I am what some would lovingly, or not lovingly, call a gold bug, but I find that term somewhat offensive. I simply believe in precious metals based on supply, demand and the Federal Reserve’s horrible track record of continually printing money. Essentially, if precious metals guard against inflation and the Fed tries to keep inflation at +2-3% a year it just makes sense to have some money in precious metals under normal circumstances, but add in a little financial crisis and demand far exceeding actual supply and metals are a sure thing, in my opinion.
Ever since I first decided to research gold and silver, those were the first metals I ever bought, I found countless threads and blog posts about the price being manipulated by the Fed and major banks. I figured that most of this was just rhetoric by my fellow bugs, but after awhile it started to make sense. Of course, there was never any real proof, just USGA reports showing the U.S. exporting way more gold than it imported and COMEX inventory reports showing far more metal being traded than could ever be delivered. There was also some obscure Federal Reserve minutes, from the 1970’s, talking about selling gold on the open market to suppress the price. Finally, there was Greenspan saying that the Fed was ready to sell as much gold as it could to drive the price down, which makes sense since gold did poorly in the 1990’s while money supply grew at an unprecedented rate.
It was all very interesting, but there was no actual proof. Sure, we had GATA with their data points and going to the CFTC to lodge complaints, but nothing ever was done. It finally appears that the rumors and conspiracy theories may have been right after all. Last week GATA dropped a bomb on the public by announcing it had a whistleblower that proves JP Morgan and other banks are suppressing the price of gold and silver.
Andrew Maguire, the whistleblower or Exhibit A, sent a few emails to the CFTC shortly before the non-farm payroll data was released a couple months ago. Mr. Maguire clearly outlined, 2 days in advance, that JP Morgan (JPM) was shorting silver in the thinly traded after hours market driving the price down. He told the CFTC that there were 2 possible outcomes, the payroll numbers would be good and silver would go down or the payroll numbers would be bad (which is bullish for metals) and the price of silver would go down. Sure enough, 2 days later, the price plummeted and Mr. Maguire traded emails again to ensure the regulator received them, he did.
It appears that an investigation is being started which would be the first manipulation investigation since the Hunt brothers 3 decades ago. What is striking is that one of the largest banks in the world has been implicated in what could turn out to be the manipulation case of the century, if the claims are true, and no media source has picked it up. I even brought it to a reporter friend of mine for a lead, after days of not hearing anything, not even from CNBC, but nothing yet. If this is true there are large implications for the precious metals market and it is very bullish.
I always figured that if the price was being suppressed, more sellers than buyers, eventually the gig would be up because you cannot sell more than you have forever. Eventually someone will want their metal along the way which means the banks would have to deliver and buy it in the open market. If that happened the price would go through the roof, but, again, this was all speculation until the whistleblower came forward. Somehow, I know this might be hard to believe, I am sure the CFTC will find no wrong doing anywhere and everything will continue back to the way it was, dysfunctional, but if the allegations are true prices will surely rise rapidly.
It is crazy to think that silver, especially silver, would be trading so low considering it is rarely recycled and silver is used in everything from the common mirror to your cell phone. By all accounts most of the easy silver has already been mined and new mines are just coming online now, but they take a long time to get into full production. Let us not forget that silver is usually mined s a secondary metal to begin with, usually gold or copper is the primary metal being looked for. I have seen some estimates that silver reserves will be depleted in 5 years, but no one really knows and that is an aggressive figure to say the least. What I do know is that silver is in high demand, above ground reserves are declining and governments used to be net sellers of the metal, but now are net buyers of it, all of this is very bullish. My point being is prices are cheap and regardless of whether these accusations are true or not one should hold some precious metals in their portfolio, silver being a core holding.
Ben Bernanke may in fact seem like the unassuming soft spoken professor who is well spoken and polite, and he is, but at the same time he is perhaps suffering from the greatest of the deadliest of sins, pride. I am translating pride into arrogance with Ben because it is essentially the same thing and the sin is identical. There is also no question that Ben suffers from the delusion that he s right and everyone else is wrong, which is how we can tell that he suffers from this disease of arrogance wich will be his ultimate downfall.
I am referring to an article I read this weekend from Reuters, which was reprinted on Bloomberg and various other news sources, where Ben announced that it was not the Federal Reserve’s wall of liquidity during the early 2000’s that caused the housing boom, and subsequent bust, but rather lack of regulation. First of all, he is wrong, because without the liquidity easy credit or the showdown securitization mortgage market simply would not have existed, that is obvious. What is not so obvious is the fact that his regulation argument is also an attack on himself. While Congress did encourage the GSE’s and banks to loosen credit standards, so did the Federal Reserve Bank and the Fed had some significant regulatory authority over these mortgages.
Am I the only one that finds it ironic that Ben, Man of the Year, Savior of the Economy, or whatever else we are calling him now, is the same guy saying that his wall of liquidity is not to blame and more regulation’s was the answer, when part of his job was to regulate the banks? Granted, the Fed’s job in regulating the banks is somewhat small, but are we forgetting Greenspan’s famous speech were he encouraged banks to get more inventive when it came to mortgage origination? This does not sound like getting tough with banks, in fact it sounds like it was a green light to do whatever you want to get homeowners into a house.
Essentially, the Fed gave its blessing to do whatever it took to get people to sign the dotted line on the mortgage application. Not only that, the Fed also provided the liquidity to encourage the lax lending standards. Having just one of those two things is bad, but both combined is disastrous, which we found out. However, our Savior still does not realize that it was the Fed at fault for this mess and I think I know why he is saying this now. He simply wants to be left alone. He figures with his reappointment a done deal, his Man of the Year award, and the magical 25% S&P 500 returns in the market people will get off his back as he built up some credibility, especially the audit the Fed people.
I honestly believe he thinks that his sins of the past can be forgiven because of his recent ‘accomplishments’ which were not really accomplishments. If anything Ben was merely picking up after himself, but with our money. To put everything into perspective on how Ben feels here is how the article ended, and what he thinks caused, I guess, the credit crisis:
“Bernanke pointed to adjustable-rate mortgages and overconfidence that house prices would continue to rise as the main culprits behind the catastrophic housing bubble.”
That is that I guess. He was partially right, but it was not just ARM’s that were the problem, not at all, it was a whole slew of mortgages that were problems. There were jumbo’s that trigger higher rates if the LTV slides below a certain value, there were sub-prime, there was the fact that the asset bubble from the Fed was not just in housing, but in commercial real estate and, well, everywhere. The question is why were people betting so heavily on housing prices to rise? Perhaps because the liquidity spigot was going full force for way too long and then when you went to turn it off the effort was meager at best. Regardless, the biggest problem now is with all types of mortgages, not just ARM’s and sub-prime.
The sheer arrogance of this man is just unbelievable though. The one thing about the deadly sins is that they are deadly and catch up to you, pride is always the one that kills the worst to. At first it was nice to see Ben apologize for the Fed’s role in the Great Depression, but how could we go from a guy who knows that his organization caused the Depression to him denying the Fed caused this problem. What happened over the last 4 years to Ben where he could state the obvious before only to deny it know? It makes no sense other than he suffers from the affliction of arrogance or pride. What I do know is what Ben is doing, long-term, will not work, because Ben has a terrible track record, and the Fed’s powers are on the verge of finally being reduced, which is a great thing as the system failed us greatly and it’s time for it to go.
No matter what Ben and Greenspan are to blame for a large portion of what happened. I am not saying that Congress is innocent, you know me better than that, and I am not saying that those who lied or bought houses they couldn’t afford are innocent either. However, legitimate fraud too place, even to reasonably intelligent people, the Fed let things happen that they should not have and Congress, well, Congress is just incompetent, what do you expect.
Is the market going to crash? It already did, just not in one day, but it is not over yet. As of yesterday the Dow has lost 2,000 points this month which puts the US markets in “crash” territory. We expected another negative day, 8 straight days, but not a 7% decline in the Dow.
As of right now the overnight markets are getting hammered. Japan is down 9 – 10% plus, its 1 AM right now, so it is unclear where it will close. The other markets are also down China is off 4% and Australia is off 7%. European markets are indicating a steep selloff when they open. All of this points to the 9th straight negative day in the US markets, unprecedented in our lifetime.
Historically, after 5 or 7 days of steep selloffs there is a rally of 10% or so. This has failed to occur and yesterday we saw a 800 point reversal with the selling happening in the last 40 minutes of the trading day. This may indicate the beginning of the bottom, but that is unclear at the moment. Certainly this is no time to bargain hunt and prudence takes first priority.
We still favor a 40% + cash position, but selling now to raise cash is a fruitless endeavor as you suffered severe losses already. Do not try and pick the bottom as you will not find it right now. If the Dow crashes through 8300 it is possible, stressing possible, to see 7300 or lower near term.
This is not a problem you can just throw money at, we tried that already and it failed miserably. In our opinion bankruptcies need to happen and the Fed needs to let the market go, it is the first step to recovery. Unfortunately, they will not let that happen.
We suspect that the Fed will cut interest rates by at least another .50% to a full 1%. We will see a FDIC brokered bank deal in the morning and an accelerated cash injection into the banking system, the Fed buying preferred stock, in the next few days. Unfortunately this will not work.
The problem is not sub-prime, that was just the catalyst, the problem is derivatives, which is a $560 TRILLION market, is that half a google? Combined with hedge funds unwinding $2 trillion in trades or a portion thereof. All of this equals severe problems for the US markets, especially with a 3 day bank holiday. Not only do we favor high cash positions, but we also favor cash under the mattress, yes it could be that bad.
Who is to blame? Easy, all the Politian’s that we re-elect all the time. All those who voted for the repeal of Glass-Steagall need to go, preferably indicted, as that is the major reason we have this issue right now. Greenspan should be drawn and quartered considering he resisted regulating the derivatives market and support the Glass-Steagall repeal. I know it is I am speaking blasphemy for blaming Greenspan, but the guy caused all of this with loose credit and monetary policy with a flare for no regulation on the banks…nice move.
Hindsight is 20/20, but it was just as obvious then as it is now that these moves were bad news. It is possible to see a 10% decline tomorrow, but we also see the possibility of a relief rally. It is a 60/40 split right now favoring a decline given the selling pressure and mounting losses for investors.
Potential possibilities are National City is sold tonight, maybe Sovereign bank as well. A interest rate cut and more cash infusions into the banking/commercial paper system. We may see the nationalization of the banking system in the near future, a good move? We think no for the long-term, but right now it would stabilize the markets. Cash remains king.
We wish the best to everyone and are hoping for the best.
Be the First to Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
