It is June and the economy is weakening

Posted by Ray on June 6, 2011 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I suppose it was back in the late fall and reiterated again in mid-winter that I believed the market would simply go up for no real reason until QE2 ended and then it would begin to decline as liquidity ended. It looks as though I was somewhat accurate in that prediction although you did not have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out unless you were a permabull with your blinders on and absolute faith in the government and the Fed in which case please move along.

The Fed knew the same thing I and many others did and that is why at the last meeting they emphasized that they would continue to reinvest maturing paper and interest from the existing portfolio, kind of a QE infinity if you will, but on a small scale. I do believe they will let QE2 go and not announce anything new until the fall when they see the economy really weaken. I think a couple months of sub 100K jobs reports, with a healthy BLS birth/death adjustment, along with softening other indicators such as the PMI and so forth the Fed will get the point and step in with $1T in QE since $600B did not work.

That is how it works as one QE is ineffective the next one gets bigger. The really unfortunate part is that Japan has done the same thing and it did not work but there is a big difference between the US and Japan, we are the reserve currency and they aren’t. In other words, Japan could print all they wanted because their citizens bought their own debt and the world settled trades in dollars. However, the US is limited in what they can really do in QE because as the value of the dollar sinks, and we really had a nice scare a week or so ago, the world will pick a new reserve currency on its own. You know how that story ends.

Ben knows this and he knows that his QE options are limited and he can probably only get away with 1 more so it will be big, it has to be. If that one does not work and spur growth, well, the Fed is done and completely out of bullets in a traditional sense. We would see some new things coming to the table like in 2008 with all the new facilities and such, but I have no idea what they will be or what they will look like since we do not know how things will play out.

What I do know is that we should get a nice bounce in the dollar here sending commodities lower for a bit. This will give Ben and Washington a little relief and you an opportunity to buy, buy, buy every commodity you like. I love silver, still, wheat, gold, palladium, soybeans and corn (unless the subsidy is pulled). If those go on sale buy them either directly or via the growers or agricultural ETF’s.

In the mean time enjoy watching Ben sweat it out as he will not have answers for the weakness in the economy or the weakness is ‘transitory’ which is the longest transitory period I have ever seen. Kind of like this recovery it is the longest start of a recovery ever as it gains steam and loses steam every other week. Good luck.

Quantitative easing, it’s reality, kind of

Posted by Ray on August 11, 2010 under Main | Read the First Comment

When I wrote last week that the Fed would do QE 2 and the trade of the century, granted that was over the top, was leveraged bull 20+ year ETF’s I received some flack, a lot actually. First, let’s talk about the economy and what is going on there. Second, let’s talk about the treasury, gold barbell trade that seems wild and crazy. To clarify something, no, I am not drunk as one commenter asked.

The economy, oh, how this recovery summer is not such a recovery after all. Perhaps Geithner’s op-ed in the Times should have read, “Sorry, we screwed up any chances of a recovery” instead of “Welcome to The Recovery.” Any improvement we have seen within the economy has been purely statistical or for the very wealthy, period. Yes, Saks and Macy’s are indeed having good years, but look at Walmart, not such a blockbuster year. If you strip away the stimulus spending and government transfers you have poor GDP readings, period. I cannot see how anyone would or could really dispute that, but I am sure there are some that will try.

The truest test of any economy is unemployment and I was saying, before it was popular by a certain ‘New Normal’ guy, that unemployment was a leading indicator, not a lagging indicator. Our employment situation is poor at best considering that we are having more and more people leaving the workforce because they are giving up. Imagine just giving up all hope of finding work, not that you don’t want a job, but you just can’t find one, but since you have given up our government says you do not count anymore, nice. Anyhow, if we include all those people who dropped out of the workforce we are up to 10.2-10.5% official unemployment. As far as the U-6 we are still around the 17% area, but I am willing to bet it is much, much higher and who knows, exactly, how many people simple have been unemployed so long they just don’t count anywhere anymore. Regardless, our unemployment issue is the truest test of our economic situation and has indicated for well over a year that the economy is in poor condition.

As far as the other economic data points and indicators, well, show me one that points to an actual positive improvement please. Hint, there is not one that points to a significant improvement in the economic condition in recent months. In fact it is so bad that the Fed is turning to a form of QE which they know will do nothing to boost the economy, but it will look like they are doing something. It is so bad you had Ben Bernanke testify in front of Congress and say; “I don’t know what is going to happen,” basically when he said ‘unusual uncertainty.’ You have the Fed Presidents talking about recessions, QE, Japan scenarios and a host of other issues, but don’t worry because CNBC says no double dip. You know what, they are right. There will not be a double dip because we never made it out of the first depression.

We got the Fed doing this reinvesting of interest and repayment of principal now, to the tune of about $300B or so, into treasuries. What is that going to do for the economy? Nothing. Ben is trying to force banks to lend by doing a bull flattener to the yield curve, good luck Ben. What he doesn’t realize yet is people do not want to borrow. In fact, people want to pay off their debts instead, go figure. Ben cannot boost demand and QE will not do anything at all besides make bond investors very happy. It is a dog and pony show to make everyone feel good and like the Fed has some ammo left, they don’t and the game is over for them. All more QE will do is damage the dollar at some point in the future, that is a certainty. Consumer demand will return only after the deleveraging period is done and that could take 10 more years, who knows. It will be a tough ride, that is for sure.

Now, for those who thought I was nuts for going long a leveraged 20+ treasury ETF and gold, well, you don’t have to say, my account says it for me. UBT was about $85 a share when the article came out and it closed today at about $90.50 and gold was at about $116.50 and it is at $117.73 (I am using GLD as a proxy). I do not believe the trade is done, I wouldn’t enter it here, but I am not exiting it either, especially after CSCO missed their revenue estimates tonight. This was not a crazy trade, it was the most obvious trade in the world. Easy money like this does not happen very often so I am not sure why anyone would think this was ‘high risk’ or abnormal. You can hold leveraged ETF’s, if they go in your favor, over a period of days, just not long-term.

Everyone knew the Fed was going to do something, anything, because the Fed is staunchly independent and not influenced by politics, yeah right. Come on, the Fed knew it had to do something to show it was helping the economy, but not too much because we have an election coming up. What could be safer than maintaining the balance sheet, but reinvesting loose change into treasuries to bring down long-term treasury rates? It does not raise any eyebrows, everyone knew they would do this and it does help borrowers, but it doesn’t help the real economy. Regardless, this was telegraphed and sets up the Fed for real money printing and QE after November.

In the meantime, I plan on locking in profits on my UBT soon and rolling into TLT on weakness. I fully expect that we see the 30 treasury move towards the 3% area, maybe 2.5% as Ben wrote about in the past. That makes longer duration treasuries very attractive still and inflation is not an issue now. However, inflation will be at some time in the future and QE will damage the dollar, hence the gold hedge. I think gold goes back to its high and make a run towards $1,300 an ounce, maybe higher is full blown QE kicks in this fall. Equities are not attractive, in my view, unless they pay an outsized dividend and have a strong balance sheet. Stocks like AAPL, no thanks, they do not work in this environment unless they pull a new killer product out of their back pocket every other month. Good luck.

The BP Selloff

Posted by Ray on June 1, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

The media is blaming BP for just about everything nowadays including today’s selloff which is absurd to say the least. There is little doubt that BP has had an impact on the oil service sector and sent those shares lower as the government is about to unleash the proverbial Hell on the sector for what amounts to a horrible accident. A word on the spill, it is terrible, awful and I hope it gets taken care of as soon as possible, but BP is doing everything it is supposed to be doing. Even the President admitted that the company cannot make a move without his direct approval, so let’s make sure we spread blame to all who deserve it. However, the leak is not the cause of the market selloff, but only part of the problem.

What I found extremely interesting in Tuesday’s trading was that the Euro made a fresh 4 year low and someone decided to step in and buy the Euro like no tomorrow. It had to have been a central bank because I know of no investor that would be anxious to buy anything that just made a fresh 4 year low on speculation of a rebound, but that is rumor and my own speculation and it does not matter who did it because it happened. The Euro is leading the trading and that is what is important to realize and that in itself is what is interesting because that trend is on again and off again day by day so do not depend on the Euro to always be the guide. To be sure if the Euro is leading the way check the EURO/USD and EURO/JPY pairs and id they are both heading in the same direction with the market the trend is valid, if they are mixed take your own chances trusting the Euro to lead.

What else was extremely interesting today is the fact that the Russell 2000 and the transports had diverged from the Dow 30, S&P 500 and the NASDAQ all day today. It is also important to note that I have mostly thrown my charts away as I feel they are more or less useless at this point, but I do look at them from time to time. Regardless, I always use the RUT, Russell 2000, to gauge the overall movement of the market and where we are ultimately heading for the day, it is fairly accurate as it is a broad based index, and if you are a Dow Theorist you watch the transports anyhow to see where the Dow will go for the day. I guess I am a bit of everything because I watch a lot of things all throughout the day. Of interest was the RUT was down a good 1.7% most of the day as the Dow was positive and the S&P crossed throughout the day and the transports were also down about 1% throughout the day as well.

Having a divergence in itself is not a big deal, it kind of happens all the time and the markets tend to even out at the end of the day, but not today. The RUT and the transports ended down pretty hard, almost 3% and over 2%, respectively, while the Dow ended down 112 and the S&P ended down 18. Typically, when the RUT and transports are down that much the Dow is down about 200+ and the S&P is down about 30 so it was strange trading all day long. It is safe to assume that I merely held my shorts today as I think there is something to this divergence and there is more downside to this market. However, the real catalyst for the selloff was not BP, oh no, it was the EU.

About 10 PM EST last night the ECB released a statement saying that EU banks may write down about $290B in debt, that is a problem. When that news hit it drove futures down 50 ticks and they just stayed there all night long. Considering that it was a holiday that is a pretty big move so I was not surprised this morning when I saw the open, but I was surprised on the turn at 10 AM when the markets went positive and I saw the divergence in the different indices. I kept waiting for the reversal to happen again, but it did not come through until 3:30 which is a bit odd, kind of, but it also shows that this market is not a bull market at all anymore, it is a bear market. A bull market would not be trading like this and we would not get such bearish signals at 3:30 PM, sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

I do expect a rally in the short-term, but nothing to write home about, previously I thought a run to 1,200 on the S&P was possible, but not any longer. I believe we may see 1,120 or so, but that is about it unless the news really turns, which I do not see happening. I believe the ISM data we saw today is the beginning of the official rollover in the data series, leading indicators already rolled, and I am not expecting much more strong economic data as the stimulus money is gone, that was a quick trillion, eh.

Everyone is watching for the employment report on Friday, but no one looks beyond the headline number so why bother? With initial claims in at 460K, 2.5 years into this thing(!), we are in negative job growth territory. I expect to see the unemployment rate climb to 10%+ as people get back into the workforce as extended unemployment benefits are running out and people reenter the workforce. I expect a high number of government employment which needs to be discounted and one needs to remove the Birth/Death model tinkering that occurs because those jobs are simply made up, that is why 880K jobs had to be added to the unemployment roles in February as this model underestimates the unemployment rate. If the private sector is adding only temporary workers at this stage we are in big, big trouble and that is NOT a bullish item, it is very bearish. Overall, I expect a number that is going to be in the 300 – 350K area, I hear of some shenanigans in the numbers, more on that is I can confirm, but until then it is rumor only.

I do not believe there is much upside to this market and the risks run very high with the exception of cash and gold. At this point even high paying income stocks are getting hit hard and bonds are, in my opinion, overvalued at this point and I got very lucky with my exit on high yield. I like short treasuries, 2 year durations, but cash is better at this point. I believe deflation is here and it is going to get very tough going forward which means stocks are way overvalued by 20 – 30%, think 10-12 P/E on $75 earnings on the S&P plus much lower growth. Be very nimble or start looking for entry points for a short position, but you should have been doing that 3 weeks ago so don’t go jumping on the bandwagon now without doing your research.

At this point I am holding high yielding stocks, short duration treasuries, country specific ETF’s, equity income ETF’s, 3x bear ETF’s, put options, gold, silver and platinum group metals. Clearly I am thinking much lower equity prices, deflation followed by inflation at some point. Everyone is a genius when the market is going up, but we are about to hit a very rough market and I expect volatility to remain elevated for some time and the VIX might offer some excitement for you, but you must understand it before you do anything with it. In the meantime my price target is 900 on the S&P 500 which has been my target since the beginning of the year, I think it could go much lower if conditions worsen. Good luck.

Explaining Deflation vs. Deflation

Posted by Ray on May 16, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I was reading Zero Hedge yesterday, a post in regards to gold where Peter Schiff was part of the topic, and there were some interesting comments. One caught my attention as being somewhat ludicrous which is not unusual, but is was because the author is a contributor to the site. Unfortunately the comment was flagged as junk, I hate it when that happens because counterpoints are always good things to have and I do not mean to rip him apart, but rather correct years of misinformation he probably picked up from school or TV armchair economists.

One comment he made was:
“On gold to the moon: Peter you’ve been talking up your gold positions for years, but once calm is restored, you’re going to take a major haircut on gold.”
Another was:
“On the US economy “not growing”: Has he looked at the ISM, employment (not just payrolls but household survey), industrial production, and the leading indicators over the last ten months?”
And the other one was referencing that as soon as the trillions in bailouts the banks received hits the economy it will calm the economies or something to that effect. He also indicated that as long as confidence remains in the system everything will be fine, which is true, but how much will it take to keep that confidence or instill that confidence? Also, the more money we inject to create confidence the more confidence it actually erodes, it is a zero sum game in the end. Part of the comment was that the EU was trying to avoid a “deflationary death spiral” or something similar, this is why people should not flag things as junk because they are not junk, which is what really bothered me.

People are thoroughly confused by deflation and deflationary death spirals and what that means. Deflation is a problem, we have deflation now, but it is not a huge problem. However, a deflationary death spiral is what we had in the 1930’s and is what keeps Ben Bernanke up at night. We will not, I do not think, have that deflationary death spiral and I think we need to understand what that death spiral was, what caused it and why we will not have it. After that I want to address the rest of the comments he made above.

What we suffered fro in the 1930’s was horrible and something I hope we never see again. To understand more about what it was like in the Depression please Read The Depression: A Diary by Benjamin Roth and stay away from the academic stuff. However, during the depression dollars were scarce because fo the massive bank failures and deposits were frozen or simply lost when the bank closed down. On top of that the stock market wiped out millions of peoples savings which had a domino effect into the real estate market which is what caused the banking crisis, somewhat reversed from today’s crisis I might add.

What this did was literally wipe dollars out of existence, they just disappeared and were not transferred to anyone else. Today one persons loss is likely another’s gain through derivatives or other hedging instruments known as bailouts, but that was not the case in the 1930’s. Since these dollars were gone or frozen and the U.S. was on the gold standard we did not have a Helicopter Ben to get dollars into the system, at first the Fed tightened credit, who knows why, but they later tried to reverse that decision, but it was too little too late. What we had was complete demand destruction and people saving whatever dollars they had, which was strange because people would rather starve than spend their money.

In fact, while people were starving crops were on or at a record pace, prior to the dust bowl fiasco of course. It was a simple fact that the U.S. was tied to the gold standard and could not put more dollars into the system and people just did not want to spend what they had saved because who knew what tomorrow would bring. We also had no safety systems in place such as unemployment insurance, welfare or Social Security, until FDR was elected a few years into the Depression. By not having those safety nets in place it made things much, much worse and that is why we had such massive deflation.

This was not the run of the mill demand deflation, which is what we have now, this was the death spiral lack of dollars in circulation plus no demand deflation. So for people to draw a comparison to 1930’s deflation to todays is a bit ridiculous to say the least. We have those safety programs now so people will not starve instead of spending money, ironically our poor actually have cable TV, go figure, and we have other safety nets in place. This is why we will not see 1930’s deflation and this is also why we can hide the evidence of our current Depression, if we do not have to see the soup lines they are not there, right? Never mind the fact that 1 in 8 Americans receives some form of Food Stamp assistance, if that is not a Depression statistic I am not sure what is.

The banking system is still suffering from after shocks much like we saw in the 1930’s, closures did not stop for years after the crash of 1929 as real estate continued to decline in value, sound familiar? We are still suffering from similar bouts of bank closures today because of declining real estate prices and that is unlikely to change. Many of these banks were bailed out, funny how some “too big too fail” are now failing after they were bailed out. How can, as his comment claimed, the markets be calmed because of trillions in bailouts will build confidence when those banks who were bailed out are still failing? This is very similar to the 1930’s when many banks who received aid under the first Hoover plan still failed. The point being is that it will take a long time for the system to heal itself and with the government propping it up it will take much longer. The Depression lasted some 10 years, 7 with major government help, our current problem got help on day 1, how long will our recovery really take?
With the massive stimulus and government spending in the banking system it is nothing more than inflationary measures. The comment that “when the trillions making it into the economy will only build confidence,” is a bit absurd, in my opinion, as it points out that the issues were very bad for a very longtime. Also, when the trillions, a bigger and more accurate statement would had been if the trillions, make it into the economy it will create inflation, period. There is really no doubt that the measures taken by all the central banks were to stem the tide of the aforementioned deflationary spiral and it did work, but the central banks cannot stem the tide of the inflation that they created. After all, central banker’s primary mandate is to inflate the currency at about a 3% annual rate to begin with so they have no real mechanism to dis-inflate a currency anyhow. Sure, they can raise rates and do reverse repos, but serious, that will do little.

In fact, for all the money spent on bailouts and stimulus measures I would argue we have received a very poor return on our investment. We had a sharp mini-V of a +5% GDP print, but that appears to be it. We had spend far less in the past and had averaged far higher GDP prints, about a 7% print after major interventions, so, sure, you got a V, but it is one side of a W, sorry Charlie. People had been bragging about the ISM Survey’s for some time until the Ism survey’s failed to support their claims, but they fail to support my claims as well. In fact, they are neutral, but well below what we would call normal expansion averages. Not to mention, these are survey’s and should be calculated as survey’s, as in this is how people feel at this point in time, not as this is what will happen in the future.

My main point is that we do have growth and things are better, but no where near where the bulls think they are and we are not heading to where they think we are going. The comment also pointed to the leading economic indicators as a “bright spot.” Funny, Kudlow and company have not brought up the LEI for sometime now because, well, the number rolled over a couple months ago now and has been heading lower, funny what happens when Uncle Sam cuts off the money. So, I am not sure what LEI the commenter is looking at, but the one everyone else is looking at is pointing to the South, not the North, good luck if you think down is up and up is down because you got Vertigo my friend.

The global economy is about to end its amazing recovery, sorry folks. Europe is 20% of the global economy and they are instituting massive austerity measures right now and these are only the start, more is needed. If 20% of the world’s buyers have less money you will see economists start lowering forecasts very soon, trust me on that one. You know how the U.S. is pestering China to revalue its RMB? Well, it is pegged to the U.S. dollar, right? Do you know who China’s largest trading partner is? Hint, it is not the U.S., it is the EU. That means Chinas products are now more expensive in the EU than they were just 2 months ago. Wasn’t China credited for the global recovery? Isn’t China in the middle of a liquidity bubble? Won’t not selling products hurt their exports causing an artificial popping of their bubble which could cause more problems for the world than originally thought? I think so, but we are still pressuring them to revalue and spreading the falsehood that we are their largest trading partners, what baloney.

It is kind of funny to see people dismiss all this information and keep economic events locally when this is a global economy, I mean, there is a reason why when the U.S. market tanks foreign markets go down as well and why when we go into a recession so do other countries. Decoupling will happen, but not until the rest of Asia emerges like China did, but until that happens China is dependent upon the U.S. and the EU. However, let us mak sure we are clear, the EU is, for sure, China’s biggest trading partner and a falling Euro is a big problem for China as well. Keep an eye on that, I am.

On to the topic of the day, gold. Peter Schiff has been bullish on gold since, well, forever now and has taken much heat for it since it climbed from $250 to $1,240, yes, taking heat for something that quadrupled. The commenter stated that gold will take a haircut, a major one, when markets calm down, maybe he is right, but let’s take a look so far. Trillions have been spent on the banks, that has not calmed the markets and now you have governments in trouble, what is going to calm the markets even if small governments start defaulting? Even beyond that, look at 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010. During most of those years the markets were considered “calm” and in a “goldilocks” period upon a new wave of global liquidity never before seen, what happened to the price of gold? Oh, yeah, it quadrupled.

The one big down year gold had was in 2008, when it first hit $1,000 I might add, when everything was in liquidation because of a global margin call. If the Fed did not start dropping money from helicopters we would have had our 1930’s deflationary spiral on our hands, but that is not what happened. What happened was things were supported by the government and long before the markets shot back up 70% gold was on its way back up to it’s previous $1,000 high. So, Peter Schiff can hold on to his gold trade all he wants, it worked for him as he lost little during the collapse by holding it and it returned more than the S&P, from January 1, 2009 to December 31st, 2009, than the S&P 500 did without the volatility. Comments like the ones made by the person in question show that they do not look at the facts and simply do not like the asset class, or do not understand it, and end up looking silly at the end of the day.

Do I think gold will go down? Yes. Why wouldn’t it? Everything rises and falls, but I think it will be much high 10 years from now than today. We know that central banks inflate the currency, that is a fact. We know, especially right now, that sovereign default risk is real and confidence in currencies is really a fleeting thing, we have merely been lucky for 38 years since the gold standard was eliminated, we know that turmoil will always exist and we know gold, silver or other commodities are a finite resource that has much higher demand that supply could ever meet. In my opinion, only a fool would not want to own gold, just look at APMEX.com, all their smaller American Eagle coins are sold out for crying out loud, is that the confidence in the global system we are looking for? Is that the sign of a growing global economy? Nope.

Panic hits the market

Posted by Ray on May 6, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Was it Greece? Was it a fat finger trade? Was it high frequency trading? Was it quant funds run amok? No one knows for sure, but it was ugly to say the least. I believe the selloff was very, very real and a matter of no one left to buy the dip. We fell within 1.5 points away from all trading being halted and we miraculously reversed course and rebounded some 700 points. Some think it was the Fed or the plunge protection team, I would say that is not farfetched either.

The one thing this was definitely not was a fat finger trade, like originally reported. When trades are entered for equity orders they only use numbers, not letters so the whole “B” versus “M” argument is a bit irrelevant and merely makes a good news story. I believe this whole thing was a perfect storm of a hugely overbought market, yes it is and was overbought, mixed with Greece contagion fears sprinkled with a bit of tight orders by HFT or quant funds and no one left to buy, anything. All liquidity was sucked out of the market and when that happens, well you saw what the results are.

I believe this is only the beginning and things will get much worse. It was also odd to see mining stocks remain in the green along with gold. If this was a trading error these stocks should have tanked as well, but they did not. This tells me that the selloff was more than a bad trade or order imbalance and any other ludicrous reason the media can come up with. It was selling, real live selling from people who know what it is like to lose 40-50% of their money and did not want to repeat that again. Watch fund flows to verify this, I bet we see more bond fund inflows in the very near future.

Even if you were short it was a tough market for you, especially option traders who saw the bid/ask spread widen to levels I have rarely seen before. I am long VIX August and September calls and it took an hour to get pricing back to normal and there was no premium being given for being in the money. It was amazing to see the selloff today as I jokingly went to my wife’s office and said the market is crashing, it was down only 280 at the time, and when I turned it to CNBC to show here it was down 400 and moving fast to the downside. It was breath taking and luckily I was hedged, but the talking heads on TV and perma bulls that you talk to probably told you that hedging was not important and the market now only moves up, it doesn’t, sorry to tell you.

I always find it odd that when the market tank there is talk of manipulation, but if the market goes up for 8 straight weeks that is normal, come on now. I do not believe anything about today was manipulated, except for the massive rebound that “just happened” all of a sudden. No one seems to be really looking for the cause of this, in a serious manner I mean, and are chalking the decline up to a fat finger event, etc. I am a bit more inquisitive though and while I do not have an answer, I have some theories.

I have heard rumors that the overnight repo market in Europe is frozen, I do not know if this is true yet, and if you notice the overnight LIBOR has been creeping up and is close to the 1 and 3 month rate, this might mean the rumor of the repo market is true. On top of that the risk of contagion is extremely real, I wrote about that a week ago in the “Greece Does Matter” post, and the next up is Portugal followed by Spain, Italy and France who owns tons of PIIGS debt, $781B to be exact. After that it is anyone’s guess to who is next, but it is more than likely going to be the UK. What is happening in Europe should be a lesson, in advance, for the US who, ever since Obama has come into office, seems to think the European way of doing things is better than our system, it is not.

The reason for the debt crisis is the massive debt these countries accumulated to give away free health care, massive pensions, paid vacations and other luxury things to their populations. Clearly following the European lead is not a wise move, but that will not stop our politicians who are immune to market downturns because, A) they are all wealthy and B) they are paid very well for what little work they do. We are the next Europe and we will suffer the same issues they have now if we do not get our act together. I am fairly certain that the funding crisis which is a rumor today will be public knowledge in a few days and is one of the main reasons for our selloff today.

If Europe cannot fund itself, other than through the printing press, today will seem like good times moving forward. This is bigger than Greece and it is 10 times bigger than Lehman, we are talking about countries now, not banks. Essentially, we decided to save the banks at our own peril and we are now seeing the results of this action. We should have let them fail, all of them, because we now run the risk of major countries failing. Was Goldman Sachs really worth it? I think not.

What really stood out today was gold, it went up and is on the verge of a tremendous break out. Are gold bugs really that creepy now or is it that we knew something in advance? For those of you wondering, it is the latter. Gold is now the new reserve currency, period. We may suffer from deflation when this funding crisis escalates, but that will quickly turn into inflation, very, very fast. When dollars come into high demand and they are not available we will see this deflation, but remember, we have Helicopter Ben at our disposal. He will literally get into his helicopter and drop dollars all over the country. This will seem like nothing as the dollar stays strong, but that will be very short lived.

After the dollars are dropped inflation will be swift and unlike anything we have seen before. You see, even though Ben flooded the banks with dollars over the last 3 years none of those dollars made it to us, the people who spend them. Instead the banks bought treasuries, also a good option for investors right now, and this time the dollars will bypass the banks and hit us directly, think Bush stimulus instead of green energy stimulus from Obama. Putting that money in our pockets will mean people will spend, that is what Americans do, don’t ask me why. There is where inflation begins and that is only the start. I am not sure what they will do after that, but I am confident it will involve more spending and giving us money, thanks china!

There is where the problems will really begin because there will be a global funding crisis at that point. This means that no one will buy our debt so we can buy iPods. Ben will have to print it, literally print it to get it into our hands. Inflation is a funny thing and very misunderstood, but I assure you that we will not enjoy it, we will at first though if we pay off our personal debts. In the end we will merely be left with tons of worthless paper and sky high prices. What happens next is a mystery to even me and I am a doom and gloom guy, but it is not going to end well. This is why you must own gold, in your possession, because it will get that bad. The worst case scenario is the value of said gold drops, but it will still be better than holding only USD’s. I think the biggest risk is not owning it versus owning it at this point.

Perhaps this was a one day event though, I doubt it, and everything will be fine. Tomorrow we will receive news that the government hired tons of people and private companies hired more temporary workers, we know the number will be good because Obama already scheduled an 11 AM press conference to go over the jobs report. However, those who continue to think temporary jobs and government jobs are a good thing will be very disappointed to learn it is not. I believe that we will open up much lower, working off unclosed sell orders, and we will rebound some tomorrow, who wants to be short into the weekend.

The real show might be next week, depending what happens over the weekend. I am not sure of the near-term outcome or what will happen, I am holding my shorts and VIX calls though, but we did get a glimpse of what will happen longer term today. I do not know about you, but I did not think it looked pretty. As far as believing some trader pushed the wrong button, come on we can do better with our excuses than that.