S&P Under Attack from the Government

Posted by Ray on August 8, 2011 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I had made a prediction last year, found HERE, that US Treasuries would be put on negative watch by Fitch and downgraded to junk by China. Well, I was wrong as it was S&P who made the call and actually did downgrade the US to AA+ which is still a joke as the government will never be able to actually repay much of the $14T it has outstanding without just printing money, which IS a form of default. China is now saber rattling about the US dollar again, but this time they are serious, I think at least, asking for a new reserve currency and I think they will get what they want as other countries have raised the same concerns.

The US deserved to be downgraded and we should be downgraded much further than AA+ as we will not get serious about debt reduction. To prove my point all we have to do is look at how the debate is structured. The politicians are all talking about annual deficits and NOT the outstanding debt load. They do all sorts of double talk to make sure the average person only believes we have a trillion or o in outstanding debt, but that trillion is just the annual deficit and no one talks about the big number of $14T in outstanding current liabilities. S&P gets it and that is why they are the first one to downgrade the US.

When the downgrade happened the Treasury Department acted quickly calling the move unjustified, political, terrible lapse of judgment, S&P made a mistake, and these are the same people who rated junk bonds AAA to begin with. While it is easy to criticize S&P for their prior actions, but relative to its sovereign debt ratings those arguments hold no water and anyone with a stitch of unbiased rationale realizes that the US is indeed in big trouble and we do not deserve a AAA rating. The worst part about this downgrade is the fact that the government is now baring down on S&P about this downgrade.

It was just announced that the Senate Banking Committee will be looking into the downgrade. While we do not know if hearings will happen or not the person close to the matter did say all options are on the table. I was under the impression that Congress wanted independent ratings agencies along with an independent Federal Reserve. Silly me I guess as the minute a ratings agency does the right thing they try to crush it with Senate investigations, but the Federal Reserve can monetize trillions in US debt without Congress blinking an eye, unreal.

What Congress is saying is be independent as long as you do what we say and want and if you decide to think for yourself, well, we will hunt you down and skin you alive. The government is acting very much like the old Soviet Union and is sending a message, not matter what we do keep us rated AAA. How can a ratings agency offer an independent review of a security if the government demands that it gets what it wants regardless of what the facts are? It is insane to think that the ratings agencies will remain independent if Congress has investigations if the US is downgraded. Frankly, this is extortion, blackmail or a combination of the two since the government is the one who issues S&P with its ratings license. Will S&P lose its license over this? I do not know, but it is possible and shameful if that is what happens.

As an American you should be angry over the downgrade, but not at S&P. You should be angry at the people who rubberstamps every bill that comes along wasting billions of dollars. You should be angry at their inability to work with each other and address the seriously obvious structural issues that will consume immense amounts of capital in the coming years. You should be angry that the Senate wants to investigate S&P while saying other quasi government agencies are left alone even though they are part of the problem. You should be angry that Alan Greenspan, Mishkin, Bernanke and every other clown out there says the US will never default because we can print our own money to pay the debt, devaluation IS a default.

You should NOT be mad at S&P and you should demand that Congress work on real problems because their lack of dealing with those problems is exactly why S&P downgraded them to begin with. We are not showing the world that we are capable of fixing any real problems. What we are showing the world is that if we do not get our way we will simply create problems were none exists and threaten the “trouble maker” with depriving them of their livelihood or by throwing them in jail. Way to go America.

It is June and the economy is weakening

Posted by Ray on June 6, 2011 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I suppose it was back in the late fall and reiterated again in mid-winter that I believed the market would simply go up for no real reason until QE2 ended and then it would begin to decline as liquidity ended. It looks as though I was somewhat accurate in that prediction although you did not have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out unless you were a permabull with your blinders on and absolute faith in the government and the Fed in which case please move along.

The Fed knew the same thing I and many others did and that is why at the last meeting they emphasized that they would continue to reinvest maturing paper and interest from the existing portfolio, kind of a QE infinity if you will, but on a small scale. I do believe they will let QE2 go and not announce anything new until the fall when they see the economy really weaken. I think a couple months of sub 100K jobs reports, with a healthy BLS birth/death adjustment, along with softening other indicators such as the PMI and so forth the Fed will get the point and step in with $1T in QE since $600B did not work.

That is how it works as one QE is ineffective the next one gets bigger. The really unfortunate part is that Japan has done the same thing and it did not work but there is a big difference between the US and Japan, we are the reserve currency and they aren’t. In other words, Japan could print all they wanted because their citizens bought their own debt and the world settled trades in dollars. However, the US is limited in what they can really do in QE because as the value of the dollar sinks, and we really had a nice scare a week or so ago, the world will pick a new reserve currency on its own. You know how that story ends.

Ben knows this and he knows that his QE options are limited and he can probably only get away with 1 more so it will be big, it has to be. If that one does not work and spur growth, well, the Fed is done and completely out of bullets in a traditional sense. We would see some new things coming to the table like in 2008 with all the new facilities and such, but I have no idea what they will be or what they will look like since we do not know how things will play out.

What I do know is that we should get a nice bounce in the dollar here sending commodities lower for a bit. This will give Ben and Washington a little relief and you an opportunity to buy, buy, buy every commodity you like. I love silver, still, wheat, gold, palladium, soybeans and corn (unless the subsidy is pulled). If those go on sale buy them either directly or via the growers or agricultural ETF’s.

In the mean time enjoy watching Ben sweat it out as he will not have answers for the weakness in the economy or the weakness is ‘transitory’ which is the longest transitory period I have ever seen. Kind of like this recovery it is the longest start of a recovery ever as it gains steam and loses steam every other week. Good luck.

U.S. debt, no big deal?

Posted by Ray on March 7, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I just read a Time Magazine article today about the U.S. debt and how it is no big deal the U.S. has so much debt. In fact, Zachary Karabell actually believes that our debt is a good thing. I have actually met Mr. Karabell last year at a conference we both spoke at, although he was paid and I was merely on a panel, but it is unlikely he would remember me. Regardless, I have to humbly disagree with the conclusions he came up with in his article.

Debt can be a good thing, but only in small amounts and for productive reasons. For example, a business that takes out a loan to hire a new employee to expand their business would be productive debt as it contributes to society, hopefully. However, taking out a loan to buy a 50” high definition TV is, in my opinion, a terrible reason to add debt to ones balance sheet. The U.S. government borrows money, recently, to hire people and encourage spending, but the government is not creating productive jobs because it creates nothing and it must tax the people in order to pay off the debt for the job it created. The government actually destroys wealth through taxation and wasteful spending. Basically, the government is borrowing money to buy big screen TV’s, bad debt.

The U.S. government does need to carry debt because we are the reserve currency and carry trade deficits. Debt for a government could be a good thing if that country is the reserve currency, but there is a point where too much debt is the ultimate problem. The impact of too much debt over time during strong economic times may not be a major problem because a growing GDP means more tax revenue is being collected and should increase over time as long as conditions are good. However, any economy has cycles where there are good and bad times, we are currently experiencing bad times, and when times get bad that large debt load becomes a problem and is no longer good, Greece is a good example of this, kind of.

Excess debt during poor economic times means tax revenues decline and the government will have to run deficits to pay for its spending, I am way over simplifying this. Generally, a government will spend much more during these bad times to spur the economy, known as the Keynesian Theory, but this spending, in my opinion, is not the way to spur the economy. As the debt builds and the central bank cuts interest rates the debt during these bad times might not seem so bad because the country has artificially lowered the cost of borrowing, again to spur growth. The key word is “artificially” lowered interest rates and the current interest rate may not actually reflect the current economic conditions or the risk of holding said countries government debt. The reason people ignore deficits more during lower interest rate periods is because the cost to carry the debt is so low, like now.

The U.S. currently has over $12T in debt, heading much higher rapidly, but the carrying costs of that debt is about $500B a year. Keep in mind this is because the Fed Funds Rate is at .25% which means yields on the U.S. government debt is very low, artificially low. The government can currently borrow money for 30 years, for those crazy enough to buy it, for less than 5%, not a bad deal, right? However, what happens if the bulls are right and the economy is recovering and rates have to increase? A 1% increase in Fed Funds would mean the aggregate increase on our debt would be roughly .70%, most of our debt matures in less than 10 years, not good I might add. That means our debt servicing costs, the interest we pay, would increase to about $600B a year, still not bad.

The problems start to get real bad when the Fed increases rates to say 3% or so. The cost to borrow on the 30 year treasury would go up dramatically to about 6%, on the conservative side, and even out short-term interest rates on our bills and notes would go substantially, everything is relative, higher. Before I go further you have to remember that debt is a deadly circular beast because the more you borrow the more you have to pay back and during rising interest rates in order to make all of your payments you either have to tax the people or have more deficit spending, guess which will win in the U.S.? If rates go to 3% because of a hot economy the interest on our debt servicing costs will quickly rise to about $800-$900B, depending. It will take no time at all for the interest payments to reach $1T and considering our debt mostly matures 10 years or less you cannot forget the refunding that must take place. The CBO just did an estimate on a lot of this in the past few days, I did not read the report, but I know the final numbers without a lot of obvious assumptions end up close to what I just said.

Karabell makes the argument that the U.S. would use the borrowed money to retrain our workforce and rebuild our infrastructure. That may be the case, but to fully upgrade our infrastructure, not including pie in the sky green energy items, would cost about $2T. I believe the last stimulus only applied a small portion of what is needed, so the infrastructure idea Karabell had does not pan out in my book. Plus, there is no return on infrastructure immediately, over time yes because it makes commerce easier, but that takes time. He also made the case that China and India are flush with cash and building their infrastructure now and, I think, was indicating that since the U.S. is so stable that excess cash will end up here, which is reasonable to assume, for now.

What he failed to address is the fact that the money they are flush with is ours from them exporting goods to us. Because they have such huge exports to the U.S. we have a trade deficit with them and they need to buy our debt to balance it out. It is a case of vendor financing and all vendor financing ends up with someone getting hurt, guess who in our case? The point I am making is that the Chinese and Indians will buy our debt now because treasuries are going up in value, thank you deflation, but how long will that continue for? Not only that, but if China un-pegs their currency from ours it will appreciate and their treasury holding, in RMB terms, will decline. Why would one invest in treasuries if your currency is rising and the country you are loaning money to as a declining currency, you wouldn’t do that.

Essentially, all gravy trains end and there is a limit to how much a country can borrow. Consider the U.S. has implicit guarantees on not only our debt, but also on banks, insurance companies and the mother of all bad investments the GSE’s. Oh, and if you ever expect to see GM pay back the money they got, well, I wouldn’t hold my breath on that one. All of those guarantees are about $23T, not including the national debt and the entitlement guarantees we have. Again, my point is the limit to what the market will allow a country to borrow cannot be far off. At the very least we will need to pay a greater risk premium on our debt which means the interest rates on our government bonds will detach from where the Fed sets them at and go through the roof.

I get what Karabell is saying, but he is speaking in the here and now which is suicide when talking about so much money. You must look forward in order to see the real problems and it is kind of crazy to think that all this borrowing will go towards retraining the people and vastly improving our infrastructure. The government is the worst at spending money efficiently and much of that money goes to wasteful projects like DNA research on bears in Montana, no offense to bears, but I just do not care about their DNA. On top of all that, who knows if we will actually emerge from this downturn, sorry I do not buy an inventory rebuild as a real economic recovery. If we do not exit this thing in the next10 months our problems will be bigger than we think.

On top of all of this there is the whole impact to our currency, which is not good. The more debt we issue the more we dilute our currency and at some point the world will demand some type of other reserve currency, it is being talked about now. If we lose our reserve currency status we are in a heap of trouble, I know that could ‘never happen.’ All of these problems or these potential problems leave me a couple of conclusions, besides the fact that bulls will spin even really dangerous debt problems positively, that; 1) Precious metals are cheap and 2) The Fed will never raise the Funds rate to a reasonable level again.

Lack of Consumer Confidence

Posted by Ray on July 28, 2009 under Economy, Main | Be the First to Comment

This is a major problem since consumer spending is 70% of GDP and the longer consumers saves, which is good, versus spend the longer the economy may remain in a slump. This combined with reduced credit available is not helping the bulls case. in fact, the spin is that consumer confidence is not indicative of how consumers behave, which is a 180 degree turn from the last positive reading which was proclaimed as “the return of the consumer.”

The index came in at 46.6 versus 49 reported last month and, more important in my opinion, consumer expectations decreased as well. Consumer expectations was reported at 62 versus the last reading of 65.5 which is a pretty substantial drop. What is the reason for this drop in confidence and expectations? Jobs.

The hope of a jobless recovery is an oxymoron at best and a foolish belief unless you do fancy footwork with the economic numbers, which is the norm nowadays. Unemployment is going to rise, we know this, and confidence will remain low as long as those 500K a week numbers continue to pour in. The good news is that the weekly unemployment numbers cannot continually come in at 500k a week, eventually there will be no one left to fire, sorry, layoff or right size.

The spin is unreal and I cannot help to think that perhaps things are better than I think, then I look at the numbers again and statements like this; “Consumers continued to rate current conditions unfavorably in July. Those saying business conditions are “bad” increased to 46.3 percent from 45.3 percent, however, those saying conditions are “good” increased to 9.1 percent from 8.1 percent. (emphasis mine on this ultra low “positive number) Consumers’ assessment of the labor market deteriorated further. Those claiming jobs are “hard to get” increased to 48.1 percent from 44.8 percent (emphasis mine), while those claiming jobs are “plentiful” decreased to 3.6 percent from 4.5 percent. (emphasis mine, who could be saying jobs are plentiful?)

Commercial mortgage backed securities are also off the charts for defaults, up 585% from one year ago to $28.65 billion and the 10th straight month of increases for defaults. Why this is not talked about is beyond me, but I guess it doesn’t fit into the view of the media as part of the recovery we are in. What effect will these defaults have is what many are wondering and my answer is none.

With government backstops on everything there will be no repercussions of defaults, which is crazy. This ultimately means 2 things:

1. We really do not know how bad things are; and
2. How much is this really going to cost th taxpayers? This is why we need to audit the Federal Reserve.

The free markets are anything but free with guarantees on everything and the ban on short selling, through SEC rules and the fact that banks are not lending out securities to short. This is the greatest orchestrated recovery I think the world has ever seen, but the repercussions will be emense.

While equities will do OK, I guess until the top line numbers actually mean something, but the dollar will suffer. like it or not the Fed is printing money and monetizing the debt. All of the money we are borrowing will devalue the dollar and countries will stop buying our debt. I know, every expert says where can they go, the dollar is the most liquid and, laughably, “stable” asset they can buy.

The fact is they can buy the Euro, it is getting deep enough to be realistic in the near future, they can buy commodities, other hard assets and in China’s case more companies. The fact is the dollar is getting risky, in my opinion, simply because of our debt load. I know everyone says inflation is not the problem, and it isn’t know, but what is a problem is devaluation which has the same effect as inflation.

In short, consumers saving their money is good and the pundits should realize this. A society built on debt is dumb and should not ben encouraged, but that is what out government is doing.

China Demands Currency Reform, France Backs Debate

Posted by Ray on July 9, 2009 under cnbc, Main, The Federal Reserve | Be the First to Comment

This is major news. You can forget China’s talk on supporting the dollar as the reserve currency. It is clear that they are saying on thing and doing another so this may mean they are going to send us a message, probably through a treasury boycott. What is surprising, kind of, is France is backing them on this statement.

You have to ask yourself if you blame them? The dollar has slipped in the last few years so all those treasuries central banks bought are worth less to them now. Why would they wish to continue to lose money? The long-term slide of the dollar is clear and will continue, based on the technicals and fundamentals.

We are stuck, there is nothing the Fed can do to strengthen our currency at this point. Well, that is not 100% true, they can raise interest rates, but that would crush our economy. We have too much debt and we are going to issue more and without higher interest rates the dollar will slide downwards.

There was only 2 ways the US could get out of this debt anyhow. They could be honest and default, not make interest payments or they could print their way out. They chose option 2 which is a huge problem. Now we will have a deep recession, may be a depression, with higher prices. This is nuts and a major problem for us.

Here is the CNBC story:

China called on Thursday for reform of the reserve currency system at a meeting of world leaders in one of its most direct attacks on the dollar’s global dominance.

Chinese State Councilor Dai Bingguo did not specifically name the dollar at talks between the Group of Eight rich nations and G5 emerging powers, but he was unequivocal in calling for the world to diversify the reserve currency system and aim at relatively stable exchange rates.

France also unexpectedly called for a currency discussion and moving toward a “multimonetary” system, though Britain warned any debate should be reserved for the long term to avoid destabilizing markets in the midst of a global recession.

China’s ideas for changing the system had previously been mentioned in reports by its central bank, but had never been voiced in a speech by such a high-ranking political leader.

“We should have a better system for reserve currency issuance and regulation so that we can maintain relative stability of major reserve currencies’ exchange rates and promote a diversified and rational international reserve currency system,” Dai told the summit in Italy, according to a statement read by Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu.

Dai made his statement to a meeting including British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, U.S. President Barack Obama and the leaders of Japan and the European Union, whose currencies are often held as part of countries’ foreign exchange reserves.

There is no question on whether the comments represented those of of China’s top leadership, the spokesman said.

“China’s position on reserve currencies has had different interpretations, but I can tell you that what I have just quoted is the most authoritative standpoint of the Chinese government,” he said.