Look, things in the U.S. are certainly better, even though I am bearish on the economy, but they are just a “less worse” type of better rather than a true recovery or whatever you want to call it. Someone once commented that I would not know a V shaped recovery if it sat on my face, or something to that, as the recession in the early 1980’s saw a lag in initial claims of some 6 months before the recovery in employment happened. Boy, I hope that person is reading this because that comment was made in august or September of last year, almost a full year ago, and initial claims barely broke the 500K mark as we speak, is that the ”V” we are looking for? The fact is in a post credit collapse employment is a leading indicator, I said it a year ago and I am saying it now and the only difference is the unemployment rate is HIGHER today than a year ago.
What changed over the last 12 months?
Nothing. Wait, I take that back, a lot. The U.S. is now $3T more in debt, we performed a “stress test,” which we are telling the ECB to do, more on that in a minute, and the Fed expanded its balance sheet by how much? What did we get for all of that? A 5.2% GDP print based on inventory a rebuild that was probably premature, if we take away the stimulus would firms have rebuilt their inventories so much? I think not. Unemployment is slightly better thanks to temporary jobs and government hiring, not exactly what I would call “robust” at all. The bottom line is all my criticism of the stimulus was right, it failed.
The banks are better you say, right? Are they? If you think that, well, I just don’t know what to tell you. Did the banks get rid of the “toxic assets?” Did they write all their bad debts off? Did real estate values increase? How about commercial real estate, is that sector flying strong again? No. Are banks loaning money again? Sure, if you have a credit score of 850 or better and don’t need the money they will gladly make a loan to you. However, if you need to refinance your home you better hope you qualify for a government program or you are out of luck. The “stress test” was a joke and meant nothing because we are at the outer limits of the stress test, remember, 10% unemployment, etc., etc.? What saved the banks was one thing and one thing only, the repeal of mark-to-market account, period, end of story.
If we brought back mark-to-market accounting today we would have a handful of big institutions left, I guarantee it. Just look at Wells Fargo’s balance sheet with the “Pick-A-Pay Loans” they inherited, worse, they bought, from Wachovia, the LTV’s, except for Texas, God Bless Texas, are all horrible. I am not saying WFC would fail, I am just saying they would have to realize pretty significant losses is all. It is no coincidence that right after, literally right after, the repeal of mark-to-market accounting rules by the FASB, by Congressional pressure I might add, bank earnings went through the roof. What replaced mark-to-market accounting? Mark-to-model accounting, do you know who made that model famous? Enron, need I say more?
Europe
Now, Timmy Geithner is over in Europe telling the Europeans to do a “stress test” to let the world know all is well. Sorry Tim, I do not think this will work since it is technically not the banks in question, but rather the sovereign debt that they are holding. Why not do a stress test on governments instead, maybe that will solve the problem. This is a banking problem, again, that was brought on by huge deficit spending and countries inability to service their debt loads, this is big, huge actually. While this will impact banks it is not really banks that caused it, but politicians who decided to bribe the people with their own money.
It is likely that one of the PIGS, or whatever we are calling them now, will default given the issues they have and the inability of politicians to say no to spending. It is just odd, it always has been, that the people demand all this gravy from the government in the form of give a ways, tax credits or straight cash in some form. Don’t these people realize that they are only getting back their own money? Actually, if governments spent less and had lower debts that means they would have lower overall taxes which means the people would have more money on their own… they would be better off! However, the people insist on being bribed with their own money and politicians are only too happy to oblige.
The point is that this bigger than the banks as we are talking about the solvency of countries now. Bailouts are much more difficult to do for countries and the implications of a default by any country has widespread ripples that most people have no idea can or would occur. Even if Hungary or Greece defaults it is a huge deal and will impact governments and banks all over the world. I have been saying this for months now, Greece is a big deal and all those people saying it is not are, well, disqualified to render their opinions anymore as the markets have spoken and they have sided with me.
Run a stress test, it doesn’t matter because it really doesn’t matter Tim. The problem is with government spending this time and I do not think mark-to-model accounting can fix this problem.
The real problem
The real problem is I do not know where the sovereign debt problems will end, I know it will get worse. I know that more European countries will succumb to this very same issue as most European countries are socialist by their very nature and their debt levels are very high. As the weaker countries fall they will drag the stronger countries down with them, it is just how it works. I made a call that the Euro will fall to 1.18, we are about there. Do I think it will go lower? Yes, to parity in the near future. I think 1.16 is the next level, but the ECB will have to intervene and China has to intervene as a weak Euro is a major problem, it is, another story for another time. The currency will not survive without a mechanism to eject the weak states, period.
After the carnage in Europe is done, I do not have a timetable for that, it could be tomorrow or 10 years from now, but more than likely it will be sooner rather than later, the debt problems will spread, to the U.S. We have $13T in debt and an economy that is not recovering, I am not happy about that, but those are the facts. We are spending $4.9B a day, 3 times the amount George Bush, not exactly the face of fiscal conservatism I might add, was spending. We are in major trouble and what are our politicians doing? Trying to figure out how to get stimulus 3 out the door, that’s what.
I have been saying for months that our debt to GDP level is almost at parity, but it takes the Drudge Report for people to start listening? OK, at least people are listening now. The problem is we have no politicians willing to take the steps to fix out problems. Go ahead, elect the Republicans, look what they did from 2000-2006, they really helped to speed the process up, in my opinion. Of course, out current President and Congress has surely kicked what the Republicans did into hyper drive as they added 30% to our debt load in less than 2 years, that is $3T, an astounding figure. Neither of these parties really want to fix the problems, in my opinion, because they have a vested interest in perpetuating the problems so they can stay in power, it is just how it works.
What this means is we are all in very big trouble. I am not talking about, oh, gee, go buy an ounce of gold and protect yourself from inflation, I am talking about the Weimar Republic, hyperinflation, type of trouble. I see no way out besides inflation and in a big way. As Paul Krugman points out, there is a big difference between Greece and the U.S., we can print our own money. We also know Ben Bernanke has no problem with hitting that print money either. I am also confident that the Fed is, basically, completely incompetent.
If we cannot go to the market to finance our debt, which we have trillions of dollars of that most of it matures in under 10 years, the Fed will monetize it. That is how we will deal with our sovereign debt crisis, we will print our way out of it and it will be the very worst thing we can do. Instead of cutting our government, spending or doing anything else that is logical, because politicians want to get reelected, they will choose to inflate their way out. Will gold protect you? Yes, but so will food and any other useful commodity including toilet paper. It disturbs me to no end that we are where we are and that the President is listening to the likes of Mr. Krugman who thinks deficits don’t matter, they do, and that since we can print money it is OK, printing money is not OK.
In the meantime I am still short the market. We will have a bounce I am sure and I almost took a nice broad long position today, but I passed. While I am sure we will have that bounce I did not think the risk reward was worth it. My target is still 900 on the S&P 500.
Thanks to Bloomberg and Fox we might now find out who borrowed what and what was provided as collateral to the Fed during the crisis we may finally know thanks to a lengthy legal battle. The Fed might continue to fight, but it may not go much further, just show us already as this data is almost 2 years old, I am sure we can handle the truth.
However, you will see that the Fed took some very questionable items as collateral or so we think. Some bankruptcy documents do show that the Fed did take some stocks and other, well, crap for collateral during the height of the financial crisis. What many people do not know is that it is against the rules for the Fed to take credit risk since it is the U.S. governments bank. These documents will either confirm or deny those rumors, but I am betting on the former, if we ever really get to see them.
Could this be the end of the Fed as we know it? I hope so because since the Fed was enacted, in secret in 1913, we have witnessed the dollar lose 97% of its value, a depression in 1920-21, the crash of 1929 leading to the Great Depression (now known to be the Fed’s fault for tightening credit), more boom-bust cycles than any other time in history, the 1970’s (really, need I say more about the 70’s? I think they introduced bell bottoms too, but I cannot prove it), the 1980 near collapse of the U.S. treasury market, the first banking crisis, Long-Term Capital, the dotcom bubble, loose monetary policy for the last 30 years, the housing bubble, the complete meltdown of the financial system, and, for its final act, complicity to destroy the dollar’s value with its current balance sheet.
Really, I cannot think of any reason why we need to reform the Federal Reserve system.
Ben Bernanke may in fact seem like the unassuming soft spoken professor who is well spoken and polite, and he is, but at the same time he is perhaps suffering from the greatest of the deadliest of sins, pride. I am translating pride into arrogance with Ben because it is essentially the same thing and the sin is identical. There is also no question that Ben suffers from the delusion that he s right and everyone else is wrong, which is how we can tell that he suffers from this disease of arrogance wich will be his ultimate downfall.
I am referring to an article I read this weekend from Reuters, which was reprinted on Bloomberg and various other news sources, where Ben announced that it was not the Federal Reserve’s wall of liquidity during the early 2000’s that caused the housing boom, and subsequent bust, but rather lack of regulation. First of all, he is wrong, because without the liquidity easy credit or the showdown securitization mortgage market simply would not have existed, that is obvious. What is not so obvious is the fact that his regulation argument is also an attack on himself. While Congress did encourage the GSE’s and banks to loosen credit standards, so did the Federal Reserve Bank and the Fed had some significant regulatory authority over these mortgages.
Am I the only one that finds it ironic that Ben, Man of the Year, Savior of the Economy, or whatever else we are calling him now, is the same guy saying that his wall of liquidity is not to blame and more regulation’s was the answer, when part of his job was to regulate the banks? Granted, the Fed’s job in regulating the banks is somewhat small, but are we forgetting Greenspan’s famous speech were he encouraged banks to get more inventive when it came to mortgage origination? This does not sound like getting tough with banks, in fact it sounds like it was a green light to do whatever you want to get homeowners into a house.
Essentially, the Fed gave its blessing to do whatever it took to get people to sign the dotted line on the mortgage application. Not only that, the Fed also provided the liquidity to encourage the lax lending standards. Having just one of those two things is bad, but both combined is disastrous, which we found out. However, our Savior still does not realize that it was the Fed at fault for this mess and I think I know why he is saying this now. He simply wants to be left alone. He figures with his reappointment a done deal, his Man of the Year award, and the magical 25% S&P 500 returns in the market people will get off his back as he built up some credibility, especially the audit the Fed people.
I honestly believe he thinks that his sins of the past can be forgiven because of his recent ‘accomplishments’ which were not really accomplishments. If anything Ben was merely picking up after himself, but with our money. To put everything into perspective on how Ben feels here is how the article ended, and what he thinks caused, I guess, the credit crisis:
“Bernanke pointed to adjustable-rate mortgages and overconfidence that house prices would continue to rise as the main culprits behind the catastrophic housing bubble.”
That is that I guess. He was partially right, but it was not just ARM’s that were the problem, not at all, it was a whole slew of mortgages that were problems. There were jumbo’s that trigger higher rates if the LTV slides below a certain value, there were sub-prime, there was the fact that the asset bubble from the Fed was not just in housing, but in commercial real estate and, well, everywhere. The question is why were people betting so heavily on housing prices to rise? Perhaps because the liquidity spigot was going full force for way too long and then when you went to turn it off the effort was meager at best. Regardless, the biggest problem now is with all types of mortgages, not just ARM’s and sub-prime.
The sheer arrogance of this man is just unbelievable though. The one thing about the deadly sins is that they are deadly and catch up to you, pride is always the one that kills the worst to. At first it was nice to see Ben apologize for the Fed’s role in the Great Depression, but how could we go from a guy who knows that his organization caused the Depression to him denying the Fed caused this problem. What happened over the last 4 years to Ben where he could state the obvious before only to deny it know? It makes no sense other than he suffers from the affliction of arrogance or pride. What I do know is what Ben is doing, long-term, will not work, because Ben has a terrible track record, and the Fed’s powers are on the verge of finally being reduced, which is a great thing as the system failed us greatly and it’s time for it to go.
No matter what Ben and Greenspan are to blame for a large portion of what happened. I am not saying that Congress is innocent, you know me better than that, and I am not saying that those who lied or bought houses they couldn’t afford are innocent either. However, legitimate fraud too place, even to reasonably intelligent people, the Fed let things happen that they should not have and Congress, well, Congress is just incompetent, what do you expect.
It is always fun to make forward looking statements or predictions even though no one knows what is really going to happen. I decided to write this piece because Dennis Kneale was bragging about his wonderfully generic and completely mindless 2009 predictions he wrote last year which he claims was 90% accurate, even though it was the equivalent of a John Edwards show accurate list of junk.
Sorry, but predicting ‘corporate smashup,’ which I am not even sure if that is an actual technical term or not, but regardless, is as pretty generic as you can get as the government was passing out bailout money like mad. My other favorite prediction was that the Big 3 would get bailout funds as they were begging Congress for, drum roll please, a bailout, I mean seriously. The mindlessness went on of course, but that is Dennis for you, so I figured I would actually go out on a limb and make real predictions, and not use general ‘corporate smashup’ terminology.
I am not picking on Dennis, ok I am, but its fun! In all fairness to Dennis 2009 was a tough year for him as CNBC teased him with his own show only to take it away from him. He clearly is putting all that weight back on again, hey we all face the battle of the bulge at one point or another though. He got smacked by multiple guests for being an idiot because, well, he’s an idiot. The real irony is his 2010 prediction of Twitter going under is already in the can as they just inked 2 deals worth millions, wrong again Dennis and it is not even 2010 I guess VC money is a lot smarter than you, go figure.
Here we go, 2010 predictions:
Sovereign debt issues will escalate in Eastern Europe, meaning defaults because no one cares about that area. Dubai will not receive more exceptional help because they will be “made an example of” by its neighbors. Greece will be bailed out by the EU, go figure. However, emerging market debt will be OK.
Unemployment does not improve and will reach 11.2%, unfortunately. U-6 unemployment/underemployment will reach 20%+.
A third party will be formed in the US, but not in time for the midterm elections.
Democrats will lose the majority in the Senate and the super majority in the House, but not the majority.
Obama’s approval ratings will mirror Bush’s as he pushes cap and trade which is unnecessary and punitive to the American people. He will learn that there is a price for over exposure, seriously, we do not need to see him every day and he is no FDR. Unfortunately, if we give anyone any credit for the BS growth we are witnessing it is the, I can’t believe I am going to say this, the Fed.
Bank failures will reach over 300 for the full year.
We will see a spectacularly large bank failure next year, obviously not a too big to fail, but a large institution. I actually would place the FHA in this category, but it could also be a large regional about the size of a Key Bank, I refuse to give my prediction because of legal reasons and Key Bank is for comparative purposes only, but they are not in great shape.
We will see inflation and the Fed will be unable to raise interest rates due to the unemployment picture. For the first time we will have a recession, or whatever we are calling it by then, with rising prices.
Health care premiums will go sky high because the biggest sham of “reform” just got past by our elected officials who do not understand how the system actually works.
Some nut job attempts to shoot investment bankers because of high bonuses they will receive. I am not advocating it, I think it is stupid and it will be senseless, but there is a high probability that some nut job will do it.
High frequency trading, dark pools and other questionable practices will be regulated or severely restricted by Congress through legislation. Whether or not this is a good thing remains to be seen, but I would suspect it is.
The market suffers a sharp and severe correction as people realize that stocks do not go straight up and the markets actions have deviated from the realities of the economic conditions. When this happens is anyone’s guess, but it will happen.
We may see a 5% GDP print, but those numbers will be severely revised down and we will see the weakest ‘recovery’ ever in the history of recoveries from recessions. After we had spent some $2T+ fighting this economic downturn which will astound the public. The average recovery in terms of GDP growth is well above 6%, but the latest revision for 3Q09 GDP is 2.2% which is appalling. Remove government spending, just forget it because you don’t want to know.
The dollar will have some strength before the Fed realizes that it must double its balance sheet again and we will then see new lows in the DXY by year end.
Gold will reach new nominal highs.
The debt ceiling will be raised again to $16T before they eliminate the debt ceiling completely. I am kind of kidding here, but seriously why have a ceiling when as soon as they hit it they just raise it?
Emergency tax hikes will be enacted by summer bringing top marginal rates to 40%. Capital gains tax rates will increase to 25% and dividends will revert to ordinary income. I would not be surprised to see a VAT enacted as well, just because.
Google takes over the world because Android is really a secret mind control device that when Eric Schmidt gives the secret command, I hear the word is ‘snicker doodle,’ everyone with an android phone will do Google’s bidding.
Obama will finally fess up and admit that he was born in Kenya followed up with the following statement; “what are you going to do about it?”
Mark Haines finally snaps on the air and starts babbling incoherently to himself while swatting at invisible bugs… wait he already does that.
There you have, Ray’s long list of predications for 2010. Some will happen, most won’t, but they are fun to guess at. I also have a wish list that involves people joining that 11.2% projected unemployment rate because they deserve it, but since its Christmas I will refrain from printing such a negative list. However, I am sure you have guessed that one of those wishes, projections, is that Dennis’s contract will expire at CNBC and we never see him again, I can dream. However, as we have seen from other failures like Ron Insana no matter how bad you screw up that network will always take you back. Man, how do I get a job there? Merry Christmas, yeah I am not politically correct.
While I am convinced there is no pricing power for retailers and deflation is here to stay for the foreseeable future today’s PPI data was not encouraging. Of course, Steve Liesman has no idea how to look at the data and refuses to acknowledge that this data shows higher prices in any form. Whether you believe it or not, and I do not believe much in terms of government data anymore, this data shows higher prices.
However, Liesman does not seem to understand higher prices and ignores any inflationary numbers. He seems to think that zero interest rates is a great thing. He also claims, in the clip below, that all the data is getting much, much better, huh? Yes, the data is marginally better, but it is still bad news and Liesman just simply has no clue. After all, this is the same Steve Liesman who missed the Russia meltdown as it happened in front of him, only to take credit for calling it later when he took the Pulitzer later on. Mr. Liesman, I had respect for you 1 year ago, but now you are just a clown.
Santelli really hammers Liesman, rightfully so. Keep in mind this is the same morning show where they hammered Ron Paul for the audit the Fed Bill, which the media, most Liesman, has grossly distorted and framed as taking the Fed’s “independence” away. That is a joke and totally inaccurate as the bill merely removes secrecy away from the Fed, nothing more. Read the bill Mr. Liesman, you idiot.
Be the First to Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
