It was funny to see many of the pundits spin bad data on the weather. This equates to my daughter saying the dog ate her homework. It is hard to believe the snow is to blame for higher initial jobless claims when we are in the middle of winter. However, I will concede that retail sales will be pretty horrible because of the weather, but other pieces of data, well, not so much of that weak data can be blamed on some snow.
Housing starts stink because the housing market is in trouble and even massive government stimulus is not helping. My guess is this data will probably improve in March to April because of the last minute rush to buy homes, but I would not count on that being much of a bump. What is worse is that the President wants a permanent moratorium on foreclosures which is doing no one any good and, in fact, will hurt banks that would not be able to collect or sell an asset that is earning them anything. I am referring to Obama’s demand that before a foreclosure can happen it has to pass through the re-modification process. Capitalism is officially being suspended until further notice.
As far as jobless claims are concerned, they are going to get worse as far as I can see. I am basing this on antidotal evidence of firms continuing to announce layoffs and a jump in the mass layoff indicator a few days ago. It is crazy to think employment will improve when you have blue chip companies announcing layoffs and claims are heading back above 500K a week. This is not because of the weather it is because the economy stinks. David Rosenberg calls this a Houdini recovery and he is correct. Besides a statistical recovery and a rally in equities, which is odd considering the dismal news over the past 2 weeks, the average person is worse off than they were last year. Again, unless it has been snowing for 8 months it cannot be blamed on the weather.
Perhaps it is snowing in Greece as well, that will explain their financial problems. It is true that the weather hurts certain things, but it has a rather limited impact on employment. After all, snow removal companies would probably be hiring. The weather might hurt retail sales, but with more people using the internet, me included, to shop I would not buy the soon to be claim that the weather killed retail sales. This is all about uncertainty in the world and to deny that there is uncertainty is simply crazy.
We have problems all over the place from domestic issues to possible sovereign defaults. Let us not forget we will witness municipal bankruptcies in the near future as well, chapter 9 is the more likely bankruptcy procedure. Health care reform is back and will be passed, whether you like it or not, and believe me you should be careful what you wish for because this means higher premiums for everyone. Do you really think Anthem raised prices 39% because they wanted to? Nope, it is because, I as speculated months ago, they know they are out of business in 4 years. All of these things mixed with tight credit conditions means tons of uncertainty.
Why the markets are not down 200 points, I do not know. However, it appears that Goldman Sachs was a huge buyer or S&P 500 futures yesterday, according to Zero Hedge reports, which made this a futures driven rally, check out the trading between 3 and 6AM for more weird futures action. I do not want to spread conspiracy theories, but all I am saying is the markets are trading very odd right now. I am still very bearish, how could anyone be bullish with the horrible data we have seen as of late? This is not 1 week of bad data, but 2 months worth of bad data and the market ignores it, weird.
If you believe the recession is not over or we are due for a double dip then this employment report was certainly bullish for put options or leveraged bearish ETF’s. If you are a long only bull today’s report should make you move a bit more defensively. While the rate of firings has certainly been declining the real question is why are we losing this many jobs at this stage of the supposed recovery? I can hear it now, employment is a lagging indicator, sure, for an inventory led recession you would be correct, but not for a credit collapse, sorry.
More on the employment report in a second, I love government data, but there was a piece of a lesser reported report data released today as well. Credit contracted at a hefty $15B clip last month compared to the consensus estimated $5B, this is a problem for the V shapers. Contracting credit at this level means that consumers are still deleveraging and it indicates that they will be buying less iPods and Kindles in the near future. However, consumers shedding debt is a good thing because debt is wealth destruction and maybe the government will begin to figure out what the majority of Americans have already figured out, spending money you do not have is not a good idea.
Do we really have 10% unemployment? Not a chance, it is much higher. The BLS is constantly taking people out of the employment pool which lowers the unemployment rate, except on the U-6 report. Let’s not forget about the BLS’s birth/death model which is constantly giving us a major fudge factor for jobs. For example, in December this model added 59K jobs, meaning the BLS estimates that 59K people started their own companies. It gets better, if you go to the BLS website birth/death page it shows that during April of 2009 it estimates 226K people started their own business, when no credit was available. This fudge factor was so bad that the BLS will have to adjust the numbers at some point in time, like February 2010 when the BLS will add, officially, 800K to the unemployment rolls, because even they cannot hide how bad it was/is forever.
The length of time it takes people to find work is at record levels, the medium time frame is 20 weeks, but it takes about 40% of unemployed people 29+ weeks to find a job, if they find one. This is where it gets interesting because the longer it takes to find a job the more discouraged you get and the less you look. The less you look, the less “attached” you are to the labor forest and the BLS will just remove you if you stop looking for work, see no evil, hear no evil…
Basically, if the BLS left the “marginally attached” people in the employment report the official unemployment report would have grown to about 10.4%. Now, after spending $1.6T in stimulus and job creation bills this is just getting less encouraging and downright scary, unless you are delusional to reality. There was one bright spot in the report, well 2 bright spots, November was revised to positive 4K, which is completely unbelievable and inconsistent with all the data for the month of November, and temporary help increased for December. I want to say this again, at this stage f the recovery, how can we still be shedding jobs when every pundit has said that firms have cut to the bone or over fired? Clearly they were wrong.
While I do not believe the November employment report, simply because it does not match any of the interim data, let’s assume it is correct and we had +4K in job creation, so what? Sure, that might make some feel better for potential future job growth, but it was, in large part, due to temporary employment hiring for the holidays, so it is relatively meaningless. Even with all this infrastructure spending and stimulus we are still losing a construction job, which is not good. With productivity at a mythical 9% we are still losing manufacturing jobs, which is horrible. Temporary employment is just that, temporary and meaningless.
Everyone is making a big deal over this temporary employment hiring because it is a precursor to more hiring, supposedly. No, it is not, sorry. I would like to agree with everyone that large seasonal temporary hiring will lead to more hiring in the future, but it is not, period. Here is why, these temporary jobs were created exactly when most temporary jobs were created, October, November and December, this is for the holiday shopping season. I would expect these people to start being laid off in the middle of January after the shopping season is done.
My view on temporary help is pretty simple and I know many will disagree with me and that is fine, but temporary help is brought on to keep costs low and, in this case, to prepare for the inventory rebuild. After that is done the temporary help is let go and the company does not have to pay any severance or, while they are working for the firm, any benefits and they pay temporary workers a lot less than their fulltime counterparts. I do not believe it is leading up to fulltime employment or a precursor to more hiring in the future in this case. In the past that may have been true, but in this recession or depression we are going to have a very uneven recovery or a double dip and firms know this so temporary help is just as the name implies, temporary.
If CEO’s really believed in a V shaped recovery like most of the pundits why in the world are they net sellers of their stock? My point is pretty simple, if employment was going to improve and demand was going to pick up CEO’s, who know their companies and industries the best, would be buyers of their stocks, they are not. If they are not buying their own stock they surely are not going to hire these temporary workers, sorry.
To sum up today’s employment report, it was horrible. I was not expecting a report this bad and I am a bear. The absolute irony is that the market did shrug off this bad news so it is likely that we will see 11,500 or maybe 12,000 on the Dow and 1,200 on the S&P 500 before the big selloff comes, but don’t kid yourself, there is going to be a selloff. That is unless you think the markets are supposed to go straight up and break all resistance with absolutely zero volume? The unfortunate part is that by the time the correction comes there will be many more unsuspecting people sucked into the market only to suffer more losses. Regardless, let us hope we do not have more employment reports like this, if we do I do not know what to tell you because that would be a signal of a major fundamental problem with the economy.
What no one wants to talk about, ever, in terms of retirement planning is the sequence of returns and the impact on retirement planning. I am bringing this up now as we wrap up the worst 10 year period ever in the S&P 500 we have ever had. In fact, technically, this is the only official 10 year period of time the S&P 500 has ever been negative. I say officially because the 10 year period is subject to interpretation, but regardless we are looking at a period of time wrapped by 2 of the worst periods ever to invest in the equity markets. In other words this decade had the mother of dumbbell negative returns ever.
What the impact of this 10 year period has had on retirees will be felt for the next couple of decades. Essentially, many retirees or pre-retirees have been wiped out or will have to drastically alter their lifestyles in order to make their money last. While I could easily blast the likes of Scott Burns, Suze Orman and a million other drive by financial advisor writers for dispensing horrible advice that they likely did not even follow themselves, I will not. They simply told people what they believed to be true because they used flawed logic and ridiculous assumptions that normal financial advisors would have dismissed as idiocy, not that they are innocent either, but they were the targets of these writers inept ridicule for long enough.
The simple fact is this, everything has a cycle whether we are talking about the Earth, the moon or the markets they all of a cycle. When we look at market returns sometimes the cycle shows an unmanaged index does substantially better than managed money while at other times managed money does better than the unmanaged index. Over the past 15 years we saw the unmanaged index do better than managed money, but will that trend continue? Unlikely. That cycle has run its course from my point of view, sure there will be stand out sectors, but that is it. If you go back in time to the 1970’s it is fair to say that this theory of mine pans out and managed accounts did better than the unmanaged indexes, but you know me, let’s not let the facts get in the way of what they pawn off as the truth.
The beginning of this decade should have been the warning sign for those following the advice of the financial rags who themselves have never ran money or witnessed what it is really like to lose someone money. Instead they blast brokers for making money and tell you to buy an index fund because over the long-term “nothing outperforms the S&P 500,” how’s that working out for you? Simply put, they did not know their history and they over simplified a very complex thing, your retirement planning. Retirement planning is complicated and deeply personal and no one, I really mean this by the way, should ever take their retirement planning advice from the TV or newspaper.
With hindsight on my side, unfortunately, it is now clear that these people did not know what they were talking about. Not only that, but their intentions are now out for everyone to see. One person mentioned already, who always advocated Vanguard index funds, opened an RIA firm and will gladly manage your money for a small fee, even though he said brokers were crooks before, unless he is the broker I guess. The other person sells binders for $50 or $100 that you can buy at Staples for $10 or $20, but since they are branded with their logo or some other nonsense they are worth more, I am still trying to figure out why that is. Either way, to their legions of devoted followers their betrayal means nothing or they will continue to mindlessly follow them, which is astounding to me, even though they destroyed their wealth. Here is what I mean.
The sequence of returns is the timing of returns, either good or bad, and the impact on your portfolio. This is the most important aspect of investing and the biggest ‘Black Swan’ there is because it is out of your control. This is why asset allocation is so important when you are talking about your serious retirement money. I have a larger portion of play money that I speculate with, but you better believe that my real money, my retirement money, is not in some E-Trade account with my finger on the buy/sell button all day long. I have a plan with my real money and I do tinker with it occasionally, but only when I feel the need to be more conservative or more aggressive, but it is professionally managed, not by me, to keep my emotions out of the game. However, the sequence of returns is always ignored by most gurus I read or listen to and it will devastate you if you are not careful.
If you invest and instantly lose 10% for the first couple of years it takes you a very long time to regain those losses or exceptionally high returns for a few years. It is even worse if you are taking income from your portfolio which is the case for many retirees, unfortunately. I am going to concentrate on those taking income from their portfolios in this example, just 5% income I might add, because many Boomers retired either in 2000 or in the last few years, either way you will get the point. I am not even going to show you the double whammy of the dumbbell negative returns because that is so depressing it is not even funny. In fact, this will be and is such a serious problem I am not sure what can be done about it because literally millions of Boomers are in serious trouble now.
Here we see someone who decides to retire and rolls over his 401K and listens to a buy and hold indexing guru. They decide to invest into a generic fund and let it all ride thinking that 5% withdrawals should suit them just fine, since he is told the market averages 10% over the long-term, another farce I might add. Unfortunately for this investor he got suckered into a bad time to invest and the market fell 10% for the first 2 years he owned his fund, but no problem writes the financial guru, just hold on and everything will be fine, really? Well, you tell me if everything looks fine to you.
Exhibit 1-1
Keep in mind, I am not showing any other negative returns, not even a negative 1%, and I am showing +8% returns for every other year in this illustration. I am also showing a straight 5% withdrawal rate, not ever a little more for the grand kids, to pay the taxes or medical bills, just 5%. This person runs out of money in about 20 years with 2 negative years right off the bat and they did not even look that bad, 10% market declines are, well, normal right? That is just one illustration of the sequence of returns and how they can impact the investor, not imagine if I put in the 2008 50% decline in there, there would not be anything left. I also ran this with 6% withdrawals, but the only difference is it gets uglier faster.
There is nothing you or I can do about the sequence of returns, but I have never seen something so important ignored before. While we are wrapping up the worst decade on record for stocks don’t you think we should talk about this stuff a little bit, especially since Boomers are about to retire in droves, well they were at least. Frankly, those bond funds everyone is slamming right now, do you know why they are so popular, not that I agree with it I might add, but they are so popular because they have positive returns on the 5 and 10 year benchmarks. Look at equity portfolios, most funds look horrible, except some managed funds I might add, but in comparison investors are saying, well sure this fund only did 5%, but it is better than the -3% I did over 10 years, so buy it.
I may sound bitter, but this is serious stuff that people just take so lightly and it drives me nuts. CNBC is now all about entertainment, not about serious news anymore which is a shame. The personal financial gurus are all about selling their latest book rather than helping people do real things, but maybe it is the peoples fault when you have to have a segment called can I afford this. People, if you have no money in the bank, in debt up to your eyes, make $50K a year, then no you cannot afford a $700K house, it is common sense. However, even though they are getting calls like this it does not justify giving out poor advice, ignoring history, not understanding the sequence of returns, the basics of asset allocation, vilifying brokers, picking on products – yes folks a variable annuity turned out to be the best product in the world to buy in 2000, and simply recommending index funds because they are index funds – a monkey could do that.
It is always fun to make forward looking statements or predictions even though no one knows what is really going to happen. I decided to write this piece because Dennis Kneale was bragging about his wonderfully generic and completely mindless 2009 predictions he wrote last year which he claims was 90% accurate, even though it was the equivalent of a John Edwards show accurate list of junk.
Sorry, but predicting ‘corporate smashup,’ which I am not even sure if that is an actual technical term or not, but regardless, is as pretty generic as you can get as the government was passing out bailout money like mad. My other favorite prediction was that the Big 3 would get bailout funds as they were begging Congress for, drum roll please, a bailout, I mean seriously. The mindlessness went on of course, but that is Dennis for you, so I figured I would actually go out on a limb and make real predictions, and not use general ‘corporate smashup’ terminology.
I am not picking on Dennis, ok I am, but its fun! In all fairness to Dennis 2009 was a tough year for him as CNBC teased him with his own show only to take it away from him. He clearly is putting all that weight back on again, hey we all face the battle of the bulge at one point or another though. He got smacked by multiple guests for being an idiot because, well, he’s an idiot. The real irony is his 2010 prediction of Twitter going under is already in the can as they just inked 2 deals worth millions, wrong again Dennis and it is not even 2010 I guess VC money is a lot smarter than you, go figure.
Here we go, 2010 predictions:
Sovereign debt issues will escalate in Eastern Europe, meaning defaults because no one cares about that area. Dubai will not receive more exceptional help because they will be “made an example of” by its neighbors. Greece will be bailed out by the EU, go figure. However, emerging market debt will be OK.
Unemployment does not improve and will reach 11.2%, unfortunately. U-6 unemployment/underemployment will reach 20%+.
A third party will be formed in the US, but not in time for the midterm elections.
Democrats will lose the majority in the Senate and the super majority in the House, but not the majority.
Obama’s approval ratings will mirror Bush’s as he pushes cap and trade which is unnecessary and punitive to the American people. He will learn that there is a price for over exposure, seriously, we do not need to see him every day and he is no FDR. Unfortunately, if we give anyone any credit for the BS growth we are witnessing it is the, I can’t believe I am going to say this, the Fed.
Bank failures will reach over 300 for the full year.
We will see a spectacularly large bank failure next year, obviously not a too big to fail, but a large institution. I actually would place the FHA in this category, but it could also be a large regional about the size of a Key Bank, I refuse to give my prediction because of legal reasons and Key Bank is for comparative purposes only, but they are not in great shape.
We will see inflation and the Fed will be unable to raise interest rates due to the unemployment picture. For the first time we will have a recession, or whatever we are calling it by then, with rising prices.
Health care premiums will go sky high because the biggest sham of “reform” just got past by our elected officials who do not understand how the system actually works.
Some nut job attempts to shoot investment bankers because of high bonuses they will receive. I am not advocating it, I think it is stupid and it will be senseless, but there is a high probability that some nut job will do it.
High frequency trading, dark pools and other questionable practices will be regulated or severely restricted by Congress through legislation. Whether or not this is a good thing remains to be seen, but I would suspect it is.
The market suffers a sharp and severe correction as people realize that stocks do not go straight up and the markets actions have deviated from the realities of the economic conditions. When this happens is anyone’s guess, but it will happen.
We may see a 5% GDP print, but those numbers will be severely revised down and we will see the weakest ‘recovery’ ever in the history of recoveries from recessions. After we had spent some $2T+ fighting this economic downturn which will astound the public. The average recovery in terms of GDP growth is well above 6%, but the latest revision for 3Q09 GDP is 2.2% which is appalling. Remove government spending, just forget it because you don’t want to know.
The dollar will have some strength before the Fed realizes that it must double its balance sheet again and we will then see new lows in the DXY by year end.
Gold will reach new nominal highs.
The debt ceiling will be raised again to $16T before they eliminate the debt ceiling completely. I am kind of kidding here, but seriously why have a ceiling when as soon as they hit it they just raise it?
Emergency tax hikes will be enacted by summer bringing top marginal rates to 40%. Capital gains tax rates will increase to 25% and dividends will revert to ordinary income. I would not be surprised to see a VAT enacted as well, just because.
Google takes over the world because Android is really a secret mind control device that when Eric Schmidt gives the secret command, I hear the word is ‘snicker doodle,’ everyone with an android phone will do Google’s bidding.
Obama will finally fess up and admit that he was born in Kenya followed up with the following statement; “what are you going to do about it?”
Mark Haines finally snaps on the air and starts babbling incoherently to himself while swatting at invisible bugs… wait he already does that.
There you have, Ray’s long list of predications for 2010. Some will happen, most won’t, but they are fun to guess at. I also have a wish list that involves people joining that 11.2% projected unemployment rate because they deserve it, but since its Christmas I will refrain from printing such a negative list. However, I am sure you have guessed that one of those wishes, projections, is that Dennis’s contract will expire at CNBC and we never see him again, I can dream. However, as we have seen from other failures like Ron Insana no matter how bad you screw up that network will always take you back. Man, how do I get a job there? Merry Christmas, yeah I am not politically correct.
This seems to be a continuing theme for whoever is driving the markets to the moon, sell the dollar and buy equities. If you were watching today you would have noticed that oil, gold and stocks were trading down to relatively flat. Right about 12:00 the dollar started to decline which drove stocks and commodities higher.
This is a continuing trend within the markets and the primary reason why we have had such a dramatic rally. However, the reduction in buying power is not worth the trade off, in my opinion. If you are watching the news channels they attribute the markets turn on higher oil prices and virtually ignore the dollars plight, even though it is a weak dollar that moves oil. Why are they ignoring a declining dollar, I do not know, but they are.
There is really no reason for the market to be positive today as unemployment numbers were not very good, but, I guess, no revision in 2Q09 GDP was somewhat good news. Either way, we are seeing continuations of a very tired bull market were the likes of AIG, Citi, Fannie and Freddie are the market leaders. While the talking heads applaud this move I am reducing my equity position to 7%, down from 25%, most of which is international holdings.
Frankly, we are setting ourselves up for a most painful selloff which I am choosing to not participate in. I do not know when it is coming, but it will come and I am sure it will be brutal. The likes of Mark Haines seem to think that my view is very bullish for stocks, maybe it is, but I consider my view to be balanced with the data on hand. The data I see is horrible, frankly, and when AIG and Citi, both of which heavily owned by the government, are the market leaders then we have a serious speculation bubble building.
Examine the chart below, the data at hand and make your own call. I am sticking with the call I made 3 weeks ago, which we are barely 2% higher than now, of a market top. Of all the people I have spoken to, no one understands why we have not sold off yet and, perhaps, we will not. Until earnings catch up with valuations or valuations trade down to earnings I am very bearish on equities.
Be the First to Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
