When I wrote last week that the Fed would do QE 2 and the trade of the century, granted that was over the top, was leveraged bull 20+ year ETF’s I received some flack, a lot actually. First, let’s talk about the economy and what is going on there. Second, let’s talk about the treasury, gold barbell trade that seems wild and crazy. To clarify something, no, I am not drunk as one commenter asked.
The economy, oh, how this recovery summer is not such a recovery after all. Perhaps Geithner’s op-ed in the Times should have read, “Sorry, we screwed up any chances of a recovery” instead of “Welcome to The Recovery.” Any improvement we have seen within the economy has been purely statistical or for the very wealthy, period. Yes, Saks and Macy’s are indeed having good years, but look at Walmart, not such a blockbuster year. If you strip away the stimulus spending and government transfers you have poor GDP readings, period. I cannot see how anyone would or could really dispute that, but I am sure there are some that will try.
The truest test of any economy is unemployment and I was saying, before it was popular by a certain ‘New Normal’ guy, that unemployment was a leading indicator, not a lagging indicator. Our employment situation is poor at best considering that we are having more and more people leaving the workforce because they are giving up. Imagine just giving up all hope of finding work, not that you don’t want a job, but you just can’t find one, but since you have given up our government says you do not count anymore, nice. Anyhow, if we include all those people who dropped out of the workforce we are up to 10.2-10.5% official unemployment. As far as the U-6 we are still around the 17% area, but I am willing to bet it is much, much higher and who knows, exactly, how many people simple have been unemployed so long they just don’t count anywhere anymore. Regardless, our unemployment issue is the truest test of our economic situation and has indicated for well over a year that the economy is in poor condition.
As far as the other economic data points and indicators, well, show me one that points to an actual positive improvement please. Hint, there is not one that points to a significant improvement in the economic condition in recent months. In fact it is so bad that the Fed is turning to a form of QE which they know will do nothing to boost the economy, but it will look like they are doing something. It is so bad you had Ben Bernanke testify in front of Congress and say; “I don’t know what is going to happen,” basically when he said ‘unusual uncertainty.’ You have the Fed Presidents talking about recessions, QE, Japan scenarios and a host of other issues, but don’t worry because CNBC says no double dip. You know what, they are right. There will not be a double dip because we never made it out of the first depression.
We got the Fed doing this reinvesting of interest and repayment of principal now, to the tune of about $300B or so, into treasuries. What is that going to do for the economy? Nothing. Ben is trying to force banks to lend by doing a bull flattener to the yield curve, good luck Ben. What he doesn’t realize yet is people do not want to borrow. In fact, people want to pay off their debts instead, go figure. Ben cannot boost demand and QE will not do anything at all besides make bond investors very happy. It is a dog and pony show to make everyone feel good and like the Fed has some ammo left, they don’t and the game is over for them. All more QE will do is damage the dollar at some point in the future, that is a certainty. Consumer demand will return only after the deleveraging period is done and that could take 10 more years, who knows. It will be a tough ride, that is for sure.
Now, for those who thought I was nuts for going long a leveraged 20+ treasury ETF and gold, well, you don’t have to say, my account says it for me. UBT was about $85 a share when the article came out and it closed today at about $90.50 and gold was at about $116.50 and it is at $117.73 (I am using GLD as a proxy). I do not believe the trade is done, I wouldn’t enter it here, but I am not exiting it either, especially after CSCO missed their revenue estimates tonight. This was not a crazy trade, it was the most obvious trade in the world. Easy money like this does not happen very often so I am not sure why anyone would think this was ‘high risk’ or abnormal. You can hold leveraged ETF’s, if they go in your favor, over a period of days, just not long-term.
Everyone knew the Fed was going to do something, anything, because the Fed is staunchly independent and not influenced by politics, yeah right. Come on, the Fed knew it had to do something to show it was helping the economy, but not too much because we have an election coming up. What could be safer than maintaining the balance sheet, but reinvesting loose change into treasuries to bring down long-term treasury rates? It does not raise any eyebrows, everyone knew they would do this and it does help borrowers, but it doesn’t help the real economy. Regardless, this was telegraphed and sets up the Fed for real money printing and QE after November.
In the meantime, I plan on locking in profits on my UBT soon and rolling into TLT on weakness. I fully expect that we see the 30 treasury move towards the 3% area, maybe 2.5% as Ben wrote about in the past. That makes longer duration treasuries very attractive still and inflation is not an issue now. However, inflation will be at some time in the future and QE will damage the dollar, hence the gold hedge. I think gold goes back to its high and make a run towards $1,300 an ounce, maybe higher is full blown QE kicks in this fall. Equities are not attractive, in my view, unless they pay an outsized dividend and have a strong balance sheet. Stocks like AAPL, no thanks, they do not work in this environment unless they pull a new killer product out of their back pocket every other month. Good luck.
A few things have been out there that just blew me away over the past couple of days. The first was when I saw a video of Jim Cramer advocating for the Treasury to issue $2T in 30 year paper to solve our debt issues. The second is that some talking heads believe that we will get a 700K print for the NFP, non-farm payroll (employment report), on Friday. It leads me to believe that most people in the world have just lost their mind or at least lost touch with reality. There is some logic to the aforementioned items, but reality just does not work like that and when one throws out an idea make sure it is feasible first or make sure it is a clean number, as in the 700K NFP on Friday.
First, Jim Cramer, the man I love to hate, but I respect the hedge fund manager as a take no prisoner SOB who got the job done, but this “I am going to make you mad money” thing, well, I think not. He has been giving out some decent advice lately, too little too late, but nevertheless, he has advocated high dividend stocks for sometime which is a good strategy as I see deflation. However, he said yesterday that the Treasury should issue $2T in 30 year paper while rates are low because we have too much short-term debt, he is right, and we will eventually have funding issues, he is right again. The issue I have is that the U.S. has $13T in total debt with much more coming so $2T does nothing to “solve our debt problems” and the bond market would reject $2T in 30 year paper. I mean come on, the market would demand a higher yield than 4.23% for that size paper. This is also the same guy who said, no more than 8 months ago, that Treasury should issue a 5% 30 year Retirement Bond as well, yeah right.
If one has been paying attention to the bond auctions they would notice that there is a reason Treasury is issuing shorter maturities, no one wants long-term paper from the U.S. government. Investors would just assume buy 10 year TIPS instead which offer some protection from the inevitable inflation risk that exists. Why would Treasury want to steepen the yield curve even more than it already is? If Geithner has half a brain he will try to move our maturities out to the 10 year mark and if Treasury swamped the 30 year they would move the yield up on the 10 year. It is just a bad idea and it impresses no one, period. I am surprised that Cramer would even say such a thing as he did run a ton of money, but, well, I guess I am not surprised.
The other hot issue of the day is the employment report due out at 8:30 AM EST Friday morning, it is THE report on the first Friday of each month. This month we are due for some really interesting data I suspect, especially given the smooth work last month in the Birth/Death model, I know I talk about that a lot, but it is important that you look at that figure and understand it. I see some estimates that we will see a print of 700K on Friday and, frankly, I would not be surprised, it won’t be real, but I would not be surprised at all.
The NY Post ran a story on how some Census workers were hired for a few hours, paid, fired and rehired which will boost the NFP figure on Friday. Are those accusations true? I don’t know, but it would not surprise me if they were. All I know is that it would be awfully tough to pull off a huge private sector growth figure with 460K+ weekly initial claims and with many blue chip companies announcing more layoffs, H-P is laying off 9K, seriously. There are still almost 6 people available for every open position which is not good news or bullish for new hiring. I am not saying it is getting worse, but I am saying it is not getting better.
There are specific area’s to watch and the first one is the actual unemployment rate, I think we will see it uptick to 10.2%, remember we now have an oil spill which impacted a very large area. Another area is the BLS Birth/Death model, obviously, which may add another hefty 200K to this month’s report. I also believe you must subtract all government jobs out of the report since they are temporary and we need private sector jobs to pay for government jobs to begin with. The U-6 report is also very important as it will show the under employed, which is a huge, and growing, problem in America that everyone turns a blind eye towards. Finally, temporary jobs are no longer a bullish indicator. Perhaps a year ago they were, but if they are not converting to fulltime employment by now they never will, sorry, but subtract them out.
The other painful part of the report is the time it takes to find a job, this is the heart breaking, in my opinion, part. The vast majority of unemployed are taking far longer than 6 months to find work, in many cases more than a year, this is the worst since the DOL has ever recorded, it started keeping records in 1948. Basically, those are Depression era numbers there are just no other times in our history where it took so long to find work and I can assure you people are not voluntarily staying unemployed to collect that whopping $400 a week unemployment benefit check. This is a major problem and it is not getting better, sadly, and you need to look beyond whatever the headline number is to see what the real situation is like. I am sure Joe Biden and President Obama will be patting themselves on their backs on Friday, but I can assure you that whatever the number is it will be the equivalent of Enron accounting.
Little attention has been given to the main Friday events this year, I am guilt of not reporting on it either, which is bank failures. I guess everyone, me included, has become complacent with the fact that banks are failing at a very scary rate still. I am thinking that the Fed should have left the discount rate along as we are now up to 25 bank closures this year, 3 tonight (see below). At this rate we will see, assuming February is the example of what the rest of the year holds, we will see upwards of 180 bank failures for 2010. I thought the crisis was over?
Clearly there are major structural problems within the banking system still. Although the “too big to fails” will remain, well, too big to fail the smaller banks are up the creek without a paddle. Clearly whatever plan the administration had in mind for these smaller institutions has not worked or the problems are so severe that no one wants to talk about them. I think the latter is probably more likely than the former. Either way, these failures are a major problem especially as the FDIC is technically bankrupt, what else do you call an organization that has a substantial negative net worth? Obviously that lifeline with the Treasury will have to be tapped in order to guarantee the $250,000 per deposit.
Tonight’s winners are:
Bank
State
Assets
Deposits
Waterfield Bank
MD
$155.6M
$156.4M
Bank of Illinois
IL
$211.7M
$198.5M
Sun American Bank
FL
$535.7M
$443.5M
Centennial Bank
UT
$215.2M
$205.1M
Total
4
$ 1118.2M
$ 1003.5M
I guess the losses are not that bad, but given the sorry state of the FDIC I think any loss is bad news. So much for the FDIC’s national savings week push, why save when your bank goes out of business?
Bank
Loss-Share Agreement
Realized or Expected Losses
Waterfield Bank
$0 – No Buyer
$51M
Bank of Illinois
$166.6M
$53.7M
Sun American Bank
$433M
$103.8M
Centennial Bank
$0 – No Buyer
$96.3M
Total
$599.6M
$ 304.8M
Waterfield Bank had no buyer, apparently, but the other 2 banks did have buyers. As you can see the losses are pretty severe given the asset size of the banks. All told losses could hit $808.1M if the FDIC needs to make good on the loss-share agreements, certainly some of the loss-share will be realized if not all of it. Bank of Illinois was purchased by Heartland Bank and Trust Company out of, get this, Normal Illinois and Sun American Bank was acquired by First-Citizens Bank out of Boca Raton FL.
Centennial Bank and Waterfield Bank had deposits of $1.8M and $407,000, respectively, not covered by the FDIC insurance, keep no more than the maximum insured limit at banks, especially smaller banks. There may be more closures later tonight so check back. Below are the press releases.
Waterfield Bank:
Waterfield Bank, Germantown, Maryland, was closed today by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the insured depositors, the FDIC created Waterfield Bank, FA—a new depository institution chartered by the OTS and insured by the FDIC—to take over the operations of Waterfield Bank. The new institution will remain open until April 5, 2010, to allow depositors access to their insured funds and time to move accounts to other insured institutions.
The bank had one branch location. It also took deposits from customers via the Internet and 38 affinity groups.
At the time of closing, the receiver immediately transferred to Waterfield Bank, FA, all insured deposits of the failed bank, except certificates of deposits (CDs) and individual retirement accounts (IRAs). The FDIC will mail checks directly to customers with CDs and IRAs for the amount of their insured funds, on Monday morning, March 8.
Customers with savings accounts, checking accounts and money market deposit accounts will have access to their insured funds as usual during this transitional period. Banking activities, such as direct deposit, check writing, and ATM and debit card use, will continue as normal for the customers with demand deposit accounts until Waterfield Bank, FA, closes on April 5. At the end of this transition period, the FDIC will mail checks to customers who have not closed their accounts or transferred their funds to another institution.
On-line banking services, including bill pay, will be unavailable for transactions over the weekend; however, these systems will be active by Monday morning, March 8.
As of December 31, 2009, Waterfield Bank had $155.6 million in assets and $156.4 million in deposits. At the time of closing, the amount of deposits exceeding the insurance limits totaled about $407,000. This amount is an estimate and is likely to change as the FDIC works with customers of Waterfield Bank. The uninsured deposits were not transferred to the newly chartered institution.
Depositors with more than $250,000 at Waterfield Bank should call the FDIC at (800) 830-4735 to make an appointment to discuss the status of their funds. The phone number will be operational this evening until 11:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., EST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EST.
Customers who would like more information about today’s transaction can call the toll-free number; send an e-mail to waterfieldbankquestions@fdic.gov.
Under the FDI Act, the FDIC may create a new depository institution to ensure that depositors have continued access to their insured funds where no other bank has agreed to assume the insured deposits. This arrangement allows for uninterrupted direct deposits and automated payments from customers’ accounts and allows them time to find another institution with which to do business.
The FDIC estimates that the cost to its Deposit Insurance Fund will be $51.0 million. Waterfield Bank is the 25th bank to fail in the nation this year and the first in Maryland. The last FDIC-insured institution to fail in the state was Bradford Bank, Baltimore, on August 28, 2009.
Bank of Illinois:
Bank of Illinois, Normal, Illinois, was closed today by the Illinois Department of Financial Professional Regulation – Division of Banking, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Heartland Bank and Trust Company, Bloomington, Illinois, to assume all of the deposits of Bank of Illinois.
The two branches of Bank of Illinois will reopen on Saturday as branches of Heartland Bank and Trust Company. Depositors of Bank of Illinois will automatically become depositors of Heartland Bank and Trust Company. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from Heartland Bank and Trust Company that it has completed systems changes to allow other Heartland Bank and Trust Company branches to process their accounts as well.
This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Bank of Illinois can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.
As of December 31, 2009, Bank of Illinois had approximately $211.7 million in total assets and $198.5 million in total deposits. Heartland Bank and Trust Company will pay the FDIC a premium of 3.61 percent to assume all of the deposits of Bank of Illinois. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, Heartland Bank and Trust Company agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.
The FDIC and Heartland Bank and Trust Company entered into a loss-share transaction on $166.6 million of Bank of Illinois’s assets. Heartland Bank and Trust Company will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $53.7 million. Heartland Bank and Trust Company’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. Bank of Illinois is the 24th FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the third in Illinois. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was George Washington Savings Bank, Orland Park, on February 19, 2010.
Sun American Bank:
Sun American Bank, Boca Raton, Florida, was closed today by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company, Raleigh, North Carolina, to assume all of the deposits of Sun American Bank.
The 12 branches of Sun American Bank will reopen on Monday as branches of First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company. Depositors of Sun American Bank will automatically become depositors of First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers should continue to use their existing branch until they receive notice from First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company that it has completed systems changes to allow other First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company branches to process their accounts as well.
This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Sun American Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.
As of December 31, 2009, Sun American Bank had approximately $535.7 million in total assets and $443.5 million in total deposits. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company did not pay a premium to acquire the deposits of Sun American Bank. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank, First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company agreed to purchase essentially all of the assets.
The FDIC and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company entered into a loss-share transaction on $433.0 million of Sun American Bank’s assets. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company will share in the losses on the asset pools covered under the loss-share agreement. The loss-share transaction is projected to maximize returns on the assets covered by keeping them in the private sector. The transaction also is expected to minimize disruptions for loan customers.
Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-866-954-9532. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., EST; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., EST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., EST.
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $103.8 million. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company’s acquisition of all the deposits was the “least costly” resolution for the FDIC’s DIF compared to all alternatives. Sun American Bank is the 23rd FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the fourth in Florida. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Marco Community Bank, Marco Island, on February 19, 2010.
Centennial Bank:
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) approved the payout of the insured deposits of Centennial Bank, Ogden, Utah. The bank was closed today by the Utah Department of Financial Institutions, which appointed the FDIC as receiver.
The FDIC entered into an agreement with Zions First National Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah, to accept the failed bank’s direct deposits from the federal government, such as Social Security and Veterans’ payments.
The FDIC was unable to find another financial institution to take over the banking operations of Centennial Bank. As a result, checks to the retail depositors for their insured funds will be mailed on Monday. Brokered deposits will be wired once brokers provide the FDIC with the necessary documents to determine if any of their clients exceed the insurance limits. Customers who placed money with brokers should contact them directly for more information about the status of their funds.
As of December 31, 2009, Centennial Bank had approximately $215.2 million in total assets and $205.1 million in total deposits. At the time of closing, the bank had an estimated $1.8 million in uninsured funds. This amount is an estimate that is likely to change once the FDIC obtains additional information from these customers.
Customers who have questions about today’s transaction can call the FDIC toll-free at 1-800-889-4976. Customers with accounts in excess of $250,000 also should contact the toll-free number to set up an appointment to discuss their deposits. The phone number will be operational this evening until 9:00 p.m. Mountain Standard Time (MST); on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. MST; and on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m. MST; and thereafter from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. MST.
Beginning on Monday, customers of Centennial Bank with deposits exceeding $250,000 at the bank may visit the FDIC’s Web page “Is My Account Fully Insured?” at https://www2.fdic.gov/drrip/afi/index.asp.
Centennial Bank is the 26th FDIC-insured institution to fail this year and the second in Utah since Barnes Banking Company, Kaysville, was closed on January 15, 2010. The FDIC estimates the cost of the failure to its Deposit Insurance Fund to be approximately $96.3 million.
The Fed just raised interest rates to .50-.75% on the discount window. What does this mean? Nothing. It is simply just a measure to shut people like me up and to encourage banks to go to the private markets for capital. Essentially, this was a populous encouraged move and will have a negative impact on equities, but do not concern yourself with this.
This hike will not hurt corporate bonds, but treasuries and equities, ouch! The bottom line is that the Fed is not selling its assets so, again, this is meaningless at best. If they raise rates above 1% then be worried, but other than that, who cares. Ben, apparently, has just had enough of the negative mean people like me. However, this could prove difficult for Treasury as they have to place so much paper on to the Street. It is also a move to “prove” that this statistical recovery is for real, which it is not. A meaningful rate hike would be well above 1%, don’t hold your breath for that anytime soon.
Clearly when you have Goldmanites design a bailout program for financial institutions not only will they give them money upfront, but they also build the bailout so firms can profit for years to come. How you might ask?
Well, look at AIG for example, They got bailed out, with $13B going to Goldman Sachs and now Morgan Stanley is going to get a piece and Earnest and young. According to Bloomberg, Earnest and Young could recieve up to $60 million in fees from AIG for advice when the previous cap was set at $40 million in 2008.
Morgan Stanley will receive a $4 million retainer fee and an additional $2.5 million per quarter for advising AIG. The firm also could receive $72 millions if AIG lists its American International Assurance division on the Hong Kong exchange next year. All-in-all not a bad pay day for the financial sector at the expense of American tax payers, who says failure doesn’t pay?
This is one of those things that should make people question what is going on with these bailouts and TARP. With the expected cost of TARP reaching, potentially, $23 trillion a few million or even billion here and there is nothing, but these firms are not risking anything and they are receiving a nice payday.
Goldman and Morgan Stanley were both doomed to collapse last year before their bailouts and approval to become commercial banks. This begs the question, should they be compensated at all for advising a government owned entity when they would not be in business if it wasn’t for the government, a.k.a the US taxpayer?
This whole bailout was for the complete benefit of the financial institutions and not for the American people. It was payback for all the money funneled into Washington through lobbyists and campaign contributions, period. The taxpayer will not benefit from these bailouts. For example, have you received a dividend check yet from the firms who paid the Treasury interest on their TARP funds? Nope, well at least I have not gotten my check, so stop telling us we will profit from this, we won’t. Our taxes will not go down nor will our Social Security benefits increase, instead the money will be left in a slush fund indefinitely.
The only ones profiting are the same assholes who are responsible for the global meltdown, but no one says a word. Obama loves the banks, they gave him $23 million last year which is more than Hillary received, and will do nothing to stop this insanity. Instead firms will just collect funds when needed and pay out those funds to other investment banks in the form of advisory fees. The circle jerk continues at our expense.
If you are not outraged then you are not paying attention to anything that is going on.
Read the First Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
