Temporary hiring myth busted, first by me now by the AP
Posted by Ray on February 15, 2010 under Main | 
Be the First to Comment
I first came to the conclusion that temporary hiring was not the forward looking indicator it may have once been, actually I always thought it was a poor forward indicator for more employment. However, most pundits, friends and even some commenter’s felt I was wrong, but I never wavered on my belief that today’s temporary hiring was merely a cost cutting method and not indicative of a better job market in the near future. Apparently the Associated Press now feels the same way along with some other sources, i.e. David Rosenberg, and such.
My belief was that employers were simply hiring temporary workers for pure financial reasons, they are less costly, easy to terminate and right now you can get highly skilled workers for a fraction of the cost by hiring them temporarily. It was more than that though as inventories dropped to such low levels the need to restock, a large portion of that mythical 5.7% 4Q GDP print, which made employers hire people. However, why hire a fulltime employee when employers know the business cycle is severely damaged and restocking is a short-term boost only? Employers know their business and they know what real demand is meaning they know there is no real end demand at this stage of the game. Yes, deflation is here to stay for now.
My theory was confirmed by the AP’s article and some of the economists quoted. Here is what a portion of the article said:
“I think temporary hiring is less useful a signal than it used to be,” says John Silvia, chief economist at Wells Fargo. “Companies aren’t testing the waters by turning to temporary firms. They just want part-time workers.”
The reasons vary. But economists and business people say the main obstacle is that employers lack confidence that the economic rebound has staying power. Many fear their sales and the overall economy will remain weak or even falter as consumers spend cautiously.
Companies also worry about higher costs related to taxes or health care measures being weighed by Congress and statehouses. That’s what Chris DeCapua, owner of employment firm Dawson Careers in Columbus, Ohio, is hearing from clients.
That basically hits the nail right on the head and then some. There is just no way to know if the recovery is real or a stimulus induced liquidity rush. On top of that, the unknown about taxes and health care are a huge problem for employers as they do not know if having more employees will cost much more than just a year ago. Yes, Washington is working on a jobs bill to reduce taxes on employers, but that bill was slashed by the Senate leadership from some $85B to $15B, I mean why bother with a $15B jobs bill anyhow?
I have advocated for the government to stop their Keynesian policies as they will create much bigger problems than we have now, but I even concede that we need a jobs bill now. Tax breaks would be a start for hiring, but do not kid yourself this is a short-term fix, see Jimmy Carter’s same attempt and its aftermath. No company is even going to hire until real demand actually comes back anyhow so we need to spark demand. How we could do this is by simply reducing patrol taxes and income tax rates and implement a TEMPORARY, I cannot stress that enough, national sales tax. This way the government will not sacrifice tax revenue and people will feel richer with the tax break.
I do not expect Washington to embrace any reasonable solution and that temporary sales tax would end up being permanent so it is not the best idea ever, but it is certainly better than what they are trying now. Perhaps if they mandated the tax had to expire in a year it might fly, but I doubt it. The primary problem with trying to spur job growth is that it needs to involve tax cuts, but we cannot cut taxes as it will kill the deficit, see Greece for the end result. This is why we would need to replace one tax with another unassuming tax for now as one would certainly make up for the other. Again, it is not perfect, but it is much better than what is being proposed in Washington.
Unemployment will continue to weaken for sometime into the future. Yes, we will have decent unemployment numbers over the next couple of months for the Census, but, again, don’t kid yourself as those jobs are very temporary. The caveat to the higher unemployment figure is that the BLS continues to take people out of the workforce which means if the government has its way we could be at 5% “official” unemployment by the end of next year. It doesn’t mean it’s true, but let’s face the facts, governments around the world do what they have to do to make things “look good” in order to not create a panic. Again, look at Greece for the lengths a government will go to in order to make things look good.
While demand is weak, unemployment is high and deflation is here to stay, for now, I still believe precious metals are a fantastic play. I like Palladium, silver, platinum and gold, in that order, for precious metals as I do believe we are in for a bumpy ride in the FX market. As the dollar strengthens these prices will come down and be a screaming buy, in my opinion. I see deflation being the current conditions for prices I also foresee some problems in the currency market which will benefit precious metals in a positive way in the near future. Plus, the summer time is usually the best time for precious metal prices. I am now a buyer again, scratch that, I am a selective buyer now of most metals.
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's FeedLS Blogs
