Jim Cramer

Posted by Ray on July 6, 2009 under Annuity News, cnbc, Main | Be the First to Comment

OK, there are lot’s of things we could say about Mr. Cramer, but you know what I kind of like what he does. Before you get the wrong impression I do think he is dangerous and makes some bad calls, i.e. the housing bottom, but he does get people interested in stocks which is a good thing.

Even though I strongly disagree with most of his views he brought up an interesting idea tonight. He says that the government should issue a 30 year bond paying 5% which he shamelessly called the Cramer Bond. The general idea is interesting, but who would give the government money for 30 years only to receive 5%? Now, he did say make it tax free, but still that is betting that inflation will stay below 5%, which it really has never done.

He says you will double your money after 14 years, plus a few months, and they should be offered directly to the public with no fees. All good ideas, but Jim a product already exists like that.

There is a product that is rated AA that guarantees to double your money in 10 years, without taxes until you withdraw the funds. It is not right for college planning, but it is perfect for retirement planning. Not only that it allows you to participate in the market and you could, potentially, do much better than a simple doubling of your money. You have different investment options and a guaranteed fixed account, sounds better than 5% doesn’t it?

There is a catch, there are fees and you have to buy it through a broker. What is it? It is a variable annuity with living benefits. You can choose a guaranteed minimum account balance option or a guaranteed income benefit, but nonetheless it is better than your proposal. I know it is not as sexy as a high tech stock or some other off the wall investment, but it meets the needs of investors, period.

Say what you will about annuities, there simply is no other investment that can do what they do. Yes, you will take a risk through both investments, but that is mitigated through guarantees, but also the risk of the insurer. However, I feel much better about insurers risk than I do about the massive debt being issued by our government. Not only that, inflation will be an issue so 5% is not good enough.

Good idea, one of your better ones, but as usual you miss the obvious. I cannot wait until I get the tell all book written by one of your employees. Should be an interesting read!

They Just Don’t Get It…

Posted by Ray on October 28, 2008 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Nope, they have not and they will not understand the benefits of variable annuities. This market which has devastated retirement savings has had nothing that has gone up. Even gold has now declined in value, bonds are a no go, especially corporate bonds and stocks have been horrible.

However, a variable annuity with a living benefit has done something that no other investment has done, guaranteed retirement income without annuitization. All the financial writers in the world tell you to buy index funds and to stay away from those bad variable annuities. If you listened to them you would be sucking wind in the S&P 500 with 24% or more exposure to financial stocks – pre-market meltdown – and another 20% or so in technology which as also suffered badly.

Even with reality hitting them right in the face they still deny variable annuities their rightful place as a good investment alternative. They, the financial guru’s, just don’t get it. They do not understand that the Democrats will more than likely take the Whitehouse and Congress which will ultimately raise taxes, specifically the capital gains tax.

A complete Republican controlled government did not do well, spending went through the roof along with other questionable behavior, what makes them think that Democrats will do any better when they have a much stronger history of raising taxes. Actually Obama is the only political candidate that we have ever known to be, possibly, elected on the premise that he is actually going to raise taxes.

Your political affiliation does not matter, all you need to know is what we have been saying about the 15% capital gains tax is correct, it’s going higher. Regardless of who would have been elected taxes would need to be increased given the massive debt the US has, we just never had such stark honesty from a politician who is advocating higher taxes.

So, income taxes will go up for those “wealthy” Americans, we will see what the term wealthy means after the election, and capital gains taxes will go up. This means that all distributions from mutual funds will be taxed higher and it blows the argument right out of the water for the Suze’s, Liz Pullman’s and Scott Burn’s of the world.

Oh, did we mention your retirement income is also guaranteed?

And This is Why Variable Annuities Make Sense

Posted by Ray on October 6, 2008 under Main | Be the First to Comment

Given the market reaction to the Fed Bailout and the current credit crisis this is why a variable annuity makes sense for equity investors. While many financial services firms are in turmoil, going bankrupt or becoming commercial banks, not to mention the market retreat – is that what we will call it? – insurance companies have done fairly well.

Yes, AIG had issues, but the insurance divisions did just fine. The Hartford accepted a cash infusion from Allianz, but that is an investment, so far at least, and that was because Hartford was concerned over a downgrade, not a failure type situation. Other than those instances the insurance industry has held up very well with limited exposure.

The guarantees offered by variable annuities may not be around forever given this whole crisis, so it may be prudent to look at them now. Living benefits offer a rich guarantee that is not like any other type of investment in the world. Yes, you will pay for it, but come on, look at the market. Would you rather pay for nothing and have huge losses or would you rather have to pay 3% a year to guarantee income for life?

It seems like an obvious choice to us, but that is your call.

The market turmoil is not going to be over for awhile. What we see happening today is what we feared for a longtime. Europe is in trouble, Congress passed the bailout package and the markets still retreat, almost 1,000 points in a week. These are indications that there is more to come. The only saving grace, if there is any, is that it showed strength at the end of the day, but it was, overall, on light volume. We expect more losses in the future though.

The Fools are at it Again

Posted by Ray on June 12, 2008 under Main | Be the First to Comment

These guys are relentless with their misinformation, especially on annuities. It is a miracle that they are still in business, especially with all of the bad advice they give. In their recent article titled “Are Annuities Ever Not Stupid?” they really show their stupidity.

First, they say: “An annuity is a contract between you and (usually) an insurance company”, emphasis added. The last time we checked all annuities were issued by an insurance company. We know we are going out on a limb here, but since all we do is annuity work, we are pretty sure that statement is just plain wrong. The thing is they mention Fidelity and Vanguard as Annuity options at the end of the article, are they suggesting that their annuities are not issued by insurance companies? They are by the way.

Second, they recommend all equity stocks as a reasonable alternative to an annuity. Talk about comparing apples-to-oranges stocks and annuities should NEVER be compared as a similar investment. variable annuities do offer equity investments, but they are mutual funds, generally speaking, and diversified while stocks are not unless you buy many different stocks.

Third, they say equity indexed annuities are ugly, well we kind of agree with them, but the facts are still a bit dubious in their statement as they lay into fees on indexed annuities. Generally, there are no fees, perhaps an asset charge or a spread, but most offer straight participation rates.

Fourth, variable annuities are bad! There is a shocking statement for you. Here is what I find interesting, before they said that they had this blurb: “You’d think investors would avoid these products. Yet no less an eminence than retirement whiz John Greaney, a regular Fool contributor and former engineer who successfully retired at age 38, has said repeatedly that under some circumstances, one type of annuity can be a useful component of your overall retirement strategy. Writing in the March 2005 issue of the Fool’s Rule Your Retirement newsletter, Greaney showed how adding a lifetime income Annuity to your retirement portfolio can help ensure that you don’t outlive your retirement savings.”

Now, first off the day we listen to an engineer about retirement is the day we should all start letting our pets drive us to work, come on that is just plain stupid. If we were building a bridge then I may consult with John, but not when we are investing our money. Second, right in this statement they illustrate a variable annuity. An equity investment with a lifetime income component, what do you think living benefits are with equity sub-accounts? Thats right an equity portfolio with a lifetime income component.

Finally, lifetime income annuities sometimes make sense, i.e. immediate annuities. While immediate annuities do make sense for many investors, they do have significant drawbacks which the author so blatantly glossed over. He then recommends Fidelity and Vanguard, not that they are bad annuities, but what is the deal, did T. Rowe Price not buy enough advertising to get mentioned by the Fool? For a website that says to always shop around they certainly do make the same annuity recommendations rather frequently, therefore their recommendations have to be dismissed as they are hypocritical.

If you are going to bash a product at least know something about them, do not use sound bites from a decade ago. Worst of all they described a variable annuity in one portion, a more risky version individual equities and and immediate annuity, and then said they stink in the next. If you do not understand what or how a product works then do not talk about it. Otherwise you simply sound, well, foolish.

What is The Deal With Income Replacement Funds?

Posted by Ray on April 28, 2008 under Main | Be the First to Comment

The hottest trend for investment firms is planning for income distribution for the Baby Boomers. As the Boomers age they are seeking investments that will provide income for their retirement needs. The insurance industry has had a lock on the guaranteed income angle for the better part of 200 years through annuities.

Now, mutual fund firms are trying to get in on the action. The hottest trend, besides ETF’s, are income replacement funds which will allocate the investors money and then start to pay a stream of income after a set number of years. The income is derived from income paying securities, dividends and good old fashion withdrawals. The big question is will these products work?

Well the jury is out because all of these products are brand new and have zero track record. With the existing strategies it seems feasible that they will work if the market only goes up and interest rates increase, but then again all investments look good in that scenario. The truth is only time will tell.

They can as part of a diversified portfolio, but not as a stand alone solution. Like investing at any point in a persons life diversification is key and having guaranteed income mixed in with mutual funds can make perfect sense. In a recent article a person from Morningstar was even quoted as saying that for guaranteed income the variable annuity, with living benefits, makes much more sense than just income replacement funds.

While some annuities are less than appealing, EIA’s for example…huh, hum, Steve, a variable annuity with a living benefit can provide guaranteed income along with inflation protection by keeping money invested in equities. As with any type of investment a variable annuity should be considered an asset class and not as a stand alone solution. By using mutual funds and an Annuity the investor will reduce their risk and improve long term returns, Ibbotson has proven this.

The only thing is how do you know what variable annuity is good and which ones are below par? Sign-up for Annuity IQ to find out.