Too late to go short?

Posted by Ray on July 19, 2010 under Main, Markets | Be the First to Comment

The market has had a spectacular run lately, both up and down, which has been fantastic if you are a trader, but not if you are a long-term investor. Odds are that if you are a long-term investor you should be in bonds or cash anyhow at this stage of the game as the data clearly shows that equities are about to, or should be at least, take a rather large decline. The bulls have no data to stand on, zero, and the bears have all the evidence in the world including the Federal Reserve telling us that there is little to be excited about and what meager recovery we do have will take years to play out. How that could be interpreted as bullish is beyond me, but I am sure someone will read it that way. As for those waiting for quantitative easing part 2, keep waiting because it is not going to happen unless something different happens, like higher rates or a much stronger dollar.

What data am I pointing to? Pick a data series. The ECRI has been my favorite lately since it has never thrown off a head fake in the -10 range, we are at -9.8 now. Unemployment is also a favorite of mine, where is it getting better? Initial claims are stuck at 450,000+ per week, last week was a gift of seasonal adjustment, that will work itself out in the next couple of weeks. The employment reports are terrible and even the JOLT report was bad. I will say employment has stabilized kind of like how the Titanic stabilized when it finally hit the bottom of the ocean, but I fear there is a ravine close by and we are sitting very close to that edge, look for downside surprises in the employment reports. Housing is DOA and that is certainly not going to change, as I write this the Home Builder Confidence came in at a disheartening 14, need I remind you above 50 is considered positive? Tomorrow we are facing more housing data that is more than likely going to be worse than expected. Face it, there is little data in the bull’s camp except the data can’t get much worse or can it?

On the earnings front, well, we certainly had some great numbers last week, but what about this week? IBM missed on the revenue component and guided down by a couple of cents, no big deal, but big enough to emphasis a slowing in the second half. Texas Instruments met expectations, revenues were mildly light, but considering it is usually easy to beat estimates by a penny or two they couldn’t. Zions Bank, the fabled regional banks that were going to go gang busters this quarter, came in way below estimates, ($.84) vs. est. ($.54) and were light on the revenue side as well. Worse, on the top they said credit was improving, but they are setting aside more for credit losses and their charge offs increased between 1Q and 2Q10, how that is an improvement is beyond me, and we are talking about banks that get to carry loans at make believe values. Even Tupperware missed when people are spending less and eating leftovers! As I write many of these companies are trading lower off between 3 and 6%, not good news for the S&P futures.

Of course, we have a whole slew of earnings this week, a couple hundred companies, so why make big deal over these few firms. Oh, wait, they are IBM, Texas Instruments and Zions Bank, pretty big and respected companies that are leaders in their respective fields. Could earnings improve? Yes. Will they? I honestly do not know because, frankly and like it or not, earnings have been a mixed bag this quarter, but I also think earnings do not matter right now. The macro data is overwhelmingly bad and considering CEO’s do not want to repeat 2009 with negative warnings it is unlikely they will give negative guidance. I do not blame the CEO’s since they were punished relentlessly by the likes of Cramer in 2009 for not being positive enough and even today you only see CEO’s that give the most optimistic forecasts given air time on the TV. It is also or should be widely known that CEO’s are terrible at giving accurate forecasts, look at 2000 earnings releases and see what kind of guidance CEO’s gave back then. Clearly they did not see the slowdown coming when people like myself saw it a mile away, the same may hold true today.

So, is it too late to get short this market? Maybe, it depends on what happens tomorrow. My forecast is for the S&P 500 to initially drop to the 960-980 area where it will rebound, I obviously have no idea when it will happen or how long it will take. After it rebounds I believe it will drop to 860 so there is plenty of time to get short, depending how you plan on shorting it. If you are using options you have to be careful and trade them. If you are using leveraged ETF’s I think there is a lot of danger in holding them, but unleveraged ETF’s, like SH (I own SH), is safer to hold. I believe the best time to get short was 100 points ago, obviously, but last week was a great opportunity as well. Tomorrow, Tuesday, everyone is going to be looking to get short so you will pay a premium to jump on the bandwagon and will be assuming more risk than reward in the short-term.

What is interesting is that the rally, the whippy 7% gain, was a 61.8% retracement from the lowest closing low, 101ish on the SPY. It goes to show that the rally in itself was nothing more than a technical bounce and was rejected when it tried to go higher. That, to me, confirms that there is much more room on the downside than there is on the upside right now. Yes, stocks can move higher depending if ‘something’ happens like a stress test that was designed to not fail actually impresses people, but I actually believe that is irrelevant at this point. Europe is not the cause of our problems, we are as the data is all U.S. data that shows we are if not in another recession/depression certainly going to slow down significantly. I am short so I do not have to worry about working in new positions, I hope you were short as well. (I own various SPY put options, SDS, SH, TZA, BGZ, TYP)

Alcoa, the contrarian indicator

Posted by Ray on July 12, 2010 under Economy, Markets | Be the First to Comment

Alcoa is infamous for having lousy numbers and missing its estimates, even Cramer came out today saying who cares about Alcoa, they have lousy numbers. Last quarter they had lousy numbers, but everyone else had great numbers, so what does this mean? To me, it means that Alcoa is the contrarian play since they beat their numbers and raised guidance. Although one analyst says he was not happy with the results as he thought they would guide higher and attributed last quarter’s beat to the airline and auto industries higher demand, basically he said the rest of the year would be weak. I have not looked through the company’s numbers because I do not own Alcoa and I do not want to own Alcoa, so why bother.

Alcoa had good earnings, at least good headline earnings, and CSX had good earnings, which is no surprise since the rail reports have been looking better, but I think we are in for some serious outlook shocks moving forward. All the initial signs are there as the economy is cooling off, frankly it was never that hot to begin with, as retail sales are not stellar, consumer credit is contracting and unemployment remains incredibly high. For some reason the unemployment aspect has become a new normal that most people are immune to, 454,000 initial claims last week was not good and a 466,000 4 week average is not good, in fact it is disturbing that more people are not concerned about this. Not to mention, unemployment benefits for some 3M people are about or have already ran out, not good at all for future earnings outlook, in my opinion, or maybe this fits into a V shaped recovery story somewhere along the way, I get confused nowadays.

One surprise last week was the news that Wells Fargo was closing down 638 stores that catered to non-prime, a.k.a. sub-prime, borrowers, I thought they got out of that business 2 years ago? The firm is expected to has a $.02 charge because of this closure which leads me to believe there may be more losses which led to the closure of the division, not a stretch, I know. Also considering that their pick-a-pay mortgage portfolio still looks terrible I think there is more to the story, but, frankly, with the suspension of mark-to-market accounting what does a bad loan really mean anymore? I will say even with the accounting gimmickry that a bad loan still impairs the balance sheet even if it ‘looks’ good in the reporting and over time a loss will catch up to the bank it is just a matter of how long. I also suspect that there is probably no more perfect quarters for the trading desks f Goldman and JP Morgan, my heart bleeds for them. What I am trying to say is that we might be shocked to find that financials do not perform as well as expectations and their outlook gets more cautious.

There is also technology which has been on fire for the past year, there is no denying that. Earnings have been fantastic and growth has been abundant for pretty much anyone in the technology arena, but will it continue? I fear, no. One of the dirty little secrets is the fact that for the bulk of the last years Asia has been the driving force of growth and these firms have had the benefits of a declining dollar which meant a lot of positive FX results. This is true for Google to Intel who all had several hundred million in earning kickers thanks to a depreciating dollar, but that trend stopped at the end of 1Q10 when Europe started to really catch on fire. I am sure 2Q earnings are going to be good, but guidance might not be as robust as many believe and there is now greater possibility for misses on the top or bottom line as well.

There is also Europe to contend with, I know, everyone says Europe is no big deal and the impact in the U.S. will be minimal. Well, the same people also said the sub-prime crisis was contained in 2007 as well, how did that work out for you? The fact of the matter is that 30% of the S&P 500 earnings are coming from Europe and they are going to stop spending as much, that is just a fact. This slow down will have an impact on earnings moving forward, how much? I do not know, no one knows which is why guidance will probably be more cautious this quarter. You may be saying, well Asia is growing like a weed and I will agree with you, but only somewhat.

I will say that the population in Asia will probably be more liberal with their wallets than businesses will be. China has a lot to contend with right now between property bubbles blowing up, banks worrying about capital requirements, loans becoming harder to come by, profit margins being squeezed by employees wanting higher pay, but their top importer, the EU, has a falling currency and the U.S. consumer is also not buying as much either. They probably are not going to be buying as much as they would be or had in the past. A good barometer of this is the Baltic Dry Index which has plummeted over the past few weeks. China is the reason why the BDI expands and contracts, for the most part, and it shows that China is importing less because they are uncertain or at the very least done stockpiling for now. I believe that means Chinese companies are not doing much capex right now, I could be wrong, but I just don’t see it happening.

The other thing I know people will rip me apart on is the $1.7T, or there about, in cash U.S. companies has on its balance sheets. Many believe all that money will be spent or used to hire, well, what planet are you living on? How long has that money been there for? 6 – 9 months maybe a year now? This is like the cash on the sideline argument, it doesn’t hold water. I agree that eventually that money will go to work somewhere, but not now there is simply too much uncertainty out there. These companies will not go out and hire people, why would they do that, they just fired them? They don’t hire people just to give people jobs, that what governments do. The bottom line is there is no end demand right now, all the evidence shows that as the consumer is deleveraging and so are companies.

That money is sitting on the balance sheet right now because firms are worried about what is going to happen. Most firms paid down debt and are preparing to hunker down for a bad business environment for a long period of time which is why they are not raising dividends to much higher levels or buying new equipment. There is simply no reason to invest right now when the current employee level and technology can met their needs which is the problem with deflationary depressions. Over time this may change, but given what we see right now and the sharp drop in the leading indicators, drop in retail sales, etc. companies are just going to hold that cash until they absolutely have to spend it. I hope I am wrong, but it doesn’t look that way.

I believe that we have plenty of reasons to be worried this earnings season. There has been tremendous technical damage done to the S&P and unless we get stellar earnings and good guidance I do not see the markets going higher. The headwinds are just too strong right now and there is little sign that things are getting better, the opposite is true. I believe we are heading for an immense P/E multiple compression and that is a good thing for value investors, bad for those who own AAPL though. Speaking of which, AAPL is also another reason to be weary of the market right now, it is the only alpha holding out there, take that bad boy out and it will be like trying to get an elephant through an eye of a needle. Plus, if AAPL broke the trust they have with their users who can the people trust? Look for lower guidance.

Double Dip Surprise

Posted by Ray on June 27, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

How anyone is really surprised by the possibility of a further decline in economic activity is puzzling to me. Perhaps it is all the distortions in the data that is coming from the government supporting the economy. Maybe it is because their vested interest is to have you invest in their funds. Perhaps they just drank the Kool-Aid. No matter what it is almost a certainty, in terms of forecasting, that the economy will either stagnant here or decline.

The main indicator that has been telling us there were problems for some time now is the initial claims data and the lack of private payroll growth. Sure, we saw a bump up in payrolls with the 5%+ GDP print, thanks to inventory restocking, but 1Q10 GDP shows signs of significant weakness. What has held true is initial claims, first they got better with the big GDP print, but now they are soft with the constant downward revisions to 1Q10 GDP. The ECRI data also points to weakness in the economy as well which correlates with initial claims data. From my lens, employment is not a lagging indicator, I have been pounding the table on this for a year now, it is a leading indicator in a post credit collapse scenario.

Friday’s employment report is now being telegraphed by Bloomberg to be weak, -110K is the forecast, especially since the Census hiring is done and they are now laying off workers. All of this is not surprising if you track initial claims and use it as a leading indicator. To put the monthly initial claims data into perspective 1,850,000 are filing claims for the first time and that means there needs to be about 2M jobs created every month to offset the ones just lost and we also have to contend with population growth as well. To be blunt, full employment is a figment of one’s imagination at this point for at least the next 5-8 years. Unemployment will be our greatest problem for a long, long time and there is little the government can do since end demand is the issue.

There is simply no way the Fed can raise rates for the foreseeable future either since one of their mandates is full employment. Yes, I know they said they would raise rates before employment recovered, but they won’t for political reasons. Obviously, that might change depending on what happens in the future, but for right now there simply is no reason to raise interest rates, at all, from their perspective. Worse is the fact that the Senate did not extend unemployment insurance last week which means a million plus people will lose benefits very soon. After their drunken spending binge to bailout the banks after they created this it is beyond me how they would let a million people just wither and die. There are 6 people for every job opening out there so it is not like these people are actively NOT trying to find work, so enough with that whole theatrical display of utter idiocy. Keep in mind I am a deficit hawk, but there is a difference between government wasting money and government helping those who cannot find work.

The loss of those benefits will have a huge impact on the economy as a whole since that money will not be spent. Retail sales will continue to slide and foreclosures will continue to rise, how many of those million plus people are barely hanging on? I am not sure how so many people can claim that the unemployed are simply freeloaders looking to live the highlife on such a meager government stipend which is what you hear often on other blogs or by the ultra rightwing. Considering that there are so many people looking for work the competition for a job, any job, is extremely high which reduces the odds of a person actually getting a new job anytime soon. Not to mention that unemployment benefits are usually around $300 – $500 a week I find it hard to believe that anyone is living the highlife on such a low amount, but that is the case. I am sure that there are abuses, but this is one of those give me a break moments and I am definitely right of center.

The other reason many believe a double dip is out of the question is that companies have extraordinary amount f cash on their balance sheets. Well, all I have to say is how long has that cash been on their balance sheet and it has not gone to work yet? This is like the temporary employment is a bullish indicator, if it is not happened yet the odds of it happening anytime soon are dwindling. The cash on the balance sheet is also part of the deleveraging cycle as companies pay down debt and hoard cash. Perhaps the main reason that companies have so much cash on hand is they think that business is going to get very tough in the near future. After all, many of our best companies have roots going back beyond the Depression and they know the value of having cash on hand to make it through the storms. Of course, they could spend it all tomorrow, but I ask again, what are they waiting for and why hasn’t it happened yet?

The bottom line is that it is really shocking to see so many smart people caught off guard about a potential double dip recession. All of the signs have been around for a longtime that the thought should have entered their mind at some point in time in recent months. There is a chance that we could avoid it, but I do not see how. I should point out the fact that I never bought the idea that we actually made it out of the first one, other than a statistical recovery that is. Time will tell on this one, but if Friday’s report is worse than expectations we will be well on our way to S&P 900.

Bring on the European Stress Test

Posted by Ray on June 7, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Look, things in the U.S. are certainly better, even though I am bearish on the economy, but they are just a “less worse” type of better rather than a true recovery or whatever you want to call it. Someone once commented that I would not know a V shaped recovery if it sat on my face, or something to that, as the recession in the early 1980’s saw a lag in initial claims of some 6 months before the recovery in employment happened. Boy, I hope that person is reading this because that comment was made in august or September of last year, almost a full year ago, and initial claims barely broke the 500K mark as we speak, is that the ”V” we are looking for? The fact is in a post credit collapse employment is a leading indicator, I said it a year ago and I am saying it now and the only difference is the unemployment rate is HIGHER today than a year ago.

What changed over the last 12 months?

Nothing. Wait, I take that back, a lot. The U.S. is now $3T more in debt, we performed a “stress test,” which we are telling the ECB to do, more on that in a minute, and the Fed expanded its balance sheet by how much? What did we get for all of that? A 5.2% GDP print based on inventory a rebuild that was probably premature, if we take away the stimulus would firms have rebuilt their inventories so much? I think not. Unemployment is slightly better thanks to temporary jobs and government hiring, not exactly what I would call “robust” at all. The bottom line is all my criticism of the stimulus was right, it failed.

The banks are better you say, right? Are they? If you think that, well, I just don’t know what to tell you. Did the banks get rid of the “toxic assets?” Did they write all their bad debts off? Did real estate values increase? How about commercial real estate, is that sector flying strong again? No. Are banks loaning money again? Sure, if you have a credit score of 850 or better and don’t need the money they will gladly make a loan to you. However, if you need to refinance your home you better hope you qualify for a government program or you are out of luck. The “stress test” was a joke and meant nothing because we are at the outer limits of the stress test, remember, 10% unemployment, etc., etc.? What saved the banks was one thing and one thing only, the repeal of mark-to-market account, period, end of story.

If we brought back mark-to-market accounting today we would have a handful of big institutions left, I guarantee it. Just look at Wells Fargo’s balance sheet with the “Pick-A-Pay Loans” they inherited, worse, they bought, from Wachovia, the LTV’s, except for Texas, God Bless Texas, are all horrible. I am not saying WFC would fail, I am just saying they would have to realize pretty significant losses is all. It is no coincidence that right after, literally right after, the repeal of mark-to-market accounting rules by the FASB, by Congressional pressure I might add, bank earnings went through the roof. What replaced mark-to-market accounting? Mark-to-model accounting, do you know who made that model famous? Enron, need I say more?

Europe

Now, Timmy Geithner is over in Europe telling the Europeans to do a “stress test” to let the world know all is well. Sorry Tim, I do not think this will work since it is technically not the banks in question, but rather the sovereign debt that they are holding. Why not do a stress test on governments instead, maybe that will solve the problem. This is a banking problem, again, that was brought on by huge deficit spending and countries inability to service their debt loads, this is big, huge actually. While this will impact banks it is not really banks that caused it, but politicians who decided to bribe the people with their own money.

It is likely that one of the PIGS, or whatever we are calling them now, will default given the issues they have and the inability of politicians to say no to spending. It is just odd, it always has been, that the people demand all this gravy from the government in the form of give a ways, tax credits or straight cash in some form. Don’t these people realize that they are only getting back their own money? Actually, if governments spent less and had lower debts that means they would have lower overall taxes which means the people would have more money on their own… they would be better off! However, the people insist on being bribed with their own money and politicians are only too happy to oblige.

The point is that this bigger than the banks as we are talking about the solvency of countries now. Bailouts are much more difficult to do for countries and the implications of a default by any country has widespread ripples that most people have no idea can or would occur. Even if Hungary or Greece defaults it is a huge deal and will impact governments and banks all over the world. I have been saying this for months now, Greece is a big deal and all those people saying it is not are, well, disqualified to render their opinions anymore as the markets have spoken and they have sided with me.

Run a stress test, it doesn’t matter because it really doesn’t matter Tim. The problem is with government spending this time and I do not think mark-to-model accounting can fix this problem.

The real problem

The real problem is I do not know where the sovereign debt problems will end, I know it will get worse. I know that more European countries will succumb to this very same issue as most European countries are socialist by their very nature and their debt levels are very high. As the weaker countries fall they will drag the stronger countries down with them, it is just how it works. I made a call that the Euro will fall to 1.18, we are about there. Do I think it will go lower? Yes, to parity in the near future. I think 1.16 is the next level, but the ECB will have to intervene and China has to intervene as a weak Euro is a major problem, it is, another story for another time. The currency will not survive without a mechanism to eject the weak states, period.

After the carnage in Europe is done, I do not have a timetable for that, it could be tomorrow or 10 years from now, but more than likely it will be sooner rather than later, the debt problems will spread, to the U.S. We have $13T in debt and an economy that is not recovering, I am not happy about that, but those are the facts. We are spending $4.9B a day, 3 times the amount George Bush, not exactly the face of fiscal conservatism I might add, was spending. We are in major trouble and what are our politicians doing? Trying to figure out how to get stimulus 3 out the door, that’s what.

I have been saying for months that our debt to GDP level is almost at parity, but it takes the Drudge Report for people to start listening? OK, at least people are listening now. The problem is we have no politicians willing to take the steps to fix out problems. Go ahead, elect the Republicans, look what they did from 2000-2006, they really helped to speed the process up, in my opinion. Of course, out current President and Congress has surely kicked what the Republicans did into hyper drive as they added 30% to our debt load in less than 2 years, that is $3T, an astounding figure. Neither of these parties really want to fix the problems, in my opinion, because they have a vested interest in perpetuating the problems so they can stay in power, it is just how it works.

What this means is we are all in very big trouble. I am not talking about, oh, gee, go buy an ounce of gold and protect yourself from inflation, I am talking about the Weimar Republic, hyperinflation, type of trouble. I see no way out besides inflation and in a big way. As Paul Krugman points out, there is a big difference between Greece and the U.S., we can print our own money. We also know Ben Bernanke has no problem with hitting that print money either. I am also confident that the Fed is, basically, completely incompetent.

If we cannot go to the market to finance our debt, which we have trillions of dollars of that most of it matures in under 10 years, the Fed will monetize it. That is how we will deal with our sovereign debt crisis, we will print our way out of it and it will be the very worst thing we can do. Instead of cutting our government, spending or doing anything else that is logical, because politicians want to get reelected, they will choose to inflate their way out. Will gold protect you? Yes, but so will food and any other useful commodity including toilet paper. It disturbs me to no end that we are where we are and that the President is listening to the likes of Mr. Krugman who thinks deficits don’t matter, they do, and that since we can print money it is OK, printing money is not OK.

In the meantime I am still short the market. We will have a bounce I am sure and I almost took a nice broad long position today, but I passed. While I am sure we will have that bounce I did not think the risk reward was worth it. My target is still 900 on the S&P 500.

How crazy is crazy?

Posted by Ray on June 2, 2010 under Economy | Be the First to Comment

A few things have been out there that just blew me away over the past couple of days. The first was when I saw a video of Jim Cramer advocating for the Treasury to issue $2T in 30 year paper to solve our debt issues. The second is that some talking heads believe that we will get a 700K print for the NFP, non-farm payroll (employment report), on Friday. It leads me to believe that most people in the world have just lost their mind or at least lost touch with reality. There is some logic to the aforementioned items, but reality just does not work like that and when one throws out an idea make sure it is feasible first or make sure it is a clean number, as in the 700K NFP on Friday.

First, Jim Cramer, the man I love to hate, but I respect the hedge fund manager as a take no prisoner SOB who got the job done, but this “I am going to make you mad money” thing, well, I think not. He has been giving out some decent advice lately, too little too late, but nevertheless, he has advocated high dividend stocks for sometime which is a good strategy as I see deflation. However, he said yesterday that the Treasury should issue $2T in 30 year paper while rates are low because we have too much short-term debt, he is right, and we will eventually have funding issues, he is right again. The issue I have is that the U.S. has $13T in total debt with much more coming so $2T does nothing to “solve our debt problems” and the bond market would reject $2T in 30 year paper. I mean come on, the market would demand a higher yield than 4.23% for that size paper. This is also the same guy who said, no more than 8 months ago, that Treasury should issue a 5% 30 year Retirement Bond as well, yeah right.

If one has been paying attention to the bond auctions they would notice that there is a reason Treasury is issuing shorter maturities, no one wants long-term paper from the U.S. government. Investors would just assume buy 10 year TIPS instead which offer some protection from the inevitable inflation risk that exists. Why would Treasury want to steepen the yield curve even more than it already is? If Geithner has half a brain he will try to move our maturities out to the 10 year mark and if Treasury swamped the 30 year they would move the yield up on the 10 year. It is just a bad idea and it impresses no one, period. I am surprised that Cramer would even say such a thing as he did run a ton of money, but, well, I guess I am not surprised.

The other hot issue of the day is the employment report due out at 8:30 AM EST Friday morning, it is THE report on the first Friday of each month. This month we are due for some really interesting data I suspect, especially given the smooth work last month in the Birth/Death model, I know I talk about that a lot, but it is important that you look at that figure and understand it. I see some estimates that we will see a print of 700K on Friday and, frankly, I would not be surprised, it won’t be real, but I would not be surprised at all.

The NY Post ran a story on how some Census workers were hired for a few hours, paid, fired and rehired which will boost the NFP figure on Friday. Are those accusations true? I don’t know, but it would not surprise me if they were. All I know is that it would be awfully tough to pull off a huge private sector growth figure with 460K+ weekly initial claims and with many blue chip companies announcing more layoffs, H-P is laying off 9K, seriously. There are still almost 6 people available for every open position which is not good news or bullish for new hiring. I am not saying it is getting worse, but I am saying it is not getting better.

There are specific area’s to watch and the first one is the actual unemployment rate, I think we will see it uptick to 10.2%, remember we now have an oil spill which impacted a very large area. Another area is the BLS Birth/Death model, obviously, which may add another hefty 200K to this month’s report. I also believe you must subtract all government jobs out of the report since they are temporary and we need private sector jobs to pay for government jobs to begin with. The U-6 report is also very important as it will show the under employed, which is a huge, and growing, problem in America that everyone turns a blind eye towards. Finally, temporary jobs are no longer a bullish indicator. Perhaps a year ago they were, but if they are not converting to fulltime employment by now they never will, sorry, but subtract them out.

The other painful part of the report is the time it takes to find a job, this is the heart breaking, in my opinion, part. The vast majority of unemployed are taking far longer than 6 months to find work, in many cases more than a year, this is the worst since the DOL has ever recorded, it started keeping records in 1948. Basically, those are Depression era numbers there are just no other times in our history where it took so long to find work and I can assure you people are not voluntarily staying unemployed to collect that whopping $400 a week unemployment benefit check. This is a major problem and it is not getting better, sadly, and you need to look beyond whatever the headline number is to see what the real situation is like. I am sure Joe Biden and President Obama will be patting themselves on their backs on Friday, but I can assure you that whatever the number is it will be the equivalent of Enron accounting.