Let’s talk inflation

Posted by Ray on September 14, 2010 under Main | 2 Comments to Read

I have previously laid out my thoughts as to what will eventually happen with the whole inflation-deflation debate, but the issue is still raging full speed ahead. It is interesting that it is hard to find 2 experts that actually agree on what will happen or is happening, deflation or inflation. I think it is obvious that we have disinflationary forces here as producers cannot pass along higher prices or they will lose business. In fact, only food, a basic necessity, has any real pricing power right now.

While I am comfortable claiming we have disinflation right now I do not think it will last for a very long period of time. I believe we will see more easing by the Fed via asset purchases, but that will not create immediate inflation. However, over a longer period of time we will see that inflation pick up and not because of money velocity, but because of straight out dollar devaluation. Let me explain.

We did not experience inflation in the 1930’s because no one spent large sums of money on a regular basis. People actually were starving even as food prices declined, sad really. The thing is that since we were on the gold standard, or a form thereof, it was impossible to have true inflation even though FDR was spending like a madman. The Fed was also not in the practice of buying assets because, well, they followed the rules. Because of the gold standard and there were no asset purchases, government bonds or otherwise, inflation remained tame, deflationary in fact. This is a very 30,000 foot view of the situation, but I think you get the gist of what I am saying.

Now we do not have the gold standard, I am not preaching for a gold standard either, just pointing out the obvious, and we have a completely fiat money supply. The Fed has used its “emergency powers” to do what it would not do in the 1930’s, buy assets. It is clear that the asset purchases are doing nothing for the economy other than keeping rates low on loans, which no one wants or are really willing to make unless you have a perfect credit score. It is not even kicking up much inflation, at all, which is because there is simply zero money velocity. Since there is no money velocity the typical economist will say that inflation is impossible and it can never happen, never say never.

What the heads buried in the sand do not realize, because they are using the Depression as their road map (they always do this at the wrong time I might add), is that the dollar is floating now with nothing backing it. That in itself is not bad, as a matter of general opinion, as long as the printing press is used sparingly and every country prints money at relatively the same pace. The problem is that now, after the crisis supposedly ended, countries are printing money at a slower pace or they stopped printing altogether. Many are certainly not doing asset purchases.

Forgetting the fact that QE will do nothing to ease the pain of the economy being bad, sorry, but it will do nothing whatsoever, what it will do is wreak havoc on the dollar. Since the currency is floating more printing and asset purchases will diminish the value of the currency. This has been Ben’s and Obama’s plan all along since Obama wanted to double exports within 5 years, something that can never be accomplished. We are seeing the impact of what more printing will do to the dollar now, unless you think 1.5 cent moves in the Euro/USD pair is normal, as investors move to a currency that is somewhat more sound, not that the Euro is sound, but perception is half the game.

The citizens, us, will not feel the devaluation right off the bat because we consume 87% of what we produce domestically. However, imported products will cost more and we do import a lot of goods, obviously. As domestic supplies are sucked up by foreign countries, as our dollar is worth less thanks to Ben, we will have to import more from elsewhere. This is how our next bout of inflation will begin, dollar devaluation without an increase of money velocity. If you think about it it will make sense, capital flows to the land with the cheapest goods and a weak dollar means China, Europe or whoever, will find more value, cheaper products, from America.

That actually sounds good, more purchases of American goods means higher production as we have to replace what others are buying, but that may not be the case. Why? Simple, prices domestically will be rising and our government, always trying to do the right thing will institute some sort of protectionist legislation to stop prices from rising as incomes are stagnant. It would be a form of capital controls of sorts, but in reverse. Can’t you see it now? Prices are rising and people are not able to get those big screen TV’s or something less important, food, so the government tries to stop it through making new laws. It sounds counterintuitive, but it would happen, look at what Congress wants to do to China in order to get the yuan to appreciate in value? Actually, if we do more QE Congress will not want that to happen because China will literally own us if or when the dollar is devaluated.

While all of this is happening the treasury market, after an initial huge ramp up in prices, this is what the Fed will be buying, will be in freefall as no one will want to be repaid, without a substantial risk premium, in devalued dollars. This will lead the Fed into more massive buying because even at this stage Americans will not even want to buy our own debt. Also, China will have no need to hold their massive treasury holds so they will be selling like mad. All of this is happening without money velocity picking up. Even if you think I am wrong about the previous paragraph think of it this way, if our production did pick up because of foreign country buying sprees that means we will have the money to buy things, but it will only increase the inflation rate… damned if it does, damned if it doesn’t.

It has nothing to do with actual money velocity anymore, we even have mild inflation with dwindling velocity now, and has everything to do with confidence in the system. More QE will be bad news for global confidence in the USD, it is on shaky ground as is. If we look at today’s market action it proves how the market will react, lower dollar, higher commodity prices and equities stuck because it is good news on one hand and bad news on the other hand. Longer term high inflation is bad news for stocks, in my opinion, and bullish for commodities, obviously. Stocks are horrible inflation hedging instruments, look at the last 10 years for proof, while silver (by far my favorite investment right now), gold and other metals should do very well. Of course, precious metals are not really an inflation hedge, but a currency hedge instead. Since we are looking at a currency issue rather than straight out inflation it makes bullion of any flavor very attractive.

Could anything change my mind about what I think will happen? Sure. If no QE happens it will be great news, but the likelihood of no QE ever happening again are about as long of a shot as you can get. While I am using QE for my defense of my position in this article I believe we can safely assume that budget deficits will not get better so even if no QE happens our spending will accomplish the same thing. I say that knowing that if the deficit does not resolve itself the Fed, to save the US, will still have to do QE eventually on a massive scale no matter what, to keep rates low so the interest doesn’t bust us. However, the Fed cannot suck in all that paper and treasuries will fail eventually.

Outside of no QE I think there is not much that can change my mind about what I think will happen. It is pretty much in stone and will happen either as I laid it out or in a somewhat similar fashion. In the near-term I am still bullish on treasuries, now that we sold off, and on silver, gold too, but I am more partial to silver right now. I am not crazy about stocks and would be very hesitant about committing major capital to any position right now, the market is trading odd to say the least. At this point bullion is your best play, silver looks very promising and a recent Scientific American article points out that there is only 19 years left of easily mined silver, a no brainer to me, buy it.

People always wait to buy metals to “see how it does” and while they are waiting the price goes nuts and then they buy it and wonder why they lost money. Don’t be one of those people, but buy it smart, some every month. Because even if you think the bulk of my argument is wrong, or all of it, we have disinflation and higher bullion prices, what do you think will happen when we do have inflation? Not to mention silver is not only a precious metal, but an industrial metal. So, if you think the world is going to end, buy silver. If you think we are in a real recovery, buy silver.

The Death of M3

Posted by Ray on July 15, 2010 under Economy, Main, The Federal Reserve | Be the First to Comment

All the talk of the town is deflation, disinflation or disinflationary trends, what does all of this mean, is it bad and more importantly, should the Federal Reserve try to stop it? First, deflation is negative price growth year-over-year, we are not there yet even though I often say we are in a deflationary period, because we will get there, in my opinion. Disinflation or disinflationary trends are signals that show prices are declining and is how many economists or snarky bloggers, like myself, describe the trend before we hit outright deflation. In a nutshell, deflation is demand destruction or no end demand which means companies must drop prices in order to attract business. The most commonly referenced period of deflation is the 1930’s where, sadly, food was cheap, but people starved, houses were cheap, but people went homeless. Deflation has been framed as ugly, horrible and something that must be avoided at all costs.

Deflation during the good times is fine and we all reap the rewards, such as cheaper technology, i.e. cell phones or computers, which become cheaper because of competition from outsourcing and technological advances. No one minds paying lower prices during these periods of times and the Fed even doesn’t mind deflation during these periods, but they like it to remain in check. Because lower prices do not mean people are not buying the products, the opposite is typically true. Plus, other indicators usually show that only certain items are prone to deflation under normal conditions, usually technology related items. The Fed would only be concerned if they saw other items start to lose pricing power and the money supply shrinking, people saving more money, basically.

When people save their money, in an economy such as the U.S., it is devastating because such a large portion of our domestic growth comes from spending money freely on stuff we really don’t need. When we save we stop that wasteful spending this grinds our economy to a halt. In order to get sales going again companies start to offer incentives to get shoppers in the door. This usually means lower prices through either temporary or permanent sales on the price of the products they sell. Since these products are not selling the stores are not ordering new products which mean the raw materials to make the clothes or whatever begin to decline. Even if the product begins to move at reduced prices the company selling to the end user begins to demand lower prices for the product and even if they don’t ask for it the orders are so much smaller prices would fall anyhow. Essentially it is a chain reaction, this is pretty common knowledge, but it comes from one simple thing happening, people saving their money.

The other part of the equation of people saving their money is that money is taken out of circulation. This sounds counterintuitive to those who rail against the fractional reserve banking system since this system allows for more loans to be made if the deposit base grows. However, if the economy is bad banks simply do not make loans because they fear not getting repaid. Therefore, a higher savings rate means lower monetary circulation, commonly referred to as M3, which the Fed no longer produces by the way. In order to boost the money supply the Fed will try to encourage banks to make riskier loans by lowering interest rates. By lowering interest rates banks make lower rates of returns for doing nothing with their money so by loaning out the money to borrowers banks can make higher interest rates. In turn the borrower will go out and spend that money which will ultimately boost the money supply and, hopefully, boost final demand.

That is how things work in normal business cycles, but that is not what we have now. We have a very abnormal business cycle that happens once every few generations where we go through this huge leveraging cycle and then have to live through a period when we deleverage all the debt. The last time we went through this was in the 1930’s and the time before that was about 60 years before the 1930’s so about every 60 to 80 years we go through a super cycle of debt leverage that blows up. During these super cycles the consumer has so much debt that they just try to pay it off and does not waste much money on other items. This is bad for our economy which is built on a consumption model to the tune of 70% of our GDP. This lack of demand or demand destruction means people just will not spend unless it makes absolute sense to them, i.e. a generous tax credit from Uncle Sam. This demand destruction leads to lower prices which starts out as disinflationary forces, moves to deflation when prices finally start dropping YoY, which will happen soon.

No matter what the central bank does, the Fed, it on its own cannot change this deflationary trend when it has spent all of its ammo. When interest rates hit zero there is nothing the Fed can do to spur demand from a monetary policy point of view. Remember, this is a very unusual situation because in these super cycles not only are consumers saddled with debt, but so are the banks and the banks are usually saddled with worthless debts which make them insolvent. That was true 80 years ago and the same thing is true today because banks are not making loans nor do they want to. So what can the Fed do? They have insolvent banks and consumers that don’t want to spend and are trying to shed their debt loads.

Some people say more quantitative easing will be helpful. I ask how? We already did how much QE? $2T+ that we know of and that did nothing. In fact, mortgage rates have dropped even more after QE stopped and we have falling demand for housing so what will another round of QE do? All it would do is cripple the dollar and trust me, the dollar is going to be in trouble soon enough anyhow because of the bloated balance sheet the Fed has and our national debt load. QE will not boost money velocity at all. It might give banks more money for their balance sheets, but other than that it will not boost the overall money supply so I am totally perplexed as to why anyone thinks QE will work. We have no problem selling our debt right now either, so it is a total waste of time and resources. The negatives far outweigh the positives.

What else can the Fed do? Nothing. They are done or have done everything they can do. Sure, they can roll out with TALF again, but the market has no problem placing junk paper right now so what would the point be? The problem is simple, the consumer does not want to spend. Businesses do not want to spend. Does anyone know why this is happening? I think it is pretty simple, no one knows what is going to happen. The President is keeping everyone in the dark about where taxes are going to go, heck, we are not even going to get a budget for 2010, unreal! We still have no idea how health care reform is really going to impact us yet, how much will it cost, etc. The business environment is weak at best and CEO’s are too afraid to admit it, look how they get treated by the administration, as traitors!

The consumer, well, I wonder why they aren’t spending. We have weekly initial unemployment claims coming in at well over 400K, 4 week average is 455K. We have more firings than hiring’s going on right now. The work week declined and so did wages. There are 6 people for every open job. It is taking 35 weeks to find a new job if you get fired. People were feeling more secure about their job, but when initial claims began to heat up again that confidence disappeared, even H-P started laying people off again and I bet Google will announce layoffs very soon. Their debt loads are through the roof and banks raised all their fees on the consumer so it is taking longer to pay down debt. Foreclosures, delinquencies and now a story broke tat home owner associations are foreclosing on homes for pennies on the dollar over the dues not being paid, come on. To top it all off the Senate is not extending unemployment benefits, but they can pass a 2,300 page Fin Reg bill with no problem, what is wrong with those people?

It is fair to say that there are plenty of reasons to not spend money from the consumer’s point of view. From corporate America’s point of view there is also little reason to spend money and even if they did it is so little of GDP it doesn’t even matter. The bottom line is how do we get M3 to increase? Can money velocity get positive again and should we even try? In my opinion, I do not believe we can get money velocity to get positive again without a drastic event such as WWII. These super cycles have to work themselves out and that takes time and the more tinkering we do the longer it takes. Look at housing, if we did not do the tax credit we might have bottomed in housing prices already, but we will never know now.

The Depression lasted as long as it did because of the tinkering and those who say we had a relapse because stimulus was removed in 1937-38 simply do not get it. If we cannot attract buyers to the housing market at 4.5% interest rates and prices significantly lower than the peak it just is not going to happen for some time to come. The market has to find its own bottom and it will be painful, but we cannot simply throw money at it and hope it works out. We could do that in the 1930’s because we had savings and we had manufacturing, we have neither now. We started out in a horrible position, greatly in debt, and to get ourselves out we are advocating going much deeper in debt. The problem is we cannot grow our way out of the debt we have, we cannot afford another New Deal. The most important thing to remember about the New Deal to begin with was that it did not work, it was a majorly failed policy.

As painful as it is going to be I say we have to let it be. No more QE and I hope we do not do another stimulus, but we will, look for a Bush style check coming right around October. Money velocity will sort itself out when the deleveraging is over and that could be as fast as next year or as long as 2015, no one knows except the collective minds of the consumers. The bottom line is we may come out, the consumer and corporate America, stronger than when we came into this thing with less debt and important lessons learned. Our government and the Fed, well, I do not believe they learned anything and look for QE and stimulus money just in time to buy your vote in November.

Quantitative Easing 2.0

Posted by Ray on July 8, 2010 under Economy, The Federal Reserve | Be the First to Comment

I have written about money velocity at length and what I think will eventually happen and much of my thesis is about to be put to the test. For whatever reason the market seems to think massively shrinking consumer credit is a good thing and that the Federal Reserve will be starting a new QE process very soon, which is the news this afternoon that coincided with the parabolic move late in the day. However, I cannot disagree with this more and believe that any quantitative easing will do nothing to help expand credit or increase the money supply to the public. We have at the very least disinflationary forced if not outright deflation and the Fed is already running negative real interest rates.

If you recall about a year ago there was a paper from a Fed of IMF official, the authors name escapes me, that recommended real interest rates to run at -5% annually. At the time everyone thought the man was nuts and he was/is in my opinion, but the only way to get real rates that low is through loose money policy and quantitative easing. The Fed has maintained, and will continue to maintain a zero interest rate policy forever as far as I can tell, a loose monetary policy and performed the only quantitative easing policy the U.S. has ever seen, $1.5T in agency and U.S. treasury paper. Unfortunately we still have no idea what the long-term impact of these policies will be, but they cannot be good. These policies are causing real rates to go negative and mortgage rates to plummet.

In order to get the target rate to -5% the Fed will need to buy much more paper than it owns now. My guess is another $2-3T in additional paper and, again, we will not know what the impact of this QE program will be to our economy or currency for some time, but it will not be good. I am not sure why the Fed or this President cannot figure out that interest rates really don’t matter and declining credit is actually a good thing. In fact, all of the “bad news” is really long-term good news as far as the consumer is concerned, not the employment or housing data, but consumer credit. This de-leveraging is just what is needed as we were all awash in debt and most people cannot or could not ever repay their debts. I have never seen a government so desperate to reignite indebtedness of the public like we are seeing right now, it makes no sense long-term.

So, the Fed will start QE again, what will this do? Nothing. Will it increase the money supply? Yes, but not the public’s money supply merely the banking sectors balance sheet which is supposedly flush with cash anyhow. Banks are not lending money because they know they will not get repaid, but borrowers simply do not want more debt either, a good thing! We have mortgage rates below 4.6% and there is no demand, it just doesn’t get much better than that right now, although I think mortgage rates go sub 3% soon. Quantitative easing will do nothing to improve that situation and it certainly will not boost the confidence in the USD which is more than likely the goal, remember, the only way to double exports in 5 years is to devalue the dollar, but it will not work.

The point is that all the QE in the world will not put money in your pocket or your employer’s bank account to give you a raise. Essentially, from a monetary point of view the Fed is done as it cannot get money into the system. QE will merely create inflation, but not the kind of inflation Ben wants, Ben wants wage inflation and QE will merely create dollar devaluation which is Weimar Republic type of inflation. The public also does not want more games or trickery from the government and it frightens me to think what could happen if Ben goes down this reckless path. Remember, just because there is not an impact from his current policies today does not mean there will not be negative implications from these idiotic policies a year or 5 years from now.

What Ben will tell Obama is to create a direct QE program, i.e. a Bush style stimulus, a big one. I do not believe this will go over very well nor do I think voters are in any mood to be bribed with their own money this year, but if one is unemployed and offered $2,000 could or would they say no? Probably not. This type of stimulus would create what Ben is looking for, wage inflation and money velocity, but make no mistake it will be a short-term boost only. We have a long time before we are out of this mess and we have much pain ahead of us. We need to suck it up and deal with it. Contrary to popular belief it is not Bush’s fault, it is all politicians fault going back 30 years and the only cure is pain.

We will still look for an easy way out and probably do QE with another stimulus, but make no mistake that will be suicide for our countries long-term financial health and our currency will be in major trouble if we choose that path. I hate to say it, I have friends who are unemployed, but we must take the pain as it will be shorter than looking for the quick fix. We are all credit junkies and we got to kick the habit.

Are precious metals being manipulated?

Posted by Ray on March 30, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I am what some would lovingly, or not lovingly, call a gold bug, but I find that term somewhat offensive. I simply believe in precious metals based on supply, demand and the Federal Reserve’s horrible track record of continually printing money. Essentially, if precious metals guard against inflation and the Fed tries to keep inflation at +2-3% a year it just makes sense to have some money in precious metals under normal circumstances, but add in a little financial crisis and demand far exceeding actual supply and metals are a sure thing, in my opinion.

Ever since I first decided to research gold and silver, those were the first metals I ever bought, I found countless threads and blog posts about the price being manipulated by the Fed and major banks. I figured that most of this was just rhetoric by my fellow bugs, but after awhile it started to make sense. Of course, there was never any real proof, just USGA reports showing the U.S. exporting way more gold than it imported and COMEX inventory reports showing far more metal being traded than could ever be delivered. There was also some obscure Federal Reserve minutes, from the 1970’s, talking about selling gold on the open market to suppress the price. Finally, there was Greenspan saying that the Fed was ready to sell as much gold as it could to drive the price down, which makes sense since gold did poorly in the 1990’s while money supply grew at an unprecedented rate.

It was all very interesting, but there was no actual proof. Sure, we had GATA with their data points and going to the CFTC to lodge complaints, but nothing ever was done. It finally appears that the rumors and conspiracy theories may have been right after all. Last week GATA dropped a bomb on the public by announcing it had a whistleblower that proves JP Morgan and other banks are suppressing the price of gold and silver.

Andrew Maguire, the whistleblower or Exhibit A, sent a few emails to the CFTC shortly before the non-farm payroll data was released a couple months ago. Mr. Maguire clearly outlined, 2 days in advance, that JP Morgan (JPM) was shorting silver in the thinly traded after hours market driving the price down. He told the CFTC that there were 2 possible outcomes, the payroll numbers would be good and silver would go down or the payroll numbers would be bad (which is bullish for metals) and the price of silver would go down. Sure enough, 2 days later, the price plummeted and Mr. Maguire traded emails again to ensure the regulator received them, he did.

It appears that an investigation is being started which would be the first manipulation investigation since the Hunt brothers 3 decades ago. What is striking is that one of the largest banks in the world has been implicated in what could turn out to be the manipulation case of the century, if the claims are true, and no media source has picked it up. I even brought it to a reporter friend of mine for a lead, after days of not hearing anything, not even from CNBC, but nothing yet. If this is true there are large implications for the precious metals market and it is very bullish.

I always figured that if the price was being suppressed, more sellers than buyers, eventually the gig would be up because you cannot sell more than you have forever. Eventually someone will want their metal along the way which means the banks would have to deliver and buy it in the open market. If that happened the price would go through the roof, but, again, this was all speculation until the whistleblower came forward. Somehow, I know this might be hard to believe, I am sure the CFTC will find no wrong doing anywhere and everything will continue back to the way it was, dysfunctional, but if the allegations are true prices will surely rise rapidly.

It is crazy to think that silver, especially silver, would be trading so low considering it is rarely recycled and silver is used in everything from the common mirror to your cell phone. By all accounts most of the easy silver has already been mined and new mines are just coming online now, but they take a long time to get into full production. Let us not forget that silver is usually mined s a secondary metal to begin with, usually gold or copper is the primary metal being looked for. I have seen some estimates that silver reserves will be depleted in 5 years, but no one really knows and that is an aggressive figure to say the least. What I do know is that silver is in high demand, above ground reserves are declining and governments used to be net sellers of the metal, but now are net buyers of it, all of this is very bullish. My point being is prices are cheap and regardless of whether these accusations are true or not one should hold some precious metals in their portfolio, silver being a core holding.