The dollar is dead

Posted by Ray on February 21, 2011 under Main | Be the First to Comment

We have witnessed the Middle East go up in flames and the troubles in Europe start to percolate again, but the dollar is not doing anything. I am only surprised that it is happening so soon, I thought there was more time. While I highly doubt that anyone will rush back into the greenback it could happen. The world’s faith in the US has been shaken by our inability to seriously discuss our deficit and debt problems. A perfect example is the latest round of talks encompasses cutting some tens of billions of dollars from a mere 12% of our total budget leaving the entitlements and military spending off the table, is it any wonder why no one trusts us to seriously address our debt issues?

If people are not buying dollars what are they buying? Gold and silver. The prices do not lie and both metals have moved significantly over the past few weeks as the Middle East began to demand regime changes. All the while the USD has basically treaded water or moved slightly down. Not only does the lack of interest coincide with the latest budget battle but it also coincides with the fact that we are right in the middle of QE2 which was frowned upon by most nations. The double whammy of our inability to seriously deal with our debt and our very own central bank monetizing large amounts of our debt, over mythical low inflation figures I might add, makes other countries stop and think about how to allocate their assets during times of uncertainty.

Overall the US total debt and monetary policy is also inflationary which makes an inflation protected asset more attractive than UST’s and dollars. Why would investors choose gold and silver over TIPS? Because no one trusts the government to actually track inflation honestly which is why you are seeing lower inflation expectations in TIP yields right now. Again, gold and silver fit the bill as an alternative as a flight to safety. Granted, gold is considered safer than silver, but lately silver has picked up more prestige and I believe silver will make some spectacular moves in the near future. In other words, gold has likely picked up more of the safe haven assets than silver but it is clear that both metals have outperformed the dollar and may be replacing the dollar until something else comes along.

So, is the dollar dead? I think it is one its way if we do not address our debt and annual deficits this year. The deficits are so bad, so outrageous and so dangerous that ignoring them for one more year may be devastating. Our total national debt, officially, if 100% of GDP and our unfunded liabilities is tens of trillions of dollars… we got serious problems. Adding insult to injury is the whole QE situation which is debt monetization no matter how you slice it. This shows weakness and is highly inflationary which will drive foreign investors away from the USD. Why would you buy an asset today that you know will be worth less in the future? You wouldn’t and either will other countries when it comes to USD’s.

The fact that we have had a few governments get toppled and a few more on the way in the most volatile region in the world and the dollar has not rallied is kind of scary. Instead we have seen commodities continue to rally, stocks (I guess the only source of our economic success) go straight up, and the dollar trend a bit lower. In the meantime gold and silver are being treated as currencies and when turmoil kicks up they go up in value. I have known for a long time that the dollar is in trouble and would blow up because we have a lack of leadership in Washington who do not want to make hard choices and the Federal Reserve who seemingly has lost its mind and has missed every major issue with our economy over the last 10 years who has decided to monetize our debt.

This will end with high inflation and the fact that the Fed disagrees is exactly why you should agree with me. Gold and silver make sense, own them physically, along with other soft commodities. I fear that the dollar has seen its best days and while I do not know exactly what will come in the longer term I do know it will not be pretty. I think you will know who to blame by then, I hope at least.

Silver, the trade that was easy to see

Posted by Ray on November 4, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

There have been lots of things happening in the silver market lately all of which reinforce my bull case for being long. Long time readers know I have been pounding the table of silver for the better part of 2 years now.  The one aspect of the market that I have concentrated on is the supply/demand side of the equation. It stands to reason that with some 2 billion souls entering the middle class they will all want cell phones and other modern toys. All of these toys involve silver to some extent in their production.

The supply of silver is not unlimited and very few miners solely look for the shiny metal, it is typically a byproduct of copper and gold mines. Silver is also not recycled the way many other metals are which means it is used once and never again and that is unlike many other metals that are usually recycled. I believe that the reason people believed silver had an unlimited supply is because it was so cheap, but now we find out, I have known for awhile, that the prices were manipulated by 2 big banks, HSBC and JPM. This is not conspiracy talk anymore as 2 lawsuits have been filed and Bart Chilton has admitted the manipulation.

Moving forward I believe we will continue to see higher prices as the shorts cover in the silver market. I also think that COMEX does not have enough supply to meet physical demand for the metal if investors want to take possession, which they will eventually. That means there may not be enough silver at any price to meet demand. It sounds unbelievable, but it could happen. I would not bet the farm on the COMEX thing being the driver, but I would bet the farm on Asia and India driving demand well into the future.

The other very obvious factor in the recent rise in silver prices is the dollar. In the US we have to ask if silver is really climbing or is the dollar just tanking so hard making it more expensive to us. Frankly, it is both things happening at once which should worry my fellow dollar bulls out there. I think the dollar will break its all-time low in the near future thanks to Mr. Bernanke. You cannot print as much money as you want without repercussions and the repercussions of massive printing are the dollar losing much of its value. Out of everything happening out there right now the dollar’s slide is what scares me the most and it should scare you too.

Silver is the barometer of inflation, in my book at least, and the rise in price is signaling trouble ahead. Everyone believes the dollar will always be there in its current form and nothing like Zimbabwe or Argentina can happen in the good ole US of A, but bad things can and do happen here all the time and with an obscene monetary policy that Brazil, Russia, China and now Germany are criticizing bad things are sure to happen here. I would be a buyer of silver not just to profit from it, but to hedge my wealth with it. That means owning it physically, not in a brokerage account or in storage somewhere, but where I can see it. If the dollar breaks its all-time low things may get ugly and as we buy up our locally produced products we will see what the inflationary pressure is like when we are forced to buy, suddenly, very expensive Chinese goods.

Doom and gloom you are thinking, maybe, but I prefer to say this is a realistic situation now. I know I would rather be prepared instead of just hoping things will work out. In my experience hope is a wonderful thing, but hope isn’t reality. Reality is that thing outside your window and our reality may just turn into a nightmare and suddenly moving from the city to the country, farmland specifically, with a shot gun and you silver and gold hoard may suddenly make sense. After all, this is the advice some hedge fund managers gave their wealthier clients in recent years.

Buy silver on any dip and I am sure that in 5 years, or much sooner, you will be extremely happy. As for equities, well, if you think these gains are real you are delusional. Ben is simply propping up prices to make people think they are wealthy, but if the dollar keeps falling at some point the rise in equity prices will not offset the loss of purchasing power of your dollars, just ask any Zimbabwean about that. They had the best performing market over the last 10 years, but would you be holding their currency? I think not. Silver, gold or other commodities are your hedge, not stocks and not TIPS.

QE2: Savior or Suicide

Posted by Ray on November 3, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

The long awaited decision was announced today by the Fed, $600B in fresh money printing followed by continued reinvestment of proceeds from its first round of easing. This equals about $900B in total QE by our monetary masters. Speculation is rampant in the media about its success or how it will be an epic failure. The funny thing is, no one really knows what will actually happen. Personally, I am still perplexed as to why they are doing it at all, it is stupid.

The Fed is also completely out of ammo which many have stated, myself included, and all they have is the printing press. I want to stress something here and you should pay attention, this whole QE thing is experimental and no country that has ever tried has succeeded. Therefore, I have a predetermined outcome, but at the end of the day you or I have zero idea if it will work. I will lay out a case for its failure based on what I know. I am sure many will disagree and that is fine, but in time one of us will be right.

The economy has a demand problem, not a liquidity problem. Over 2 years ago we had a massive liquidity problem which is why Lehman failed, but now the Fed has dumped trillions into the system along with the federal government. All of that money dumping ended the liquidity crisis and now banks, supposedly, have excess reserves just sitting at the Fed waiting to be loaned out to that sucker who wants to pay 15% interest on money the bank got for free in order to buy that new LED flat screen TV that is just calling his or her name. The problem is the sucker doesn’t want to buy that TV because he doesn’t know if he will have a job next week or is worried about retirement, etc.

We have a demand problem, not a money shortage. I say that with a grain of salt because money velocity is dropping which technically means there are dollar shortages. However, I contend that that dollar shortage is because people are paying off debt to simply saving their money somewhere 9under the mattress??). Regardless of the reason no one wants to buy big ticket items and I do not blame them. After all we got here because of excess debt and no one wants to leverage up to buy senseless items. No amount of QE will change this, sorry, but it won’t. Job security and rising wages will create demand, but that is not happening either. Demand is stuck where it is, weak.

The Fed knows this and they know QE will not change this so why did they do it? I really do not know. Sure, everyone has their own reasons for it, but at the end of the day it is all speculation. I know what they are trying to do, create wage inflation and inflation in general, which they will do eventually, but by their chosen path, QE, they are creating the worst possible outcome, inflation without wage inflation. Stop laughing, it can happen. How you may ask, simple dollar devaluation is inflation, but dollar devaluation does not guarantee wage growth. The only way to get wage growth is through demand with inflation, what the Fed did will not do this. Frankly, everyone should be terrified of Mr. Bernanke and he should be punished for lying to Congress when he said he would not monetize the debt, he is.

I can rattle off all sorts of conspiracy theories as to why the Fed is doing QE, but they are too laughable to mention. I do think one thing makes sense, it is a back door bailout of the banking system, again. There is a little issue I am sure you are familiar with, the foreclosure crisis, and this crisis is a huge, enormous, problem. If you are a bondholder it is one thing to have a borrower default on the debt, the cash flow ends and you get to take the collateral, a home in this case, to recover your capital. However, this whole chain of custody issue, there is no legal remedy for it and all those pundits who claim that this is no big deal are either stupid or scared to admit the truth, means that there is no collateral to collect now. Essentially the borrower can keep the house and screw the lender if the paperwork is messed up, how would you like to own a MBS now? Your bonds are worthless… or are they?

If there was fraud in the loan, as we are now seeing, the bondholder can put back the bond and be repaid their original capital. This is the problem that is starting to rear its ugly head, the put back, and it could be huge. Think about all the paper the banks would have to buy back and now think of all the synthetic derivatives that were written against that bond. What a mess. A big costly web of a mess. I do not know how big the problem can be, but I think part of the QE might help these banks by either allowing the bank to front run the bonds the Fed is buying or by infusing the bank with capital.

It doesn’t matter really, but I think that was one of the reasons for QE2. We have been told for over a year now how great things are now and we are in a recovery so why do QE at all? We have inflation, it is not sky high, but it is there in the PPI and the CPI is still positive. If the CPI were negative I would say we have deflation, but it isn’t and at best we had disinflation which does not justify such a crazy move as monetizing almost a trillion dollars in paper. The Fed sees that no real recovery has happened and maybe that is the reason for the latest round of easing. Regardless, the banks are going to benefit from this, remember the Fed asked them how much they should buy from them.

I stated about a year ago that we can have inflation without wage inflation. We are about to see if that once crazy theory of mine is right. The Fed has now monetized trillion’s in debt and I can say, with history on my side, this has never ended well for any country who has ventured down this path. America is a special place because of our freedoms, but we are not so special that math and history doesn’t pertain to us. All of the people warning about the Fed’s insane moves might be right and the sky very well might be falling. Heck, if things were as great as we have been told over the past few months by the talking heads and our politicians, who no one believes, why are we even having this conversation? Things are not well and I fear we may be in the calm before a very bad storm like we have never seen before.

China to allow more “flexibility” to its exchange rate

Posted by Ray on June 19, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

The media is abuzz with China’s central banks decision to allow the RMB to float a bit more freely, but no one is asking the more important question, which way will they let the currency float? Everyone and by everyone I mean certain U.S. Senators and some White House officials, claims that the artificial weak currency has cost Americans their jobs. The claim is it has cost millions of Americans jobs, but the it utter nonsense and political posturing.

A weak currency definitely gives China an advantage, it gives any country an advantage, but at the end of the day China had their currency pegged to the U.S. dollar, so perhaps our political officials should have been looking in the mirror while throwing criticism towards China. In other words, if our currency was stronger it stands to reason that China’s currency would be stronger as well. However, we all know that the intention of the U.S. government is not to have a strong dollar, but to have a weak dollar. That would mean a weaker RMB which would give China an advantage, in the eyes of those living in the land of the blind, in world trade.

How do we know the U.S. wants a weak dollar? Simple, Obama told us. He wants to double exports within 5 years, but we have the most expensive workforce in the world and are largely viewed as inefficient because of our pesky workers rights laws. That makes producing goods in the U.S. for export very difficult with the exception of complicated financial instruments, bombs, military hardware and some technology items. Let’s look at producing hammers, a hammer made in the U.S. would cost about $10, but a hammer made in China would cost about $5, why? Labor costs. The steel is going to be about the same and they are shipping the steel to China and the final product from China to the U.S. at half the cost. They pay the same amount of money for transportation, energy and raw materials, but they pay less for labor. My point is that we cannot export more without severely devaluing our currency or our standard of living.

Which brings me to my next point, China’s willingness to let their currency float more freely, great, but which way? One of China’s major manufacturers, the one were all the people are killing themselves, you know, Apples plant, is raising their workers’ salaries by 14%. Now, forget that 14% on $2 an hour only means another $.28 an hour, but that is a significant increase in labor costs, but are your iPad and iPhone costs going up? No, as an aside, this is just one more reason that I feel good about not owning an Apple product. I have also said that the Euro’s collapse is a significant issue for China, it still is, and a further decline in the Euro means China’s #1 importer of goods will import less, much less from the big red giant. What I am saying is it is entirely likely that China will float their currency lower and now they can claim it is the free market doing it, smooth move if you ask me.

It is not possible for China to have a rising currency, a weakening Euro, a weakening USD and higher wages for its workers with most manufacturers maintaining profit margins of 3%. It just doesn’t work for China and we all know the ruling party wants to maintain its power and in order to do that it must make the people happy. Without plus 8% GDP growth unemployment will increase and discontent will grow threatening the powers that be. In other words, the RMB will go lower unless other currencies increase in value. I realize this is an outside the norm view, but if one steps back and looks at the bigger picture it makes sense.

I could be wrong and perhaps every firm is out there hedging their currency, but that is highly doubtful. Even if they did it would not stop the slowdown in exports and all the bubbles in China will pop at roughly the same time, in the next few months. It is funny that the same people who said the U.S. was not in a real estate bubble in 2006 are saying China is not in bubble territory now, they are. Any slowdown, even a minor hiccup is extremely dangerous and has worldwide ramifications. We are talking about the engine of the “worldwide recovery story” here, not some small corner of the world that does not matter. If their currency appreciates and the slowdown is bigger than anticipated, they always are I might add, there are no more surpluses, no more U.S. debt auctions to show up at and prices will head higher on products.

It also means that they may become net sellers of treasuries instead of buyers, that is not good news, if their currency does appreciate. However, it won’t happen, it will go lower and everyone will be surprised when it happens, except for me. It is clear as day that the Chinese economy is showing extreme signs of stress, look at their markets, they are way off their highs and have been for some time now.

From my lens the entire system is in major trouble and it is evident when we try to find scapegoats for our problems, bankers, the Chinese with their cheap currency, etc. The system needs to reset itself and it cannot happen with all of this intervention and additional debt. Everything needs to be restructured and debts need to be purged from the system, but this will never happen as it means everything goes to zero. Instead we will carry on blaming others, inflating our way out and causing much more pain than by having an absolute reset.

Explaining Deflation vs. Deflation

Posted by Ray on May 16, 2010 under Main | Be the First to Comment

I was reading Zero Hedge yesterday, a post in regards to gold where Peter Schiff was part of the topic, and there were some interesting comments. One caught my attention as being somewhat ludicrous which is not unusual, but is was because the author is a contributor to the site. Unfortunately the comment was flagged as junk, I hate it when that happens because counterpoints are always good things to have and I do not mean to rip him apart, but rather correct years of misinformation he probably picked up from school or TV armchair economists.

One comment he made was:
“On gold to the moon: Peter you’ve been talking up your gold positions for years, but once calm is restored, you’re going to take a major haircut on gold.”
Another was:
“On the US economy “not growing”: Has he looked at the ISM, employment (not just payrolls but household survey), industrial production, and the leading indicators over the last ten months?”
And the other one was referencing that as soon as the trillions in bailouts the banks received hits the economy it will calm the economies or something to that effect. He also indicated that as long as confidence remains in the system everything will be fine, which is true, but how much will it take to keep that confidence or instill that confidence? Also, the more money we inject to create confidence the more confidence it actually erodes, it is a zero sum game in the end. Part of the comment was that the EU was trying to avoid a “deflationary death spiral” or something similar, this is why people should not flag things as junk because they are not junk, which is what really bothered me.

People are thoroughly confused by deflation and deflationary death spirals and what that means. Deflation is a problem, we have deflation now, but it is not a huge problem. However, a deflationary death spiral is what we had in the 1930’s and is what keeps Ben Bernanke up at night. We will not, I do not think, have that deflationary death spiral and I think we need to understand what that death spiral was, what caused it and why we will not have it. After that I want to address the rest of the comments he made above.

What we suffered fro in the 1930’s was horrible and something I hope we never see again. To understand more about what it was like in the Depression please Read The Depression: A Diary by Benjamin Roth and stay away from the academic stuff. However, during the depression dollars were scarce because fo the massive bank failures and deposits were frozen or simply lost when the bank closed down. On top of that the stock market wiped out millions of peoples savings which had a domino effect into the real estate market which is what caused the banking crisis, somewhat reversed from today’s crisis I might add.

What this did was literally wipe dollars out of existence, they just disappeared and were not transferred to anyone else. Today one persons loss is likely another’s gain through derivatives or other hedging instruments known as bailouts, but that was not the case in the 1930’s. Since these dollars were gone or frozen and the U.S. was on the gold standard we did not have a Helicopter Ben to get dollars into the system, at first the Fed tightened credit, who knows why, but they later tried to reverse that decision, but it was too little too late. What we had was complete demand destruction and people saving whatever dollars they had, which was strange because people would rather starve than spend their money.

In fact, while people were starving crops were on or at a record pace, prior to the dust bowl fiasco of course. It was a simple fact that the U.S. was tied to the gold standard and could not put more dollars into the system and people just did not want to spend what they had saved because who knew what tomorrow would bring. We also had no safety systems in place such as unemployment insurance, welfare or Social Security, until FDR was elected a few years into the Depression. By not having those safety nets in place it made things much, much worse and that is why we had such massive deflation.

This was not the run of the mill demand deflation, which is what we have now, this was the death spiral lack of dollars in circulation plus no demand deflation. So for people to draw a comparison to 1930’s deflation to todays is a bit ridiculous to say the least. We have those safety programs now so people will not starve instead of spending money, ironically our poor actually have cable TV, go figure, and we have other safety nets in place. This is why we will not see 1930’s deflation and this is also why we can hide the evidence of our current Depression, if we do not have to see the soup lines they are not there, right? Never mind the fact that 1 in 8 Americans receives some form of Food Stamp assistance, if that is not a Depression statistic I am not sure what is.

The banking system is still suffering from after shocks much like we saw in the 1930’s, closures did not stop for years after the crash of 1929 as real estate continued to decline in value, sound familiar? We are still suffering from similar bouts of bank closures today because of declining real estate prices and that is unlikely to change. Many of these banks were bailed out, funny how some “too big too fail” are now failing after they were bailed out. How can, as his comment claimed, the markets be calmed because of trillions in bailouts will build confidence when those banks who were bailed out are still failing? This is very similar to the 1930’s when many banks who received aid under the first Hoover plan still failed. The point being is that it will take a long time for the system to heal itself and with the government propping it up it will take much longer. The Depression lasted some 10 years, 7 with major government help, our current problem got help on day 1, how long will our recovery really take?
With the massive stimulus and government spending in the banking system it is nothing more than inflationary measures. The comment that “when the trillions making it into the economy will only build confidence,” is a bit absurd, in my opinion, as it points out that the issues were very bad for a very longtime. Also, when the trillions, a bigger and more accurate statement would had been if the trillions, make it into the economy it will create inflation, period. There is really no doubt that the measures taken by all the central banks were to stem the tide of the aforementioned deflationary spiral and it did work, but the central banks cannot stem the tide of the inflation that they created. After all, central banker’s primary mandate is to inflate the currency at about a 3% annual rate to begin with so they have no real mechanism to dis-inflate a currency anyhow. Sure, they can raise rates and do reverse repos, but serious, that will do little.

In fact, for all the money spent on bailouts and stimulus measures I would argue we have received a very poor return on our investment. We had a sharp mini-V of a +5% GDP print, but that appears to be it. We had spend far less in the past and had averaged far higher GDP prints, about a 7% print after major interventions, so, sure, you got a V, but it is one side of a W, sorry Charlie. People had been bragging about the ISM Survey’s for some time until the Ism survey’s failed to support their claims, but they fail to support my claims as well. In fact, they are neutral, but well below what we would call normal expansion averages. Not to mention, these are survey’s and should be calculated as survey’s, as in this is how people feel at this point in time, not as this is what will happen in the future.

My main point is that we do have growth and things are better, but no where near where the bulls think they are and we are not heading to where they think we are going. The comment also pointed to the leading economic indicators as a “bright spot.” Funny, Kudlow and company have not brought up the LEI for sometime now because, well, the number rolled over a couple months ago now and has been heading lower, funny what happens when Uncle Sam cuts off the money. So, I am not sure what LEI the commenter is looking at, but the one everyone else is looking at is pointing to the South, not the North, good luck if you think down is up and up is down because you got Vertigo my friend.

The global economy is about to end its amazing recovery, sorry folks. Europe is 20% of the global economy and they are instituting massive austerity measures right now and these are only the start, more is needed. If 20% of the world’s buyers have less money you will see economists start lowering forecasts very soon, trust me on that one. You know how the U.S. is pestering China to revalue its RMB? Well, it is pegged to the U.S. dollar, right? Do you know who China’s largest trading partner is? Hint, it is not the U.S., it is the EU. That means Chinas products are now more expensive in the EU than they were just 2 months ago. Wasn’t China credited for the global recovery? Isn’t China in the middle of a liquidity bubble? Won’t not selling products hurt their exports causing an artificial popping of their bubble which could cause more problems for the world than originally thought? I think so, but we are still pressuring them to revalue and spreading the falsehood that we are their largest trading partners, what baloney.

It is kind of funny to see people dismiss all this information and keep economic events locally when this is a global economy, I mean, there is a reason why when the U.S. market tanks foreign markets go down as well and why when we go into a recession so do other countries. Decoupling will happen, but not until the rest of Asia emerges like China did, but until that happens China is dependent upon the U.S. and the EU. However, let us mak sure we are clear, the EU is, for sure, China’s biggest trading partner and a falling Euro is a big problem for China as well. Keep an eye on that, I am.

On to the topic of the day, gold. Peter Schiff has been bullish on gold since, well, forever now and has taken much heat for it since it climbed from $250 to $1,240, yes, taking heat for something that quadrupled. The commenter stated that gold will take a haircut, a major one, when markets calm down, maybe he is right, but let’s take a look so far. Trillions have been spent on the banks, that has not calmed the markets and now you have governments in trouble, what is going to calm the markets even if small governments start defaulting? Even beyond that, look at 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010. During most of those years the markets were considered “calm” and in a “goldilocks” period upon a new wave of global liquidity never before seen, what happened to the price of gold? Oh, yeah, it quadrupled.

The one big down year gold had was in 2008, when it first hit $1,000 I might add, when everything was in liquidation because of a global margin call. If the Fed did not start dropping money from helicopters we would have had our 1930’s deflationary spiral on our hands, but that is not what happened. What happened was things were supported by the government and long before the markets shot back up 70% gold was on its way back up to it’s previous $1,000 high. So, Peter Schiff can hold on to his gold trade all he wants, it worked for him as he lost little during the collapse by holding it and it returned more than the S&P, from January 1, 2009 to December 31st, 2009, than the S&P 500 did without the volatility. Comments like the ones made by the person in question show that they do not look at the facts and simply do not like the asset class, or do not understand it, and end up looking silly at the end of the day.

Do I think gold will go down? Yes. Why wouldn’t it? Everything rises and falls, but I think it will be much high 10 years from now than today. We know that central banks inflate the currency, that is a fact. We know, especially right now, that sovereign default risk is real and confidence in currencies is really a fleeting thing, we have merely been lucky for 38 years since the gold standard was eliminated, we know that turmoil will always exist and we know gold, silver or other commodities are a finite resource that has much higher demand that supply could ever meet. In my opinion, only a fool would not want to own gold, just look at APMEX.com, all their smaller American Eagle coins are sold out for crying out loud, is that the confidence in the global system we are looking for? Is that the sign of a growing global economy? Nope.