I have been writing about the decaying economic data for some time now and have taken some heat for being a pessimist or a permabear, but now it appears that I was correct. It is also striking that almost a year ago I called this current economic funk we are in a Depression. I said one of the reasons why we do not recognize a modern Depression is because there is no need for soup lines and the like. In today’s world everything is automated with food stamps, 40M Americans are currently on food stamps a huge YoY increase, we have unemployment benefits (99 weeks currently), the HAMP (loan modifications), energy assistance, public housing and a slew of other safety nets available to those in absolute need.

Since we have all of those programs our growing economic troubles can remain out of sight and mind. We can be told things are improving because the data says it is. Never mind the fact that unemployment is “only” at 9.5% because people are so discouraged that they left the workforce. To me the most telling sign is the food stamp data which is just unbelievably high with almost 12% of Americans in need of public assistance just to feed themselves, think about that for a minute. That kind of takes the wind out of my sails about being right about the current economic climate. I never wanted to be right, but the data was never strong nor did it point to a sustainable recovery, which was merely a statistical recovery to begin with.

I have been silent for a few weeks because I have not felt so hot and I was letting the data set in. I think it is clear now that the recovery was not really a recovery and when the stimulus stops we are in deep trouble. As Rosenberg said, when businesses are dependent upon government spending for growth we got serious problems, I am paraphrasing the statement, but it is close enough. He was right all along and the permabulls have a rude awakening coming their way in the near future. Whether it is the Hindenburg Omen or just a slew of bad data, which will get worse, stocks are way overpriced, period. We will or the market will correct this error for us by forcing a multiple compression and it will either happen all at once or over a period of days, but it is coming.

My last call was to look into leveraged ETF’s for long dated treasuries, UBT or TMF, and gold, GLD or physical. This trade was profitable, UBT, which I own, was about $86 and it is now $102.43 and GLD was about $116, it is currently $120. Those were good trades that required guts in the face of deflationary forces and the fact that you were looking at a leveraged ETF, which are very dangerous, but they worked. I suspect that it will continue to work, but I would not, besides gold, buy the pair trade here. The Fed told us what they were going to do, monetize some debt on the longer end of the curve, and I suspect they will continue in the near future, we might now Friday for sure, but if they do more QE look for a $1-2T figure.

Ben Bernanke wants to flatten the yield curve to force lending by banks, but it will not work. It is a good theory for Ben, but the reality is banks do not want to lend and consumers do not want to borrow. QE will also not do anything to boost money velocity and I am not sure why anyone would possibly think it would. Banks will merely do what they did before the credit crisis and take on more risk so they can play a different yield curve other than treasuries. As we know, that did not work the last time so why anyone would think it will work now is beyond me, but I am sure that banks will take more risk to boost profits. After all, they are too big to fail.

The outlook for the markets is not good as Ireland just got downgraded and I think we will see some weak data at 8:30 tomorrow as well. Unemployment claims, a leading indicator according to, well, me and PIMCO, are rising and another week +500K will be devastating. Also, the employment report survey was out the very week we saw that 500K print, not good news for the unemployment figure out a week from this Friday. The Philly Fed, Richmond Fed and the Empire Report’s were not very good and I think we will see close to 50 on the ISM survey out next week, perhaps lower than 50 so be ready. All the data is pointing to very, very weak near-term economic pain ahead, there is little doubt about that.

I realize that balance sheets are rich with cash right now, but that means nothing as companies are merely hoarding cash at this point. It is, the cash on hand, good for corporate bonds though, which I still love. The outlook from CEO’s is also becoming more mixed, John Chambers from Cisco was not optimistic, this should scare you because this guy is always optimistic. Basically, much like in 2000, CEO’s merely did not foresee a slowdown in the immediate future, which is very surprising and takes down the credibility of many corporate leaders, in my opinion.

Because of all of this I am more bearish now than I have ever been in the past. I am positioned for a correction and pulled most longs off the table. I am in longer duration treasuries along with my UBT play, long gold, silver, corporate bonds (no high yield to speak of), some international holdings (frontier markets), a few biotechs, and inverse ETF’s. My long holdings are all dividend paying stocks with very low P/E’s and strong balance sheets. Blind belief that the market is going to head higher is insane and, frankly, we have just seen an insane rise in equity prices to begin with. That time is now over and the bears will come back to take control. I find it difficult to believe no one saw this coming, I have written about it and many others as well. The data never lies, ever, but the people reading the data usually have a reason to spin it in their favor.

Everyone is expecting a bad employment report, especially after the ADP report on Wednesday and the initial claims data this morning, but I think it will be worse than most people believe. Estimates are for modest private payroll growth, meaning poor of course, but given the weak data that came in waves this month it is bound to be less robust than we think. I am one of the few who believe there is a very strong possibility of private payroll losses tomorrow, not merely a weak report, but a disastrous report.  I am not referring to the census workers being laid off either.

I expect huge losses in construction jobs which will offset any manufacturing gains we have. The housing, initial claims and extended jobless benefit data points are what lead me to believe that we will see a train wreck tomorrow. It is clear that the economic indicators are rolling over, from the ISM to the ECRI all the way to housing, which should not shock anyone. What most people fail to realize, but not economists, is that housing represents some 20% of GDP and the data we saw is telling us that the construction industry must have been shedding jobs, in the residential market, like crazy. This is also why the home buyer tax credit is going to get extended as well, of, and it is also an election year.

Overall, I do not believe a bad employment report is priced into the market and that is certainly not good news for the bulls. I am also curious to see what the birth/death model adjustment is going to add to the mix, while many in bobble head says the B/D adjustment is not a big deal, well, they are wrong. As I have said many times, the B/D model underestimated unemployment by 880,000 jobs last year, that is a big deal so these adjustments do matter, sorry Mr. Liesman. I also believe we will see wages stagnate with the work week getting slightly longer, why hire more people when you can have existing employees work more hours? It is unclear whether or not the unemployment rate will increase, I suspect it will, because the unemployment benefits were not extended by the Senate leaving 1.7M unemployed without a check. In other words, 1.7M people might have all of a sudden decided to look for a job, any job, which will increase the unemployment rate. The rest of the report will reflect what we know, it will merely confirm it for us.

The $60,000 question is whether a really bad employment report is priced into the market or not. I am inclined to believe that nothing is really ever priced in especially if the report is worse than expected. The market is due for a bounce and I actually thought we would get it today, it looked like we were at some points throughout the afternoon, but it did not happen. The market is definitely oversold, but markets can remain oversold or overbought for long periods of time, heck we were overbought for how long and no one complained. The market is in bad shape from a technical perspective and there are enormous headwinds in front of us from a weakening economy to the troubles in Europe. The one thing I am confident about is my 900 price target for the S&P is intact and we are well on the way to that level or lower. One hedge fund manager I spoke to has a Dow target of 3,800 and thinks we will reach new lows on the S&P 500 so next to him I am a raging bull.

If the report is bad it is possible we will trade higher to retest that 1040 – 1048 level which would be an ideal level to consider looking at short positions, depending on conditions at that point and your investment objectives, there are never any sure things. The other unknown about tomorrow is the 3 day weekend that is in front of us. I am fairly confident few will want to be short into the long weekend, but I am equally as confident that few will want to be long either. Many traders may not be around which could mean a low volume indecisive day altogether. However, if I am right and it the report is a negative number I am fairly confident we trade lower, but this market is full of surprises, both up and down.

There is one item that makes me a bit more bearish than usual and that is the way AAPL has been trading. I realize it has been plagued with some rumors or truths, I do not own Apple products, happily, so I do not know what is true or not true, but it certainly has not been able to catch a break lately. This was supposed to be the ‘safe’ stock with $50 per share in cash and THE product to own and it has fallen sharply off of its highs. Everyone loves AAPL and everyone owns AAPL, I am using AAPL as most used GS at the beginning of the year, as the canary in the coal mine. What AAPL is saying is there is a gas leak as the stock has fallen 30 points from its all-time high and it cannot shake off bad news. The weakness in stocks like AAPL are telling me that investors are treading lightly in risk assets, not to mention that they were overvalued, oh the emails I will get for that comment.

The bottom line is that even if I am wrong and the employment report is ‘good’ with a +150K private employment print, unlikely in my opinion, it really isn’t good news, just less bad. With unemployment officially at about 10% and underemployment pushing 16% we have a real structural employment problem in America. It is so bad that Vice President Biden admitted that many of the 8M jobs lost will never come back, this is the same guy who said we would be swimming in hundreds of thousands of jobs every month ‘very soon’ a couple of months ago. This is deflationary and the fact that wages are basically stagnant is deflationary. The credit markets are telling us that deflation is the immediate risk at this point. Retail sales show that there is no end demand, running at a mere 1%, all of this mixed with high unemployment is if not actual deflation disinflation which is very bearish for stocks. We will continue to have a P/E multiple compressions because of this disinflationary force and earnings estimates will come down, a lot. In short, even if we have a good day tomorrow, unless we see some real inflation equity prices are heading lower.

I was reading Zero Hedge yesterday, a post in regards to gold where Peter Schiff was part of the topic, and there were some interesting comments. One caught my attention as being somewhat ludicrous which is not unusual, but is was because the author is a contributor to the site. Unfortunately the comment was flagged as junk, I hate it when that happens because counterpoints are always good things to have and I do not mean to rip him apart, but rather correct years of misinformation he probably picked up from school or TV armchair economists.

One comment he made was:
“On gold to the moon: Peter you’ve been talking up your gold positions for years, but once calm is restored, you’re going to take a major haircut on gold.”
Another was:
“On the US economy “not growing”: Has he looked at the ISM, employment (not just payrolls but household survey), industrial production, and the leading indicators over the last ten months?”
And the other one was referencing that as soon as the trillions in bailouts the banks received hits the economy it will calm the economies or something to that effect. He also indicated that as long as confidence remains in the system everything will be fine, which is true, but how much will it take to keep that confidence or instill that confidence? Also, the more money we inject to create confidence the more confidence it actually erodes, it is a zero sum game in the end. Part of the comment was that the EU was trying to avoid a “deflationary death spiral” or something similar, this is why people should not flag things as junk because they are not junk, which is what really bothered me.

People are thoroughly confused by deflation and deflationary death spirals and what that means. Deflation is a problem, we have deflation now, but it is not a huge problem. However, a deflationary death spiral is what we had in the 1930’s and is what keeps Ben Bernanke up at night. We will not, I do not think, have that deflationary death spiral and I think we need to understand what that death spiral was, what caused it and why we will not have it. After that I want to address the rest of the comments he made above.

What we suffered fro in the 1930’s was horrible and something I hope we never see again. To understand more about what it was like in the Depression please Read The Depression: A Diary by Benjamin Roth and stay away from the academic stuff. However, during the depression dollars were scarce because fo the massive bank failures and deposits were frozen or simply lost when the bank closed down. On top of that the stock market wiped out millions of peoples savings which had a domino effect into the real estate market which is what caused the banking crisis, somewhat reversed from today’s crisis I might add.

What this did was literally wipe dollars out of existence, they just disappeared and were not transferred to anyone else. Today one persons loss is likely another’s gain through derivatives or other hedging instruments known as bailouts, but that was not the case in the 1930’s. Since these dollars were gone or frozen and the U.S. was on the gold standard we did not have a Helicopter Ben to get dollars into the system, at first the Fed tightened credit, who knows why, but they later tried to reverse that decision, but it was too little too late. What we had was complete demand destruction and people saving whatever dollars they had, which was strange because people would rather starve than spend their money.

In fact, while people were starving crops were on or at a record pace, prior to the dust bowl fiasco of course. It was a simple fact that the U.S. was tied to the gold standard and could not put more dollars into the system and people just did not want to spend what they had saved because who knew what tomorrow would bring. We also had no safety systems in place such as unemployment insurance, welfare or Social Security, until FDR was elected a few years into the Depression. By not having those safety nets in place it made things much, much worse and that is why we had such massive deflation.

This was not the run of the mill demand deflation, which is what we have now, this was the death spiral lack of dollars in circulation plus no demand deflation. So for people to draw a comparison to 1930’s deflation to todays is a bit ridiculous to say the least. We have those safety programs now so people will not starve instead of spending money, ironically our poor actually have cable TV, go figure, and we have other safety nets in place. This is why we will not see 1930’s deflation and this is also why we can hide the evidence of our current Depression, if we do not have to see the soup lines they are not there, right? Never mind the fact that 1 in 8 Americans receives some form of Food Stamp assistance, if that is not a Depression statistic I am not sure what is.

The banking system is still suffering from after shocks much like we saw in the 1930’s, closures did not stop for years after the crash of 1929 as real estate continued to decline in value, sound familiar? We are still suffering from similar bouts of bank closures today because of declining real estate prices and that is unlikely to change. Many of these banks were bailed out, funny how some “too big too fail” are now failing after they were bailed out. How can, as his comment claimed, the markets be calmed because of trillions in bailouts will build confidence when those banks who were bailed out are still failing? This is very similar to the 1930’s when many banks who received aid under the first Hoover plan still failed. The point being is that it will take a long time for the system to heal itself and with the government propping it up it will take much longer. The Depression lasted some 10 years, 7 with major government help, our current problem got help on day 1, how long will our recovery really take?
With the massive stimulus and government spending in the banking system it is nothing more than inflationary measures. The comment that “when the trillions making it into the economy will only build confidence,” is a bit absurd, in my opinion, as it points out that the issues were very bad for a very longtime. Also, when the trillions, a bigger and more accurate statement would had been if the trillions, make it into the economy it will create inflation, period. There is really no doubt that the measures taken by all the central banks were to stem the tide of the aforementioned deflationary spiral and it did work, but the central banks cannot stem the tide of the inflation that they created. After all, central banker’s primary mandate is to inflate the currency at about a 3% annual rate to begin with so they have no real mechanism to dis-inflate a currency anyhow. Sure, they can raise rates and do reverse repos, but serious, that will do little.

In fact, for all the money spent on bailouts and stimulus measures I would argue we have received a very poor return on our investment. We had a sharp mini-V of a +5% GDP print, but that appears to be it. We had spend far less in the past and had averaged far higher GDP prints, about a 7% print after major interventions, so, sure, you got a V, but it is one side of a W, sorry Charlie. People had been bragging about the ISM Survey’s for some time until the Ism survey’s failed to support their claims, but they fail to support my claims as well. In fact, they are neutral, but well below what we would call normal expansion averages. Not to mention, these are survey’s and should be calculated as survey’s, as in this is how people feel at this point in time, not as this is what will happen in the future.

My main point is that we do have growth and things are better, but no where near where the bulls think they are and we are not heading to where they think we are going. The comment also pointed to the leading economic indicators as a “bright spot.” Funny, Kudlow and company have not brought up the LEI for sometime now because, well, the number rolled over a couple months ago now and has been heading lower, funny what happens when Uncle Sam cuts off the money. So, I am not sure what LEI the commenter is looking at, but the one everyone else is looking at is pointing to the South, not the North, good luck if you think down is up and up is down because you got Vertigo my friend.

The global economy is about to end its amazing recovery, sorry folks. Europe is 20% of the global economy and they are instituting massive austerity measures right now and these are only the start, more is needed. If 20% of the world’s buyers have less money you will see economists start lowering forecasts very soon, trust me on that one. You know how the U.S. is pestering China to revalue its RMB? Well, it is pegged to the U.S. dollar, right? Do you know who China’s largest trading partner is? Hint, it is not the U.S., it is the EU. That means Chinas products are now more expensive in the EU than they were just 2 months ago. Wasn’t China credited for the global recovery? Isn’t China in the middle of a liquidity bubble? Won’t not selling products hurt their exports causing an artificial popping of their bubble which could cause more problems for the world than originally thought? I think so, but we are still pressuring them to revalue and spreading the falsehood that we are their largest trading partners, what baloney.

It is kind of funny to see people dismiss all this information and keep economic events locally when this is a global economy, I mean, there is a reason why when the U.S. market tanks foreign markets go down as well and why when we go into a recession so do other countries. Decoupling will happen, but not until the rest of Asia emerges like China did, but until that happens China is dependent upon the U.S. and the EU. However, let us mak sure we are clear, the EU is, for sure, China’s biggest trading partner and a falling Euro is a big problem for China as well. Keep an eye on that, I am.

On to the topic of the day, gold. Peter Schiff has been bullish on gold since, well, forever now and has taken much heat for it since it climbed from $250 to $1,240, yes, taking heat for something that quadrupled. The commenter stated that gold will take a haircut, a major one, when markets calm down, maybe he is right, but let’s take a look so far. Trillions have been spent on the banks, that has not calmed the markets and now you have governments in trouble, what is going to calm the markets even if small governments start defaulting? Even beyond that, look at 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010. During most of those years the markets were considered “calm” and in a “goldilocks” period upon a new wave of global liquidity never before seen, what happened to the price of gold? Oh, yeah, it quadrupled.

The one big down year gold had was in 2008, when it first hit $1,000 I might add, when everything was in liquidation because of a global margin call. If the Fed did not start dropping money from helicopters we would have had our 1930’s deflationary spiral on our hands, but that is not what happened. What happened was things were supported by the government and long before the markets shot back up 70% gold was on its way back up to it’s previous $1,000 high. So, Peter Schiff can hold on to his gold trade all he wants, it worked for him as he lost little during the collapse by holding it and it returned more than the S&P, from January 1, 2009 to December 31st, 2009, than the S&P 500 did without the volatility. Comments like the ones made by the person in question show that they do not look at the facts and simply do not like the asset class, or do not understand it, and end up looking silly at the end of the day.

Do I think gold will go down? Yes. Why wouldn’t it? Everything rises and falls, but I think it will be much high 10 years from now than today. We know that central banks inflate the currency, that is a fact. We know, especially right now, that sovereign default risk is real and confidence in currencies is really a fleeting thing, we have merely been lucky for 38 years since the gold standard was eliminated, we know that turmoil will always exist and we know gold, silver or other commodities are a finite resource that has much higher demand that supply could ever meet. In my opinion, only a fool would not want to own gold, just look at APMEX.com, all their smaller American Eagle coins are sold out for crying out loud, is that the confidence in the global system we are looking for? Is that the sign of a growing global economy? Nope.

I am back from a much deserved break and am beginning to catch-up on the economic data that has bulls all geared up for a push to 11,000 and 1,200, for the Dow and S&P respectively. I actually have little doubt that the markets will push higher as investors like watching their stocks go up while they do nothing, which is one reason why up volume is so much lower than down volume because investors will sell fast if stocks head south. Do not get me wrong, I am bearish on the markets, but one has to trade the tape in front of them.

I was just combing through the employment report and it is not too bad, but I see this data as less bullish as the talking heads will on Monday. Why? Well, I did not like the BLS Birth/Death model adding 81K, the government adding 48K and temporary workers brining in another 40K. Those who read follow my writing know that I hate the Birth/Death model because, frankly, they make up these numbers based on some very optimistic assumptions and as you know the B/D model underestimated job losses for 2009 by about 1M. If I had a model that underestimated employment by some 17% I would probably change the methodology or just get rid of it, but not the government because this model postpones the bad news until a later date, like we saw in February with that huge adjustment.

I do not see temporary employment as a bullish signal at all, keep in mind that since September 2009 temporary employment has added 313K jobs. If temporary employment was truly a leading indicator we would see this number coming down as these temporary workers move to permanent, but this is not happening. I admit, I could be wrong about this, but I really do not believe these people will become permanent employees anytime soon. This is kind of confirmed by the hours worked data and the inventory data from the ISM report which shows hours are increasing and the inventory build is still in full force. End demand just is not there and there is still wage deflation.

There is also an uptick in disability claims as well, which is what many apply for when their benefits either run out or they cannot find work because disability pays much more than unemployment. If one looks at the duration of time unemployed they will see that 44% of those seeking a job is on the dole for 27+ weeks, not good for a “V” shaped recovery. Furthermore, 60% of those unemployed are on the dole for 15 weeks or longer, again, not good. On the bright side the participation rate is increasing, but at the same time marginally attached workers has also increased.

Essentially, I view this report as flat, excluding government jobs and the B/D model, which is good news. While this one report is good initial claims are still out of whack at well over 430K a week, that is about 2M people a month, and I believe last week’s downtick was temporary, employers hate to fire people near holidays which is why claims plummeted in December, but resumed afterwards. This will either be confirmed or disproved over the next few weeks. I firmly believe, at best, the labor markets have merely stabilized for now, but the real question is what happens when inventories are completed? We will find out, but I am sure it is not news we actually want.

The fact that we also have so many part-time workers out of necessity pointed to an extremely weak employment situation. I heard a story about a dog kennel owner who placed an ad on Craigslist.org for an “assistant” who would be in charge, this was clearly stated, dog fecal matter. This was an $8.50 an hour job, in Washington State, and he had 218 resume responses from teachers, construction workers, hospitality, and other professionals, the same sectors the BLS’s B/D model says is creating thousands of jobs. I think that story speaks for itself.

We also need some 140K new jobs a month just to keep up with the population growth, that is scary considering there are 15M people unemployed right now. This means we need, keeping the numbers realistic, 300K+ every month for about 6 years, these are back of the envelope figures, to come back up to full employment. Forget all the optimism and look at that figure realistically and you make the conclusion of whether we will reach anywhere even close to that figure in the near future, excluding government jobs as well. In short, we have serious employment problems that will not cure itself and will take a long time to correct itself.

What is going to be odd is the fact that this may cause the market to rally in the short-term, but the markets are very overvalued for anyone using a realistic earnings estimates. The parabolic move has been cheered by the media, but I believe this move is creating undue optimism about future equity prices. Yes, the data is getting better, but not Dow 11,000 better. Of course, I am bearish, but I do have longs in the biotech area, dividend stocks, precious metals, high yield and international holdings, but at the end of the day an 8% rise in frontier markets, 4%+ in high yield and is a bit crazy considering current valuations. Yes, I am making money and complaining about it, go figure, but I also have shorts and VIX calls as well. Let’s hope for better economic news, but I am less optimistic than most that we will get it.

I just read a story where Larry Summers, White house economic advisor, is blaming the weather for a potentially ‘distorted’ jobs report this Friday. Seriously, we are still going with the bad weather? It must be snowing everywhere, the UK, Greece, China, the Ukraine, Dubai, etc. The data all over the world, including today’s ISM number, is rolling over and in some areas it is just plain scary. I got news for you, it has nothing to do with the weather, at all.

Over the past few weeks more and more companies announced layoffs, not a good sign, and the initial claims data went way up over the past 4 weeks. The data started to roll over before the snow hit the ground. Not to mention, but the last time I checked it usually snowed in the winter time anyhow. I realize we had a few days of snow, but nothing major and it is beyond me how snow would be firing people. I will say that the weather impacted retail sales, but not all this other data.

Let’s not forget that the vast majority of the bad weather was also in the Northeast so I am very excited how the bad weather in NY caused California to have increased unemployment figures. Never in my life have I seen such a snow job being perpetrated by the talking heads and now Washington blaming bad weather for horrible economic data. What will happen next month when we have even more layoffs and there is no weather to blame? Maybe we will blame the sunshine because people are so broke they cannot afford sunglasses… wait that kind of admits the economy stinks, never mind.

My point is that the data, well before the snow, rolled over viciously and it is the economy that is the problem. We are over 2 years into this thing, recession/depression, whatever, and we are still losing jobs, that is not good. The unfortunate part is we spend trillions only to be in a position where employment is continuing to contract. It is fair to say that the stimulus probably helped a little, but clearly it was not as big of a help as the administration claims. As an aside, it will be interesting to see if some municipalities file for bankruptcy in the next couple of weeks, maybe that is because of the bad weather as well.

I guess a few firms had to be to Scrooge given the 452K initial claims we saw this morning. Anyone expecting a larger number than we got is crazy because companies just do not or try not to fire people around the holidays. In fact, I am shocked that we saw claims as high as we saw today which reinforces my thought that the employment picture is not getting any better, I know I wouldn’t know a V shaped recovery if it hit me in the head because employment is a lagging indicator. That would be true for an inventory recession, but not for a credit collapse or do I have my type of recessions mixed up?

These initial claims and the ISM data is still not consistent with the magical -11K employment report we got in November, sorry for being a doubter. I simply do not trust government data and neither should you because the BLS along with this administration, any administration for that matter, will do anything to make themselves look better. For example, even though banks are not lending the BLS insists that 30K people started their own businesses in November, really, that is what the birth/death model says. Go back a year ago when things were really bad and the numbers are even higher, 100K+ people were starting their own businesses when the credit markets were frozen solid, so trust those BLS numbers all you want, I don’t.

To further illustrate this point, last month the BLS reduced the number of people in the work force by some 130K, they just took them out of the work force, why? Because they gave up looking for a job, or could not find one, and that is how you get a -11K employment report and massively revised prior reports. I wish we could all doctor our books like the government as we would all be rich. However, did you hear Steve Liesman tell you about how the BLS removed people from the workforce? Nope, you did not. Santelli told you about it and Santelli told you about how retail sales were doctored, but none of the other talking heads, why? I don’t have an answer, I really want to know why. I get that no one wants all bad news all the time, even I don’t want that, but I do want the truth.

My point is that last week and this week we will see soft initial claims numbers and December’s employment report will probably be OK, unless they doctor it up again. If they doctor the report, which will be unnecessary, it will be spectacular and completely unbelievable which will be the problem. Moving forward credibility will be an issue for the government, kind of like the USSR in the 1980’s when they said everything was fine and we knew it wasn’t, we are trying to do the same freaking thing. The thing is when 20% of the population is unemployed/underemployed, 1 out of 5 people, you cannot lie your way out of that and you will pay through the elections. This AM on Squawk even Liesman finally admitted that the Bush “economic recovery” was very poor and we are right where we were at the beginning of the decade. We need massive job growth, 300K+ a month now to turn this around and that is not going to happen.

The economy is bad and without government intervention there is no green shoots, period. The housing data yesterday proves that because that was the first look at housing starts without the tax credit, starts were down 11% when expectations were for +6%, ouch. That is quantifiable proof that the private sector is doing nothing right now and it is 110% government intervention growing the economy which has zero multiplier effect, it actually destroys wealth especially when your country has to borrow 100% of the money. That one data point on its own destroys the V shapers story, but if you combine it with any other data point it completely buries it. Let us not forget that if this was a V shape the Fed would have at least changed its language during the last meeting, but nope they did not even do that. Keep in mind I want out of this to, but I am just not delusional. Sure stocks are higher, but that doesn’t mean the economy is OK and in fact it means there is pain coming hard and fast somewhere along the way. Oh, where’s the volume?

Just how bad are things? Well, banks aren’t lending to the wealthy either. I spoke to a very wealthy friend of mine yesterday in Florida which is telling of what is really going on in the mortgage market right now. Now, I know how lending works, but there is simply no excuse for what he is going through right now in trying to refinance his condo in Florida, I know it is a hard hit area, but hear out the story before passing judgment. His condo was worth 7 figures before, but now in the high 6 figures and he has zero debt, $2M in cash, 790 FICO score and he is self employed. Now his self employed status is an issue because he has inconsistent income, $40K a year to $400K a year which is wild swings, but not bad considering he only wants to refinance $200K.

Here is the thing, he cannot get any financing from any bank anywhere. He wants to refi a portion of his condo, so it is totally secured, he has cash, credit, no debt and income with no bank wanting the business. Keep in mind I am not talking about a second lien where if he filed for bankruptcy the bank gets nothing, we are talking first lien here. So, how can this be if banks are ‘eager’ to lend, the credit markets are fully functional or the economy is just fine? It is not possible as this guy is prime to lend to. Now, if a bank is not going to lend to him, which is a collateralized loan I might add, then they are not going to lend to a small business or consumers in general.

All of this points to much tighter credit and much higher unemployment coming soon. Especially since banks are dumping TARP as fast as they can because they do not want to be told to lend by the administration or they want that one last big payday before the whole thing comes down. Actually, my belief is that why wouldn’t banks not want to repay TARP since they know they could get it back anytime they want. Either way, banks do not want to lend and they are not going. No lending, no growth.

With all of this talk about a V shaped recovery and a complete economic rebound it is amazing to see how many firms are still cost cutting. Of course by cost cutting I really mean firing people in order to improve margins or boost profitability. The question is if we are really in a recovery and everyone is talking about business stabilizing, albeit at lower levels, and there is a return to growth how can firms still be downsizing?

Well, simple there is no V shaped recovery because when you take government heroin out of the equation there is no economic growth. I am fairly certain that Friday’s employment report is showing that firms are not hiring and that employment will continue to “lag” the real economy for some time to come. Not only are firms still firing people, but consumer credit is also being paid down and contracting at a pretty healthy rate, $14B vs. the $10B estimate. Again, I do not want the facts to get in the way of a perfectly bogus recovery story.

If we examine the headlines we see some disturbing trends with top tier firms and their plans to cost cut, fire people. For starters Johnson and Johnson is laying off about 6% of its work force, J&J is a defensive name folks who thrives no matter what the real economy is doing so for them to be laying off so many folks is kind of scary in my book. Moving on, Electronic Arts also reported great earnings and the fact that they are cutting some 1,500 jobs, sounds promising to me. Sprint is another firm who has actually improved its business, but they are now laying off some 2,500 people. Not to mention Microsoft, who makes enough in a month to buy most sports franchises or something crazy like that, is laying off 800 people.

Not all of these firms are in top physical condition, but if we were in a recovery there is no way that these firms would be announcing job cuts now, 4 months after the recovery was announced, supposedly. We have very healthy initial claims reports of over 500K a week and so far, excluding the BLS magic formula, which added 86K jobs last month which means the real official jobs report should have been 276K instead of 190K. That data points to continued weakness in the economy and a lack of hiring by firms and as for the great productivity report I suggest you read the NYT’s article showing that the data is flawed, like I always said it was.

Essentially, employers are getting more out of people at a much lower cost so why in the world would they hire? To put it bluntly, they are not hiring and have no incentive to hire anyone until real orders pick up which, at this rate, should be by 2012 giver or take a few years. It is amazing how hard people will work when they fear losing their jobs and that is exactly what is happening now. I am sorry if I do not see the rose colored news like everyone else, that is what happens when you go below the headlines, but we have real problems here. Even though I am not bullish on US stocks, no one is based on the pathetic volume I might add, I am bullish on the Asian economies and see real value there.

As for the US I think we are still heading for that correction and I am sure we will get it, I am not sure when of course, but it will come. It should have come last week, but it did not and anyone who as traded for any period of time will tell you that something is majorly wrong with this market. No one’s model, except for Goldman Sachs, is working and we continually drift higher on literally no volume. Look at today we traded significantly less shares with a 200 point up day on the Dow? Compare that to last Thursday or even Friday and you will see how weak that volume is. I have no idea why it is behaving like it is, but I do know that whatever the reason it is not natural, again any trader will tell you the same thing if they have been around for more than 10 years.

So, with all of these major firms cutting jobs now instead of 6 months ago how can we say there is a recovery? There is no real evidence to point to, even the ISM reports show serious weakness in the economy, except for government sponsored growth which is fake at best. When defensive names are cutting jobs we should take notice as that is a signal that something is wrong. As for the market it is not a forward looking instrument, it never has been, and the next few days should be interesting. We could hit that 1120 mark on the S&P 500, but I doubt it will hold and even if it does hit that level it does not mean the economy is rebounding, the data would indicate that and the data is weak.

It is kind of crazy to think that someone would shell out billions in this environment to buy a railroad when loads are way down. This purchase also saved the transports index from a complete breakdown which would have, according to Dow Theorists, a broad decline in all of the markets. Whether or not this was a good move, I do not know since I do not follow the railroads, but I do know that it temporarily saved the transport index as it is up pretty big today.

If one wants to draw a conspiracy theory to all of this, they could very easily. After all, Mr. Buffet is very close to the Obama administration and he did invest heavily last year knowing things were very bad, worse than he let on. He also did this on the day that the transports were about to meltdown as well, so, as I said one could very easily draw conspiracy theories from this purchase. However, I believe the transports will still meltdown, it will just take a bit longer than expected.

As for the ISM data yester, as David Rosenberg put it, you got 55.9 from all those regional readings. Right, that is believable. Rosenberg also called into question the GDP number as well, which I did as well, as we had a decrease in hours worked, but a 3.5% print. Well, with the government steroids, sure it is possible, but if you knock out government forget it as the historical average is -.5% GDP growth with that type of hours worked. However, that ISM number did scare this bull and I did knock out my January puts, at only a 205 profit, only to have a reversal in the market.

So, my point is if this market was for real it would have rallied on yesterday’s huge ISM number and what happened? It fizzled out and almost posted a negative day, that should scare you if you are long. As for the rest of the week, the FOMC might change its language in its decision, but other than that don’t get too excited. The ADP number will give you insight into Friday’s number, but when Friday comes around, check out the BLS.gov’s birth/death model to see what voodoo they added to the number, I know the government never would stretch the truth or anything. Thursday, if we do not crack below that 500K initial claims, there is no recovery, sorry.

Again, nice play Mr. Buffet.

This question is being asked by many people, especially the media which I find interesting since they are supposed to be in tune with the experts. Clearly we are taking a breather and I suspect that the downtrend will continue as we were way overbought. There is a caveat to this, liquidity.

My primary thought has always been that liquidity was the primary driver of this parabolic rally that we have had. That liquidity remains the wild card in markets as some liquidity will be removed through, supposedly, the Fed reaching its limit on quantitative easing. However, money is definitely abundant and can continue to drive stocks higher, but, in my opinion, that just increases the danger of a steeper decline.

I do not think anyone is surprised by the ISM data today as the primary driver of the increase was artificial stimulus form the government, primarily the cash for clunkers program. Unfortunately the demand from this stimulus will be short lived and as the market is telling us the good news was already priced into equities. One must also remember that the ISM flipped positive in 2002 as well, but proved to be false as the pain continued for months afterwards.

Furthermore, sales reported by Ford and Chrysler today were not so hot as they missed estimates. This shows that these firms should not be boosting production as demand is still very lax and will more than likely not improve as unemployment continues to be a major problem. As I have said previously, unemployment is the primary problem we face now as this is a credit led recession, not an inventory recession.

Realize that the ISM number is good news, but I believe it to be completely supported by government intervention, which is bad. The government cannot intervene forever and when they stop, which they have to a certain extent, then we will have real demand data, which is pretty bad. I know you have been hearing the talking heads trumpet the good news as the end of the recession is over and everything is great now, but that may not be true. As I said above, the ISM had a very similar rebound in 2002, but the recession went on.

We are still having problems with real estate which is been a bit convoluted with the data that you have been presented with, but based on what we see only lower end homes are moving and prime mortgages are now defaulting. There is no question that the economy is in better shape than a year ago, but the problems are still here. Frankly, all that has happened is that banks have relaxed accounting rules and the government simply supported the whole system. If the support system was removed and accounting went back to where it should be the whole thing would fall apart and everyone knows that.

As far as real estate it is estimated that over 2 million new home sales are because of, drum roll please, the $8K tax credit! Take that away and there goes demand. My point is that artificial demand has created more of a problem than a solution because when real demand is figured out the market will retract significantly. Creating confidence in a system that is sure to disappoint when support is removed is just plain wrong, but that is what we have.

Yes, liquidity can drive the markets higher, but what we are seeing today is just the beginning. People have figured out that good news has already been baked into the cake and demand is not real demand so people are exiting stocks for safer investments. Today, gold, silver and short-term treasuries are doing fairly well, which is what I hold I might add, while riskier assets are getting hit pretty good today. Outside of precious metals and defensive names, like Wal-Mart or McDonald’s, I am not inclined to buy anything right now.