barrow a substantial amount for 6 days from the ECB which indicates problems. Stay nimble.

Confirmation of my thesis

Posted by Ray on June 24, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

From David Rosenberg’s morning musing’s today:

“ In contrast, the Asian FX complex is selling off. Risk assets are not responding to this week’s apparent good news: the Chinese peg announcement (has anyone noticed that yuan forwards are actually …. weakening?)”

Whether this is a real trend or not is unknown, but I fully expect the yuan to appreciate before it really falls anyhow, gotta get Congress off their backs for now. No matter what a strong yuan is not in China’s interests right now and China’s ruling party wants to remain the ruling party so are they going to fear Congress or a billion Chinese storming the Peoples House? You get my point.

To further make my point about the troubles in the EU and in China, moreover how this is a global issue now, Rosenberg went on to say:

“ There are all sorts of news reports in today’s FT discussing how the problem countries in Europe are in such bad shape that their banks are increasingly relying on the ECB for their funding survival. Portuguese banks reportedly doubled their borrowing from the central bank in May as a sign that this is not just a Greek tragedy. We have reached a stage where countries representing 18% of Eurozone GDP is accounting for 68% of the growth in ECB funding. Is that a currency you really want to own?”

What does all of this mean? It means big trouble and the markets are telling us that the problems from around the world are about to wash up on our shores. The irony is it is all coming full circle because we kicked it off with our credit induced sugar coma over a 5 year period which made risky paper seem safe and led foreign banks to buy it. Later everyone found out that safe paper was worth far less than the paper it was printed on and the write downs, globally, were enormous, with more to come. That triggered a collaborative global bailout of the entire financial system, but the ones who funded the bailouts are now in trouble and the recipients of the bailouts were never really in such great shape even after they received hundreds of billions in aid.
While we allowed our banks to extend and pretend, mostly because we have the luxury of printing our own money and we are the reserve currency, foreign banks bought seemingly safe sovereign government debt instead of treasuries, for the obvious reasons. Well, that debt became no good and we are where we are with a potential funding problem across the pond and a healthy exposure to European banks. We had exported our “safe debt” which ended up being toxic to the Europeans and they, more or less, did the same thing to us! Except theirs was disguised as safe government paper instead of CDO’s and CLO’s.

I believe the proper name for such a thing is “circle jerk,” but I am not 100% sure on that. Either way it is definitely heading this way and only a fool would deny that fact. In today’s world it no longer matters if a problem starts 10,000 miles away because everything is handled via the internet in microseconds and exposure can go from nil to billions in the blink of an eye. All this means is that we are exposed and the market knows this. Why else would treasuries be doing what they are doing while gold is rising and stocks are declining, the interesting thing is the stocks declining part is new and all 3 were once going up at one time, how odd. All 3 asset classes could not be right, but 2 out of the 3 asset classes were bearish for stocks so directionally speaking a downward move should not be overly surprising to anyone, but it is, interesting.

No problems here…

Posted by Ray on June 16, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

SNL Financial came out with a report today that said 90 banks have missed at least 1 TARP dividend payment, that is about 11% of all TARP recipients have defaulted for those of you keeping count. Keep in mind that about 829 institutions received TARP funds and about 50+ have repaid TARP funds, mostly the big name institutions that we all know and love. What is critical to note is that the defaults, I would call missing a payment a default since banks call a borrower who misses a payment to be in default, are increasing, not decreasing, as we approach the 2 year anniversary of the historic TARP legislation.

What that tells me is that not everything is fine when we are 2 years into the largest bailout in the history of bailouts and we have banks defaulting, remember only the “strongest banks” were getting bailed out, and bank closures accelerating as well. All of this while the pundits talk about “the greatest V shaped recovery in history” which is laughable. If we were in recovery mode wouldn’t these banks be earning their way out of this mess? They have the greatest accounting gimmick, mark to model, at their disposal and they are defaulting and being taken over by regulators at an increasing rate, how can that be? Perhaps the system is not as strong as we are told, that sounds about right to me.

We have to face the facts and the fact is that the data does not lie, banks are defaulting and failing. Real estate prices, both residential and, especially, commercial are falling which means more problems for banks. The banking industry as a whole is much larger than Citi, Bank of America and JP Morgan, and I am hard pressed to make the statement that those banks are largely benefiting from proprietary trading, government bond underwriting and the ability to mark to model. In other words, the bailout failed with the exception of the too big to fails and, as we already knew, the bailout was really just a selective bailout anyhow. How could Bear, Sterns be allowed to be acquired, but Lehman fail? Just days after Lehman fails AIG gets bailed out, the proof is pretty overwhelming about the selectivity of the bailouts, in my opinion, and TARP was designed to make the big banks flourish and the rest of the banks, well who cares because no one cares about the rest of the banks. I mean, who ever heard of Midwest Banc Holdings anyhow, except for the depositors.

So, as the ECB gets ready to release useless stress test results, which I am sure will show Greek and Spanish banks in trouble, but everything else hunky dory, consider the fact that our stress test and bailouts were completely and utterly useless. In other words, if you cannot trust our results, it has taken almost 2 years for the failures to show up, how can you trust the ECB’s results? Geithner knows this which is why he pushed for the stress test. He knew you can fool the markets for a little while with useless stress test and a seemingly huge bailout fund. However, the results cannot be hidden forever and our results are public, for those willing to look for the statistics, and prove that their strategy just kicks the can down the road and still leads to failure. Unless you consider accelerating defaults and closures a success, I am sure some talking head somewhere will see it as a stunning success, but in the real world most people see escalating failure for what it is, failure.

Bring on the European Stress Test

Posted by Ray on June 7, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Look, things in the U.S. are certainly better, even though I am bearish on the economy, but they are just a “less worse” type of better rather than a true recovery or whatever you want to call it. Someone once commented that I would not know a V shaped recovery if it sat on my face, or something to that, as the recession in the early 1980’s saw a lag in initial claims of some 6 months before the recovery in employment happened. Boy, I hope that person is reading this because that comment was made in august or September of last year, almost a full year ago, and initial claims barely broke the 500K mark as we speak, is that the ”V” we are looking for? The fact is in a post credit collapse employment is a leading indicator, I said it a year ago and I am saying it now and the only difference is the unemployment rate is HIGHER today than a year ago.

What changed over the last 12 months?

Nothing. Wait, I take that back, a lot. The U.S. is now $3T more in debt, we performed a “stress test,” which we are telling the ECB to do, more on that in a minute, and the Fed expanded its balance sheet by how much? What did we get for all of that? A 5.2% GDP print based on inventory a rebuild that was probably premature, if we take away the stimulus would firms have rebuilt their inventories so much? I think not. Unemployment is slightly better thanks to temporary jobs and government hiring, not exactly what I would call “robust” at all. The bottom line is all my criticism of the stimulus was right, it failed.

The banks are better you say, right? Are they? If you think that, well, I just don’t know what to tell you. Did the banks get rid of the “toxic assets?” Did they write all their bad debts off? Did real estate values increase? How about commercial real estate, is that sector flying strong again? No. Are banks loaning money again? Sure, if you have a credit score of 850 or better and don’t need the money they will gladly make a loan to you. However, if you need to refinance your home you better hope you qualify for a government program or you are out of luck. The “stress test” was a joke and meant nothing because we are at the outer limits of the stress test, remember, 10% unemployment, etc., etc.? What saved the banks was one thing and one thing only, the repeal of mark-to-market account, period, end of story.

If we brought back mark-to-market accounting today we would have a handful of big institutions left, I guarantee it. Just look at Wells Fargo’s balance sheet with the “Pick-A-Pay Loans” they inherited, worse, they bought, from Wachovia, the LTV’s, except for Texas, God Bless Texas, are all horrible. I am not saying WFC would fail, I am just saying they would have to realize pretty significant losses is all. It is no coincidence that right after, literally right after, the repeal of mark-to-market accounting rules by the FASB, by Congressional pressure I might add, bank earnings went through the roof. What replaced mark-to-market accounting? Mark-to-model accounting, do you know who made that model famous? Enron, need I say more?

Europe

Now, Timmy Geithner is over in Europe telling the Europeans to do a “stress test” to let the world know all is well. Sorry Tim, I do not think this will work since it is technically not the banks in question, but rather the sovereign debt that they are holding. Why not do a stress test on governments instead, maybe that will solve the problem. This is a banking problem, again, that was brought on by huge deficit spending and countries inability to service their debt loads, this is big, huge actually. While this will impact banks it is not really banks that caused it, but politicians who decided to bribe the people with their own money.

It is likely that one of the PIGS, or whatever we are calling them now, will default given the issues they have and the inability of politicians to say no to spending. It is just odd, it always has been, that the people demand all this gravy from the government in the form of give a ways, tax credits or straight cash in some form. Don’t these people realize that they are only getting back their own money? Actually, if governments spent less and had lower debts that means they would have lower overall taxes which means the people would have more money on their own… they would be better off! However, the people insist on being bribed with their own money and politicians are only too happy to oblige.

The point is that this bigger than the banks as we are talking about the solvency of countries now. Bailouts are much more difficult to do for countries and the implications of a default by any country has widespread ripples that most people have no idea can or would occur. Even if Hungary or Greece defaults it is a huge deal and will impact governments and banks all over the world. I have been saying this for months now, Greece is a big deal and all those people saying it is not are, well, disqualified to render their opinions anymore as the markets have spoken and they have sided with me.

Run a stress test, it doesn’t matter because it really doesn’t matter Tim. The problem is with government spending this time and I do not think mark-to-model accounting can fix this problem.

The real problem

The real problem is I do not know where the sovereign debt problems will end, I know it will get worse. I know that more European countries will succumb to this very same issue as most European countries are socialist by their very nature and their debt levels are very high. As the weaker countries fall they will drag the stronger countries down with them, it is just how it works. I made a call that the Euro will fall to 1.18, we are about there. Do I think it will go lower? Yes, to parity in the near future. I think 1.16 is the next level, but the ECB will have to intervene and China has to intervene as a weak Euro is a major problem, it is, another story for another time. The currency will not survive without a mechanism to eject the weak states, period.

After the carnage in Europe is done, I do not have a timetable for that, it could be tomorrow or 10 years from now, but more than likely it will be sooner rather than later, the debt problems will spread, to the U.S. We have $13T in debt and an economy that is not recovering, I am not happy about that, but those are the facts. We are spending $4.9B a day, 3 times the amount George Bush, not exactly the face of fiscal conservatism I might add, was spending. We are in major trouble and what are our politicians doing? Trying to figure out how to get stimulus 3 out the door, that’s what.

I have been saying for months that our debt to GDP level is almost at parity, but it takes the Drudge Report for people to start listening? OK, at least people are listening now. The problem is we have no politicians willing to take the steps to fix out problems. Go ahead, elect the Republicans, look what they did from 2000-2006, they really helped to speed the process up, in my opinion. Of course, out current President and Congress has surely kicked what the Republicans did into hyper drive as they added 30% to our debt load in less than 2 years, that is $3T, an astounding figure. Neither of these parties really want to fix the problems, in my opinion, because they have a vested interest in perpetuating the problems so they can stay in power, it is just how it works.

What this means is we are all in very big trouble. I am not talking about, oh, gee, go buy an ounce of gold and protect yourself from inflation, I am talking about the Weimar Republic, hyperinflation, type of trouble. I see no way out besides inflation and in a big way. As Paul Krugman points out, there is a big difference between Greece and the U.S., we can print our own money. We also know Ben Bernanke has no problem with hitting that print money either. I am also confident that the Fed is, basically, completely incompetent.

If we cannot go to the market to finance our debt, which we have trillions of dollars of that most of it matures in under 10 years, the Fed will monetize it. That is how we will deal with our sovereign debt crisis, we will print our way out of it and it will be the very worst thing we can do. Instead of cutting our government, spending or doing anything else that is logical, because politicians want to get reelected, they will choose to inflate their way out. Will gold protect you? Yes, but so will food and any other useful commodity including toilet paper. It disturbs me to no end that we are where we are and that the President is listening to the likes of Mr. Krugman who thinks deficits don’t matter, they do, and that since we can print money it is OK, printing money is not OK.

In the meantime I am still short the market. We will have a bounce I am sure and I almost took a nice broad long position today, but I passed. While I am sure we will have that bounce I did not think the risk reward was worth it. My target is still 900 on the S&P 500.