Apparently the markets, that wonderful forward looking discounting mechanism, did not see or have fear what is happening in Greece. It is safe to assume that this proves that the markets are not efficient and it fails to see potential problems. What is interesting is that Greece and Portugal were not or should not have been a surprise to the markets since we have all known about the issues with the PIIGS for months now. How anyone could have been surprised by this news today is beyond me. I guess the junk rating on Greece may have been a surprise, but come on, when the 2 year note was yielding 11% how in the world can it be anything other than junk?
The market has gone up for 8 weeks in a row and while the talking heads thought this perpetual “tortoise rally” was normal anyone who has even a little investment experience knew it was not. I still remember Dennis Kneale, last week, calling people who held cash “fraidy cats” because the market is back and it will be a bull market forever. The world does not work like that and the risk trade has been, frankly, out of whack. Money has been pouring in to everything from high yield to emerging markets in the expectation of a steady 1-2% a day. This was verified from mutual fund flow data reported last week which showed investors moved more money into equity funds, for the first time in a longtime, and, in my mind, confirmed we must be near a top, dumb money always moves in after fantastic rallies.
Whether or not this was a top remains to be seen, but it certainly looks like it from my lens. I have been wrong before and might be again, which I admit. However, even though I was wrong it doesn’t mean that the markets were right either. Earnings are better, I still see some misses in revenue though, but the underlying macroeconomic data has merely gone from very bad to just plain bad. When we cheer a 57% confidence reading that is a problem because that it is a horribly low number. The housing data is not verifiably strong when you have, like in October, a rush of people buying for the tax credit right before it expires. If the housing numbers stay “strong” for May then you may say housing is rebounding, but I highly doubt we will see such strong numbers at that time. Housing is a key indicator because it employs so many people and homes were the collateral that were the bad debt sitting on bank balance sheets.
Unemployment remains incredibly high, use the U-6 data not that foolish headline number, which is a severe problem. Given that weekly claims have stabilized at -450K is horrendous at best. That number shows that private employers are still shedding jobs and I am confident that the employment report next week will show “stellar” job creation in the government sector and in the temporary help area, those are not good areas to see growth in. I am a believer that the temporary help is just that, temporary and will not convert into fulltime employment, we would be seeing that conversion by now, but we are not. Housing problems plus high unemployment will keep the economy down for some time.
On top of the squishy soft economic data being heralded as a full blown recovery, don’t get me wrong less bad is a welcomed improvement, we have a sovereign debt crisis. People claim that Greece is only 2% of Europe’s GDP and dismiss their troubles. That is a bad idea because while they are right about Greece they conveniently forget that all the PIIGS account for some 13% of Europe’s GDP and they are all in trouble. Spanish and Italy’s bonds have been trading lower pushing their yields up over 4% and Portugal was officially downgraded, that is all really bad news. Each country, individually, is not a big deal, but combined we are talking about the potential to default on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of sovereign debt.
To put this into prospective, France owns some $781B of PIIGS debt, if they all default what will happen to France? They will be in trouble, of course. Then there is Germany, how much PIIGS and French debt do they have? I do not know, but I assume a lot. What will happen to Germany if they get stuck with declining value of all that paper? They will have to bailout their banks, I assume France would have to do the same for their banks as well. That, basically, puts the banking system in jeopardy again, in less than 2 years. What I am explaining, probably in a horrible way, is what contagion looks like and it doesn’t end there either. The U.K. has exposure to all these countries and they are already in horrible financial shape and the series discussed above makes the U.K. susceptible to the contagion.
U.S. banks have exposure to both European banks and sovereign debt which means out fragile banking system could face another challenge. Let us not forget that the U.S. is also heavily indebted, along with Japan, and people may start to question the safety of U.S. Treasury debt, as they should I might add. From my lens, in a worst case scenario, meaning this all happens, it would be a coin toss as to which country goes next, either Japan or the U.S. given their immense debt loads. This scenario is unlikely or has a low probability of happening, but it is possible and it could trigger a global currency crisis.
This explains why gold went up today in the face of a stronger dollar and a rush of selling from the market. Even silver held its own today in the face of dollar strength. This shows that gold is still a flight to quality, it is also in a bull market as well, and it is a trusted currency. In fact, gold’s rally today is why I think it is possible for a global currency crisis because if this was another credit crisis, like 2008, it would have sold off for liquidity, but it did not. I am not sure if I would be buying gold right now because I already own a position, but if I did not own any gold I would be a buyer.
All is not well in the global markets and people should stay nimble as to where to put their assets until things settle down. I would say this decline is extremely bearish and way overdue, the higher the market went the worse the selloff would be, which could make it worse. It was insane to think that volatility would not comeback and that people went from sheer panic a year ago to such utter complacency this year. The worst part about all of this is if this does trigger another crisis what can the Fed or the governments do to calm the markets or remedy the situation? Nothing, they already spent all their ammo and they even had to borrow some to boot. I am not saying this will trigger another crisis, but it certainly has all the ingredients for one, if you look at the big picture.
I first came to the conclusion that temporary hiring was not the forward looking indicator it may have once been, actually I always thought it was a poor forward indicator for more employment. However, most pundits, friends and even some commenter’s felt I was wrong, but I never wavered on my belief that today’s temporary hiring was merely a cost cutting method and not indicative of a better job market in the near future. Apparently the Associated Press now feels the same way along with some other sources, i.e. David Rosenberg, and such.
My belief was that employers were simply hiring temporary workers for pure financial reasons, they are less costly, easy to terminate and right now you can get highly skilled workers for a fraction of the cost by hiring them temporarily. It was more than that though as inventories dropped to such low levels the need to restock, a large portion of that mythical 5.7% 4Q GDP print, which made employers hire people. However, why hire a fulltime employee when employers know the business cycle is severely damaged and restocking is a short-term boost only? Employers know their business and they know what real demand is meaning they know there is no real end demand at this stage of the game. Yes, deflation is here to stay for now.
My theory was confirmed by the AP’s article and some of the economists quoted. Here is what a portion of the article said:
“I think temporary hiring is less useful a signal than it used to be,” says John Silvia, chief economist at Wells Fargo. “Companies aren’t testing the waters by turning to temporary firms. They just want part-time workers.”
The reasons vary. But economists and business people say the main obstacle is that employers lack confidence that the economic rebound has staying power. Many fear their sales and the overall economy will remain weak or even falter as consumers spend cautiously.
Companies also worry about higher costs related to taxes or health care measures being weighed by Congress and statehouses. That’s what Chris DeCapua, owner of employment firm Dawson Careers in Columbus, Ohio, is hearing from clients.
That basically hits the nail right on the head and then some. There is just no way to know if the recovery is real or a stimulus induced liquidity rush. On top of that, the unknown about taxes and health care are a huge problem for employers as they do not know if having more employees will cost much more than just a year ago. Yes, Washington is working on a jobs bill to reduce taxes on employers, but that bill was slashed by the Senate leadership from some $85B to $15B, I mean why bother with a $15B jobs bill anyhow?
I have advocated for the government to stop their Keynesian policies as they will create much bigger problems than we have now, but I even concede that we need a jobs bill now. Tax breaks would be a start for hiring, but do not kid yourself this is a short-term fix, see Jimmy Carter’s same attempt and its aftermath. No company is even going to hire until real demand actually comes back anyhow so we need to spark demand. How we could do this is by simply reducing patrol taxes and income tax rates and implement a TEMPORARY, I cannot stress that enough, national sales tax. This way the government will not sacrifice tax revenue and people will feel richer with the tax break.
I do not expect Washington to embrace any reasonable solution and that temporary sales tax would end up being permanent so it is not the best idea ever, but it is certainly better than what they are trying now. Perhaps if they mandated the tax had to expire in a year it might fly, but I doubt it. The primary problem with trying to spur job growth is that it needs to involve tax cuts, but we cannot cut taxes as it will kill the deficit, see Greece for the end result. This is why we would need to replace one tax with another unassuming tax for now as one would certainly make up for the other. Again, it is not perfect, but it is much better than what is being proposed in Washington.
Unemployment will continue to weaken for sometime into the future. Yes, we will have decent unemployment numbers over the next couple of months for the Census, but, again, don’t kid yourself as those jobs are very temporary. The caveat to the higher unemployment figure is that the BLS continues to take people out of the workforce which means if the government has its way we could be at 5% “official” unemployment by the end of next year. It doesn’t mean it’s true, but let’s face the facts, governments around the world do what they have to do to make things “look good” in order to not create a panic. Again, look at Greece for the lengths a government will go to in order to make things look good.
While demand is weak, unemployment is high and deflation is here to stay, for now, I still believe precious metals are a fantastic play. I like Palladium, silver, platinum and gold, in that order, for precious metals as I do believe we are in for a bumpy ride in the FX market. As the dollar strengthens these prices will come down and be a screaming buy, in my opinion. I see deflation being the current conditions for prices I also foresee some problems in the currency market which will benefit precious metals in a positive way in the near future. Plus, the summer time is usually the best time for precious metal prices. I am now a buyer again, scratch that, I am a selective buyer now of most metals.
I am watching the happenings in Venezuela carefully as this might be an indication of things to come in the US. While most people naively think that “it can never happen here” I would like to warn you that every country where these things have happened uttered that exact same phrase. Whether it happens because the Federal Reserve loses control over the devaluation of the USD or because foreign debt buyers just stop buying US debt the one thing I am sure of is that it can and will happen here at some point in the future.
What I am talking about is massive devaluation of the currency which leads to inflation or, in this case, hyperinflation. I have stated that for the moment we do not have to worry about inflation, and I stand by that prediction, for now, at some point we will have to cleanse our demons and massive balance sheet. The one and only thing that is saving us right now from inflation is our pitiful employment situation, which is not getting any better I might add. Without employment there will not be wage inflation and we will continue to have subdued demand for products with the exception of food and energy.
Even though I fully believe deflation is here for the near-term, reinforced by the Fed itself, there is one caveat to my prediction, the devaluation of the USD. I have made no secret that I believe that the Fed and the current administration, along with the former administration, have had an unofficial policy of maintaining a weak dollar. The reason for the weak dollar policy is simple, it boosts GDP and earnings in a globalized world along with a host of other seemingly positive economic stimulus. However, a weak dollar is not good long-term for a country and hurts the population as dollar sensitive products become very expensive, i.e. $140 a barrel oil marks the low point of the USD in 2008, and is inflationary without the benefit of actual inflation.
Let me explain, inflation created by excess money printing usually enters the banking system and is loaned out to the population. This is called money velocity and creates too many dollars chasing too few of goods. However, without money velocity traditional inflation cannot happen, but even if the excess money printing does not enter the economy it can still devalue the currency based on the future expectation of it entering the system. This is what was happening up until the last dollar rally and I would like to point out that the last dollar rally was because, depending on who you listen to, short covering, fear about sovereign default (i.e. people were afraid of another systemic meltdown which, in turn, initiated short covering. This is the scenario I favor), or people felt the Fed was actually going to raise interest rates which is absurd, in my opinion.
The dollar devaluation that we have seen explains why oil prices are on the rise as demand simply is not there. It also explains why metals have also climbed for most of 2009 as well. What is scary about both oil and metals going up, especially in 4Q09, are the fact that these prices increased in the face of a stronger dollar which is counterintuitive. Well, it is for gold at least as oil could increase with a strong dollar if there is sufficient demand, but, frankly, there is not as much demand as the price indicates. Regardless, rising energy prices when the economy is weak, to me, is a warning sign of a problem and should forewarn you of things to come, inflation.
If we continue with our insanity that Washington and the Fed is telling us we need it is inevitable that we will end up in a situation like Venezuela where we will either willingly or unwillingly have to devalue our currency. There are pluses to devaluation as your debt, assuming a fixed interest rate, will remain static and your earnings will eventually increase allowing you to pay off your debt faster. However, the negatives outweigh the positives by a long shot as your savings are worthless. This is why we saw the people of Venezuela go out and buy everything they could because goods will be worth more than the paper money.
What is disturbing though is the fact that even though devaluation creates higher prices the Venezuelan government shutdown some stores for “price gouging” which is humorous, in a sick way. The government intentionally creates inflation to make their balance sheet look better, but because new goods will cost more stores cannot compensate by charging more for products they currently have. How in the world are these stores supposed to stay in business or id the governments point to put them out of business? The next logical question to ask is how would this type of scenario play out in the US?
While we do not really have any past history to use as a bench market I think what we see happening in Venezuela is probably a very good example. Right down to the black markets that are more than likely popping up all over the place to provide goods and services the population cannot receive from the usual sources. What I would be interested in knowing is if these black markets are using another medium of exchange, i.e. US dollars, gold, silver, Euros, whatever it might be, to pay for these goods and services. I would be inclined to believe that is what is happening, but there is simply no proof and I am willing to bet no one wants to openly talk about such things for obvious reasons.
What is usually accompanied with this type of devaluation is the government imposing its will that its citizens continue to use its currency no matter what. We saw this happen in Zimbabwe, but just like in Zimbabwe the black market switched over to an alternative payment system, gold. It is important to note that gold is being used because dollars or other currencies simply are not plentiful in the country and gold can be mined, of course gold has also been used as currency for thousands of years as well and at current prices a little bit goes a long way. Basically, forced price controls and forced use of devalued, or worthless, currencies simply do not work, that type of system never has in 4,000 years.
I am not suggesting the US or Venezuela will turn into Zimbabwe, but I am saying that we are facing certain financial Armageddon at some point in the future. All the US has managed to do is kick the can further down the road for others to manage and we are running out of road, unfortunately. We will have only a few choices in the very near future and the most obvious, because it is politically easier, is to inflate our way out of our problems. While this seems like a good idea I am thinking that the 77 million soon to be retired Baby Boomers who are about to be living on a fixed income will like this strategy. However, it is unlikely that they will like the alternative either, much higher taxes, less Social Security and steep cuts in Medicare.
We live in unique times and the one certainty we have is that there is no certainty of anything. I do not believe that there is any question of whether or not we will follow Venezuela, in my mind it is only a matter of when it will happen, not if. However, before we go down that road you will be comforted in knowing that Japan or the UK will more than likely go down that path before us as they are in worse shape than the US. Regardless, watching what happens now will give you an idea of what could happen here and is also why I am a big proponent of investing in precious metals.
So far holding gold, silver, platinum or palladium has been a very sound move on my part, but I actually hope that these investments turn out to be horrible for me because that will mean I was wrong about the future of the US monetary system. While I might be wrong what concerns me is that there are many people who are a lot smarter than I who are sounding the same alarm I am. I would also like to not be naïve enough to believe that “it could never happen here” either because I am sure there are millions of people throughout history who would tell us that you should never, ever, utter those words because no person or country is special.
Ben Bernanke may in fact seem like the unassuming soft spoken professor who is well spoken and polite, and he is, but at the same time he is perhaps suffering from the greatest of the deadliest of sins, pride. I am translating pride into arrogance with Ben because it is essentially the same thing and the sin is identical. There is also no question that Ben suffers from the delusion that he s right and everyone else is wrong, which is how we can tell that he suffers from this disease of arrogance wich will be his ultimate downfall.
I am referring to an article I read this weekend from Reuters, which was reprinted on Bloomberg and various other news sources, where Ben announced that it was not the Federal Reserve’s wall of liquidity during the early 2000’s that caused the housing boom, and subsequent bust, but rather lack of regulation. First of all, he is wrong, because without the liquidity easy credit or the showdown securitization mortgage market simply would not have existed, that is obvious. What is not so obvious is the fact that his regulation argument is also an attack on himself. While Congress did encourage the GSE’s and banks to loosen credit standards, so did the Federal Reserve Bank and the Fed had some significant regulatory authority over these mortgages.
Am I the only one that finds it ironic that Ben, Man of the Year, Savior of the Economy, or whatever else we are calling him now, is the same guy saying that his wall of liquidity is not to blame and more regulation’s was the answer, when part of his job was to regulate the banks? Granted, the Fed’s job in regulating the banks is somewhat small, but are we forgetting Greenspan’s famous speech were he encouraged banks to get more inventive when it came to mortgage origination? This does not sound like getting tough with banks, in fact it sounds like it was a green light to do whatever you want to get homeowners into a house.
Essentially, the Fed gave its blessing to do whatever it took to get people to sign the dotted line on the mortgage application. Not only that, the Fed also provided the liquidity to encourage the lax lending standards. Having just one of those two things is bad, but both combined is disastrous, which we found out. However, our Savior still does not realize that it was the Fed at fault for this mess and I think I know why he is saying this now. He simply wants to be left alone. He figures with his reappointment a done deal, his Man of the Year award, and the magical 25% S&P 500 returns in the market people will get off his back as he built up some credibility, especially the audit the Fed people.
I honestly believe he thinks that his sins of the past can be forgiven because of his recent ‘accomplishments’ which were not really accomplishments. If anything Ben was merely picking up after himself, but with our money. To put everything into perspective on how Ben feels here is how the article ended, and what he thinks caused, I guess, the credit crisis:
“Bernanke pointed to adjustable-rate mortgages and overconfidence that house prices would continue to rise as the main culprits behind the catastrophic housing bubble.”
That is that I guess. He was partially right, but it was not just ARM’s that were the problem, not at all, it was a whole slew of mortgages that were problems. There were jumbo’s that trigger higher rates if the LTV slides below a certain value, there were sub-prime, there was the fact that the asset bubble from the Fed was not just in housing, but in commercial real estate and, well, everywhere. The question is why were people betting so heavily on housing prices to rise? Perhaps because the liquidity spigot was going full force for way too long and then when you went to turn it off the effort was meager at best. Regardless, the biggest problem now is with all types of mortgages, not just ARM’s and sub-prime.
The sheer arrogance of this man is just unbelievable though. The one thing about the deadly sins is that they are deadly and catch up to you, pride is always the one that kills the worst to. At first it was nice to see Ben apologize for the Fed’s role in the Great Depression, but how could we go from a guy who knows that his organization caused the Depression to him denying the Fed caused this problem. What happened over the last 4 years to Ben where he could state the obvious before only to deny it know? It makes no sense other than he suffers from the affliction of arrogance or pride. What I do know is what Ben is doing, long-term, will not work, because Ben has a terrible track record, and the Fed’s powers are on the verge of finally being reduced, which is a great thing as the system failed us greatly and it’s time for it to go.
No matter what Ben and Greenspan are to blame for a large portion of what happened. I am not saying that Congress is innocent, you know me better than that, and I am not saying that those who lied or bought houses they couldn’t afford are innocent either. However, legitimate fraud too place, even to reasonably intelligent people, the Fed let things happen that they should not have and Congress, well, Congress is just incompetent, what do you expect.
The term “Black Swan” is used far too often in today’s discussions about the financial markets and it pertains to unforeseen events that cause havoc on the economy or the markets themselves. Last year was called a “Black Swan” event even though the warning signs were there for at least a year, some say since 2006. In today’s discussion the news coming out of Dubai is being hailed as another Black Swan event as they are talking about delaying payment on some of their debt on December 14th.
The events in Dubai is the furthest thing from a black swan event as we have all known about this problem for the better part of 6 months or more. The country is in poor financial shape and is, basically, insolvent without a bailout from its neighbor Abu Dhabi, the rulers of the two nations are related. I would be willing to bet that the bailout will come in some fashion, but only after an example is made of the smaller nation, but is this a black swan event? What is more a more relevant question is will a technical default on Dubai’s debt be a trigger for something bigger?
I do not believe that the Dubai situation is a black swan event as it was a known situation for some time and those who lent the country money knew they were way over leveraged and lent that money at their own risk. Whether or not this default, if it actually happens, will lead to other events, a domino effect if you will, remains to be seen. Since the sub-prime situation led to a domino effect in the mortgage market it is safe to assume there will be some fallout from a sovereign default somewhere along the way. Considering Mexico was downgraded to BBB and Vietnam raised interest rates and devalued its Dong by 5% there are definitely trembling in the FX markets that cannot be ignored.
The effects of these issues are unknown to me at this time because I do not know how China will respond, although I have my speculations, nor do I know what exposure US or European banks have to the Middles East at this stage of the game. I am willing to bet their exposure, especially JP Morgan, BoA and Citi, is much higher than we all think at this stage of the game since interest rates in that area of the world are much higher than the “norm” in the US and Western Europe. However, the real black swan events that I think are being ignored are the ones in Eastern Europe where currency devaluation and real sovereign default is actually happening and has been happening for some time now. Not that you ever hear about that from the media, but read about it sometime in European blogs or news outlets and it is disturbing.
Basically, I believe the greenback will have the stay of execution I have been expecting for some time now and it should rally nicely on this possible default news. In reality a Dubai default means very little to the US other than it is a sovereign nation defaulting, but it will trigger a flight to quality which means if the dollar equity trade is intact the market could be in real trouble. Further pressure for the greenback is coming from Japan who said it was concerned over the Yen’s strength last night in a Bloomberg story. This is an issue I wrote about a day ago as well, but essentially the Yen is up about 8% against the USD which is an issue for the Japanese since they export more goods than they import. A strong Yen is not good for them as it means their products will be more expensive in the US and China, expect to see Japan intervene in the FX markets to strengthen the USD/JPY pair, IMHO.
This puts the US at odds with its trading partners because while we talk like we want a strong currency we do not. A weak currency means we make our products cheaper overseas, narrow our trade deficit and essentially boost our GDP in a very phony way. As an aside it also makes corporate profits look fantastic if they generate any overseas business as a weak dollar means they can sell the same amount, or less in fact, and when those earnings are turned over to US dollars it looks like sales increased when they did not, Houdini earnings! We will have to see who’s will is stronger, the will of investors who are about to flee to the USD for protection which will surely drive up the USD or Helicopter Ben and our Congress hell bent on devaluing our currency to pay for their crazy social engineering and to make it look like they are leading us to recovery when they are really leading us to a Zimbabwean fate.
Be the First to Comment 
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's Feed
