Quantitative Easing 2.0
Posted by Ray on July 8, 2010 under Economy, The Federal Reserve | 
Be the First to Comment
I have written about money velocity at length and what I think will eventually happen and much of my thesis is about to be put to the test. For whatever reason the market seems to think massively shrinking consumer credit is a good thing and that the Federal Reserve will be starting a new QE process very soon, which is the news this afternoon that coincided with the parabolic move late in the day. However, I cannot disagree with this more and believe that any quantitative easing will do nothing to help expand credit or increase the money supply to the public. We have at the very least disinflationary forced if not outright deflation and the Fed is already running negative real interest rates.
If you recall about a year ago there was a paper from a Fed of IMF official, the authors name escapes me, that recommended real interest rates to run at -5% annually. At the time everyone thought the man was nuts and he was/is in my opinion, but the only way to get real rates that low is through loose money policy and quantitative easing. The Fed has maintained, and will continue to maintain a zero interest rate policy forever as far as I can tell, a loose monetary policy and performed the only quantitative easing policy the U.S. has ever seen, $1.5T in agency and U.S. treasury paper. Unfortunately we still have no idea what the long-term impact of these policies will be, but they cannot be good. These policies are causing real rates to go negative and mortgage rates to plummet.
In order to get the target rate to -5% the Fed will need to buy much more paper than it owns now. My guess is another $2-3T in additional paper and, again, we will not know what the impact of this QE program will be to our economy or currency for some time, but it will not be good. I am not sure why the Fed or this President cannot figure out that interest rates really don’t matter and declining credit is actually a good thing. In fact, all of the “bad news” is really long-term good news as far as the consumer is concerned, not the employment or housing data, but consumer credit. This de-leveraging is just what is needed as we were all awash in debt and most people cannot or could not ever repay their debts. I have never seen a government so desperate to reignite indebtedness of the public like we are seeing right now, it makes no sense long-term.
So, the Fed will start QE again, what will this do? Nothing. Will it increase the money supply? Yes, but not the public’s money supply merely the banking sectors balance sheet which is supposedly flush with cash anyhow. Banks are not lending money because they know they will not get repaid, but borrowers simply do not want more debt either, a good thing! We have mortgage rates below 4.6% and there is no demand, it just doesn’t get much better than that right now, although I think mortgage rates go sub 3% soon. Quantitative easing will do nothing to improve that situation and it certainly will not boost the confidence in the USD which is more than likely the goal, remember, the only way to double exports in 5 years is to devalue the dollar, but it will not work.
The point is that all the QE in the world will not put money in your pocket or your employer’s bank account to give you a raise. Essentially, from a monetary point of view the Fed is done as it cannot get money into the system. QE will merely create inflation, but not the kind of inflation Ben wants, Ben wants wage inflation and QE will merely create dollar devaluation which is Weimar Republic type of inflation. The public also does not want more games or trickery from the government and it frightens me to think what could happen if Ben goes down this reckless path. Remember, just because there is not an impact from his current policies today does not mean there will not be negative implications from these idiotic policies a year or 5 years from now.
What Ben will tell Obama is to create a direct QE program, i.e. a Bush style stimulus, a big one. I do not believe this will go over very well nor do I think voters are in any mood to be bribed with their own money this year, but if one is unemployed and offered $2,000 could or would they say no? Probably not. This type of stimulus would create what Ben is looking for, wage inflation and money velocity, but make no mistake it will be a short-term boost only. We have a long time before we are out of this mess and we have much pain ahead of us. We need to suck it up and deal with it. Contrary to popular belief it is not Bush’s fault, it is all politicians fault going back 30 years and the only cure is pain.
We will still look for an easy way out and probably do QE with another stimulus, but make no mistake that will be suicide for our countries long-term financial health and our currency will be in major trouble if we choose that path. I hate to say it, I have friends who are unemployed, but we must take the pain as it will be shorter than looking for the quick fix. We are all credit junkies and we got to kick the habit.
Subscribe to Annuity IQ's FeedLS Blogs
