The Employment Report and Current Events

Posted by Ray on February 5, 2011 under Main | Be the First to Comment

The world is in a very tough spot right now and the word of the day is social unrest. On top of the news from the Middle East we got some, in my opinion, pretty bad jobs numbers on Friday. Of course if it was a good report it is because of the ‘economic recovery’ and when the report is bad it is because of snow, rain, wind, Earth or whatever else they want to say instead of the truth, the economy stinks.

There was not one good piece in the jobs report, not one. Sure, an unemployment rate of 9% was the headline given to us, but doesn’t this strike you as being odd since the BLS just added in some 300K under reported job losses from last year? On top of that we had, unadjusted, horrible initial claims reports for January and even the adjusted reports stunk. Even though the economy did add jobs governments are laying people off which is a problem as this will likely continue on into the future. Overall, there is still some 5 people for every open job right now, think about that and then think about how long it will take for unemployment to actually come down, especially with new workers coming into the work force through population growth.

We are not going anywhere in the near future and for proof of this look at Bernanke’s speech the other day when he basically guaranteed QE3. As an aside, I love how he said QE2 worked because asset prices, stocks, and bond yields were going up. Umm, wasn’t QE2 supposed to create negative real interest rates? And since when do we use the stock market as a barometer for economic growth? In fact, QE2 did work if you thought it would benefit stocks, but it has failed miserably for the other areas it was supposed to help, i.e. jobs, economic growth and negative real interest rates.

However, QE2 did have a successful side effect that only a few people have realized, it has overthrown a couple of governments and probably will topple a few more in short order. Remember how I said you can get inflation without money velocity? It is kind of happening and just imagine what will happen when banks actually lend again. Now, Ben says food prices are from emerging market demand which is true, but it is also because of bad harvests, which will continue, and the fact that commodities are valued in USD’s which have been sliding down in recent weeks.

This means food prices have risen for the poorest countries in the world to levels that are just unsustainable. When food prices rise in America we can weather the storm for a while, but in some countries food at lower prices consume 50%+ of the average families budget so they do not have the luxury of riding out the storm or cutting back they simply go without. They can only do this for a little while before something gives and we have witnessed what happens when that something gives way. I also believe we have only seen the beginning of the problem as no one has figured out that this year’s wheat harvest is likely to be very, very, bad and we will see much higher prices in a few months. The weather is whacky and I have a strong suspicion that the Midwest will not produce what we are used too this year. If that happens things could get very interesting and perhaps, just maybe, we will stop paying farmers to grow food in order to turn it into fuel, use sugar instead which we pay farmers to not grow… get the picture yet?

Things are getting interesting and I am trying to stick around to see how it all ends. In the meantime I believe that one must be long commodities, silver and softies for sure, and stocks until QE is over, which is likely to be never. I say that with a caveat as I believe if QE3 does happen stocks might get very choppy and at some point people will figure out that ZIRP + interest on excess reserves + QE = Really Bad News and is bad monetary policy. Then again, only a few have figured it out so far so maybe I am too optimistic.

QE2: Savior or Suicide

Posted by Ray on November 3, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

The long awaited decision was announced today by the Fed, $600B in fresh money printing followed by continued reinvestment of proceeds from its first round of easing. This equals about $900B in total QE by our monetary masters. Speculation is rampant in the media about its success or how it will be an epic failure. The funny thing is, no one really knows what will actually happen. Personally, I am still perplexed as to why they are doing it at all, it is stupid.

The Fed is also completely out of ammo which many have stated, myself included, and all they have is the printing press. I want to stress something here and you should pay attention, this whole QE thing is experimental and no country that has ever tried has succeeded. Therefore, I have a predetermined outcome, but at the end of the day you or I have zero idea if it will work. I will lay out a case for its failure based on what I know. I am sure many will disagree and that is fine, but in time one of us will be right.

The economy has a demand problem, not a liquidity problem. Over 2 years ago we had a massive liquidity problem which is why Lehman failed, but now the Fed has dumped trillions into the system along with the federal government. All of that money dumping ended the liquidity crisis and now banks, supposedly, have excess reserves just sitting at the Fed waiting to be loaned out to that sucker who wants to pay 15% interest on money the bank got for free in order to buy that new LED flat screen TV that is just calling his or her name. The problem is the sucker doesn’t want to buy that TV because he doesn’t know if he will have a job next week or is worried about retirement, etc.

We have a demand problem, not a money shortage. I say that with a grain of salt because money velocity is dropping which technically means there are dollar shortages. However, I contend that that dollar shortage is because people are paying off debt to simply saving their money somewhere 9under the mattress??). Regardless of the reason no one wants to buy big ticket items and I do not blame them. After all we got here because of excess debt and no one wants to leverage up to buy senseless items. No amount of QE will change this, sorry, but it won’t. Job security and rising wages will create demand, but that is not happening either. Demand is stuck where it is, weak.

The Fed knows this and they know QE will not change this so why did they do it? I really do not know. Sure, everyone has their own reasons for it, but at the end of the day it is all speculation. I know what they are trying to do, create wage inflation and inflation in general, which they will do eventually, but by their chosen path, QE, they are creating the worst possible outcome, inflation without wage inflation. Stop laughing, it can happen. How you may ask, simple dollar devaluation is inflation, but dollar devaluation does not guarantee wage growth. The only way to get wage growth is through demand with inflation, what the Fed did will not do this. Frankly, everyone should be terrified of Mr. Bernanke and he should be punished for lying to Congress when he said he would not monetize the debt, he is.

I can rattle off all sorts of conspiracy theories as to why the Fed is doing QE, but they are too laughable to mention. I do think one thing makes sense, it is a back door bailout of the banking system, again. There is a little issue I am sure you are familiar with, the foreclosure crisis, and this crisis is a huge, enormous, problem. If you are a bondholder it is one thing to have a borrower default on the debt, the cash flow ends and you get to take the collateral, a home in this case, to recover your capital. However, this whole chain of custody issue, there is no legal remedy for it and all those pundits who claim that this is no big deal are either stupid or scared to admit the truth, means that there is no collateral to collect now. Essentially the borrower can keep the house and screw the lender if the paperwork is messed up, how would you like to own a MBS now? Your bonds are worthless… or are they?

If there was fraud in the loan, as we are now seeing, the bondholder can put back the bond and be repaid their original capital. This is the problem that is starting to rear its ugly head, the put back, and it could be huge. Think about all the paper the banks would have to buy back and now think of all the synthetic derivatives that were written against that bond. What a mess. A big costly web of a mess. I do not know how big the problem can be, but I think part of the QE might help these banks by either allowing the bank to front run the bonds the Fed is buying or by infusing the bank with capital.

It doesn’t matter really, but I think that was one of the reasons for QE2. We have been told for over a year now how great things are now and we are in a recovery so why do QE at all? We have inflation, it is not sky high, but it is there in the PPI and the CPI is still positive. If the CPI were negative I would say we have deflation, but it isn’t and at best we had disinflation which does not justify such a crazy move as monetizing almost a trillion dollars in paper. The Fed sees that no real recovery has happened and maybe that is the reason for the latest round of easing. Regardless, the banks are going to benefit from this, remember the Fed asked them how much they should buy from them.

I stated about a year ago that we can have inflation without wage inflation. We are about to see if that once crazy theory of mine is right. The Fed has now monetized trillion’s in debt and I can say, with history on my side, this has never ended well for any country who has ventured down this path. America is a special place because of our freedoms, but we are not so special that math and history doesn’t pertain to us. All of the people warning about the Fed’s insane moves might be right and the sky very well might be falling. Heck, if things were as great as we have been told over the past few months by the talking heads and our politicians, who no one believes, why are we even having this conversation? Things are not well and I fear we may be in the calm before a very bad storm like we have never seen before.

Let’s talk inflation

Posted by Ray on September 14, 2010 under Main | 2 Comments to Read

I have previously laid out my thoughts as to what will eventually happen with the whole inflation-deflation debate, but the issue is still raging full speed ahead. It is interesting that it is hard to find 2 experts that actually agree on what will happen or is happening, deflation or inflation. I think it is obvious that we have disinflationary forces here as producers cannot pass along higher prices or they will lose business. In fact, only food, a basic necessity, has any real pricing power right now.

While I am comfortable claiming we have disinflation right now I do not think it will last for a very long period of time. I believe we will see more easing by the Fed via asset purchases, but that will not create immediate inflation. However, over a longer period of time we will see that inflation pick up and not because of money velocity, but because of straight out dollar devaluation. Let me explain.

We did not experience inflation in the 1930’s because no one spent large sums of money on a regular basis. People actually were starving even as food prices declined, sad really. The thing is that since we were on the gold standard, or a form thereof, it was impossible to have true inflation even though FDR was spending like a madman. The Fed was also not in the practice of buying assets because, well, they followed the rules. Because of the gold standard and there were no asset purchases, government bonds or otherwise, inflation remained tame, deflationary in fact. This is a very 30,000 foot view of the situation, but I think you get the gist of what I am saying.

Now we do not have the gold standard, I am not preaching for a gold standard either, just pointing out the obvious, and we have a completely fiat money supply. The Fed has used its “emergency powers” to do what it would not do in the 1930’s, buy assets. It is clear that the asset purchases are doing nothing for the economy other than keeping rates low on loans, which no one wants or are really willing to make unless you have a perfect credit score. It is not even kicking up much inflation, at all, which is because there is simply zero money velocity. Since there is no money velocity the typical economist will say that inflation is impossible and it can never happen, never say never.

What the heads buried in the sand do not realize, because they are using the Depression as their road map (they always do this at the wrong time I might add), is that the dollar is floating now with nothing backing it. That in itself is not bad, as a matter of general opinion, as long as the printing press is used sparingly and every country prints money at relatively the same pace. The problem is that now, after the crisis supposedly ended, countries are printing money at a slower pace or they stopped printing altogether. Many are certainly not doing asset purchases.

Forgetting the fact that QE will do nothing to ease the pain of the economy being bad, sorry, but it will do nothing whatsoever, what it will do is wreak havoc on the dollar. Since the currency is floating more printing and asset purchases will diminish the value of the currency. This has been Ben’s and Obama’s plan all along since Obama wanted to double exports within 5 years, something that can never be accomplished. We are seeing the impact of what more printing will do to the dollar now, unless you think 1.5 cent moves in the Euro/USD pair is normal, as investors move to a currency that is somewhat more sound, not that the Euro is sound, but perception is half the game.

The citizens, us, will not feel the devaluation right off the bat because we consume 87% of what we produce domestically. However, imported products will cost more and we do import a lot of goods, obviously. As domestic supplies are sucked up by foreign countries, as our dollar is worth less thanks to Ben, we will have to import more from elsewhere. This is how our next bout of inflation will begin, dollar devaluation without an increase of money velocity. If you think about it it will make sense, capital flows to the land with the cheapest goods and a weak dollar means China, Europe or whoever, will find more value, cheaper products, from America.

That actually sounds good, more purchases of American goods means higher production as we have to replace what others are buying, but that may not be the case. Why? Simple, prices domestically will be rising and our government, always trying to do the right thing will institute some sort of protectionist legislation to stop prices from rising as incomes are stagnant. It would be a form of capital controls of sorts, but in reverse. Can’t you see it now? Prices are rising and people are not able to get those big screen TV’s or something less important, food, so the government tries to stop it through making new laws. It sounds counterintuitive, but it would happen, look at what Congress wants to do to China in order to get the yuan to appreciate in value? Actually, if we do more QE Congress will not want that to happen because China will literally own us if or when the dollar is devaluated.

While all of this is happening the treasury market, after an initial huge ramp up in prices, this is what the Fed will be buying, will be in freefall as no one will want to be repaid, without a substantial risk premium, in devalued dollars. This will lead the Fed into more massive buying because even at this stage Americans will not even want to buy our own debt. Also, China will have no need to hold their massive treasury holds so they will be selling like mad. All of this is happening without money velocity picking up. Even if you think I am wrong about the previous paragraph think of it this way, if our production did pick up because of foreign country buying sprees that means we will have the money to buy things, but it will only increase the inflation rate… damned if it does, damned if it doesn’t.

It has nothing to do with actual money velocity anymore, we even have mild inflation with dwindling velocity now, and has everything to do with confidence in the system. More QE will be bad news for global confidence in the USD, it is on shaky ground as is. If we look at today’s market action it proves how the market will react, lower dollar, higher commodity prices and equities stuck because it is good news on one hand and bad news on the other hand. Longer term high inflation is bad news for stocks, in my opinion, and bullish for commodities, obviously. Stocks are horrible inflation hedging instruments, look at the last 10 years for proof, while silver (by far my favorite investment right now), gold and other metals should do very well. Of course, precious metals are not really an inflation hedge, but a currency hedge instead. Since we are looking at a currency issue rather than straight out inflation it makes bullion of any flavor very attractive.

Could anything change my mind about what I think will happen? Sure. If no QE happens it will be great news, but the likelihood of no QE ever happening again are about as long of a shot as you can get. While I am using QE for my defense of my position in this article I believe we can safely assume that budget deficits will not get better so even if no QE happens our spending will accomplish the same thing. I say that knowing that if the deficit does not resolve itself the Fed, to save the US, will still have to do QE eventually on a massive scale no matter what, to keep rates low so the interest doesn’t bust us. However, the Fed cannot suck in all that paper and treasuries will fail eventually.

Outside of no QE I think there is not much that can change my mind about what I think will happen. It is pretty much in stone and will happen either as I laid it out or in a somewhat similar fashion. In the near-term I am still bullish on treasuries, now that we sold off, and on silver, gold too, but I am more partial to silver right now. I am not crazy about stocks and would be very hesitant about committing major capital to any position right now, the market is trading odd to say the least. At this point bullion is your best play, silver looks very promising and a recent Scientific American article points out that there is only 19 years left of easily mined silver, a no brainer to me, buy it.

People always wait to buy metals to “see how it does” and while they are waiting the price goes nuts and then they buy it and wonder why they lost money. Don’t be one of those people, but buy it smart, some every month. Because even if you think the bulk of my argument is wrong, or all of it, we have disinflation and higher bullion prices, what do you think will happen when we do have inflation? Not to mention silver is not only a precious metal, but an industrial metal. So, if you think the world is going to end, buy silver. If you think we are in a real recovery, buy silver.

Quantitative Easing 2.0

Posted by Ray on July 8, 2010 under Economy, The Federal Reserve | Be the First to Comment

I have written about money velocity at length and what I think will eventually happen and much of my thesis is about to be put to the test. For whatever reason the market seems to think massively shrinking consumer credit is a good thing and that the Federal Reserve will be starting a new QE process very soon, which is the news this afternoon that coincided with the parabolic move late in the day. However, I cannot disagree with this more and believe that any quantitative easing will do nothing to help expand credit or increase the money supply to the public. We have at the very least disinflationary forced if not outright deflation and the Fed is already running negative real interest rates.

If you recall about a year ago there was a paper from a Fed of IMF official, the authors name escapes me, that recommended real interest rates to run at -5% annually. At the time everyone thought the man was nuts and he was/is in my opinion, but the only way to get real rates that low is through loose money policy and quantitative easing. The Fed has maintained, and will continue to maintain a zero interest rate policy forever as far as I can tell, a loose monetary policy and performed the only quantitative easing policy the U.S. has ever seen, $1.5T in agency and U.S. treasury paper. Unfortunately we still have no idea what the long-term impact of these policies will be, but they cannot be good. These policies are causing real rates to go negative and mortgage rates to plummet.

In order to get the target rate to -5% the Fed will need to buy much more paper than it owns now. My guess is another $2-3T in additional paper and, again, we will not know what the impact of this QE program will be to our economy or currency for some time, but it will not be good. I am not sure why the Fed or this President cannot figure out that interest rates really don’t matter and declining credit is actually a good thing. In fact, all of the “bad news” is really long-term good news as far as the consumer is concerned, not the employment or housing data, but consumer credit. This de-leveraging is just what is needed as we were all awash in debt and most people cannot or could not ever repay their debts. I have never seen a government so desperate to reignite indebtedness of the public like we are seeing right now, it makes no sense long-term.

So, the Fed will start QE again, what will this do? Nothing. Will it increase the money supply? Yes, but not the public’s money supply merely the banking sectors balance sheet which is supposedly flush with cash anyhow. Banks are not lending money because they know they will not get repaid, but borrowers simply do not want more debt either, a good thing! We have mortgage rates below 4.6% and there is no demand, it just doesn’t get much better than that right now, although I think mortgage rates go sub 3% soon. Quantitative easing will do nothing to improve that situation and it certainly will not boost the confidence in the USD which is more than likely the goal, remember, the only way to double exports in 5 years is to devalue the dollar, but it will not work.

The point is that all the QE in the world will not put money in your pocket or your employer’s bank account to give you a raise. Essentially, from a monetary point of view the Fed is done as it cannot get money into the system. QE will merely create inflation, but not the kind of inflation Ben wants, Ben wants wage inflation and QE will merely create dollar devaluation which is Weimar Republic type of inflation. The public also does not want more games or trickery from the government and it frightens me to think what could happen if Ben goes down this reckless path. Remember, just because there is not an impact from his current policies today does not mean there will not be negative implications from these idiotic policies a year or 5 years from now.

What Ben will tell Obama is to create a direct QE program, i.e. a Bush style stimulus, a big one. I do not believe this will go over very well nor do I think voters are in any mood to be bribed with their own money this year, but if one is unemployed and offered $2,000 could or would they say no? Probably not. This type of stimulus would create what Ben is looking for, wage inflation and money velocity, but make no mistake it will be a short-term boost only. We have a long time before we are out of this mess and we have much pain ahead of us. We need to suck it up and deal with it. Contrary to popular belief it is not Bush’s fault, it is all politicians fault going back 30 years and the only cure is pain.

We will still look for an easy way out and probably do QE with another stimulus, but make no mistake that will be suicide for our countries long-term financial health and our currency will be in major trouble if we choose that path. I hate to say it, I have friends who are unemployed, but we must take the pain as it will be shorter than looking for the quick fix. We are all credit junkies and we got to kick the habit.

Why you should always be bullish on precious metals

Posted by Ray on April 12, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Many people question whether or not they should own precious metals, gold, silver, palladium or platinum, in their portfolios for the long-term. Many are concerned about inflation versus deflation with the former being bullish on metals and the latter being bearish. In my opinion, neither situation should influence you to own or not own metals.

My thought process is fairly simple, what is the Federal Reserve’s ultimate goal? To keep a stable monetary policy along with full employment, but the way they do this is through keeping inflation alive and well in the U.S. In fact, the Fed would like to see annual inflation of about 2-3% every year. How they get inflation into the system is through the printing of money and over the long-term this devalues the dollar. The real question is whether or not the latest printing of some $2T will create inflation and, in my opinion, it will at some point in the near future. However, ignore what is happening now and let’s take a look at what the Fed has done to the U.S. dollar over the long-term.

The need for the Fed to maintain its 2-3% rate has led to the dollar to have a very clear long-term trend, down. I think this point is irrefutable based on the 30+ year chart. Given the Fed’s bloated balance sheet, which is not going anywhere for the foreseeable future, it is only a matter of time before the dollar goes even lower. I can hear everyone now, but Ray, there is no money velocity and deflation is here to stay. You would be correct, for now, but what we know is that longer term this money the banks and the Fed hold will make it into the economy, we just don’t know when that will happen. When that money reaches you, the end user, we will see inflation, eventually.

At the very least we will see the dollar devalue moving forward given the projected deficits and treasury supply. We also know that the Presidents plans to double exports, which is highly unlikely to happen I might add, would mean an intentional devaluation of the dollar. It seems that FDR’s policies are alive and well in the current White House, but there is no gold to confiscate this time to revalue the dollar. Instead they have Ben’s printing press to take care of that. However, an intentional devaluation of the dollar in today’s world is bound to go wrong as there is more money in the system now versus 1933-34 and there is no gold backing to stop the downward trend of the dollar.

This is not a partisan issue as Bush did much damage to the dollar and one can say that the bull market from 2004-2007 was because of his reckless spending and bringing the dollar down to new lows. I do not believe there is any real way to save the dollar at this stage. Either we need to bring interest rates up from the ZIRP and implement austerity actions that would mean no politician would ever get elected, from either party, again. There is also no way they will cut spending, ever, as both parties have spent way beyond our means and who would campaign on higher interest rates, higher taxes and cutting social programs? Obviously the answer is clear.

It is because of this belief that I know holding precious metals is a wise decision. You may have the timing wrong on when you buy them, but if you hold them long enough you will do just fine, in my opinion. I am a big fan of silver because it is a dual purpose metal, industrial use as well as a precious metal. It is my belief that all the easy silver has been mined and this is a simple supply and demand issue. If we examine how much silver is mined in the U.S., it is roughly 40M ounces, and the U.S. Mint has produced about 9M American Silver Eagles last quarter, annualized out that is 36M ounces of silver. The Mint along is sucking in most of the U.S. mined silver alone. Considering silver is not recycled as much as most other metals this means a new supply will have to be found in the next few years.

Considering a new mine takes months to open and no miner only concentrates on silver, typically silver is a byproduct of copper, gold or other metals, this means new mines are not on the verge of opening anytime soon. Some estimate that all the above ground silver will be used within the next 6-10 years which means supply will continue to dwindle lower and prices should move higher. Frankly, silver is the easiest sell in the world because if you believe in an economic recovery you have to won silver, because of increased demand, and if you believe the world is ending you have to own silver, to preserve your wealth. Either way, the case is bullish, but one should also invest in other metals as well. My other “favorite” metal is palladium, it is a green metal and has many uses from catalytic converters, hydrogen cell cars all the way to being used in jewelry.

What about deflation? Yes, we are in a deflationary spiral right now, but we have had deflation for how long? A couple of years, almost, and what has precious metals done during that time frame? They have risen, why? Obviously people are concerned about another complete financial meltdown and precious metals are a safe haven because they will always be worth something. Others think there is a global economic rebound and sees the use of some metals for industrial uses about to explode, but one must remember that there was also more gold sold in 1999 than in 2001 because people do buy gold when times are good, I am not sure of the exact reason. Others see inflation coming our way in the future and are using metals to hedge against that bet.

No one knows what is going to happen in the future, but the one thing I am confident about is the governments and Federal Reserve’s ability to devalue the dollar, on purpose, to keep up with the population growth. This makes metals attractive over the long-term, in my opinion. Since we have had such a long bout of deflation and PM’s have gone up just imagine if we get any real inflation. I am not worried about deflation or inflation for that matter, both will happen over time. What I concentrate on is buying silver every month and I have recently started buying gold again as well. If you buy some every month you are dollar cost averaging in. I also fully expect some selloff in the metals market when these sovereign debt issues blows up and money pours into the dollar, but the dollar will sell off because in times of stress it is merely the least junky asset to buy, only because it is liquid and you will get your money back.

However, if that does happen you can also rest assured that the Fed will do its part and print more money. Politicians will do their part as well and spend more money. Both of which devalue the dollar and make metals go higher. The fact of the matter is gold and other PM’s are a safe haven which performs better than equities during times of stress. Yes, I realize their prices sold off in 2008 during the crisis, but considering that was because banks and hedge funds needed cash, not metals, and sold everything they had. If you look at the performance in the beginning of 2009 prices were on the rise again when liquidity and the need to raise cash were over because PM’s hold real value and there was a fear that banks would all implode. That proves that PM’s are a safe haven.

Obviously one can invest however they choose, but to ignore PM’s, in my opinion, is a huge mistake. Silver is the obvious metal to own for those in doubt since it serves that dual purpose of a PM and as an industrial metal. I am a buyer of silver at these prices and will buy all the way up to $20 an ounce, maybe higher depending on what is happening. My current cost basis is very low, I bought most of my holdings at $9-13/oz, because it was at the cost of production so I will raise my cost basis, but if silver does what I think it will do over the next decade, I do not care because it will be the ultimate homerun.