China to allow more “flexibility” to its exchange rate

Posted by Ray on June 19, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

The media is abuzz with China’s central banks decision to allow the RMB to float a bit more freely, but no one is asking the more important question, which way will they let the currency float? Everyone and by everyone I mean certain U.S. Senators and some White House officials, claims that the artificial weak currency has cost Americans their jobs. The claim is it has cost millions of Americans jobs, but the it utter nonsense and political posturing.

A weak currency definitely gives China an advantage, it gives any country an advantage, but at the end of the day China had their currency pegged to the U.S. dollar, so perhaps our political officials should have been looking in the mirror while throwing criticism towards China. In other words, if our currency was stronger it stands to reason that China’s currency would be stronger as well. However, we all know that the intention of the U.S. government is not to have a strong dollar, but to have a weak dollar. That would mean a weaker RMB which would give China an advantage, in the eyes of those living in the land of the blind, in world trade.

How do we know the U.S. wants a weak dollar? Simple, Obama told us. He wants to double exports within 5 years, but we have the most expensive workforce in the world and are largely viewed as inefficient because of our pesky workers rights laws. That makes producing goods in the U.S. for export very difficult with the exception of complicated financial instruments, bombs, military hardware and some technology items. Let’s look at producing hammers, a hammer made in the U.S. would cost about $10, but a hammer made in China would cost about $5, why? Labor costs. The steel is going to be about the same and they are shipping the steel to China and the final product from China to the U.S. at half the cost. They pay the same amount of money for transportation, energy and raw materials, but they pay less for labor. My point is that we cannot export more without severely devaluing our currency or our standard of living.

Which brings me to my next point, China’s willingness to let their currency float more freely, great, but which way? One of China’s major manufacturers, the one were all the people are killing themselves, you know, Apples plant, is raising their workers’ salaries by 14%. Now, forget that 14% on $2 an hour only means another $.28 an hour, but that is a significant increase in labor costs, but are your iPad and iPhone costs going up? No, as an aside, this is just one more reason that I feel good about not owning an Apple product. I have also said that the Euro’s collapse is a significant issue for China, it still is, and a further decline in the Euro means China’s #1 importer of goods will import less, much less from the big red giant. What I am saying is it is entirely likely that China will float their currency lower and now they can claim it is the free market doing it, smooth move if you ask me.

It is not possible for China to have a rising currency, a weakening Euro, a weakening USD and higher wages for its workers with most manufacturers maintaining profit margins of 3%. It just doesn’t work for China and we all know the ruling party wants to maintain its power and in order to do that it must make the people happy. Without plus 8% GDP growth unemployment will increase and discontent will grow threatening the powers that be. In other words, the RMB will go lower unless other currencies increase in value. I realize this is an outside the norm view, but if one steps back and looks at the bigger picture it makes sense.

I could be wrong and perhaps every firm is out there hedging their currency, but that is highly doubtful. Even if they did it would not stop the slowdown in exports and all the bubbles in China will pop at roughly the same time, in the next few months. It is funny that the same people who said the U.S. was not in a real estate bubble in 2006 are saying China is not in bubble territory now, they are. Any slowdown, even a minor hiccup is extremely dangerous and has worldwide ramifications. We are talking about the engine of the “worldwide recovery story” here, not some small corner of the world that does not matter. If their currency appreciates and the slowdown is bigger than anticipated, they always are I might add, there are no more surpluses, no more U.S. debt auctions to show up at and prices will head higher on products.

It also means that they may become net sellers of treasuries instead of buyers, that is not good news, if their currency does appreciate. However, it won’t happen, it will go lower and everyone will be surprised when it happens, except for me. It is clear as day that the Chinese economy is showing extreme signs of stress, look at their markets, they are way off their highs and have been for some time now.

From my lens the entire system is in major trouble and it is evident when we try to find scapegoats for our problems, bankers, the Chinese with their cheap currency, etc. The system needs to reset itself and it cannot happen with all of this intervention and additional debt. Everything needs to be restructured and debts need to be purged from the system, but this will never happen as it means everything goes to zero. Instead we will carry on blaming others, inflating our way out and causing much more pain than by having an absolute reset.

Annuity Blog FeedSubscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
Blog Directory
LS Blogs


Sphere: Related Content

The revision is in

Posted by Ray on May 11, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I said it on Friday, I wonder how Jim Cramer will revise what he says when there is a bounce in the markets from his; “Don’t buy until Dow 9000” call. Well, we certainly did not have to wait long for the mighty Cramer to revise his history, yet again, and spin “what he meant to say was” moment. As it turns out Cramer meant to say that if Trichet did not do anything he would not buy until Dow 9,000, but that is not what he really said.

Anyone who watches his show, I only do at night when I am going to bed because I like to laugh before I sleep, knows that this guy says one thing, will be wrong and will then “remind” you of what he said. Unfortunately, he reminds you of the complete opposite of what he says, almost every time. I think he forgets that video is forever or something because I am not sure how he thinks he can spin what he says when he is on tape saying pretty much the opposite of what he says he said. Cramer was a great money manager and a great self promoter, but as far as “looking out for you,” well, I think Congress looks out for you more than Mr. Cramer and that ain’t saying much.

This is not the first time he has done this and will not be the last time either. It kills me that he just slams bears and short sellers when he also sold short and was not an investor in his hedge fund. He also wants you to believe that the markets should go straight up and never down, unreal. What I find humorous is that he thinks the fundamentals are “great,” even in Europe. In May 7th he says Europe fundamentals are junk, but on May 10th the fundamentals are great, huh? He was extremely bearish on May 7th and bullish on May 10th, huh? Make up your mind. I am bearish on the markets, but like individual companies, what does that make me? I think a realist, but Cramer is just a damn phony.

The EU is in for some awesome austerity in the near future and the EU is 20% of the world GDP. If they are going to be thrown into a recession because of austerity, let’s just call it higher taxes, that will be a drag on the world economy, right? How can this Mad Money guru not know this? If you watch the full May 7th video he talks about the 290K employment report, how can he not see the 188K phony birth/death model addition? How can he not discount Census hiring, 66K temporary jobs? On top of another 26K actual temporary jobs in the private sector? Let’s face it, this guy is a headline reader and not a fact checker. I am not sure why he gets under my skin, perhaps it is because he acts like he is looking out for you when he is not and knows nothing about macro events. Most of all, he rejects what he actually said and replaces it with what he thinks he said. Some people have a word for that, it begins with an L.

Here is what he said May 10th:

Compare that with what he said on May 7th and you be the judge:

Annuity Blog FeedSubscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
Blog Directory
LS Blogs


Sphere: Related Content


Learn  basics of stock market from   bettertrades , a company founded by Freddie Rick . Learn  options trading   to make money through buying and selling options.
home top



website statistics Site Meter