Banks: Beyond the Headlines

Posted by Ray on August 1, 2009 under cnbc, Economy, FDIC, Main, Markets | 2 Comments to Read

We all know there are problems within the banking sector from lack of lending, whether it is demand or banks unwillingness to lend is a matter of debate, and continuing credit losses. Banks are continuing to set aside more money for potential credit losses which indicates the road to recovery is still not clear yet. Not to mention the building commercial real estate issue which has yet to fully rear its ugly head yet, but recent numbers show commercial real estate delinquencies are up 585% over last year at this time.

However, what are not receiving much publicity is bank closures by the FDIC, which we post every Friday night when the report is issued in our piece called Friday Night Fun at the FDIC. One would think that seizures by the FDIC would have abated us by now with the massive bank bailouts which have cost us an estimated $3 trillion and has a projected cost of $23 trillion if things get really bad again.

Last year the US saw 25 banks closed through brokered deals by the FDIC with the most notable being Washington Mutual and Indy Mac. After those two closures we heard bits and pieces of other closures, but the news of closures began to dissipate at the early part of 2009. I suspect the media assumed that most banks worth saving had already been saved or they a carelessly overlooking the continuing problem.

I understand the “too big to fail” theory, but I disagreed with it in 1999 as much as I do today. In fact the greatest betrayal of our government and what is directly responsible for our current troubles was the dissolution of the Glass-Steagall Act which kept banks and investment firms separated in order to control risk. Because of the too big to fail theory those banks were saved first and very little rescue went out to smaller institutions.

As a result we have seen a tremendous increase in bank closures over the past 7 months. In fact, the closure rate is alarmingly high and accelerating every month. To date we have had 69, exhibit 1-1, banks fail in 2009 which is 276% more banks than last year and at the current rate it will double by the end of the year. Keeping in mind that in July alone we have had 24 banks closed by the FDIC which is almost 100% of all of last years closures, all were merged into new entities.

Exhibit 1-1

Bank Failures

This should trouble you as it has an impact to the availability of credit in smaller communities. Even though most banks are merged with others having less competition could mean less credit if the new owner tightens lending standards or practices. This could also mean less jobs as many branches do get closed in these brokered deals mostly because of overlap or poor profit margins.

Most of the banks failing are “hot money” banks who dealt in brokered CD’s which offer higher paying yields than traditional brick and mortar bank CD’s. Since the bank pays more interest on these CD’s they must make higher risk loans to keep profitability intact. Most acquiring banks, especially lately, had declined these brokered CD’s leaving the FDIC on the hook for repayment from the asset sales or to make whole if not enough money was raised through liquidation of remaining assets. This costs you, the tax payer, money eventually and this is why the FDIC raised its premiums earlier this year.

Costs of Closures

Not only is the pace of closures accelerating, but the cost of the closures is also increasing at a much higher rate than you might think. Last year the loss of Washington Mutual was nothing to the FDIC, but who knows what guarantees or funding the Fed offered that we do not know about, but other closures did cost a significant amount of money to the FDIC totaling some $14.9 billion for 2008. We calculated the cost to the FDIC according to the higher end of their estimates and included all loss-sharing agreements.

During 2008 we had a real crisis with major institutions failing, but we have been told that this year things are much better and our banking system is safe. That may be true for firms such as JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs, but the truth of the matter is we have had bank failures almost every week this year. The banks are smaller, most are below $3 billion, but the net result is astonishing with the total projected costs reaching $13.5 billion, there were not even calculations of estimates in some of the FDIC press releases so we still do not have a real number. See exhibit 1-2 for a chart of the cost of bank failures

Exhibit 1-2

Failure Cost

How can things be getting better when the banks are failing at an astonishing rate and the cost of the failures are going to surpass 2008 when we just crossed the half way point in the year. The fact that the media is not reporting on this is obscene and a disservice to the American people. The major media outlets are more interested in hearing the latest Obama speech or picking out the sparse pieces of good news proclaiming that the recession and the crisis is over all while ignoring this information.

These same pundits are also claiming we are in a new bull market and everything is just fine, but there is no mention of bank closures, none. Worse yet, we watched as many TV personalities pointed to a 3 month rise in the durable goods orders as bullish, but then turned around and said that the last report was too volatile, it is truly baffling that anyone takes these people seriously anymore.

The Bottom Line

The crisis is still here it has just been buried by the very same people you may trust on the TV. Anyone looking at these numbers, plus other evidence of the true health of the economy would not be calling for a bull market with another 20%+ to run.

You should be questioning everything from the falling dollar, which is the real reason for the bull rally besides an oversold situation, the lack of coverage of bank failures, the 35% reduced earnings expectations which were easily beat, with no top line earnings growth, unemployment is a lagging indicator, it is not in this case, and the record number of insiders selling their stock. Like it or not this time it is different than almost any other time in history because we do not loose major players like Lehman, Bear, Stearns and Washington Mutual in an average recessions.

Without questioning these things you are simply sticking your head in the sand and pretending that everything is OK, when we still have significant problems that remain unresolved. It is imperative that you do research before committing your capital to the equity markets and look at what is really going on otherwise you will get burned. If you want to hope everything is fine that is fine by me because, if the truth be known, I hope everything gets better soon as well, but do not hang your financial future on hope, that’s just crazy talk.

Annuity Blog FeedSubscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
Blog Directory
LS Blogs


Sphere: Related Content

No, It’s Not Over

Posted by Ray on October 13, 2008 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Yes, we had the greatest one day point gain ever, but it was on very light volume and the bond market was closed. This was short covering, so do not go dumping all of your money into equities right now.

The true test will be when the US markets open and the bond market is open. In between now and then we will see a continued rally in the overnight markets, but only Europe has actually started to implement their guarantees, but the US has not. We have a better road map of how it will play out, but we are not even sure that the bonds will sell yet.

There are too many if’s and but’s right now, so hold tight and dollar cost average in to the market. We expect to see much of these gains to evaporate tomorrow based on volume alone. 936 points on 1.4 billion shares, not a sign of recovery and is unsustainable.

Annuity Blog FeedSubscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
Blog Directory
LS Blogs


Sphere: Related Content

Is The Rally Real?

Posted by Ray on under Main | Be the First to Comment

The markets are up, massive international government intervention has saved the day! Not exactly. We do not think this rally should merit excessive investing into stocks just yet. The issues at hand are still there and the credit markets are not open today.

Japan had a national holiday so a major indicator was not available as a barometer of world opinion. Europe has moved very, very fast to quell this mess, but the US has not. They are talking about guaranteeing inter bank lending and a whole host of other guarantees. Long-term this is good, but for right now, there is still too much going on to arbitrarily say everything is OK.

The volume is weak in trading today and tomorrow will be the day to know if we have hit the actual bottom or not. Even if tomorrow confirms a bottom, it does not mean this is over, by a long shot. We still say dollar cost average into equities, do not jump in. We called a temporary bottom on Friday, but concerns are still high. Enjoy today’s rally, but do not get used to it.

Annuity Blog FeedSubscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
Blog Directory
LS Blogs


Sphere: Related Content

A Decent Relief Rally, but It May Fail

Posted by Ray on October 9, 2008 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Yesterday we saw 4 reversals in trading on somewhat decent volume, but the market still closed down after being up nearly 200 points. This is an indication that there is more selling pressure to come, especially since the Fed has made such strong moves to quell market concerns.

Even good news, such as unemployment and the fact that the government may buy into banks have not lifted the markets in a noticeable fashion. We hate to be the doom and gloom people and do like to see the market go up, but we feel a sense of duty to tell you what we see happening. The data still says the markets go lower.

We like 40% + cash positions still and would be selling into strength. Friday and next week will prove interesting and we believe you can buy into the markets at a much lower level. We did get some of our day-to-day predictions wrong, but cumulatively we were correct in what we predicted.

We are not rooting for a crash, but it needs to happen. We need the markets to have a swing down and close on its lows with heavy volume. That will represent a bottom and then begin to dollar cost average in as volatility will remain high for sometime to come. This, of course, is barring unforeseen problems such as further bank failures or worse.

I cannot believe we are going to even say this, because he is oh so wrong so often, but Cramer is correct on his predictions of the market. Where we do not think he is correct is in his long-term money. We think you should move some of this to cash as well, the 40% mark is a good place to start. It makes no sense to say that short-term money needs to be moved, which it does, but long-term money should suffer.

At 40% cash you have enough in equities to catch the recovery, whenever that occurs, and enough to dollar cost average back into the market to mitigate potential losses. Right now, it just make sense…unless you think that the Fed typically puts in money to bailout banks, money market funds, bonds, commercial paper and arbitrarily cuts rates overnight.

Annuity Blog FeedSubscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
Blog Directory
LS Blogs


Sphere: Related Content


Learn  basics of stock market from   bettertrades , a company founded by Freddie Rick . Learn  options trading   to make money through buying and selling options.
home top



website statistics Site Meter